Not so.

The core error in the theology which drives the McCain/Palin (McPain ?) so-called Christianist supporters is that their belief system (in practice) has made god in man's image.

Their god is susceptible to flattery and bribery from/through offerings of all sorts.
Their god is not omniscient - because it takes lots and lots of petitionary prayer to tell their god what needs to happen.
Their god is not omnipotent - because the devil still exists and the outcome of the battle between good and evil is in doubt.
Their god is not omnipresent - because there are areas where his word has to be spread.
Their god's followers, well, they're at least a little arrogant, because they know what god has to do for them and the followers aren't shy about telling him.

I could go on, but you get the idea.  The McPain god is a 98 pound weakling who doesn't know what is going on and needs to be told what to do, when, how, and how much.  And could lose at any moment.

And, FWIW, McCain has bought into this error lock, stock and barrel - remember the question about what he would do about evil, which was put to him by the megachurch pastor at the joint Obama/McCain megachurch presentation?  Remember McCain's answer:  "I'll defeat evil."

How is it that feeble, doddering old McCain proposes to defeat evil, when the McPain god can't?

Hmmmm?

Our children have sacred value and every child is equally valuable. . . .   Some of us have philosophic, humanitarian, and theological differences with those who put forth abortion as an appropriate routine and acceptable birth-control procedure. There are millions of us who would hold that such a position conflicts with our conviction regarding our sacred responsibility to our children and to human life itself.

Surely we cannot be pleased with the routine administration of millions of surgically terminated pregnancies. Something within us must be calling for a better way. If we do not resist at this point, at point will we resist. We know that our party will understand and acknowledge the moral and spiritual pain that so many of us feel because of this disregard for the lives of the unborn. . . .

Senator Obama should follow up and elaborate upon his stated intention to reduce the number of abortions by providing alternative programs which will by various approaches result in the prevention of unwanted pregnancies. . . .

But what they quote of the condemnation seems to maintain that there is indeed a question about Obama's religious background:

"While we understand the important role that faith plays in informing the votes of Iowans, questions about the religious background of the candidates only serve to distract from the real questions in this race about Barack Obama's judgment, policies and readiness to lead as commander in chief," said Wendy Riemann, McCain's Iowa spokesperson.