home

NYT Endorses Obama

It's no surprise that The New York Times endorsed Barack Obama. The lengthy editorial makes a compelling case for Obama if you're still in doubt.

< Will the Big Ten Sweep? | A Smart Use of Inmate Resources >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Oh, my... (5.00 / 0) (#1)
    by Radiowalla on Thu Oct 23, 2008 at 09:14:18 PM EST
    this is a beautiful piece, a summation of the campaign and a clarion call for the future.  Good work, NYTimes!  I love that librul media!

    OT (5.00 / 1) (#2)
    by CoralGables on Thu Oct 23, 2008 at 09:16:58 PM EST
    but newspaper related. Has your ability to appear presidential faded, and your campaign come off the rails, when the headline in a major newspaper (The Miami Herald) reads"

    "McCain's 'Joe the Plumber' tour reaches Sarasota"

    May be OT (5.00 / 0) (#9)
    by cal1942 on Thu Oct 23, 2008 at 11:02:29 PM EST
    but thanks for sharing that CoralGables.

    What a great headline and so fitting the McCain campaign and the major joke it's been from the start.

    LOL

    Parent

    There was a time (5.00 / 2) (#4)
    by NYShooter on Thu Oct 23, 2008 at 10:04:03 PM EST
    when quoting the NYT meant something. Other than Krugman, and the classified section, they're just playing "follow the leader."

    They're still good for (5.00 / 1) (#7)
    by nycstray on Thu Oct 23, 2008 at 10:43:33 PM EST
    lining cages . . . . or litter boxes.

    Parent
    Must champion the arts sections. (5.00 / 1) (#8)
    by oculus on Thu Oct 23, 2008 at 10:57:19 PM EST
    Wow...I am shocked. (5.00 / 2) (#6)
    by Stellaaa on Thu Oct 23, 2008 at 10:41:32 PM EST
     

    Good (5.00 / 0) (#10)
    by cal1942 on Thu Oct 23, 2008 at 11:04:40 PM EST
    comprehensive editorial, clear and to the point.

    It was compelling, (none / 0) (#3)
    by mg7505 on Thu Oct 23, 2008 at 09:20:25 PM EST
    but didn't contain a single new argument. The tardiness shocked me -- in fact, I thought the NYT had already endorsed Obama, and that their website had a glitch ... until I saw the date.

    sadly true. (none / 0) (#5)
    by cpinva on Thu Oct 23, 2008 at 10:16:52 PM EST
    There was a time when quoting the NYT meant something. Other than Krugman, and the classified section, they're just playing "follow the leader."

    if there was a shred of decency left in the world, the nyt's would have kadish said over it, and be given a nice christian/judao burial.