And woe betide any politician who suggests that waiting for complete triumph might not be the only alternative -- just in case democracy, prosperity, peace and brotherhood don't flower in Iraq next week. Sens . Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama opposed the war-funding bill because it lacked even the mealy-mouthed timetables in an earlier version that Bush vetoed.
. . . A confused Wall Street Journal editorial last week seemed to be addressing this question of how an elected representative might legitimately oppose a war in our democracy. It began by accusing House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of cowardice. They "claim to oppose the war and want it to end, yet they refused to use their power of the purse to end it."
So there is a "power of the purse," you see. Congress can cut off funds for a war that people don't like. . . . But what happens if you, as a member of Congress, do attempt to use the power of the purse? Sens. Clinton, Obama and Chris Dodd (also running for president) voted against the final Iraq funding bill because all meaningful deadlines and timetables had been stripped out so that President Bush would sign it. That Wall Street Journal editorial accuses these three Democratic senators of "vot[ing] to undermine U.S. troops in the middle of a difficult mission." If this is true of last week's vote, it will always be true of any attempt to cut off a war by cutting off funds. Unless the Journal is in favor of undermining U.S. troops, this makes the alleged "power of the purse" unusable.
If you let the Wingnuts, the WSJ Editorial Page and Republicans to dictate your policy and your votes on Iraq funding, you will neither look strong on defense or principled.
Here is the answer, end the war by NOT funding it. OR at least let members vote for the war or against it through the NOT funding option. If the Blue Dogs want to be for the war, then they will be. So be it.
But the leaders of the Democratic Party in the Congress can not join Republicans and President Bush in holding the Party hostage to the nonsense they spew.
If Jim Webb can't bring himself to end the war, that will be on him.
If Jon Tester can't bring himself to end the war, that is on him.
And so on.
The choice is now binary. There is no reasonable middle ground on Iraq. You will be voting for the President's Iraq Debacle if you vote to fund it.
It is not fair and it is not right. But it is.
Life is about making tough choices. Are Democrats unable to make them now? Then they do not deserve to govern.