In a diatribe against Glenn Greenwald, Patterico seemingly agrees with at least half of what Greenwald says:
To the contrary, Greenwald insists, anonymous comments by hateful leftists prove nothing about the left generally. Nothing! . . . These comments are staggeringly hypocritical, viewed in the light of Greenwald’s extensive history of spotlighting anonymous comments at conservative blogs to reach broad-brush conclusions about the entire conservative movement.
Well, I don't know about that, but presumably Patterico agrees with one of the two alleged sentiments expressed by Glenn. Either the anonymous comments about Cheney mean NOTHING, or the anonymous comments on Right Wing blogs mean SOMETHING.
So which is it Patterico, do anonymous comments mean something? Or nothing?
I tend to the nothing school myself.
< Iraq and the Congress: 2 Choices, For or Against | Iraq: Memory Lane, But There Is No Time Like The Present > |