home

Pelosi And Democratic Leadership Cave In To Cheney, Bush And Blue Dog Democrats

Well, they did it. They've proved right all of their most vocal critics. They've finally come clean and admitted up front and publicly that they have no respect for the lives of Iraqis or for the lives of the US troops they send off to die for nothing more than the price of oil. They've shown clearly that all of their rhetoric about diplomatically engaging Iran was nothing more than hot smoke blown up the asses of the American people and the world.

A million dead Iraqis were not enough for them. Tens of thousands of dead, crippled, blinded, and maimed American soldiers were not enough for them. In a futile attempt to save their political asses they have ensured that the killing and dying will continue. Not only in Iraq, but very likely in an expansion of the Mid East Debacle into an attack on Iran. Possibly one using nuclear weapons. One that could drastically increase the death count in the Mid East to millions.

Cheney and Bush and the rethuglicans were bad enough. The most deceitful bloodthirsty psychopathic killers and parasites ever to hold power in America. But after yesterday that distinction falls to Nancy Pelosi and the Democratic Party leadership.

On February 28, 2007 Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-OH), one of the 73 members of the Out of Iraq Congressional Caucus, and member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, introduced HR 1234: A bill to immediately end the United States occupation of Iraq. Kucinich's bill, if passed, would end US military involvement in Iraq within 90 days of passage.

Kucinich's plan would provide that "Not later than the end of the 3-month period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, all United States Armed Forces serving in Iraq shall be completely withdrawn from Iraq and returned to the United States or redeployed outside of the Middle East.".

His plan also would establish a "Prohibition on Use of Funds To Continue Deployment of Armed Forces in Iraq", except where needed to ensure the security of Iraq and to provide for the safe and orderly withdrawal of the Armed Forces from Iraq.
They could have had nearly all US Troops home to their families before July 4 this year, and had Iraq well on the way to peace and security for that country's people finally.
"If there is a timetable for the U.S. troops to get out, if a real Iraqi government has authority to make decisions, it can reach an understanding with the groups in the Mahdi Army to solve the situation, to stop the violence, and also with the insurgent groups," said Jawad al-Khalisi, a Shiite ayatollah and seminary leader in Baghdad who has tried to reconcile the radicals under a nationalist, pro-withdrawal banner. "The Iraqi people will get rid of the extremist powers from both sides. We won't allow them to continue their violent and terrorist acts."
It was the best opportunity Pelosi et al had to bring the Mid East Debacle to an end and show the world that they stood behind all of the high sounding rhetoric that had enabled them to take back control of Congress in last Novembers mid-term elections, and they ignored it. Worse, they simply threw it away, while at the same time spitting in the faces of the voters who swept them into the power position that they now refuse to use to further those voters express wishes and intentions. Instead they have thoroughly betrayed the American people and the Iraq people.

I could not be any more thoroughly disgusted than I am this morning. Please read Greg's article below closely.

From Greg Sargent at TPM Cafe: House Dem Leadership's Bill On Iraq Obtained
We've just obtained a copy of parts of the long-awaited House Dem leadership's bill on Iraq -- the one that's been the subject of days and days of behind-the-scenes battling among House Democrats. You can view excerpts in our TPM Document Collection.

The key points about the bill you need to know for now are as follows:

First, though the bill mandates withdrawal by Fall 2008 at the latest, it's going to be at least partly a disappointment to some House liberals. That's because language that was in earlier drafts that would have clipped funding after the deadline -- as opposed to merely declaring the war illegal -- has been taken out.

House leaders will argue that the bill does do its job, because it declares the war illegal beyond a certain date. But liberal House sources say this removed language was critical in ending the war in practice, because it would enforce the war's end with the power of the purse rather than requiring a trip to court to force an end to the war should Bush insist on keeping it going in defiance of the legislation.

Second, in another disappointment to House liberals, key language mandating that Bush get Congressional approval before going to war with Iran has been taken out. This was a concession to Blue Dog Dems who fear that if they vote for any measure tying the Commander in Chief's hands in any way, it will make them vulnerable in their moderate districts, a House staffer says.
Nearly a million dead Iraqis and more than 3000 dead US soldiers (American kids) and tens of thousands maimed for life later, in a rethuglican version of climbing over bodies to make it to the top, George W. Bush's Iraq and Mid-East Debacle is turning out to be very profitable for his friends. Among whom can now be counted Nancy Pelosi and the top level Democratic Party leadership.

How many more have to die?

----------
Originally published at Edgeing

< Hillary's War Vote: She Knew - Then & Now | Fifth comment claim report >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    The Bush Administration (none / 0) (#1)
    by misterconcept on Sun Apr 08, 2007 at 04:42:52 PM EST
    The Bottom Line is the Bottom Line

    As the Bush administration continues escalating the war in Iraq, more and more Americans are questioning the ethics of the involvement asking, "What are we fighting for?"  Unfortunately, in our blissful ignorance, we moral idealists have forgotten our history and often choose to deny uncomfortable truths.  

    In a so-called `industrial nation,' the political and economic agendas are dictated by the prevailing industries.  This, in itself, is not necessarily a tragedy.  That which we euphemistically refer to as the, `American Way of Life,' is dearly indebted to technology and industry.  It is, however, the responsibility of the elected government to insure that the influence of big business does not supercede the will of the people.  The past fifty years have given rise to a disturbing trend in American parliamentary procedure.  America has gone from a one man, one vote democracy to a one dollar, one vote oligarchy.

    It is a foregone conclusion that the current Executive Branch of the United States Government has never represented the will of the people despite a skillful propaganda campaign touting family values and Christian ideology.  George Bush along with all of his capos represent the will of big business; specifically, Exxon Mobil, Halliburton, British Petroleum, Dutch Shell and General Dynamics, not to mention, the key players in the pharmaceutical industry.

    In 1960, President Dwight D. Eisenhower, who was also a General as well as a Texan, observed the post-war expansion of American industry throughout Europe and Asia.  He warned the American people that these corporations were establishing governments of their own and could one day, acquire enough political clout to deploy the United States Military to protect and expand their interests.  He defined this association as the Military-Industrial Complex.  In 1972, President Salvador Allende of Chile spoke before the United Nations warning of the increasing leverage exerted by multi-national corporations on the governments throughout the developing world.  At the conclusion of his presentation, he received a fifteen minute standing ovation.  He was then branded a Marxist and ultimately assassinated by the American CIA on national television; however, this was later reported as a suicide.  He was replaced by a military Dictator supported by the American government or, more specifically, by American industry which had been exploiting farmers and copper miners in that region for decades.  The following military surge orchestrated by General Pinochet, under the watchful eye of the CIA, murdered tens of thousands of the Socialist majority who had democratically elected Allende; thus eliminating any opposition to multi-national corporate interests.

    Osama Bin Laden recognized the marriage between money and military during the first Gulf War.  Anyone who can prove Kuwaiti heritage has no obligation to work.  Instead, each Kuwaiti citizen is entitled to a share of oil revenues generated by the nationalized oil industry.  The minimum yearly dividend is approximately $70,000 per person.  When Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait in 1990, President H.W. Bush, without hesitation, sent the United States Military to protect these shareholders of the Big Three oil companies.  If it was truly Bin Laden's intention to mass-murder Americans, the ineptitude of the Bush intelligence apparatus could easily have provided better opportunities.  The targets could have been the World Series or the Super Bowl.  Instead, Bin Laden attacked the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, ergo the Military-Industrial Complex.  Furthermore, 911 was a direct assault on the Bush family in retribution for Desert Storm.  The Bush Administration capitalized on the atrocity by hiring elements outside the reach of the electorate to establish and perpetuate a propaganda campaign instilling and maintaining fear in the American people.  Meanwhile, these multi-nationals tightened their stranglehold on governments in the Mid-East.  Bin Laden's life ambition has been met, his work is complete.  He will forever remain a hero in the history of radicalism.  It is, however, vital to the Bush--Halliburton--Exxon Mobil consortium to keep Bin Laden alive in the hearts and minds of the American people.  Fear is the principle criterion for the successful promotion of its agenda.  Based upon the Bush regime's indelible record of lies and hyperbole, it would elicit little surprise if the bones of Osama Bin Laden were discovered in Karl Rove's garage.  

    This war has absolutely nothing to do with terrorism.  The only segment of the population who should be terrified consists of those who are profiting from it.  This war has nothing to do with Islam.  Anyone who has studied Islam would know that every aspect of this conflict is in violation to the principles of Jihad.  This war has nothing to do with democracy.  Kuwait is no democracy--it is a fundamentalist, Islamic monarchy.  This war is about money and profit--the bottom line is the bottom line.  

    George Bush, Dick Cheney, Karl Rove and the rest of the self-proclaimed illuminati are simply increasing their net worths in perpetuity with the blood of the innocent.  Patterned after Plato's Republic, they collectively seek to establish a new, ruling class.  Any effort on the part of Nancy Pelosi and the Democratic majority to ease tensions in the Middle East will be met with resistance and condemnation.  It's just, plain bad for business.

    --Quinn Stilletto
    President, Unwantedchildren.com