home

GPS tracking for everyone

I received a spam overnight from Google Earth selling Tracksticks so you can Follow Anything That Moves for less than $200.

The Trackstick records its own location, time, date, speed, heading and altitude at preset intervals. With over 1Mb of memory, it can store months of travel information. The Trackstick is the perfect tool for individuals looking for a way to track anything that moves. Use it for recording the exact routes you take when hiking, biking or vacationing. Record the location of everywhere you went, import pictures and other information into Google Earth to offer an entirely new perspective of your journey. Includes GPX photo stamping feature for adding your favorite photos to you own maps.

More...

It adds:

Applications / Features

  • Seamless integration into Google Earth<sup>TM</sup&gt
  • GPS tracking / location history recording
  • Employee and vehicle monitoring
  • Mileage recording and verification
  • Public Safety
  • Law Enforcement
  • Homeland Security
  • Jogging, Hiking and Biking
  • Photo Tours
  • Child / Family Safety

For this price, anybody can plant one in your car and track your movements. Thank you Google; we now have even fewer rights. There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in our movements in a public place, and, like the frog in the heating water, we have seen technology overtake our freedoms.

It makes me shudder at the implications. Any police department or PI can follow you anywhere, without even leaving his or her office.

< Respect For The Military | "Stripping Away The Inflammatory Rhetoric" >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Cellphones (5.00 / 1) (#7)
    by Ben Masel on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 10:14:59 AM EST
    Even with GPS "off" or pre-GPS cellphones track your location, mandated by law in "E-911." The companies maintain your history.

    I've been working with Wisconsin legislators on a bill to require the cell providers to purge the history unless you've opted in to a service requiring retention, and requiring warrants for realtime tracking by Law enforcement, due for introduction soon.

    Mentioned this at a geoprivacy workshop at the Conference on Computers, Freedom, and Privacy last year, the telco lobbyists freaked at the prospect of "a patchwork of State Laws," say they're willing to deal with uniform Fed rules.

    More Insidious Alternatives (none / 0) (#10)
    by expertlaw on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 10:22:33 AM EST
    Right. With this product it appears the data must be downloaded from the device in order to be viewed on a computer, so as I see it the danger is significantly less than from devices which actively transmit your location or the location of your vehicle. I've seen similar ads for services which allow you to track people through their cell phones, and as you point out the government can often already do that.

    Parent
    It's the nature of the cellphone networks. (none / 0) (#30)
    by Edger on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 09:01:54 PM EST
    The phones "handshake" with the network to let the network know what "cell" the phone is in.

    As long as your phone is powered on, or even powered off but has the battery IN it (as far as I know), it handshakes.

    So you can always be tracked to at least the "cell" you are in by someone determined to know where you are.

    Parent

    There's a difference btw where you are, and were. (5.00 / 1) (#31)
    by Ben Masel on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 09:16:34 PM EST
    Retention's the issue.

    Parent
    Yes, I understand (none / 0) (#32)
    by Edger on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 09:47:08 PM EST
    However I look at from a technical viewpoint, and I see ancillary issues to that.

    One, if cell providers purge the history they are going to have to keep that history long enough to span at least one billing cycle, no?

    Two, cell signals are digital signals transmitted by radio wave. Interceptable radio waves.

    I have more than enough programming and networking experience to know that a determined and technically capable third party (NSA is one example, there are others - any other telecom could do it) will always have the capability of monitoring anyone they want to, for as long as they want to.

    Is the bill you are working on intended to be that anticipatory, Ben?

    Parent

    If so how could it be enforced? (none / 0) (#33)
    by Edger on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 09:48:43 PM EST
    Might not beat NSA (5.00 / 1) (#34)
    by Ben Masel on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 11:00:28 PM EST
    but their records, if collected in violation of statute, couldn't be introduced as evidence in domestic crimes.

    Why would one need live-tracking for billing?

    Parent

    Roaming charges for last month. (none / 0) (#35)
    by Edger on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 11:04:41 PM EST
    Thanks, btw. (none / 0) (#36)
    by Edger on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 11:06:21 PM EST
    I hadn't thought about evidence in trials.

    Parent
    Earth Store != Google Earth (5.00 / 1) (#18)
    by Red Shovel on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 11:05:18 AM EST
    A few clarifications to the article and comments:

    The Earth Store is the company selling the TrackStick. They are obviously and deliberately trying to confuse consumers into thinking that they are affiliated with Google. But if you look closely, you'll see that the only Google logo on their site is the one for "Google Checkout," which is a merchant payment system that Google offers as a service to websites. They also note that they have licensed their use of the name Google Earth if you read the fine print.

    Also, this device passively records GPS information to its on-board memory. While the device isn't huge, it does require a 5-20V power supply (a cigarette lighter is the example they give). And, as expertlaw pointed out in the comments, in order to retrieve the data from the unit, you actually have to obtain the unit and connect it via a USB cable to a computer and download the data.

    The Earth Store sells the TrackStick, which "integrates" with Google Earth. However, Google publishes an open format called KML, which means that anybody can "integrate" with Google Earth, without Google's permission or consent.

    Finally, if you've ever used a hand-held GPS receiver, you know that lots of things can interfere with getting a clean signal, including the obstruction of an automobile's or building's roof.

    None of this is meant to minimize the serious privacy threat represented by the possibility that you could have this device introduced to your car or possessions without your consent.

    However, it's important to understand the technology: it doesn't work if its view of satellites is obstructed by a solid object; it requires a continuous power supply, rendering it larger and/or more obvious than it appears in the web site photos; and, critically, the device must be physically retrieved and connected to a computer in order for the recorded tracking data to be accessed.

    Finally, Google Earth is not in any way affiliated with or endorsing this product. If you're going to hate Google, hate them for storing and indexing everything you've ever posted to the Web, or for taking street-level photographs of your neighborhood, or for taking down content from YouTube in response to DMCA notices.

    But don't hate them for the TrackStick, because they don't make it, they don't sell it, and they don't endorse it. They don't even link to it from the Google Earth web site.

    [For you non-programmer types, != is a coding convention that means "is not equal to." I can't use HTML entitities like ≠ in the subject field; sorry!]

    Doncha' hate it when people point out the (none / 0) (#19)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 11:13:16 AM EST
    actual facts?

    Parent
    good comments, but (none / 0) (#22)
    by eric on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 11:33:34 AM EST
    Very good comment.  One issue, though.  I read the tech specs and it says there that the device:
    Runs on two (2) AAA batteries

    I don't see any reference to the need for a "5-20V power supply".

    Parent

    It also said that it would run for two weeks (none / 0) (#37)
    by JSN on Fri Jun 29, 2007 at 04:12:15 PM EST
    on two AAA batteries which sounds about right. I also though it
    was interesting they provided a magnetic attachment for a car.
    No doubt that is so it could be attached without the knowledge of the car's owner.

    By golly now I can find out where to hunt for mushrooms.

    Parent

    Prediction (none / 0) (#1)
    by Abdul Abulbul Amir on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 07:43:32 AM EST

    This will be standard equipment in automobiles, busses, planes, trains, etc. in ten years.  You might want one in your luggage if yoy fly much.


    New business: Anti GPS shops (none / 0) (#11)
    by lilybart on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 10:27:20 AM EST
    Someone should start a chain of shops that will take the GPS tracking stuff OUT of anything you bring in. And they will sell devices that let you "sweep" your car and other belongings for these devices.

    Fight technology with technology and free market enterprise.

    Parent

    It would be (none / 0) (#23)
    by Wile ECoyote on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 11:39:06 AM EST
    much easier to just throw it out or not plug it into the computer.  It has to be plugged into the computer to get results, so don't plug it in.  

    Parent
    Mostly here now. (none / 0) (#29)
    by jimakaPPJ on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 08:54:28 PM EST
    I already have that ability if I want to. All I have to do is call Northstar, tell them the car is stolen, and the can tell me where it is.

    It also sends me a monthly report on the health of the vehicle and reminds me of the "Oil life."

    I am quite sure that if I didn't change the oil and suffered a motor failure GM would be immediately talking about my failure to follown required maintenance activity.

    Parent

    Wow (none / 0) (#2)
    by scarshapedstar on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 08:01:07 AM EST
    These are selling points?


    # Employee and vehicle monitoring
    # Law Enforcement
    # Homeland Security

    Christ, if I didn't know any better, I'd think Google had signed on with Communist China.

    Oh, wait...

    Opportunity (none / 0) (#3)
    by dead dancer on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 08:35:51 AM EST
    Just like the radar detector, there is an opportunity here for tracking detectors and jammers; after all we are a capitalist society.

    RE: detectors and jammers (none / 0) (#5)
    by mack on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 08:52:37 AM EST
    Just like in Virginia, where radar detectors are illegal, there is an opportunity for some "clever" legislator, most likely up for re-election, to author a piece of legislation designed to "protect" the population and ban any GPS detection or jamming devices.

    Parent
    Good point (none / 0) (#6)
    by scarshapedstar on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 09:04:19 AM EST
    The unfortunate downside of a "capitalist society" is that government representation is a service to be purchased by the capitalist.

    Parent
    I think that would be difficult as law. (none / 0) (#12)
    by lilybart on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 10:29:31 AM EST
    It is one thing to thwart the police so one can SPEED, which is what the radar devices are for. That is ALL they are for.

    Unless the government can prove a good reason for tracking your car, I don't see how they can ban us from preventing being tracked.

    I know these people in charge are BAD, but people do like their imagined privacy.

    Parent

    Other uses (none / 0) (#20)
    by Abdul Abulbul Amir on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 11:13:20 AM EST

    It is one thing to thwart the police so one can SPEED, which is what the radar devices are for. That is ALL they are for.

    Thats not all they are for.  That can be used to avoid locations with certain electromagnetic radiation frequencies.  They can be used to check to see if the public servants are actually using the toys we have purchased for them.  They can be used to determine if someone other than the police is irradiating you.

    Parent

    I feel bad for the kids..... (none / 0) (#4)
    by kdog on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 08:45:48 AM EST
    I could see this technology becoming standard issue to children..."Don't forget your tracking device sweetheart so mommy can keep tabs on you."

    The children of today won't know what privacy is...they'll have eyes on 'em from the crib to college.  It could lead to kids never learning how to care and look out for themselves.

    Already marketed by Disney (none / 0) (#8)
    by Ben Masel on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 10:16:12 AM EST
    as the "Disneyphone."

    Parent
    Why not quit dickin' around... (none / 0) (#9)
    by Bill from Dover on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 10:19:24 AM EST
    and just implant a chip in everyone at birth. I mean after all, hell, what do we have to hide?

    Lets not give the authoritarians... (5.00 / 1) (#14)
    by kdog on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 10:43:49 AM EST
    any ideas.  Who am I kidding, plans are probably already in the works to make such an implant mandatory, for the "safety of the children".  

    Over my dead body for me and any potential future offspring.

    Parent

    Indeed... (none / 0) (#24)
    by desertswine on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 12:41:37 PM EST
    it seems so.  And here we enter Philip K Dick territory.

    Parent
    And DNA testing. (none / 0) (#16)
    by 1980Ford on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 10:51:59 AM EST
    Once they have a DNA sample and track people for life, they can track them like ants and track down the this bad trait or that bad trait gene.

    The only genes left will be the going to work gene and the pay your taxes gene and buy stuff gene.

    A perfect society.

    Parent

    adulterers beware (none / 0) (#13)
    by eric on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 10:34:39 AM EST
    This just made cheating on one's spouse a whole lot more difficult.  With one of these hidden inside a car or briefcase, and you are going to have to explain why you were across town at the no-tell Motel.

    Stalkers, Rejoice! (none / 0) (#15)
    by Angie Hartford on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 10:46:53 AM EST
    Look! Another tool to help circumvent those pesky restraining orders. I am utterly appalled that Google would offer such an insidious invasion of privacy. They've just surpassed Wal-Mart on my personal Evil Corporation Meter.

    It's cool technology (none / 0) (#17)
    by roy on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 11:01:03 AM EST
    If companies didn't make products that can be misused, we'd have no strong painkillers, no cutlery, no tape recorders, no gasoline, no baseball bats, no computers, no ...

    This gadget actually looks pretty nice.  I'm thinking I might take it on hikes and use the data to tie my photographs to a map of my route, and to get a more accurate estimate of my speed than I can get with a pedometer.

    So, yeah, thanks Google.

    Rats! (none / 0) (#21)
    by Abdul Abulbul Amir on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 11:17:11 AM EST

    You mean that I might not be able to keep tabs when the teen wants to use the family jalopy?

    I suggest.... (none / 0) (#25)
    by kdog on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 01:53:44 PM EST
    if you trust your kid to use the family car, let 'em use the family car without a spy feature.

    If you don't trust your kid to use the family car, don't let 'em use the family car.

    Parent

    kdig (none / 0) (#28)
    by jimakaPPJ on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 08:46:15 PM EST
    When my children was young I always asked where they were going.

    I never asked where they had went in the car.

    There is no need to force people to fib to you about trivial matters. It gives them practice for doing it on serious matters.

    Parent

    angie, (none / 0) (#26)
    by cpinva on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 02:11:41 PM EST
    that's the first thing that came to my mind: another way for a stalker to track his/her prey.

    this technology has been around for some time, it isn't new. what is new is it's ready availability at the retail level.

    make no mistake, the next generation will have a built-in, rechargeable power supply, obviating the need for bulky batteries, or connection to the vehicle's power source. further, it will be wireless downloadable to your pc, eliminating the necessity of physically retrieving it.

    those restraining orders will become even more useless then they are already.

    So much for "protected" sites (none / 0) (#27)
    by Ereshkigal on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 08:35:59 PM EST
    I assist a number of women trying to escape violent relationships.  We place most in shelters (some of which are mostly hidden) but others in private homes that temporarily house the refugees.

    These private home shelters are sometimes the only safe havens for these women, especially in rural and semi-rural areas.  Usually, we place women into a home across in a different town or county from the one where the woman usually lives.  

    I can easily imagine most of those safe homes disappearing if an abuser had the ability to track down his prey.

    Government intrusion into privacy is a real and growing threat, but the expansion of private persons and corporations to gain access to the private lives of other persons is equally threatening.