home

Misdemeanor Child Porn Defendant Brutally Killed in Jail

This is a disgusting story on so many levels.

Mercy was in short supply the night of Oct. 5, 2006, at Theo Lacy jail. Someone – perhaps a deputy – had inaccurately fingered inmate John Derek Chamberlain as a child molester. And that mistake became a death sentence.

Chamberlain, a 41 year old software engineer, was in custody because he couldn't make bail on a $2,500.00 misdemeanor child porn charge. A deputy inaccurately told other inmates he was a child molester. Prison-style vigilantism took over and as the guard watched television, later saying he wasn't aware anything was going on, Chamberlain was brutally murdered by a gang of inmates.

In the days prior to his murder, Chamberlain had called his ex-girlfriend and his public defender to say he was afraid and being threatened. The public defender called the jail and asked if he should be moved. He wasn't moved.

The details of the grisly murder.

More...

Chamberlain tried to defend himself but quickly fell to the concrete floor, curling into a ball. "Stop, please, stop," he screamed.

The beating came in waves. As some inmates rested, others took their place. They stomped on his head, holding onto a bunk bed for leverage. One inmate punched Chamberlain so hard that he broke his hand. They used their tennis shoes as blackjacks. Somebody dumped scalding water onto Chamberlain's stripped-down body. Others spit and urinated on him, inserting plastic spoons into his rectum.

Chamberlain crawled beneath a bed for protection, but they pulled him out, yelling "baby raper." They told him that molested kids hurt just as much. At one point, the attackers huddled to discuss whether someone should rape Chamberlain. As they rested, some of the attackers shook hands with each other, the report said.

Inmates estimated that 12 to 20 people took part in the beating. The rest nervously watched the Dodgers or played dominoes, pingpong and cards. One inmate said the punches sounded like drums thumping. But in their enclosed guard station, Taylor, Chapluk and Le didn't hear the beating.

An investigation is underway, by the Sheriff's office. There's evidence of a potential coverup.

The investigative file shows that Taylor watched television on duty and that deputies added an entry to the jail log after the death to reflect that Taylor had shown concern for Chamberlain's safety. Moreover, the file shows the department tolerated a jail subculture in which inmates enforce their own laws and inflict punishment on one another.

Why are they investigating themselves?

The Assistant Sheriff says his deputies did nothing wrong.

Assistant Sheriff Charles Walters, who is in charge of the jails, did say, "There is nothing that leads us to believe there was any wrongdoing by our staff."

More at the Orange County Weekly:

The guards and prisoners inside Orange County’s jail system operate in a hierarchical power structure that is strangely symbiotic. Theo Lacy is no exception. To enforce order among the 1,800 inmates housed there, the vastly outnumbered guards rely on the leaders or “shot-callers” of three main jail groups: the “Woods,” or whites; the “Southsiders,” mostly Latino gang members; and the “Paisanos,” mostly illegal immigrants from Mexico. Each shot-caller has a “mouse,” or assistant, who is responsible for passing along commands from shot-callers to the rest of the inmates. Helping the shot-callers enforce those orders are “torpedoes,” typically the toughest or most violent members of each clique.

If a guard wants the inmates in his area of the jail to clean up their bunks, he simply tells the shot-callers to pass the word that if the bunks aren’t spotless in a matter of minutes, nobody gets access to the day room, where inmates play cards or chess or watch television—mostly reruns of The Simpsons. Since day room is the only thing inmates can look forward to to disrupt the monotony of their lives, whoever fails to comply with the command could expect to be punished with a beating by a torpedo.

“There is a hierarchy in every cell block, and if you don’t do what you are told, you’re screwed,” says one former inmate. “It’s a jungle, and the deputies are all in on it.”

Another question, how did the guards have so much control over the inmates?

< State-Sponsored Suicide? | Einstein, Predestination, Quantum Mechanics and the Mystery of Faith >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Uggh (none / 0) (#1)
    by squeaky on Sat Apr 07, 2007 at 07:14:46 PM EST
    How absolutely horrible and cruel. Cold blooded torture and murder; the guards should be liable. It is hard to imagine that so many could be so callous.

    And the fact that a mere $2500 seperated him from a certain death. What were the judges thinking? Hard to believe that the condition in that prison were not know.

    Will things change there or will someone be charged? Something tells me that the answer to both is no.

    Something tells me (none / 0) (#5)
    by nolo on Sun Apr 08, 2007 at 09:43:06 AM EST
    there's one heck of a 1983 action here.  It won't bring the guy back, and the attorney who brings such an action is going to have to be smart about handling the child porn angle, but this is still the kind of thing that could bring a huge verdict.

    Parent
    At Least (none / 0) (#6)
    by squeaky on Sun Apr 08, 2007 at 10:00:47 AM EST
    That will bring some justice to the table, and maybe give cause for the people involved to think twice about their actions. I hope someone goes for it.

    It seems to me that apart from the negligence in protecting the guy, telling the 'boys' that he is a child rapist is like yelling fire in a crowded movie theater, only 100 times worse.

    Parent

    Yelling fire.... (none / 0) (#7)
    by kdog on Sun Apr 08, 2007 at 10:26:48 AM EST
    excellent analogy squeaky.

    Prisoners doing time for crimes against children are as good as dead or tortured for the duration of their sentence.  Every prison guard and cop knows this.

    Parent

    The pictures (none / 0) (#8)
    by 1980Ford on Sun Apr 08, 2007 at 11:52:05 AM EST
    themselves would be irrelevant in a 1983 action and the charges would only be relevant because they were the motive. After giving it some thought, maybe the inmates accept this system because the guards grant them power. It is the perfect divide and conquer strategy for the guards and it will not likely change until someone is beaten to death for not making their bunk on time and another six or so inmates get life.

    Parent
    140 prisoners in the cell block and nobody (none / 0) (#2)
    by JSN on Sat Apr 07, 2007 at 07:23:56 PM EST
    pushed the emergency call button. Why not?

    No one should be killed in jail, of course... (none / 0) (#3)
    by diogenes on Sat Apr 07, 2007 at 07:50:43 PM EST
    But someone who "relaxes" in a parking lot and urinates there instead of going to his home across the street sounds like someone who was cruising, whether for children or adults.
    District attorneys often file obvious misdemenor charges in such cases while investigating, and file more serious ones later when victims step forward or the computer is totally examined.
    The "misdemenor" part of this is unneeded spin.  The murder of any prisoner, even a felon multiple child predetor, is the tragedy here.


    diogenes, (none / 0) (#4)
    by 1980Ford on Sun Apr 08, 2007 at 12:29:42 AM EST
    The inmates likely suspected more serious guilt too, but no one came forward. Now, not only is Chamberlain dead, but the 6 men face life in prison. What a waste of human life over a few pictures. As Jaralyn asks, why would the inmates be so obedient on the word and order of a guard?

    Parent
    Orrin Hatchet-job on the Constitution... (none / 0) (#9)
    by Sumner on Sun Apr 08, 2007 at 02:05:18 PM EST
    but you have already been advised that there is a First Amendment, that these laws are unconstitutional.

    you have already been advised that this constructive homicide is systemic, built into the system.

    all the actors that carried out a role in the murder, fulfilled what they understood was expected from them.

    this homicide imputes to Orrin Hatch. It imputes to the US Supreme Court, which allows the pogroms to continue by foisting exceptions to the First Amendment, in order to accommodate the intolerance from religion.

    an obscenity is the Chief Justice's State of the Judiciary report, where he calls for salary increases for judges. As the courts have already been put on notice that these laws are unconstitutional, the murder imputes to them.

    all the lobbying that was done for these laws using taxpayer money, and skewed anectdotes and mythical numbers and Cultivation Theory, and distractions during votes by calling baseless Orange Alerts at the Department of Homeland Security, is just part of the crimewave within the cesspool of our criminal justice system. This constant use of these illegal means by which they enact these draconian laws is the real crime.

    and these draconians aren't satisfied with just trashing our Constitution, they foment this hysteria around the world.

    yet as if these laws aren't over-the-top enough, the attorney general has been out lobbying for ever harsher sanctions, in order to guarantee a war at home, when our war abroad winds up. the same process of resorting to lies that was used to enact these laws, was also used to scare up a war abroad, the same baseless fomenting of hysteria.

    the attorney general and Orrin Hatch and media actors such as Bill O'reilly all share the blame for these laws and the systemic murders like this one. and their gross perversions are all emblematic of Mark Foley's hypocrisy as their passion is fueled by the same pretext for indulging in this matter.

    People often talk (none / 0) (#10)
    by HK on Sun Apr 08, 2007 at 03:53:19 PM EST
    about how details of crimes against children turn their stomachs.  I too find such things difficult to hear or read about in the newspapers.  But this murder also makes me feel sick to the core.  Whether John Chamberlain was guilty or not is irrelevant.  After all, he may have been an adult, but he too was somebody's child.

    I have a theory that sometimes people come down hard on those who they perceive as being bad people to help them forget about their own poor behaviour, so they may feel righteous.  I think maybe that is part of the reason why these inmates acted the way they did.  The mentality is, 'I may be a criminal, but at least I didn't molest children.'  When we dehumanise people and see them as monsters, it makes it very easy to treat them inhumanely.

    In my opinion, if it is true that inmates were told Chamberlain was a child molester, the prison guards were not just negligent in this case but complicit.