home

One Issue Joe

During the Connecticut Senate Democratic primary, Joe Lieberman said:

Ned Lamont seems just to be running against me, based on my stand on one issue, Iraq. . . . I'm a Democrat with a 35-year record of fighting for progressive causes, for the middle class, for civil rights, for women's rights, for human rights and a lot more. I voted with my Senate Democratic colleagues 90 percent of the time. . . .

Joe Lieberman, with Hugh Hewitt yesterday:

[JL:] . . . I’ve declared myself for now an independent. . . . So I’m just watching, and I’m not going to endorse anybody until after the two parties have their nominees, and I’m going to support whoever I think is best for the country, regardless of party. . . .

HH: Oh, that’s fascinating. Last question, how do you think history’s going to evaluate George W. Bush?

JL: . . . I think overall, over time, his ratings among the historians will be greater than his ratings in the polls today. . . .

Thank you Joe for demonstrating how right we were to oppose you for the Democratic nomination for Senate in Connecticut.

< Conrad Black Guilty of Lesser Charges | Presidential Politics And Iraq >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    "One Issue Joe" Great headline. (5.00 / 1) (#1)
    by oculus on Fri Jul 13, 2007 at 04:15:21 PM EST


    "Running On Empty" (none / 0) (#2)
    by Edger on Fri Jul 13, 2007 at 04:58:13 PM EST
    might have made a good one too.

    Parent
    Sheesh... (none / 0) (#3)
    by DawnG on Fri Jul 13, 2007 at 06:32:25 PM EST
    ...that guy is living proof of something very stupid that I can't quite verbalize it's so stupid.

    I used to think the Kosers were too harsh--no more (none / 0) (#4)
    by oculus on Fri Jul 13, 2007 at 06:34:37 PM EST
    Buyer's remorse (none / 0) (#7)
    by GuyTheGuy on Sat Jul 14, 2007 at 11:23:29 AM EST
    How much buyer's remorse do you think the democrats in Conn who voted with the republicans for Liarmann must have? Because you know he got more repub votes than demo votes for the win, making him the repub winner of the state. If the dems of Conn had unity we would not have to put up with this treacherous vile fiend!

    By the way (none / 0) (#8)
    by GuyTheGuy on Sat Jul 14, 2007 at 11:25:17 AM EST
    I would to see a poll of Conn Dem voters about how they fell Liarmann is representing them. Why dosn't any polling firm do this?