Justice and Death in Indiana
States that insist on using death as a sanction have a special obligation to assure that the punishment is administered fairly and that the innocent aren't sentenced to die. This editorial, authored by the ABA's president and the chairman of the Indiana Death Penalty Assessment Team, chastizes Indiana for failing to adopt procedures that assure accurate and just results in death penalty trials.
We in the ABA and the members of Indiana’s assessment team, agree that if the government is to take a life, it must first provide justice throughout every stage of the proceedings, including the trial, appeals, and clemency proceedings. Justice is not simply swift retribution — it requires accuracy, due process and fairness, and the opportunity to verify that each of those qualities was present at trial.Among other things, justice means that all DNA and other physical evidence must be preserved for as long as a death row inmate is incarcerated. As science advances, that evidence should be available for confirming testing. Currently, however, Indiana only requires preservation of biological evidence in limited circumstances.
< Fired U.S. Attorney Speaks Out | Bong Hits For Jesus: Who Has The Movie Rights? > |