home

Alberto Gonzales Opening Statement Available

Christy at Firedoglake notes that the Department of Justice has released AG Gonzales' opening statement for Tuesday's Judiciary Committee hearing on the U.S. Attorney fireings. C-Span has it in full here.  (PDF)&nbsp.

He says he has nothing to hide and nothing improper occurred. Some quotes:

I know that I did not, and would not, ask for a resignation of any individual in order to interfere with or influence a particular prosecution for partisan political gain.

I also have no basis to believe that anyone involved in this process sought the removal of a U.S. Attorney for an improper reason. Based upon the record as I know it, it is unfair and unfounded for anyone to conclude that any U.S. Attorney was removed for an improper reason.

More

While I firmly believe that these dismissals were appropriate, I have equal conviction that the process by which these U.S. Attorneys were asked to resign could have – and should have – been handled differently.

I made mistakes in not ensuring that these U.S. Attorneys received more dignified treatment. Others within the Department of Justice also made mistakes. As far as I know, these were honest mistakes of perception and judgment and not intentional acts of misconduct.

On his own misstatements:

For example, I misspoke at a press conference on March 13th when I said that I “was not involved in any discussions about what was going on.” That statement was too broad. At that same press conference, I made clear that I was aware of the process; I said that “I knew my chief of staff was involved in the process of determining who were the weak performers. Where were the districts around the country where we could do better for the people in that district, and that’s what I knew.” Of course, I knew about the process because of, at a minimum, these discussions with Mr. Sampson. Thus, my statement about “discussions” was imprecise and overbroad, but it certainly was not in anyway an attempt to mislead the American people.

I certainly understand why these statements generated confusion, and I regret that. I have tried to clarify my words in later interviews with the media, and will be happy to answer any further questions the Committee may have today about those statements.

On the fired U.S. Attorneys:

Second, every U.S. Attorney who was asked to resign – Dan Bogden, Margaret Chiara, Paul Charlton, David Iglesias, Carol Lam, John McKay, Kevin Ryan, and Bud Cummins – served honorably, and they and their families made sacrifices in the name of public service. The Justice Department owes them more respect than they were shown. In some cases, Department leaders should have worked with them to make improvements where they were needed. In all cases, I should have communicated the concerns more effectively, and I should have informed them of my decisions in a more dignified manner. This process could have been handled much better and for that I want to apologize publicly.

That's just up to page 7 of his 25 page statement, but you can read the rest.

< Specter: WH Agrees To Outside Expert To Search For Missing E-Mails | "60 Minutes" Examines Duke Lacrosse Case >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Jeralyn, Freudian Slip In Your Post? (5.00 / 3) (#2)
    by MO Blue on Sun Apr 15, 2007 at 06:45:45 PM EST
    He says he has nothing to hide and nothing proper occurred.

    Definitely more factual than what he actually said.

    Mo Blue -- here is the senator schumer response. . (none / 0) (#5)
    by the rainnn on Sun Apr 15, 2007 at 09:21:49 PM EST
    just keepin' it balanced here. . .

    you can read highlights from
    sen. chuck schumer's response to
    alberto's dissembler, and follow
    a link to a windows document
    of it -- as we read all about
    "sen. schumer's sunday surprise for
    sir alberto gonzales
    ". . .

    money development? schumer re-questioned
    d. kyle sampson for a few hours today -- SUNDAY,
    april 15, 2007, in advance of gonzo's tuesday
    date with judiciary. . .  YES!

    oh -- and, in a later post, i've added
    the real video feed of schumer's retorts. . .

    end, public service announcement.

    Parent

    I'm hoping (5.00 / 1) (#3)
    by Carolyn in Baltimore on Sun Apr 15, 2007 at 08:03:49 PM EST
    he brings his homework with him - all those documents and emails the Committee has asked for several times.

    hey, get the government off the backs of (none / 0) (#1)
    by seabos84 on Sun Apr 15, 2007 at 06:20:39 PM EST
    the people!

    /end snark for the dense.

    while it is great that the internet / blog thing allows instant repudiation of their freaking lies,

    there hasn't been a connection between what the fasicsts do, and what they say they do, since RayGun got elected when I was 20?

    since Nixon smeared that woman in CA to win his first house seat?

    since the filthy rich fought the forty hour work week?

    rmm.

    Gonzales Gone Wild (none / 0) (#4)
    by Sumner on Sun Apr 15, 2007 at 08:16:35 PM EST
    It is abundantly clear from their "prepared" statement that the war-on-sex is their intended flagship at DOJ. The department's myriad crimes that they committed in order to get these unconstitutional laws in place are very much at issue. We are dealing with a pogrom. The usually very outspoken Orrin Hatch was quite reticent on this topic as of late, suggesting that they intended to spring the subject at the hearings for its usual dramatic emotional effect.

    The fact that they initially planned to use the DC conference for US Attorneys on the subject of "child protection" to announce the firings, (as was disclosed in the early  e-mail documents dump), belies their no political basis statement. It was also clear that they intended the firings to throw a scare into the remaining USAs.

    No doubt the many "missing" e-mails address the war-on-sex. That obsession is one of their main rationales for their frequent violations of law and civil and human-rights.

    Just this weekend the press announced that the $100 million-plus abstinence "education" programs don't work. Rather than abandoning said programs, look for the police state to declare that it is time to ramp-up a more forceful "solution" including more surveillance and draconian measures.

    It is good news that the AG has declared he has nothing to hide. So now he shouldn't be claiming to protect methods and sources, or hiding behind "national security".

    Where has the AG been spending his time? Even Joe Francis could answer that.