home

Meanwhile In Iraq . .

I missed this from Tuesday:

On Tuesday, without note in the U.S. media, more than half of the members of Iraq's parliament rejected the continuing occupation of their country. 144 (of 275) lawmakers signed onto a legislative petition calling on the United States to set a timetable for withdrawal, according to Nassar Al-Rubaie, a spokesman for the Al Sadr movement, the nationalist Shia group that sponsored the petition.

Okaaay. The US Congress votes for Debacle without end and the Purple Finger chosen Iraqi Parliament says go.

Does it matter to anyone? The Iraqis want us to leave but we refuse. Unbelievable.

< Congress To Offer Bush Blank Check? | The Role of the Informers in the Fort Dix Case >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    That could be a powerful talking point (none / 0) (#1)
    by andgarden on Wed May 09, 2007 at 11:35:25 PM EST
    at they very least.

    I truly believe (none / 0) (#2)
    by Freewill on Wed May 09, 2007 at 11:45:13 PM EST
    the media covered plans for the Iraqi Parliament to take a 2 month vacation in July and August was a very serious attempt by the Iraqi Parliament to get the U.S. out of their country! By no means should anyone underestimate their strategic planning abilities. They knew very well if they announced a two month vacation in the middle of Bush's surge that it would be the straw that broke Americas will.

    Why do you think ole' Dickey is over there right now surviving yet another failed bombing attempt on his life? He's beating the tables with his fists giving the evil eye to the Iraqi Parliament and demanding they stay on the job, or else!

    I think the Iraqi's just laid down their Straight Flush hand and Bush only had a pair of deuces.


    Duh, it just dawned on me (none / 0) (#3)
    by Freewill on Wed May 09, 2007 at 11:55:12 PM EST
    What I posted above. This is why the 11 repubs were were in conference with Bush about Iraq. They're sweating bullets over this Iraqi vacation. I bet you Bush told them to hold on long enough before throwing in the towels to let the "Enforcer" Cheney puff his chest out at the Iraqi Parliament. This is why it was so urgent to get Cheney to Iraq. The Iraqi's have backed Bush and his party into a corner. The Iraqi's know that if they take a 2 month vacation America's 70% against the war will turn into 85-90% against.

    Parent
    Meanwhile, Condi on the Charlie Rose show... (none / 0) (#4)
    by conchita on Thu May 10, 2007 at 12:25:29 AM EST
    In an interview last night on the Charlie Rose Show, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice pointedly said, "[O]ur friends in the [Middle East] need to know and the Iraqis need to know that we are not looking to leave Iraq." "Ever?" Rose asked. Rice responded, "We are not going to leave an Iraq that is not capable of defending itself and with a foundation for future reconciliation."

    ...In the interview, Rose also noted that Rice once worked for President George H.W. Bush, who was "famous for insisting there be an exit strategy. [But] no one seems to know what's the exit strategy [now]," he said. Rice responded that Iraq is "a long-term proposition."

    When Rose asked Rice if the administration was "looking for a strategy for the United States to exit from Iraq." Rice answered, "No, we're looking for a strategy that is going to do what we went there to do."

    Via Think Progress

    Anybody (none / 0) (#5)
    by Che's Lounge on Thu May 10, 2007 at 01:33:56 AM EST
    seen my strategy?

    I know it's around here somewhere.

    "Does it matter to anyone?" (none / 0) (#6)
    by Lora on Thu May 10, 2007 at 08:23:29 AM EST
    Apparently not to the US media, upon whom a lot of "anyone" depends for their information.

    Now was that "incompetent" or "deliberate?"

    Three guesses and the first two don't count.

    And Cheney in Iraq... (none / 0) (#7)
    by conchita on Thu May 10, 2007 at 09:09:03 AM EST
    The vice president had arrived unannounced in Baghdad early Wednesday to tell Iraq's government "it's game time," a senior Bush administration official said.

    The senior administration official summarized Cheney's message: "We've got to pull together. We've got to get this work done. It's game time."

    An important topic on Cheney's agenda is to persuade the Iraqi Parliament to forgo its planned two-month recess. The Bush administration is pushing for members to keep working on legislation, such as a measure on oil revenues.

    "The reality is, with the major effort we're making, the major effort the Iraqi security forces and military are making themselves, for the Iraqi Parliament to take a two-month vacation in the middle of summer is impossible to understand," Ryan Crocker, the United States' new ambassador to Iraq, told reporters.

    CNN

    And Iraqis beyond the Iraqi Parliament (none / 0) (#8)
    by conchita on Thu May 10, 2007 at 09:15:36 AM EST
    The RJF's goals are to "fight all kind of occupations" (that is, American and Iranian) and to "make Iraq an Islamic State and guarantee its unity under an Islamic flag." The RJF has also vowed to "target occupation forces and their agents and not civilians" to "promote moderate Islam and denounce all parties which do not differentiate between good and evil" to "abolish all decisions adopted by the American government including de-Baathification" and "to work to release all prisoners." The RJF announced that they will never recognize the al-Maliki government and that upon taking power they will abolish the current constitution.

    The quick formation of the RJF -- almost totally ignored by the Western media -- has brought relief to American and Iraqi officials, who feared the disintegration of a more moderate resistance in the face of the al-Qaeda threat. But the relief has been short-lived. The growth of the RJF, its ability to appeal to a broad political front, and its organizing skills have been felt throughout Anbar Province and far into the north. And while the RJF has vowed that it will fight the takifir current of al-Qaeda and marginalize the more extreme elements inside the resistance itself, its ability to quickly root itself into the populations of the Sunni heartland, just weeks after its establishment, has provided little relief to hard-pressed American and Iraqi military units.
    [...]

    I've just seen a statement announcing the creation of the Jihad and Reform Front, encompassing part of Ansar al-Sunna, the Islamic Army of Iraq, and the Mujahideen Army. The announced goals: expelling the occupiers, establishing religion, government by sharia, and a moderate approach to Islamic doctrine (i.e. against strict enforcement and takfiri practices). It rejects the legitimacy of the constitution, 'sectarian elections', and the Maliki government. It calls on all factions of the jihad to join with it, and specifically invites the 1920 Revolution Brigade, and urges all to avoid side battles at the expense of the main battle against the American occupation. While the language is typically religious, the focus is exclusively Iraqi, and says nothing about wider global jihad.

    Conflicts Forum via Abu Aardvark

    Powerless like US (none / 0) (#9)
    by squeaky on Thu May 10, 2007 at 10:21:01 AM EST

    Cheney arrived a day after a majority of Iraqi parlimentarians signed a petition in favor of the withdrawal of US troops from Iraq. Actually, last fall 131 signed a similar petition. By the rules of the Iraqi parliament, such petitions have no force. The sense of those deputies was communicated to a committe, which promised to report out the resolution to the entire parliament, which it apparently never did. So, Tuesday's move shows a 10% rise in commitment to the principle of withdrawal over 6 months ago, but may be no more consequential. A petition is not a vote, and is a sign of how powerless the parlimentarians feel.

    Juan Cole

    wondering if juan cole has discussed (none / 0) (#10)
    by conchita on Fri May 11, 2007 at 12:33:20 AM EST
    the newly formed Reform and Jihad Front (RJF)?  i would look at his site, but am too beat from a long, long day.  

    Parent