home

Making the Promise of Title VII Work

In some states, employees have only 180 days after a discriminatory act (a termination based on race, for instance) to file a claim under Title VII. In the rest of the states, employees have only 300 days. Those ridiculously short deadlines became even more burdensome after the Supreme Court decided this week to reject the Equal Employment Opportunities Commission's long-standing belief that claims based on discriminatory pay arise with each discriminatory paycheck. According to the Supreme Court's 5-4 decision, the discrimination occurs when the level of pay is first set, not when each subsequent check is received.

As the NY Times editorializes today, the majority "forced an unreasonable reading on the law, and tossed aside longstanding precedents to rule in favor of an Alabama employer that had underpaid a female employee for years." The decision makes it almost impossible to bring a disparate pay claim, since employees rarely know what other employees are making at the time their pay is set.

Congress should amend Title VII, both by making clear that discrimination in pay is a continuing act, and by lengthening the period for filing all discrimination cases.

< Army Returns Soldiers With Missing Limbs to Active Duty | Fired U.S. Attorney David Iglesias: Somewhere An E-mail Will Lead to Rove >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Women and minorities screwed again. (none / 0) (#1)
    by Aaron on Thu May 31, 2007 at 11:08:27 AM EST
    Each day our country sinks deeper into the depths of pseudo conservative corporate depravity, and this ruling by the Supreme Court is just another example of the growing injustice in America.

    Anyone wanna bet me that the Democrats will actually do something about this, and not just provide us with lip service on this judicial travesty? I'll give you five to one odds.  If we had a Democratic president, I'd still give you three to one odds, that they'll run their mouths in the House and the Senate and wind up doing nothing.

    Congressional Democrats to try to overturn Supreme Court's pay-bias ruling

    Court ruling shouldn't stand

    Hearts of stone on Supreme Court

    Equal Pay Act (none / 0) (#2)
    by diogenes on Thu May 31, 2007 at 10:57:25 PM EST
    How about simply extending the already existing Equal Pay Act, which has no time limits, (which this plaintiff CHOSE to not use though she could have) to cover racial and other forms of discrimination.
    Of course, since that act doesn't have massive punitive damages, the trial lawyer lobby won't back expanding it.