home

Friday Open Thread

I'm busy day-jobbing today.

What are you reading and thinking about today? (Please remember to put any urls in html format because long ones skew the site.)

< The Remedy | ACLU Responds to Dismissal of NSA Wiretapping Case >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    commutation procedures (5.00 / 1) (#1)
    by lawstudent on Fri Jul 06, 2007 at 01:03:37 PM EST
    WSJ law blog has an interesting letter from a law professor.  He represented a man on death row, and sought a commutation of his sentence to give him life with no possibility of release.  He got as far as a private meeting with Alberto Gonzales.  Gonzales laid out the procedures under which President Bush considers all commutations.  Needless to say, it is nowhere close to the procedures he (didn't) follow in the Libby case.  

    Now regardless of whether or not this man should have had his sentence reduced or been put to death, it does provide interesting insight into the Bush administration's handling of commutations, and it comes straight from the horse's mouth.  Or as I like to refer to Gonzales, the horse's ass.  Sorry, I couldn't resist that last one...

    Double Talk (5.00 / 2) (#3)
    by squeaky on Fri Jul 06, 2007 at 03:29:48 PM EST
    A new Iran war think tank has arrived. From TPMM

    Hojjati emphasizes that she doesn't want war. But what she wants even less -- and what her think tank is designed to fight against -- is for the U.S. to acquiesce to the Iranian regime remaining in power.

    So I guess war is the better option.  

    The Institute for Persian Studies... (5.00 / 2) (#4)
    by desertswine on Fri Jul 06, 2007 at 03:54:29 PM EST
    She has two missions: to hasten the overthrow of the Iranian regime, and to convince the American public to support her.

    Why can't these "think-tanks" call themselves what they are. Instead of The Institute for Persian "Studies."


    Parent

    Too Honest (5.00 / 1) (#5)
    by squeaky on Fri Jul 06, 2007 at 03:58:16 PM EST
    Transparency is the devil with these sorts of people.

    Parent
    well it is transparent, (none / 0) (#13)
    by gollo on Fri Jul 06, 2007 at 07:53:02 PM EST
    in a Orwellian way, it just doesn't describe what it is they are "studying".

    As an educated guess, I don't think it will be the same as the British Institute of Persian Studies!

    For a more balanced think tank I recommend British American Security Information Council especially with regard to Iran.

    Parent

    I'm working (5.00 / 2) (#6)
    by DavidDvorkin on Fri Jul 06, 2007 at 04:02:27 PM EST
    Okay.  I'm cheating by reading TalkLeft.  :)

    Ouch (5.00 / 1) (#8)
    by squeaky on Fri Jul 06, 2007 at 04:26:59 PM EST
    So much for the Libby spin job. Doesn't look like it is working.

    26 percent:
    Bush's approval rating in a new Newsweek poll. (Via Atrios.) Newsweek includes this helpful comparison chart:

    think progress

    69 percent:
    Number of voting Americans who "disapprove of President George W. Bush commuting the 30-month prison sentence of I. Lewis `Scooter' Libby."

    think progress

    Electa provides more data:


    I was amazed to learn that the children in my community have been following the Scooter story.  Probably because 85% have a parent(s)  incarcerated and grandmothers are having this discussion around the kitchen table.  Anyhew the kids are rapping a new song as they ride their scooters...Scooter Libby committed a crime, Bush commuted his sentence so he wouldn't drop a dime on Cheney's behind....but my Daddy is doing his time, doing his time, doing his time.  Who's the best man?  who's the greatest man?  Scooter Libby did the crime, Bush gave him freedom not to drop a dime.  Out of the mouths of babes.


    Squeaky (1.00 / 1) (#15)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri Jul 06, 2007 at 08:14:56 PM EST
    One    more    time....

    Bush isn't running in 2008.....

    Parent

    No. (none / 0) (#18)
    by Edger on Fri Jul 06, 2007 at 08:58:19 PM EST
    But the GOP is running next year.

    Bush presidency enters terminal phase
    July 4, 2007

    In last week's CBS poll, 23% of respondents said they approved of his handling of the war, while 70%, including one-third of all self-identified Republicans, said they disapproved. Moreover, a whopping 77% of respondents said the war was going either "somewhat" (30%) or "very badly" (47%).

    A record 40% said all troops should be withdrawn, while another 26% said they favored a decreasing the number of troops there now. A CNN poll taken a few days before showed similar numbers.

    With elections 16 months away, Republican incumbents are increasingly aware that Bush/Cheney has become a serious drag on their political aspirations. And, as the election draws near, the pressure to break with the White House - absent a major change of course, at least in Iraq - will become irresistible, just as it did last week on the immigration bill.

    But being a (heh) "social liberal" I know you won't be concerned when because of Bush the GOP is buried next year and consigned to oblivion for the next 40 or so years.

    Do you think Bush (and Cheney of course) deserve the same rights and treatment than they've given to American Citizens they've had imprisoned and tortured in Guantanamo Bay without charges and trials?

    Or do they deserve better treatment than that?

    Do you think that if they were dragged out of the WH in chains, crying and whimpering and gibbering like the cowards they are, given fair trials and promptly hung, it would help the GOP's prospects next year?

    Parent

    Another (none / 0) (#19)
    by squeaky on Fri Jul 06, 2007 at 09:34:12 PM EST
    Bit from Wingnut World:

    Bush isn't running in 2008.....

    Mindshattering.

    Parent

    Stupefying bit of wisdom, yes. (5.00 / 1) (#20)
    by Edger on Fri Jul 06, 2007 at 09:35:59 PM EST
    Bush won't be the issue. (1.00 / 0) (#31)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat Jul 07, 2007 at 07:46:30 AM EST
    What will be an issue is the attempt at passing the immigration bill. That's tied to the Demos.

    What will be an issue is the attempt to cut off the funding for the troops. That's tied to the Demos.

    What will be an issue is the "The war is lost" comments by Reid and various other Demos.

    What will be an issue is the tax increases the Demos want.

    etc., etc..... The 14% approval rating of Congress will be an issue.. And guess who is in charge???

    Instead of running on social issues that they have a definite edge on... women's rights, minority rights, gay marriage, reform of tax laws, reform of social security, NHC...... the Demos have picked the one issue they can't win on, national security.

    Parent

    I'm busy (5.00 / 1) (#9)
    by aj12754 on Fri Jul 06, 2007 at 04:30:13 PM EST
    prepping the kitchen for a 3 month renovation
    reading Philip Roth's I Married a Communist (excellent by the way and very aprpos for these times)
    marveling at the idiocy of any news organization "covering" the UHC-terrorism connection, and
    giving big props to Jeralyn for fighting the good fight in these times


    Just curious (none / 0) (#16)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri Jul 06, 2007 at 08:16:09 PM EST
    What in the world are you doing that will take three months??

    Parent
    We are... (none / 0) (#21)
    by aj12754 on Fri Jul 06, 2007 at 10:05:31 PM EST
    tearing out two walls, moving a bathroom, replacing all floors and cabinetry and most appliances, rewiring because the electrical wiring in this place (built in 1913) is byzantine, restoring the original look of the exterior which was screwed up with a 1970s era full length window -- really, what aren't we doing?

    Parent
    ajqw754 - Wow!! (none / 0) (#32)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat Jul 07, 2007 at 07:49:04 AM EST
    Having built two and redone two houses... the redo is about 10 times harder.

    Good luck!

    Parent

    Well I worked today... (5.00 / 2) (#10)
    by dutchfox on Fri Jul 06, 2007 at 04:40:39 PM EST
    I do pet sitting in Burlington, VT, so walked some dogs, sprinkled/watered some clients' potted plants under cover (before the afternoon t-storm - the veggies won't need it). Vermonters spend as much time outside for the 2-3 months of real summer we have, so I take advantage of it. I read TL usually in the morning along with other blogs, after I have checked my emails. I check in on TL later on, after the business stuff is over. Usually with a nice cool cocktail and some hors' d'oeuvres to go along with sighing at the craziness and insanity of our beloved country.
    Thanks to TL, I can keep my sanity.

    It's fun (none / 0) (#26)
    by Jeralyn on Fri Jul 06, 2007 at 11:11:39 PM EST
    to learn what TL readers do during the day. I'm always surprised.  And feel flattered they take time to read the site..

    Parent
    Pass the popcorn (5.00 / 1) (#11)
    by Sailor on Fri Jul 06, 2007 at 05:44:00 PM EST
    A woman accused of running a prostitution ring in the nation's capital is free to distribute thousands of pages of phone records after a federal judge lifted a restraining order on Thursday.


    Whooeeee! (5.00 / 1) (#12)
    by squeaky on Fri Jul 06, 2007 at 05:48:16 PM EST
    Wanna bet that the majority of them are part of the "moral majority".

    Oh, that's right they were just getting back massages.

    jajjahhahaha

    Parent

    FTC Abandons Net Neutrality (none / 0) (#2)
    by squeaky on Fri Jul 06, 2007 at 01:42:46 PM EST
    Action alert at Crooks & Liars:

    Afraid of the potential stifling of information to you? Good. Then go to Save The Internet and see what you can do to fight. There are literally only days left for you to get your voice heard.


    Anyone know what happened to guys like (none / 0) (#7)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Fri Jul 06, 2007 at 04:12:18 PM EST
    Gabriel Malor & Deconstructionist? When them and scribe and Peaches got warmed up this blog was at its best. imo, of course...

    Gabe is Out of the Country (none / 0) (#25)
    by Jeralyn on Fri Jul 06, 2007 at 11:09:43 PM EST
    for a few weeks or more, he put that in comments somewhere.

    I don't know where Deconstructionist is.

    Parent

    Thanks J. (none / 0) (#29)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Sat Jul 07, 2007 at 12:19:37 AM EST
    Nolo as well.

    Some of the best dialogues I've ever seen on the internet have been on TL and have involved Nolo and the others I mentioned above.

    When they get rolling - together - I just reach for the popcorn.

    Parent

    Libby, and Madison in 1878 (none / 0) (#14)
    by SteveAudio on Fri Jul 06, 2007 at 08:14:53 PM EST
    Here's my take on the Libby deal, with a shout out to Madison and the Philadelphia Convention of 1787, where he had some pretty good ideas for dealing with Executive obstruction of justice.

    sang-froid; phlegm; imperturbation? not yet (none / 0) (#22)
    by Sumner on Fri Jul 06, 2007 at 10:07:53 PM EST
    While I am with the many currently worked-up-into-a-lather about the administaration's machinations, I acknowledge that we still need many answers.

    I remember watching Orrin Hatch, on the Senate floor some years back, describing that what he likes most about his job as a Senator is being able to use his office to get back at those that would say bad things against him. It just seems too much like a coincidence that Hatch sits on the Senate Intelligence Committee and that his very favorite-thing-about-his-job is what got used to retaliate against Joseph Wilson.

    At least now, the infamous "Feeney Amendment" that had bolstered Hatch's draconian Protect Act, is punctuated with news reports of Rep. Tom Feeney, variously tied to convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff.

    From Sentencing Law and Policy mentioning the Feeney Amendment:

    "[A]ccurate, real-time information on sentencing ... to play an appropriate and effective role in the public debate", ... clearly are being collected and analyzed by DOJ in real-time.

    [I]t is notable that DOJ is not spotlighting or complaining about individual cases in which an imposed sentence was unduly harsh; DOJ seems really concerned not about undue disparity but rather undue leniency.

    [...]

    Daniel Collins, one of the chief proponents of the Feeney Amendment to the PROTECT ACT, stress USSC data in his testimony to argue that "We should not make fundamental structural changes solely to accommodate a problem that does not occur in 99.2% of the cases."  That statement struck me as jarring given that the Feeney Amendment, especially as originally proposed, sought to eliminate virtually all downward departures even though DOJ had identified downward departures as a major concern in some economic and sex offense cases and even though USSC statistics revealed that DOJ was successful in reversing 75% of the departures it appealed.

    And an unusually sober essay on the federal courts and the current mess is offered at CounterPunch.

    Hatch (none / 0) (#23)
    by squeaky on Fri Jul 06, 2007 at 10:16:11 PM EST
    Is repulsive. Among the worst.

    Loaded (none / 0) (#24)
    by squeaky on Fri Jul 06, 2007 at 10:21:44 PM EST
    Prison Video Of Ex-Priest's Slaying Shown On YouTube

    HuffPo

    I inherited my daughter's old nano (none / 0) (#27)
    by Militarytracy on Fri Jul 06, 2007 at 11:15:32 PM EST
    my husband put "my" music on it and I've been practicing being hip.

    LOL Militarytracy you're cracking me up n/t (none / 0) (#28)
    by dutchfox on Sat Jul 07, 2007 at 12:09:20 AM EST
    Today (and tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow) (none / 0) (#30)
    by TomStewart on Sat Jul 07, 2007 at 03:37:54 AM EST
    I'm working on completing my first book (due out in the spring of '08). I only have a three foot stack of research to read and digest, but it's sunny and I can do that in the backyard, under the gazebo.

    With a steady supply of diet Pepsi, of course.

    It's a good thing the (none / 0) (#33)
    by Edger on Sat Jul 07, 2007 at 10:51:06 AM EST
    repugs are so strong on "national security". If they weren't it might cost the country bug bucks paying pensions to ex intelligence officers.

    Whistle-Blower's Fight For Pension Drags On

    By Lyndsey Layton, The Washington Post, Saturday 07 July 2007
    Former defense official seeks private relief bill.

    From a cramped motor home in a Montana campground where Internet access is as spotty as the trout, Richard Barlow wakes each morning to battle Washington.

    Once a top intelligence officer at the Pentagon who helped uncover Pakistan's efforts to acquire nuclear weapons, Barlow insisted on telling the truth, and it led to his undoing.

    He complained in 1989 that top officials in the administration of President George H.W. Bush - including the deputy assistant secretary of defense - were misleading Congress about the Pakistani program. He was fired and stripped of his security clearances. His intelligence career was destroyed; his marriage collapsed.

    Federal investigations found Barlow was unfairly fired, winning him sympathy from dozens of Democratic and Republican lawmakers and public interest groups. But for 17 years, he has fought without success to gain a federal pension, blocked at every turn by legal and political obstacles also faced by other federal intelligence whistle- blowers.

    "This case has been put before the Congress to right a wrong, and for various reasons, they've failed to do it," said Robert Gallucci, dean of the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University and an expert in nonproliferation. "It's infuriating."



    Afghan Civilians Caught in Crossfire (none / 0) (#34)
    by Edger on Sat Jul 07, 2007 at 12:23:33 PM EST
    By Kim Barker, Chicago Tribune, Sunday 08 July 2007
    Kabul, Afghanistan - The men told the same story, of how foreign troops bombed their villages long after the Taliban fighters had left, how the bombs killed women and children, goats and sheep, and how if they had one wish, it would be for the foreigners to leave.

    One man said 60 civilians had been killed in the air strike June 29 in a village in southern Helmand province, one of the most remote and dangerous areas of Afghanistan. Another villager, likely a Taliban sympathizer, exaggerated that as many as 500 innocent people had died, according to video of the bomb's aftermath provided by Ariana TV station, one of the few media outlets to visit the insurgent stronghold.

    "Our children are being killed," said Abdul Qader, who said he lost at least seven family members. "Our homes are being destroyed. We are bombed. They destroy us and they kill us. What should we do?"

    The air strike, near the village of Hyderabad, came after fighting between the Taliban and Afghan soldiers supported by the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force. The video showed shrapnel- riddled tractors and mangled cars and homes that looked like piles of crushed crackers.

    Such bombings and the allegations of civilian casualties, exaggerated or not, are now the biggest challenge facing foreign forces trying to prop up Afghanistan's government. More than any suicide bombing or insurgent offensive, this issue has the potential to undermine foreign troops and ultimately hurt the NATO mission in Afghanistan, Western diplomats and Afghan officials say.



    More on That New Iran "Think Tank" (none / 0) (#35)
    by squeaky on Sun Jul 08, 2007 at 12:44:33 PM EST
    Some background on Mattie Fein aka Mattie Lolavar aka Mahtaub Hojjati aka Mattie Lolavar-Cohen & the Institute for Persian Studies.  

    Boy sure sounds like a plot akin to the Niger Forgeries. Wonder how many others like her get checks from US taxpayers via Cheney's et al discretionary slush funds.

    And as Laura Rozen asks: I am just curious, how does IKON do PR for the Argentinian intelligence chief for a year without uh registering as a foreign agent? The Israelis don't have to register either.....hnmmmmm

    TPM