home

Maureen Dowd's Daddy Complex

I like Maureen Dowd's writing. I really do. But if she is going to continue to write about the politcs, she needs to attend to her daddy complex. In writing about the silly Edwards haircut story, Dowd reveals the psychological block she has in writing about politics - she needs to overcome her Elektra complex:

Speaking of roots, my dad, a police detective who was in charge of Senate security, got haircuts at the Senate barbershop for 50 cents. He cut my three brothers’ hair and did the same for anyone else in the neighborhood who wanted a free clip job. Even now, Mr. Edwards could get his hair cut at the Senate barbershop for $21 or the Chapel Hill Barber Shop near his campaign headquarters for $16.

Guess she is bidding for the "daughter of a police detective" vote. Memo to MoDo, just cuz daddy did it that way does not mean doing it some other way is wrong.

But in all seriousness, every significant defect in Dowd's writing, from her outrageous writings on Clinton, Gore, Hillary Clinton, Republicans and Democrats, really can be traced back to this. She needs to address that.

< Schwarzenegger Orders Construction Stop on New Death Chamber | Bush Uses Va. Tech to Push Religion >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Electoral Projections (5.00 / 1) (#3)
    by eluminata on Sat Apr 21, 2007 at 12:28:26 PM EST
    My take and best educated guess is that Maureen Dowd is exploring some of the themes similarly presented by George Lakoff (i.e. his construct/model of GOP as 'Strict Father' verses DNC as 'Nurturant Parent' that can be found in such texts as "Moral Politics" and "Whose Freedom?").  And as both outlooks seem to suggest, many voters have some sort of a daddy complex, especially when opting to vote for a President in a climate of fear (and that we ignore this at our peril).  

    Dowd is detestable (1.00 / 2) (#5)
    by DavidDvorkin on Sat Apr 21, 2007 at 02:27:38 PM EST
    And has been since the 2000 election, at least.

    I'm always surprised that when from time to time she attacks a right winger, the left wing/progressive blogosphere weeps at her wonderfulness.

    Some of you (5.00 / 1) (#8)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Sat Apr 21, 2007 at 05:17:02 PM EST
    are clearly unhinged.

    Parent
    that was your first big mistake (1.00 / 4) (#6)
    by cpinva on Sat Apr 21, 2007 at 04:16:14 PM EST
    I like Maureen Dowd's writing. I really do.

    it shows the shallowness at the depth of your core. to be so attuned, to one so lacking in substance, is a reflection on the true intellectual black hole at your center.

    were you a person of honor, having now admitted this in public, the decent thing would be to use that single bullet in the .45, and end your genetically useless existence.

    Have you lost your mind? (5.00 / 2) (#7)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Sat Apr 21, 2007 at 05:16:17 PM EST
    What a pathetic comment.

    You need help.

    Seriously.

    Parent

    no, but surely you have (1.00 / 1) (#12)
    by cpinva on Sat Apr 21, 2007 at 10:00:06 PM EST
    to admit, in public, to liking ms.dowd's pathetic excuse for a column, says much about your intellectual heft, or, more precisely, your lack thereof.

    she and ann coulter are twin daughters of different mothers. her inane drivels are, in large part, responsible for g. bush sitting in the white house.

    perhaps you ought to actually read her columns, instead of merely skimming the single-syllable words.

    come back when you have, then we'll talk.

    Parent

    Just pathetic (5.00 / 1) (#16)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Sun Apr 22, 2007 at 02:41:09 AM EST
    You really have a serious problem.

    I wondered before.

    I am sure of it now.

    Parent

    BTD (1.00 / 1) (#17)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sun Apr 22, 2007 at 09:18:50 AM EST
    If getting a chuckle out of watching two members of the Left slice and dice each other over a meaningless column that less than .00000000000000000000000000000000000000001% of the world even knows exists is a problem...

    color me problem....

    Parent

    my hero (1.00 / 1) (#14)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat Apr 21, 2007 at 10:10:18 PM EST
    BTD (none / 0) (#10)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat Apr 21, 2007 at 07:34:46 PM EST
    uh.... I think cpinva was pulling your leg.

    Parent
    As hilarious as Imus. (none / 0) (#11)
    by MacLane on Sat Apr 21, 2007 at 07:50:11 PM EST
    Gun jokes are timely, sophisticated and elegant too.

    Parent
    I've stopped reading her. (none / 0) (#1)
    by andgarden on Sat Apr 21, 2007 at 11:58:09 AM EST


    Dowd , while a fine writer, (none / 0) (#2)
    by robotalk on Sat Apr 21, 2007 at 12:12:11 PM EST
    is unfortunately barren of ideas.

    That (none / 0) (#4)
    by jondee on Sat Apr 21, 2007 at 12:34:40 PM EST
    could be the perrenial, unspoken motto of The NYT and The New Yorker: write well, just dont get any ideas.

    Unfair to the New Yorker (5.00 / 1) (#13)
    by Demi Moaned on Sat Apr 21, 2007 at 10:05:46 PM EST
    I do think the New Yorker has erred in an attempt to be 'fair and balanced' towards the Republicans. I especially am thinking of the pieces Nicholas Lemann wrote about Bush during the 2000 campaign and there was also a profile of McCain that was very flattering to him around that time.

    OTOH, the New Yorker has published some very hard-hitting pieces on the Bush Administration from the likes of Hendrik Hertzberg, Seymour Hersh and George Packer.

    Parent

    BTD, that's just (none / 0) (#9)
    by MacLane on Sat Apr 21, 2007 at 07:01:51 PM EST
    fatuous! Don't waste your time writing about this, BTD. You have better things to do with your generous gifts.