home

Meanwhile, In His Alternate Universe . . .

President Bush was pleased with the performance of his Attorney General:

President Bush was pleased with the Attorney General's testimony today. After hours of testimony in which he answered all of the Senators' questions and provided thousands of pages of documents, he again showed that nothing improper occurred. He admitted the matter could have been handled much better, and he apologized for the disruption to the lives of the U.S. Attorneys involved, as well as for the lack of clarity in his initial responses. The Attorney General has the full confidence of the President, and he appreciates the work he is doing at the Department of Justice to help keep our citizens safe from terrorists, our children safe from predators, our government safe from corruption, and our streets free from gang violence.

I have a theory Bush figures Gonzo is the one guy who can make Bush look less incompetent. For example, 'you think Bush is incompetent, you should see Gonzales.' My alternate theory is Bush enjoys seeing baby seals get clubbed.

h/t Meteor Blades

< Republicans: Gonzo Going Down In Flames | Joe Trippi Joins John Edwards Campaign >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Gonzo is Bush's firewall (5.00 / 2) (#3)
    by profmarcus on Thu Apr 19, 2007 at 06:53:18 PM EST
    the only people standing between george bush and a tsunami of revelations are gonzo, karl rove, and dick cheney... with gonzo gone, bush's flank is mercilessly exposed... bush isn't going to let him go... besides, with the focus on gonzo, it keeps some of the spotlight off of rove, although i'm not sure that strategy is going to work for much longer...

    And, yes, I DO take it personally

    That firewall (5.00 / 1) (#4)
    by Che's Lounge on Thu Apr 19, 2007 at 06:56:44 PM EST
    is toast.

    me too prof (5.00 / 1) (#10)
    by orionATL on Thu Apr 19, 2007 at 08:30:38 PM EST
    i'm with prof marcus.

    i think bush is dallying in firing gonzales because

    he will find it nearly impossible to replace him with someone else who will loyally keep the lid on things.

    once the doj has orders from a new attorney general, even a somewhat loyal bushie,

    to let "the documents" out,

    there will be no stopping the inferences that can be made from what has been released, more documents will be demanded, more bush loyalists will defect in worried self-interest

    in short, in time, all hell will break lose in the bush presidency:

    - more on the u.s. attny problem, for sure,

    but

    electronic spying, in general

    -spying on american political and war opponents, american soldiers, and diplomats in particular

    • using the doj to frame arab-americans for terror crimes, in order to pump up public alarm

    • suppressing black vote with great focus

    • suppressing the investigation of congressional corruption tied to military and intelligence  contracts originating in the white house, ovp,

    add your own others.

    gonzales may eventually go, but when he does, the damn may burst on the bush admin's  many sub rosa/illegal manipulations of  american democracy.

    Maybe (5.00 / 1) (#11)
    by manys on Thu Apr 19, 2007 at 08:37:12 PM EST
    But if Bush doesn't fire him and Alberto doesn't resign, what is there to do? Not much, and Bush doesn't seem to be concerned what his approval ratings are. What's it going to hurt if they both just ride it on out? Bush at 5% approval or something in 1/2009, he won't care because he doesn't have to. I mean really, who's gonna do anything about that?

    Parent
    I don't think 5% is achievable (none / 0) (#12)
    by Demi Moaned on Thu Apr 19, 2007 at 08:50:20 PM EST
    The absolute floor seems to be somewhere in the mid-20's.

    Parent
    It doesn't take a lot (none / 0) (#1)
    by Edger on Thu Apr 19, 2007 at 05:45:56 PM EST
    to make Bush happy, does it?

    But earlier in the day (none / 0) (#5)
    by TexDem on Thu Apr 19, 2007 at 07:12:45 PM EST
    also from MB's post


    [UPDATE: BarbinMD points out that Dana Perino said this afternoon:

        Of course, the President has not seen any of that testimony. As I told you, he's had a busy morning, and now we're on our way to Tipp City, Ohio.]

    Which is it? You haven't seen it or your happy with it?

    Parent

    Ask Dana (5.00 / 1) (#7)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Thu Apr 19, 2007 at 07:18:33 PM EST
    "Hey, as long as they're clubbing Alberto, (none / 0) (#2)
    by BroD on Thu Apr 19, 2007 at 06:00:31 PM EST
    they'll leave me alone. Heh, heh."

    KO says Gonzo said 74 times (none / 0) (#6)
    by TexDem on Thu Apr 19, 2007 at 07:16:57 PM EST
     
      "I don't know or I don't recall"

    Wow!

       

    Easy explanation. As long as Gonzo's testimony (none / 0) (#8)
    by robotalk on Thu Apr 19, 2007 at 07:33:02 PM EST
    is substance free, Bush wins.  Bush wins, even if Gonzo looks like a fool.

    approval of seals (none / 0) (#9)
    by chemoelectric on Thu Apr 19, 2007 at 08:25:54 PM EST
    BTD, I think your second theory is a winner.

    I personally think (none / 0) (#13)
    by Miss Devore on Thu Apr 19, 2007 at 09:14:53 PM EST
    the conventional blogoshere moved on way too quickly from outrage over the SCOTUS decision of yesterday over prochoice issues, to playing "running bases" over abu gonzales. It's a lot easier. And seems to be what the Dem elects, male or female, prefer to do.

    In other places (the VAGosphere, e.g.), you can hear Zapatero explain a few thangs to Catholic Spain:

    http://marisacat.wordpress.com/2007/04/19/theres-a-vicious-crazed-god-inside-america/#comments

    Now why (none / 0) (#14)
    by andgarden on Thu Apr 19, 2007 at 09:29:32 PM EST
    link to her?

    Parent
    did you read (none / 0) (#16)
    by Miss Devore on Thu Apr 19, 2007 at 10:06:42 PM EST
    the Zapatero speech she posted? or are you overconcerned with linking to the "wrong" blogs.

    do you let silly mediocre mobs keep you away from a fine groups of writers?

    what's funny--on my own tiny blog I get the 2nd most  amount of  referrals from people who have declared me "dead"--can't imagine how much Marisacat gets since she's been at it so much longer.

    Parent

    She might be a "fine writer" (none / 0) (#17)
    by andgarden on Thu Apr 19, 2007 at 10:11:01 PM EST
    but she's also many other things that make me uncomfortable. Do you read the Washington Times?

    Parent
    you're implying (none / 0) (#18)
    by Miss Devore on Thu Apr 19, 2007 at 10:15:40 PM EST
    the washington times is a haven of "fine writers"?

    What is it about Marisacat that makes you uncomfortable?

    Parent

    Haven't looked (none / 0) (#19)
    by andgarden on Thu Apr 19, 2007 at 10:23:03 PM EST
    recently enough to remember.

    Parent
    Thanks for stopping by (none / 0) (#21)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Thu Apr 19, 2007 at 11:08:44 PM EST
    it is always (none / 0) (#22)
    by Miss Devore on Fri Apr 20, 2007 at 09:20:02 AM EST
    my pleasure.

    Parent
    oh, and one other thing (none / 0) (#15)
    by orionATL on Thu Apr 19, 2007 at 09:57:36 PM EST
    pres george bush engaged in obstruction of justice  when he canned carol lam in the midst of her cunningham, wilkes,  et al., investigation.

    so did rove, and gonzlaes, and monica goodling and kyle sampson, imio.

    sampson chose the richard armatage road of being (more or less) out front, no attorney.

    goodling got a (very expensive) attorney who devised a clever(?) fifth-amendment head fake.

    but it was not just a fake, because, like the president, goodling likely committed obstruction.

    so,

    where are we now?

    well,

    just yesterday the home of representative  doolittle was raided by fbi.

    today, rep doolittle resigned from his prominent congressional committee, without a squawk or a delay -unlike ney or cunningham.

    so,

    it looks to me like Abeu gonzales will be in charge of the doj at least until all the necessary retroactive  steps have been taken to inoculate those i mentioned above, including president bush, from obstruction charges.

    in short, gonzo has a job to do, and that job is not finished yet.

    when it is finished, he will resign.

    damn, it's bed time (none / 0) (#20)
    by orionATL on Thu Apr 19, 2007 at 10:26:41 PM EST
    but

    think progress has a report just up that the fbi,

    just his afternoon,

    raided a family business associated with (arizona) representative rick renzi.

    renzi, i have read, has a reputation as one of the most corrupt congressmen serving.

    looks like the retroactive "good faith" efforts to avoid charges of obstruction fro  pres bush and his gang are continuing full force.

    for now.

    let's see what hs happened by next sept or november, when the current fuss over u.s. attorney replacements has died down.

    Parent