home

Immigration Raids: Leaving Children Behind

There are three million children in the U.S. with at least one parent who is an undocumented resident.

What happens to them when their parents are swept up in an immigration raid?

What is going to happen to the children? These children are American-born," said Helena Marques, executive director of the Immigrant Assistance Center in New Bedford. "There are hundreds of children out there without their moms, in tremendous need. These babies have become the victims of a problem that legislators can't seem to fix."

It's time for these immigration raids to stop. We need a path to citizenship for those who are already in this country.

< Sunday Readings | Impeach Gonzales >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Sigh (none / 0) (#1)
    by jarober on Sun Mar 11, 2007 at 09:56:15 PM EST
    Let me ask you a simple question: Which crimes should we ignore if the effect of punishing them is to leave children alone?  Clearly, you think that parents should be able to enter the US without following the rules, and - once they are here - they shouldn't be expelled.  Which other crimes should get a pass if they are committed by parents?

    It's not a crime (none / 0) (#2)
    by Jeralyn on Sun Mar 11, 2007 at 10:11:36 PM EST
    to be in the U.S. without proper papers. It's a civil violation.

    Parent
    In reality however... (none / 0) (#4)
    by LonewackoDotCom on Sun Mar 11, 2007 at 10:41:25 PM EST
    Crossing into the U.S. without permission is a crime. And, many use smugglers, another crime (or whole series of state and federal crimes). Then, many purchase and use forged documents, sparking another series of crimes. And, when employers knowingly hire illegal aliens, that's another crime.

    Parent
    So.... (none / 0) (#3)
    by jarober on Sun Mar 11, 2007 at 10:31:30 PM EST
    So moving to the US with no intention of going back to your home country should be treated as less relevant than a moving violation?  

    Here's another question: Why not treat illegal aliens from Mexico exactly as the government of Mexico treats them?  Why not tell the Mexican government that we'll deal with their citizens who come here exactly as they deal with illegals there?

    How this would work (none / 0) (#5)
    by LonewackoDotCom on Sun Mar 11, 2007 at 10:51:34 PM EST
    "You can't deport people who have kids here!"
    {{1 million new illegal aliens come here because of that rule and aren't deported because of it}}

    "You can't deport people who have kids here!"
    {{1 million new illegal aliens come here because of that rule and aren't deported because of it}}

    "You can't deport people who have kids here!"
    {{1 million new illegal aliens come here because of that rule and aren't deported because of it}}

    Well, I think even "liberals" should get the point by now.

    jeralyn (none / 0) (#6)
    by cpinva on Sun Mar 11, 2007 at 11:13:06 PM EST
    if entering the country, without proper authorization, isn't a crime, why can you be fined and imprisoned for it?

    to cross our borders, absent required documentation, and at other than a designated point, is a violation of federal law, subject to both fines and imprisonment. that, in my mind, and in the mind of any reasonable person, makes it a crime. whether it is a crime at the same level as murder or assault & battery is another issue.

    that said, i see jarober's point: which crimes do we ignore, for the purpose of insuring that children have a parent at home?

    i do sympathize with the kids. they are, as always, the innocents. however, i'm not sure i agree with your proposed solution, it seems like that would be a slap in the face to everyone who actually followed the rules, and provide a huge incentive for others to ignore our laws as well.

    what's the solution? i have no idea, but i know the last blanket amnesty didn't stem the tide.

    I agree. (none / 0) (#8)
    by Gabriel Malor on Mon Mar 12, 2007 at 01:06:26 AM EST
    it seems like that would be a slap in the face to everyone who actually followed the rules, and provide a huge incentive for others to ignore our laws as well.

    This is why merely regularizing the status of illegal aliens already present in this country will not solve the problem. Whether it is granting legal permanent residency or even citizenship, this type of solution only makes it more likely that some time in the future we will be in exactly this position again: sympathetic people saying, "oh, but what about the children."

    We granted a general amnesty twenty years ago, and in response, millions of people responded to the incentive. They have entered and are just waiting for the sympathetic among us to save them, yet again. Will we replay this farce in twenty more years?

    Congratulations to all you who were desperate enough for the law and protection of this country that you broke those laws to enter it. You've reached critical mass; you are most likely here to stay. But there is no reason that his has to go on forever. Shut the border.

    Parent

    you can be detained (none / 0) (#7)
    by Jeralyn on Sun Mar 11, 2007 at 11:20:53 PM EST
    for being in this country without proper documentation while you face deportation proceedings. But it's a civil violation, if presence here is your only violation.

    not to accept plain language:google:
    A crime in a broad sense is an act that violates a political or moral law. In the narrow sense, a crime is a violation of the criminal law.
    Also, most of the ongoing illegal activities illegal aliens commit while here are habitually criminal.

    Regardless of such Clinton-esque prevaricating over the definitions of commonly understood words ("It depends on what the meaning of is is." "A BJ is not sex."), illegal immigrants take jobs from our citizens:

    Illegals taking more and more jobs  
    NEW BEDFORD -- Last summer, 40 or 50 carpenters from Local 1305, the Fall River chapter of the New England Council of Carpenters, didn't work at all. Ron Rheaume, the business manager for the union, said that means about 10 percent of the union's 500-strong work force couldn't find any jobs for the first time in recent memory. The biggest reason, he believes, is the influx of illegal immigrants who have begun to work in the New England construction industry over the past four to five years. It's blatant and it's everywhere," he said. "It's happening in prevailing wage jobs and it's happening in state projects. It's happening all over the place." John O'Connor, a senior organizer with the carpenter's union, said the employment situation in Massachusetts has been so changed by illegal labor that it is even becoming impossible for high school students to find such traditional part-time positions as bus boys, landscapers or painters.

    I'm all for increased work visas, etc., as long as you have to apply for them in person from your home country. Don't be a cheater, get in line like everyone else.

    don't say wait in line like everyone else (none / 0) (#10)
    by Jen M on Mon Mar 12, 2007 at 06:57:05 AM EST
    as if it were easy

    Not until you have had watch a loved one wait for for a visa.

    Not until you have had to watch a navy veteran friend wait for years for their spouse to get permission to return. Still waiting.

    Not until you have seen your brother have to leave the country to be with their loved one.

    I am one person. I personally know of two instances at least.

    My mother belongs to the Mayflower Society. Want to ask some more recent immigrants how many people in these circumstances they know?

    You say "go through channels" as if it were something easier than winning the lottery.

    Jen M (none / 0) (#12)
    by jimakaPPJ on Mon Mar 12, 2007 at 07:07:24 AM EST
    Did you ever think that if we didn't have the huge illegal aliean problem, the process for coming in legally might get better?

    Parent
    oh no! (none / 0) (#13)
    by Jen M on Mon Mar 12, 2007 at 07:15:04 AM EST
    lets not do the chicken/egg thing!

    Parent
    Jen M (none / 0) (#18)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Mon Mar 12, 2007 at 11:10:35 AM EST
    You say "go through channels" as if it were something easier than winning the lottery
    You must have missed the part where I wrote:
    I'm all for increased work visas, etc.
    To be clear, that means I'm all for increasing the number of work visas, etc., such that it will make it easier for those who want to come here legally.

    Parent
    So fix the channels (none / 0) (#11)
    by jarober on Mon Mar 12, 2007 at 07:06:42 AM EST
    I realize that the legal immigration system is broken -  but that should be a call to fix it, not a call to ignore it.  

    I'll ask TL again, since she's steadfastly ignoring the question: which other laws should parents get a pass on as "not serious" enough to warrant prosecution?

    not according to the federal code (none / 0) (#14)
    by cpinva on Mon Mar 12, 2007 at 07:38:09 AM EST
    But it's a civil violation, if presence here is your only violation.

    it's an act subject to imprisonment and fine, including civil penalties. it's not the same as failing to remove signs after an election. while it usually only results in deportation, it can be punished by incarceration, than deportation to follow. how many other "civil" infractions can you be sent to prison for committing? i ask because i don't know.

    jen, while i sympathize with your plight, the solution isn't to just open the borders and let everyone pour in, without any controls. the solution is to fix an obviously broken system. whether congress has the will to do that remains to be seen.

    I didnt say (none / 0) (#15)
    by Jen M on Mon Mar 12, 2007 at 08:21:51 AM EST
    just open the borders

    I said stop implying that getting in the legal way is easy.

    The immigration system needs a massive draino flush.

    Parent

    That it does.... (none / 0) (#16)
    by kdog on Mon Mar 12, 2007 at 08:55:13 AM EST
    A massive overhaul of immigration is sorely needed.  Until that happens, I can't support ripping families apart.

    Are they "criminals"?  Who cares?  Not this criminal, thats for damn sure.  Us "criminals" gotta stick together, maybe the immigrants will back me up if the state tries to break my family apart.

    Parent

    More than criminality (none / 0) (#17)
    by jarober on Mon Mar 12, 2007 at 09:48:42 AM EST
    There are a number of things that a functioning immigration system should be doing, amongst them:

    -- ensuring that sick people don't enter - we don't really need more drug resistant diseases than we have now

    -- ensuring that we get the people we want - i.e., it's better, IMHO, to get skilled people than unskilled.  Unlike 1900, we don't have tons of low-skill factory and farm jobs waiting to be filled.

    One clear problem with bringing in lots of low skilled labor illegally is that they do take work from low skill citizens.  The people cutting grass and trimming bushes used to be teenagers and other low skilled labor; now it's mainly illegals, probably being paid exploitation wages (and, quite possibly, living in indentured servitude to mules).

    Yeah, there's a policy liberals should get behind.  

    i care (none / 0) (#19)
    by cpinva on Tue Mar 13, 2007 at 01:04:06 AM EST
    Are they "criminals"?  Who cares?  Not this criminal, thats for damn sure.  Us "criminals" gotta stick together, maybe the immigrants will back me up if the state tries to break my family apart.

    and so should everyone else, including the illegal immigrants themselves. the bottom line: it's the responsibility of the parents to ensure their children are cared for, not the state, except in extreme circumstances.

    what makes the native-born children of illegals more special than the sons & daughters of citizens incarcerated, for crimes they've been adjudicated guilty of committing?

    when you violate the law, you risk not only yourself, but everyone else in your family that's dependent on you. it's true in their native countries as well, we aren't unique in that regard.


    Update: Felony Pleas (none / 0) (#20)
    by Gabriel Malor on Thu Apr 05, 2007 at 02:22:54 PM EST
    Forty-six of those arrested during the immigration raids on the Swift plant have plead guilty to felony charges. Their crimes are use of fraudulent immigration documents and false representations of  Social Security numbers.

    Here is the most recent article about the pleas.