home

Cheney Says He Has NSA Warrantless Spying Docs, Won't Turn Them over

The Washington Post reports:

Vice President Cheney's office acknowledged for the first time yesterday that it has dozens of documents related to the administration's warrantless surveillance program, but it signaled that it will resist efforts by congressional Democrats to obtain them.

Among the docuemnts Cheney acknowledges having in his possession:

They include 43 separate authorizations from President Bush for the program, which had to be renewed approximately every 45 days beginning on Oct. 4, 2001.

The letter also lists dates, from October 2001 through February 2005, for 10 legal memoranda from the Justice Department. Although Cheney's office has copies of the memos, none of them "was rendered to the Office of the Vice President," Coffin wrote.

As to 2004, the year of the Ashcroft hospital visit,

Coffin's letter indicates that Bush signed memos amending the program on March 19 and April 2 of that year. The details of the dispute have never been revealed publicly.

Th March 19 and April 2 memos amending the plan, signed by Bush, would seem to be key in understanding the objections of those in the Justice Department. I hope the Senate Judiciary Committee sticks with their plan to seek to hold the White House in contempt for not turning them over.

Update: Marty Lederman at Balkanization parses the letter from Cheney's office.

< Bush Administration Opposes Health Care For Children | Karl Rove and the Mining Disaster: Connecting the Dots >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Earthen dam springs a leak. (5.00 / 1) (#1)
    by Semanticleo on Tue Aug 21, 2007 at 10:09:43 AM EST
    Does anyone remember the Nixon Tapes?

    This could be the metaphorical equivalent.

    I say 'could be' because of the makeup of
    the El Supremos, and the  pusillanimous
    Dems in Congress

    Leahy is gutless (5.00 / 1) (#2)
    by cmpnwtr on Tue Aug 21, 2007 at 10:26:24 AM EST
    I think the plan here is for Senator Leahy to get realllllllllllllllly mad and hold his breath, now that the White House has failed to comply with subpoenas.

    Leahy (5.00 / 2) (#3)
    by Edger on Tue Aug 21, 2007 at 10:35:15 AM EST
    has been threatening more contempt of Congress charges over the WH refusal, through Fred Fielding, to comply with Judiciary Committee subpoenas.

    The Vermont Senator said he'll begin contempt proceedings in the Judiciary Committee if the Bush administration does not comply with the subpoenas by the end of the current congressional recess. A majority of Judiciary Committee members would have to endorse the decision to begin criminal proceedings before the full Senate could consider pursuing prosecution.
    Will the rest of committee follow through on Leahys lead, or was it a gutless meaningless move on his part?

    Parent
    Link for (5.00 / 1) (#4)
    by Edger on Tue Aug 21, 2007 at 10:36:14 AM EST
    Sadly I have to agree (none / 0) (#7)
    by tnthorpe on Tue Aug 21, 2007 at 06:53:50 PM EST
    I saw the press conference early this morning on a C-Span rerun, and Sen. Leahy openly acknowledges that Bush broke the law. You can link here to the page on C-Span with the link.
    His rationale for Democratic inability to prevent the egregious FISA expansion amounted to pointing out that he didn't vote for it. I'm sure it's no picnic to be a Senator with the present crew in the White House or to be a Democrat what with all the bluedogs crossing the aisle at the drop of a hat or the threat of a mean word from the White House press secretary, but a more assertive strategy, since after all the law, reason, and ethical duty are on his side, would be much appreciated. Word for the day, Senator, is impeachment.

    Parent
    Cheney has Inherent Contempt (5.00 / 1) (#6)
    by scarshapedstar on Tue Aug 21, 2007 at 05:40:20 PM EST
    for democracy, the rule of law, and the American people.

    I just have to ask (1.00 / 0) (#8)
    by jimakaPPJ on Wed Aug 22, 2007 at 07:51:22 AM EST
    Th March 19 and April 2 memos amending the plan, signed by Bush, would seem to be key in understanding the objections of those in the Justice Department. I hope the Senate Judiciary Committee sticks with their plan to seek to hold the White House in contempt for not turning them over.

    Given that the dispute was settled, and given that Comey agreed, what does any of this protend? Who cares what the objections were? The objectors won.

    In the meantime, the do-nothing Congress rocks along  doing nothing on health care... drug law reform...gay marriage...

    well then (5.00 / 2) (#9)
    by Jen M on Wed Aug 22, 2007 at 09:04:04 AM EST
    there's nothing to worry about, they did nothing wrong. They can turn over the documents tomorow.

    Parent
    Love your logic (1.00 / 1) (#10)
    by jimakaPPJ on Wed Aug 22, 2007 at 10:21:12 AM EST
    Glad to see that you now support warrantless wiretaps..

    After all, I'm sure you have nothing to hide..

    Parent

    wiretaps (5.00 / 0) (#11)
    by Jen M on Wed Aug 22, 2007 at 12:12:03 PM EST
    where I grew up one assumed them.

    You know, a country with a military dictatorship?

    Parent

    Does Leahy think the WH uses archival scriveners? (none / 0) (#5)
    by Ellie on Tue Aug 21, 2007 at 11:07:12 AM EST
    These ignored requests must be in double digits now. Last time I looked the total was stalled near ten.

    Leahy Sets Warrantless Wiretapping Subpoena Deadline
    By Paul Kiel - August 8, 2007, 3:12 PM

    Saying that he's waited long enough for the White House to comply, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy [D-Now It's Just Getting Sad] set a new deadline for documents ... August 20th is the date [...]

    Leahy [D-Seriously, an empty chair is more threatening ...]had, at the request of White House counsel Fred Fielding, delayed a prior deadline. But now that an informal date suggested by the White House has come and gone, Leahy [D- ... esp. if it has old or uneven springs] writes to Fielding that he's running out of patience  [...]

    Fortunately, the nation has been protected from the prospect of Leahy actually losing patience thanks to the Bush admin's bold policy of drilling for it in vast, previously unspoilt wildernesses.