home

Bush On Iraq: An Offer Congress Can't Refuse

My offer is this: nothing. Not even the $20,000 for the gaming license, which I would appreciate if you would put up personally. -Michael Corleone

So Bush has made his Michael Corleone offer to the Dems on Iraq:

President Bush on Tuesday invited Democrats to discuss their standoff over a war-spending bill, but he made clear he would not change his position opposing troop withdrawals. The White House bluntly said the meeting would not be a negotiation. [Bush said:]
It's time for them to get the job done, so I'm inviting congressional leaders from both parties — both political parties — to meet with me at the White House next week. At this meeting, the leaders in Congress can report on progress on getting an emergency spending bill to my desk. We can discuss the way forward on a bill that is a clean bill, a bill that funds our troops without artificial timetables for withdrawal and without handcuffing our generals on the ground. I'm hopeful we'll see some results soon from the Congress.

Levin and Obama have already caved. So why should Bush negotiate?

< Now 94 and Harmless, Why Is He Still in Jail? | Dem Prez Hopefuls Talk Iraq At Move On Virtual Town Hall >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    My way or the highway. (5.00 / 3) (#1)
    by LarryInNYC on Tue Apr 10, 2007 at 12:29:11 PM EST
    Imagine that.

    I changed the title (5.00 / 2) (#2)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Tue Apr 10, 2007 at 12:30:57 PM EST
    I like the Corleone reference better.

    Parent
    Change of tactics? (5.00 / 7) (#3)
    by magster on Tue Apr 10, 2007 at 12:31:53 PM EST
    The President is a lost cause.  I think it would be a better PR strategy to try to divide the GOP caucus in the house and senate, and demand they override the veto.  Every time Iraq comes up for a vote, we peel off one or two votes.  Worst case: the GOP Congress continues to be tied to the war.

    Actually (5.00 / 4) (#4)
    by andgarden on Tue Apr 10, 2007 at 12:36:31 PM EST
    That's a really good idea.

    Parent
    I think so too. (5.00 / 3) (#5)
    by Edger on Tue Apr 10, 2007 at 12:49:25 PM EST
    There is no point in talking to Bush. He's too far gone.

    Parent
    Bush's idea of a compromise (5.00 / 6) (#6)
    by TexDem on Tue Apr 10, 2007 at 12:54:20 PM EST
    has always been to have his idea agreed upon.

    In Texas where he didn't have a choice, because at that time the TX Legislature was Dem., he just simply took credit for everything that was passed. He had no control because he would not have been able to sustain a veto. In areas where he had absolute control (executions) he never compromised.