home

Troy Davis Gets 90 Day Stay of Execution


The Georgia State Board of Pardons and Parole has granted Troy Davis, scheduled for execution tomorrow, a 90 day stay of execution.
The stay means the execution will be on hold while the board weighs the evidence presented as part of Davis' request for clemency. The board must rule by Oct. 14.

That's what his lawyers were asking for all along, a chance to present their evidence. The actual order is here (pdf).

Original Post 8:00 am :
Executioner's Clock Still Ticking for Troy Davis

Troy Davis is scheduled to be executed in Georgia on Tuesday. Time is running out as concern grows among his supporters that Davis is innocent. Witnesses against him have recanted, some stating their testimony against him was the product of police coercion.

More...

Three of four witnesses who testified at trial that Davis shot the officer have signed statements contradicting their identification of the gunman. Two other witnesses -- a fellow inmate and a neighborhood acquaintance who told police that Davis had confessed to the shooting -- have said they made it up.

Other witnesses point the finger not at Davis but at another man. Yet none has testified during his appeals because federal courts barred their testimony.

AEDPA, the 1996 Anti-Terrorism and Death Penalty Enforcement Act, signed into law by then President Clinton in the aftermath of the Oklahoma City Bombing and intended for Timothy McVeigh, is the culprit.

Before the law, the federal courts intervened to provide "relief" to death row inmates -- that is, a new trial, new sentencing hearing or a commutation of the sentence to life imprisonment -- in about 45 percent of cases, though the rate was declining. But between 2000 and 2007, federal courts intervened to provide such relief to the death row inmate in about 10 percent of cases, according to a forthcoming study.

The law has prevented the Courts from considering new evidence in Troy Davis's case. As I've opined many times here, we should never enact laws as an emotional response to a single tragedy, no matter how horrific. Cooler heads are needed.

In 1895, the United States Supreme Court decided Coffin v. United States, in which it traced the presumption of innocence and the phrase “It is better that X number of guilty men go free than one innocent person be put to death” past England, Ancient Greece and Ancient Rome, and according to one scholar, Greenleaf, to Deuteronomy.

It's time to reconsider the harshness of the habeas restrictions in AEDPA and its one-year limitation period for filing a state prisoner’s federal habeas corpus petition. For a blog devoted to AEDPA issues, check out the AEDPA Law and Policy Blog. Scotus Blog discusses the current state of AEDPA constitutional challenges here.

Mike King, in an Atlanta Journal Constitution op-ed this week urging intervention for Troy Davis, reminds us,

Over the years, 124 death row inmates have been released from state prisons after evidence proved their innocence. Police, prosecutors, judges, witnesses and juries make mistakes, but those mistakes can never be reversed once a death sentence is carried out.

As to how Troy Davis is faring as the executioner's clock keeps ticking:

I just think they made a mistake in the investigation," Davis said by phone last week. "I'm just trying to hold up. . . . I'm trying to maintain my faith that God will step in and soften the judge's heart."

< Shooting at the Colorado Capitol | Judge Dismisses KPMG Charges for Government Misconduct Respecting Right to Counsel >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Comments sort of miss the point... (4.50 / 2) (#3)
    by Strick on Mon Jul 16, 2007 at 10:27:20 AM EST
    Whatever you think about the death penalty, a stay and a new trial seem in order in this case.

    Laws that prevent that are simply wrong.  There should be no statue of limitations on presenting actual, exculpatory evidence, particularly where there's a suggestion of misconduct on the part of the police or prosecutors.  

    If you want to put a limit to appeals, that's one thing.  Ignoring new evidence is something completely different.

    Wrong (none / 0) (#1)
    by 1980Ford on Mon Jul 16, 2007 at 02:47:06 AM EST
    death row exonerations (none / 0) (#4)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Mon Jul 16, 2007 at 11:58:31 AM EST
    The reporter was talking about the number of death row exonerations, which he says is 125
    not "post-conviction DNA exonerations" which, as you say, appear to be 205.

    Although, oddly, from your link:

    There have been 205 post-conviction DNA exonerations in the United States.

    15 of the 205 people exonerated through DNA served time on death row.



    Parent
    Different Stats (none / 0) (#2)
    by Jeralyn on Mon Jul 16, 2007 at 03:45:47 AM EST
    The reporter was talking about the number of death row exonerations, which he says is 125, This is con firmed by the Death Penalty Information Center who puts the nunber at 125.

    The Innocence Project's numbers are at 225 but  not of them  all of  them were in cases where the inmates faced the death penalty.

    Thank you both (5.00 / 1) (#6)
    by 1980Ford on Mon Jul 16, 2007 at 06:38:08 PM EST
    Nothing worse than being wrong when saying someone was wrong.

    I sit corrected.

    Parent

    Well done 1980 (5.00 / 1) (#14)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Tue Jul 17, 2007 at 12:19:09 PM EST
    State-sanctioned Killing Must Stop!!! (none / 0) (#5)
    by notime4lies on Mon Jul 16, 2007 at 02:05:37 PM EST
    No matter what you think about the death penalty, this story should make you rethink the issue and side with abolishing the death penalty.

    That's right, boys and girls.  At 7:00 p.m. tomorrow, peachy Georgia will shackle Davis to a padded metal gurney, inject his veins with a deadly cocktail and if all goes "well," he'll get to meet his maker within minutes. If not, oh dear, give him another cocktail and let him take a "bathroom break." Just like Ohio had to do with former death row inmate Christopher Newton in Ohio where it took more than 10 attempts and two hours to execute him.


    Meanwhile, in North Carolina... (none / 0) (#7)
    by cag1970 on Mon Jul 16, 2007 at 09:30:19 PM EST
    Misty Witherspoon was convicted today in Iredell County of first-degree murder in the shooting death of her husband, a police officer in Concord.  Prosecutors successfully argued that Witherspoon, who changed her story several times, shot her husband because she was afraid to tell him that she had squandered the family's money.  

    I talked to someone with more in-depth knowledge of this case, and that person told me that the Iredell County prosectuor took the death penalty out of consideration on this case very early in the game.  That person believes, as do I, that the prosecutor did it because historically, it is hard to get a jury to sentence a woman to die.

    Women have fought hard for equal opportunity in this country.  Now we, as a society, need to fight for equal responsibility--that is, if a woman can die defending her country, she ought to be able to die just as easily when she commits a capital offense.  If juries are that chicken to sentence a woman to die, they have no business sentencing anyone to die, period.  And in light of the fact that a potentially innocent man might be dying soon, people ought not be wondering why bad things sometimes happen in this great nation of ours.

    Here's the link to the story, for anyone who's interested.  

    What Twisted Thinking... (none / 0) (#10)
    by notime4lies on Tue Jul 17, 2007 at 12:24:42 AM EST
    Oh yea, that's just what this damn country needs.  To have the state execute even more people who may be innocent.

    That is the most idiotic statement I've read in a long, long time.

    Parent

    What powers does the Parole Board have. (none / 0) (#8)
    by Edger on Mon Jul 16, 2007 at 10:34:51 PM EST
    Can they decide whether or not new evidence exonerates him, or if a new trial is warranted?

    No, they can't order a new trial... (none / 0) (#9)
    by notime4lies on Tue Jul 17, 2007 at 12:21:38 AM EST
    They can commute the sentence to life in prison or grant a temporary stay of execution (like they did).  

    The board doesn't have the power to pardon or order a new trial.  The Georgia Supreme Court or the SCOTUS could order a new trial but because of a law that Bill Clinton signed as president, it's extremely difficult.

    Oh well, Bushie could give him the Libby special.

    I'm not sure whether the governor has the power to pardon, although I imagine he does.

    By the bye, the guy who heads the board is running for public office. He's trying to take a Dem seat in the state House.  He's also African-American and graduated from Howard University's law school.


    Parent

    Thanks, notime.... (none / 0) (#11)
    by Edger on Tue Jul 17, 2007 at 02:17:18 AM EST
    perjury (none / 0) (#12)
    by diogenes on Tue Jul 17, 2007 at 10:39:59 AM EST
    If the witnesses recant the testimony they gave at trial, do they get indicted for perjury?

    And commutations? (none / 0) (#13)
    by Edger on Tue Jul 17, 2007 at 10:44:38 AM EST
    perjury (none / 0) (#15)
    by Shadow Wolf on Tue Jul 17, 2007 at 12:42:01 PM EST
    They appear to be safe, due to the statute of limitations.

    Parent
    Execution (none / 0) (#16)
    by Doda on Sat Jul 28, 2007 at 08:07:26 AM EST
    Maybe I am wrong in my thinking, But if a person is caught in the crime, and this person is found guilty by his peirs, then do not put this person in jail for us to take care of for the next 50 years. If this person is given the death sentence, then take them in the back room, put them in the gas chamber, or sick the needle in there arm, or in the electric chair. I don't care which one you use. Put. I feel that if the courts would stop playing games with these thugs, then maybe there would be less criminals in this world. Enough is Enough. You know they did the crime, so don't do the time, put an end to their life, just as they have ended the innocent ones life.

    You are advocating executing innocent people. (1.00 / 1) (#17)
    by Edger on Sat Jul 28, 2007 at 09:33:53 AM EST
    There are good reasons for not doing what you want to do.

    You should read the post more thoroughly.

    Three of four witnesses who testified at trial that Davis shot the officer have signed statements contradicting their identification of the gunman. Two other witnesses -- a fellow inmate and a neighborhood acquaintance who told police that Davis had confessed to the shooting -- have said they made it up.

    Other witnesses point the finger not at Davis but at another man. Yet none has testified during his appeals because federal courts barred their testimony.



    Parent
    you did not read (none / 0) (#19)
    by Doda on Tue Aug 07, 2007 at 06:17:05 PM EST
    You did not read what I said, I said that if a person is caught red handed in the act then, I did not day, if a person is thought to have done it, or if someone points a finger, Being caught in the act, doing the crime is different.

    Parent
    Georgia isn`t a killer state.... (none / 0) (#18)
    by gorgonzola on Sun Aug 05, 2007 at 11:20:31 PM EST
    I`m white.I`m a man.I`m german.I`m happy.

    I`m too fat....and I`m adult.I don`t believe in heroes.

    This story is heardbreaking and perhaps we (I) needed it!Mark Allen MacPhail wasn`t a hero.O no!
    He was THE(!) hero...helping a homeless crying and shouting person,alone against a gang?Shot.Shot.Shot!Dying on the street down there in Savannah...Burger King?McDonalds?
    Troy A. Davis was there.His nickname was RaH...rough as hell..a wonderfull person eventually.So he was the killer.Definitly.
    Really.Really?
    I have biggest doubts,no better nightmares since I read this case!

    C`mon GEORGIA!We have 2007!We need a new trial!
    This is America,this is USA , this is democracy.
    We made a mistake?!WE CAN CORRECT IT!
    NOW!
    We can`t correct it after we killed an innocent.

    GOD BLESS US!                 Sebastian S.