home

Gwen Ifill

If you get a chance, watch Meet The Press and watch Gwen Ifill shame the white men around the table on the Imus issue. She was brilliant.

Eugene Robinson was also good. And the general discussion, which included John Harwood and David Brooks, who was surprisingly interesting and intelligent though wrong on some things, was excellent.

The tension was palpable. And that is good. It should be. Here's the link.

Let me add, kudos to Tim Russert for putting the panel together. Good for him. He knew he would take his lumps. Well done Russert.

Update: nolo brings us some excerpts from Think Progress:

[RUSSERT:] And yet, you write this: “Why do my journalistic colleagues appear on Mr. Imus’ show? That’s for them to defend and others to argue about. I certainly don’t know any black journalists who will.”
IFILL: You know, it’s interesting to me. This has been an interesting week. The people who have spoken, the people who issued statements and the people who haven’t. There has been radio silence from a lot of people who have done this program who could have spoken up and said, I find this offensive or I didn’t know. These people didn’t speak up. Tim, we didn’t hear from you. David, we didn’t hear from you. What was missing in this debate was someone saying, you know, I understand that this is offensive. . . . The offense, the slur that Imus directed at me happened more than 10 years ago. I would like to think that 10 years from now, that Asia [her duaghter] isn’t going to be deciding that she wants to get recruited for the college basketball team or be a tennis pro or go to medical school and that she is still vulnerable to those kinds of casual slurs and insults that I got 10 years ago, and that people will say, I didn’t know, or people will say, I wasn’t listening. A lot of people did know and a lot of people were listening and they just decided it was okay. . . .

This is nice, but frankly, Ifill's appearance was much much better than this. Watch the whole thing when you can. I'll post it just as soon as I can.

< 42 | Sunday Open Thread >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Gwen Ifill (5.00 / 1) (#1)
    by Edger on Sun Apr 15, 2007 at 10:35:33 AM EST
    is far more than brilliant. She is so far beyond anyone who would try to defend Imus' remarks about the Rutgers team that she could shame them without a word, just by raising one eyebrow. Her existence puts them to shame.

    BTW (5.00 / 3) (#7)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Sun Apr 15, 2007 at 11:01:31 AM EST
    For the record, I have had problems with Ifill's reporting on the Bush Administration in the past and no doubt will in the future.

    Just to be clear.

    Parent

    PBS... sigh (5.00 / 1) (#8)
    by Edger on Sun Apr 15, 2007 at 11:06:02 AM EST
    I know. Different issue though.

    Parent
    Well (none / 0) (#2)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Sun Apr 15, 2007 at 10:40:36 AM EST
    IT was her words this morning I thought.

    Parent
    I can imagine. :-) (5.00 / 1) (#3)
    by Edger on Sun Apr 15, 2007 at 10:44:28 AM EST
    I didn't see it, but she never let's me down.

    Parent
    It is must see TV (5.00 / 1) (#4)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Sun Apr 15, 2007 at 10:48:12 AM EST
    It should up on the web by (none / 0) (#11)
    by Edger on Sun Apr 15, 2007 at 11:12:29 AM EST
    1pm EST, hopefully.

    Parent
    Gwen Ifill on MTP (5.00 / 2) (#5)
    by Bklyn07 on Sun Apr 15, 2007 at 10:52:18 AM EST
    Yes, she was brilliant.  I just sent an email to her care of PBS, because I thought she looked like she was getting depressed by some of the comments.  She really put David Brooks to shame.  It sounded like Tim Russert was trying to pave the way for an Imus comeback (eg, "Imus and his wife told me they have learned a lot").

    Perhaps (none / 0) (#6)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Sun Apr 15, 2007 at 10:59:57 AM EST
    on Russert. Imus is his friend and I don't think you drop your friends in times of trouble. And can you imagine an Imus show about racial sensitivity? It was a pretty ludicrous idea.

    I think we might also want to drop Russert a line and thank him for the panel and the excellent discussion.

    It is true that Ifill shamed Brooks and all of us really.

    IT was an wonderful and IMPORTANT appearance from here. But Brooks was good too. Wrong on alot but good.

    It was a first rate discussion, mostly because of Ifill, but also because of Robinson, Harwood, Brooks and yes, Russert.

    Parent

    So 'the cleaning lady' has intellect..... (5.00 / 1) (#12)
    by Kitt on Sun Apr 15, 2007 at 11:15:01 AM EST
    I didn't realize until this past week what (or who) Imus meant with that statement. Gwen Ifill also had an opionion peice.

    Also, MTP is online after 1:00 or 3PM EST (can't remember which ) on MSNBC's MTP site.

    A bucketful (5.00 / 2) (#14)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Sun Apr 15, 2007 at 11:16:08 AM EST
    She pulled out a bucketful of intellectual and emotional whupass this morning.

    Parent
    I've watched the entire program twice (none / 0) (#36)
    by Kitt on Mon Apr 16, 2007 at 11:48:42 PM EST
    and each time I'm amazed at how she outshone them all. Plus just the clips of certain sections of the program.

    Tim Russert was damned near - this close - to indignant. Another good ole' boy himself. Comparing his Irish Catholicism to Gwen Ifill's being a black woman.

    Parent

    Video and Transcript at Thinkprogress (5.00 / 4) (#13)
    by nolo on Sun Apr 15, 2007 at 11:15:31 AM EST
    Link here

    Thank you! (5.00 / 2) (#16)
    by Militarytracy on Sun Apr 15, 2007 at 11:20:00 AM EST
    Been cruising around wanting to see it since I read this ;)

    Parent
    Yep - (none / 0) (#21)
    by Kitt on Sun Apr 15, 2007 at 11:46:28 AM EST
    ....hitting all 'the usual suspects' - so to speak.  :)

    Parent
    Priorities (5.00 / 1) (#15)
    by Pete Guither on Sun Apr 15, 2007 at 11:19:40 AM EST
    Fire the idiot, don't listen to him, fine.  Whatever.

    But my God... the endless rounds of picking apart which apologies were sufficient and which were lacking (and the attendant media circus) is really depressing when we're imprisoning black men at a dramatically higher rate during Prohibition 2 than South Africa did during Apartheid.

    When Arianna wrote her scathing OpEd on the subject of politicians, race, and the drug war recently (mentioned here), where was the MTP panel?  Where are the demands for apologies from politicians on both sides of the aisle who created and have propagated an inherently racist drug policy?   How about a demand for even a response?!

    Do we feel good now that we've stomped on a racist comment by an idiot?  Should we pat ourselves on the back and say "Job well done"?  Maybe so.  I've been told often enough that it's political suicide for Democrats to actually address the drug war, so we'll just have to live with it.  

    So we don't have the will to address racial destruction.  No problem.  We'll go after the words... Yeah!  That'll help us sleep at night.  (At least, those of us not sleeping in prison cells, or having lost family members, or...)

    This is a strange comment (none / 0) (#18)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Sun Apr 15, 2007 at 11:24:53 AM EST
    I did not realize we are going to just all rest on "our laurels" (not my laurels at least) now.

    Rather silly comment imo.

    Parent

    Excellent Debate (5.00 / 2) (#17)
    by Freewill on Sun Apr 15, 2007 at 11:21:25 AM EST
    Kudos to Russert and all of the panel members during that discussion!

    Maybe, just maybe people will start to understand that outsiders to a culture are only allowed inside when they are invited inside. I'm tired of watching different cultures proclaiming that they themselves righteously hold the moral high ground crown and therefore need to interject themselves into everyone else's affairs believing that they are going to somehow "win the hearts and minds" of those different cultures.

    Gwen Ifil and the entire panel did an excellent job keeping the discussion from becoming solely a "let's blame the rap artists" discussion to embracing the much bigger picture. It was a start, let's just see where this Nation of ours allows it to go.

    Gwen Ifill on MTP (5.00 / 3) (#20)
    by Bklyn07 on Sun Apr 15, 2007 at 11:44:27 AM EST
    To me, one of Gwen's best comments was in response to Brooks saying Imus is not a racist.  Gwen replied, in substance: I'm not saying he's a racist.  His words were racist.  They have a racist effect, whether the intent was there or not.

    She is so right.  The girls on the basketball team suffered the effect, even if the intent was absent.  Gwen felt the racist sting when Imus's words attacked her.

    Brooks' anecodote about a colleague of his about whom Imus made an anti-semitic remark (the hooked nose) was grotesque.  Brooks said he knew Imus didn't mean it.  When Gwen asked what the colleague thought about it, he had no reply!

    Whatever happened to (5.00 / 1) (#23)
    by nolo on Sun Apr 15, 2007 at 11:51:27 AM EST
    Handsome is as handsome does?  I don't really care what's in Imus's heart. Nobody's making people like Imus say the things they do.

    Parent
    I agree (5.00 / 1) (#22)
    by sharrong on Sun Apr 15, 2007 at 11:48:44 AM EST
    I also think Gwen Ifill was great.  One comment of Russert's really rubs me the wrong way; the one about his being made fun of by Imus because he is Irish and so he understands how Ifill feels but it doesn't bother him.  When will these guys understand-its not the same.  And one reason its not the same is because all these white ethnic guys can always pass.  They can labor away without backlash, accomplish something and then show how the prejudice against their ethnic group was bull.  Women and blacks will never pass.  It will always be used as a part of their identity and "color" how they are perceived, until these negative stereotypes aren't connected to them any longer.

    Re (5.00 / 1) (#24)
    by Edger on Sun Apr 15, 2007 at 11:55:30 AM EST
    it still is so about how women who succeed are referred to by [insecure] men so afraid of the women that the only thing they can think of is to try to cut them down to their level.

    Stupid lowest common denominator (non) thinking, by too many terrified men (boys actually).

    You can watch the whole thing (5.00 / 1) (#25)
    by andgarden on Sun Apr 15, 2007 at 12:03:52 PM EST
    If you're a Mac user (5.00 / 1) (#26)
    by andgarden on Sun Apr 15, 2007 at 12:06:22 PM EST
    Or prefer Mp4 download here.

    Parent
    Actually the most stunning moment (5.00 / 1) (#27)
    by Pithy Cherub on Sun Apr 15, 2007 at 02:40:58 PM EST
    was John Harwood of WSJ.  He told the story of attending last year's White House Correspondence Dinner and meeting Ludacris.  His kids thought that was the coolest.  He said he had no idea waht Ludacris rapped about.  Eugene Robinson told him on air.  Harwood said maybe he would have been better off not knowing and he should pay more attention to what HIS kids were listening to in their music.  That encapsulates the whole thing, right there.  Abdication of responsibility.

    I think they got it (none / 0) (#10)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Sun Apr 15, 2007 at 11:10:39 AM EST
    to some extent AFTER she said it.

    "Imus isn't a racist" (none / 0) (#28)
    by diogenes on Sun Apr 15, 2007 at 06:31:22 PM EST
    If Imus isn't a racist, then he made a mistake and is potentially redeemable.  Is this really a firing level mistake?  Didn't Hillary once make a joke about Gandhi being a worker in a convenience store?  Big corporations still give money to Jesse Jackson's organization, and he wasn't fired by his organization after he called New York "Hymietown".
    Al Sharpton wasn't thrown out of the Democratic party after Tawana Brawley.  
    If anyone here has never made a joke based on race, sex, religion, fatness, shortness, thinness, sexual orientation, ethnicity, etc. in your life then you can pronounce permanent banishment/boycott on Imus.  Otherwise you're simply lucky enough to not have been caught on camera.

     

    No (none / 0) (#29)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Sun Apr 15, 2007 at 06:38:12 PM EST
    on all counts.

    Whether Imus is a racist or not is not the issue. That he has a 20 ear history of racist reamrks is not in dispute.

    I suggest you bone up before you comment on the issue.

    Hillary did NOT say any like that.

    Parent

    sorry, i missed it (none / 0) (#30)
    by cpinva on Mon Apr 16, 2007 at 03:32:52 AM EST
    did ms. ifill finally decide whether or not mr. imus had, in fact, insulted her many years ago? i ask because she didn't know as of her latest column.

    the group she was with is low-hanging fruit, i could easily have raped & pillaged them, with little intellectual strain. i fail to be impressed with her so far.

    diogenes, stop spouting RNC nonsense about hillary, or provide a cite to support your idiotic claim.

    that mr. imus is an incomprehensible moron isn't open for debate, it's demonstrably true. is he a racist/sexist pig? beats me. however, if a clear sign of being racist/sexist is your public statements, made over a fair period of time, then yes, mr. imus qualifies.

    did mr. imus deserve to be fired, for his idiotic comments? again, beats me. however, i wasn't his employer, so it wasn't my call. had i been, he'd have been gone 15 years ago, when he totally lost the ability to speak in clear narrative.

    Watch for yourself (none / 0) (#31)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Mon Apr 16, 2007 at 09:20:09 AM EST
    Boy you really do not like to admit being wrong do you?

    You were dead wrong on the point and still are making a fuss.

    Parent

    Gwen Ifill's anger (none / 0) (#32)
    by scottiex2 on Mon Apr 16, 2007 at 10:26:18 AM EST
    Gwen was clearly seething and after sitting on the
    cleaning lady comment for 10 years, with good cause.
    However I thought she came across as a sanctimonious prig.
    Her refusal to entertain criticism of the 'revs' and rappers
    was revealing. She has some serious 'problemas'.

    Gwen Ifill's anger (none / 0) (#33)
    by scottiex2 on Mon Apr 16, 2007 at 10:27:05 AM EST
    Gwen was clearly seething and after sitting on the
    cleaning lady comment for 10 years, with good cause.
    However I thought she came across as a sanctimonious prig.
    Her refusal to entertain criticism of the 'revs' and rappers
    was revealing. She has some serious 'problemas'.

    Imus is fired now after "20 years" (none / 0) (#34)
    by diogenes on Mon Apr 16, 2007 at 10:52:40 AM EST
    So I guess that big record corporations should fire recording acts that defame African-American women and if they don't then there should be boycott threats against the record companies and against any store that continues to sell the stuff (e.g. Kmart, Walmart, etc).  Obviously any radio station that plays this stuff should have its advertisers boycotted too and should be publicly shamed.  
    Hey, this is a campaign that can unite the majority of writers here with Tipper Gore, Joe Lieberman,  and the Christian Right, who have no great love for these lyrics either.  Unity is a good thing in these divisive times.    

    Who's a racist? (none / 0) (#35)
    by Slado on Mon Apr 16, 2007 at 11:17:33 AM EST
    Whenever I hear someone say "I'm not a racist" I always laugh becuase they say it as if there is a scorecard and since they don't act like a racist most of the time it excuses the times that they do.

    This whole incident has really made me think and what I've learned are there are no harmless jokes about race and sterotypes.    

    The question of taste and being funny shouldn't determine if it's ok to say something you wouldn't say in normal conversation.  We wouldn't say it at all if we didn't on some level believe it and using humor to disguise it isn't an excuse.

    He'd been sold on some level that those girls from Rutgers where ho's and that allowed him to make the bad joke.  It backfired and the smartest thing that Ifil got accross is it's no excuse to hide behind humor or entertainment when you say racial things.  

    Brooks and Russert where trying to excuse his actions without dealing with the reality that whereter Imus is a "racist" or not he acted like one and that was why he was fired.

    Great show.

    btd (none / 0) (#37)
    by jimakaPPJ on Tue Apr 17, 2007 at 10:42:24 AM EST
    It is true that Ifill shamed Brooks and all of us really.

    oh really? speak for yourself. i was raised to be respectful of women, and have tried to be so all my life. i don't have  to accept some fake shame for something i haven't done.