home

The New Right: Fighting For The Middle Class By Blaming It

The new line on the failure of Republicanism from the David Brooks right, wrapped in pretty words and "compassion," is well delivered here by Ross Douthat, it is "liberalism's" fault. Reprising the debate between George Bailey and Mr. Potter in It's A Wonderful Life, Douthat blames Baileyism run rampant:

[T]he fact that Baileyism may have gone too far doesn't meant that the Bailey vision isn't worth defending in the long run.

Apparently Potterism (greed leading to income inequality) had nothing to do with it. It was all Mr. Martini's and George Bailey's fault. Douthat uses the pernicious Brooksian device of playing the "reasonable conservative" all the while adopting the divisive and fallcious world view of the most extreme conservatives, in order to attempt to discredit progressivism. During the last 8 years, it toook many on the Left a long while to realize that David Brooks was a mendacious cretin. I wonder how long it will take for them to see the same things in the new Brookses sure to emerge. Hopefully, not as long.

By Big Tent Democrat, speaking for me only

< Will McCain Resolve Conflicting Advice, Or Will He Explode? | Mandates And A New Hundred Days >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    I really have nothing (5.00 / 1) (#1)
    by Fabian on Sun Oct 12, 2008 at 09:13:46 AM EST
    against the American dream of home ownership.  

    I do have something against financial institutions selling high risk loans as low risk investments.  If the high risk loans were sold as such, much of this wouldn't have happened.  Of course, the economy would have slowed down much sooner, probably years earlier, possibly even costing Bush the 2004 election.

    It's not about home ownership or the American Dream, it's about the financial institutions who packaged and sold high risk loans as low risk investments.