home

Justice and Death in Indiana

States that insist on using death as a sanction have a special obligation to assure that the punishment is administered fairly and that the innocent aren't sentenced to die. This editorial, authored by the ABA's president and the chairman of the Indiana Death Penalty Assessment Team, chastizes Indiana for failing to adopt procedures that assure accurate and just results in death penalty trials.

We in the ABA and the members of Indiana’s assessment team, agree that if the government is to take a life, it must first provide justice throughout every stage of the proceedings, including the trial, appeals, and clemency proceedings. Justice is not simply swift retribution — it requires accuracy, due process and fairness, and the opportunity to verify that each of those qualities was present at trial.

Among other things, justice means that all DNA and other physical evidence must be preserved for as long as a death row inmate is incarcerated. As science advances, that evidence should be available for confirming testing. Currently, however, Indiana only requires preservation of biological evidence in limited circumstances.

Justice means that competent lawyers must be adequately trained to handle complex capital cases. While Indiana provides poor defendants with counsel, the only training requirement is a 12-hour seminar within two years of their appointment. Little is done to monitor the performance of lawyers in these important cases.

Justice means that similar offenders and similar crimes receive similar punishments. While most agree that the death penalty should be reserved for the “worst of the worst,” Indiana does not have the procedures to make sure this happens. Prosecutors seek death sentences in only a few cases each year, and only a few of those result in death sentences. Even fewer of these result in an execution. Imposition of the death penalty has been referred to as Indiana’s “other lottery,” and there is often no meaningful difference between those sentenced to life in prison and those sentenced to death.

Justice means a system without bias, whether based on race, income or geography. Yet the Indiana Criminal Law Study Commission found in 2002 that a criminal defendant is more likely to receive the death penalty if the victim is white than if the victim is African-American. The assessment team confirmed that of the 17 men executed in Indiana since 1973, only two had black victims.

< Fired U.S. Attorney Speaks Out | Bong Hits For Jesus: Who Has The Movie Rights? >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Justice and Death (none / 0) (#1)
    by reddog on Wed Mar 21, 2007 at 02:28:13 PM EST
    It is important that the executee be established to be truly guilty, maybe even beyond a reasonable doubt. There should also be an equal standard of justice.

    Beyond this, executions should not be held behind closed dors with limited witnesses. They should be held in a large public place at a time convenient for a large attendance. The verdict should be read. The executee should be allowed to speak. If we decide that capital punishment is the right thing to do, we should have nothing to hide.