home

The GOP "Night of The Long Knives"

Here's an interesting Republican take on what the GOP should do now:

Now, what about those whom Obama and his supporters vanquished? What the Republican party badly needs is a Night of the Long Knives [Link supplied].

All righty then. I wonder if Deroy Murdock would welcome Joe Lieberman to the Republican Party?

By Big Tent Democrat, speaking for me only

< The Blogs And Obama | Search Still On For Missing White House Emails >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Yes, that's what the Republican party needs (5.00 / 4) (#1)
    by lilburro on Mon Nov 10, 2008 at 04:54:29 PM EST
    Nazi symbolism...

    To go along with their practices? (5.00 / 2) (#4)
    by scribe on Mon Nov 10, 2008 at 05:09:21 PM EST
    How convenient they bring it up on the 70th Anniversary of Kristallnacht?

    And, oh, BTW.  

    If that's the symbolism they're choosing to use, it's probably not a good idea to be a member of the Log Cabin Republicans, seeing as how the homosexual members of the Nazi party leadership (e.g., Roehm of the SA)were among the most prominent targets on their Night of Long Knives...  Viz.:

    a series of political executions, most of those killed being members of the Sturmabteilung (SA), a Nazi paramilitary organization. Adolf Hitler moved against the SA and its leader, Ernst Röhm, because he saw the independence of the SA and the penchant of its members for street violence as a direct threat to his power (fn A). Hitler also wanted to conciliate leaders of the Reichswehr, the official German military. They both feared and despised the SA and in particular feared Röhm's ambition to absorb the Reichswehr into the SA under his own leadership. Finally, Hitler used the purge to go against critics of his regime, especially those loyal to Vice-Chancellor Franz von Papen, and to settle scores with old enemies.

    At least 85 people died during the purge, although the final death toll may have been in the hundreds, and more than a thousand perceived opponents were arrested. Most of the killings were carried out by the Schutzstaffel (SS), an elite Nazi corps, and the Gestapo (Geheime Staatspolizei), the regime's secret police. The purge strengthened and consolidated the support of the Reichswehr for Hitler. It also provided a legal grounding for the Nazi regime, as the German courts and cabinet quickly swept aside centuries of legal prohibition against extra-judicial killings to demonstrate their loyalty to the regime (fn B). [my emphasis]

    And it used to be that the first guy in the argument who mentioned parallels to Nazism in the conduct of today's Republicans, was deemed to have lost the argument.  Wonder what that says about today's Republicans, when they deliberately bring it up....

    -

    (A)  Not that today's Republicans have any antipathy for street violence, as they've shown in Florida, 2000, Minneapolis this year, and anywhere within the sound of Palin's rabblerousing.
    (B) Does the italicized text sound eerily familiar?  Not that today's Republicans don't have the utmost respect and deference to the Courts and Rule of Law.  (I still get queasy thinking about James Baker intoning The Rule Of Law as triumphant in his announcement justifying their acceptance of Bush v. Gore).

    Parent

    Quirky oddity (none / 0) (#16)
    by lilburro on Mon Nov 10, 2008 at 08:54:12 PM EST
    of the zeitgeist - homosexuals were actually a bloc that Republicans gained in during this election.

    Parent
    lilburro (5.00 / 1) (#20)
    by cal1942 on Mon Nov 10, 2008 at 10:50:02 PM EST
    did you forget da rulz that it's OK for Republicans to call Democrats Socialists, Communists and terrorist fellow travelers but not OK to call Republicans Nazis?

    Always remember the double standard.

    Parent

    Indeed (none / 0) (#2)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Mon Nov 10, 2008 at 04:58:06 PM EST
    I wonder what the late Dean Barnett would make of this.

    Parent
    It's kind of funny (none / 0) (#3)
    by lilburro on Mon Nov 10, 2008 at 05:02:36 PM EST
    did he not notice the GOP is only white people now?

    But the market sees no color!!!  Er, not.

    Parent

    Meanwhile.... (5.00 / 4) (#6)
    by kdog on Mon Nov 10, 2008 at 05:14:13 PM EST
    the editorial writer sounds like one of the heretics he wants to expel.

    Decries Bush's spending while implying Iraq and Afghanistan was money well spent, praises St. Ron when he was the guy who made fiscal irresponsibility cool...distorting the principles he criticizes Bush and Rove for betraying.  

    He had some valid criticism in there and went and ruined it by being full of sh*t.

    After they get rid of the "heretics"... (5.00 / 1) (#12)
    by santarita on Mon Nov 10, 2008 at 07:21:53 PM EST
    who will be left to turn out the lights?

    Frankly the GOP (5.00 / 1) (#15)
    by Slado on Mon Nov 10, 2008 at 08:22:02 PM EST
    needs better candidates.   It was only 4years ago that democrats where pickinp up the pieces.

    Events go a long way to determin the changing tide of politics and candidates do the rest.

    Events caused americans to give the democrats a chance and Obama burst through the door.

    Events will turn on the democrats and republicans if they put forth better candidates will get thier chance again.  

    And those (none / 0) (#23)
    by cal1942 on Tue Nov 11, 2008 at 12:49:17 AM EST
    events were both the result of GOP policy and the failure of GOP policy to respond to events outside anyone's control.

    Additionally, the GOP now has a paucity of candidates because they've purged their liberals and real moderates and now accept only moron schmucks as proper candidates.

    The GOP is too embarrassing for decent people to attach themselves as candidates.

    Parent

    Political opportunism (none / 0) (#26)
    by Fabian on Tue Nov 11, 2008 at 05:10:32 AM EST
    is truly a bipartisan enterprise.

    Parent
    Perhaps the GOP will drown itself in a (5.00 / 1) (#18)
    by ThatOneVoter on Mon Nov 10, 2008 at 09:08:15 PM EST
    bathtub, once its ranks are small enough. That would be a fitting end.

    Shhhhh (none / 0) (#25)
    by cal1942 on Tue Nov 11, 2008 at 12:59:51 AM EST
    don't tell 'em that purging Grover would be the first positive step.

    Parent
    /long mordant chuckle. (none / 0) (#5)
    by Faust on Mon Nov 10, 2008 at 05:13:46 PM EST


    unbelievable (none / 0) (#7)
    by coigue on Mon Nov 10, 2008 at 05:20:14 PM EST


    Operation Leper? (none / 0) (#8)
    by squeaky on Mon Nov 10, 2008 at 05:52:57 PM EST
    RedState is pleased to announce it is engaging in a special project: Operation Leper.

    We're tracking down all the people from the McCain campaign now whispering smears against Governor Palin to Carl Cameron and others. Michelle Malkin has the details.

    We intend to constantly remind the base about these people, monitor who they are working for, and, when 2012 rolls around, see which candidates hire them. Naturally then, you'll see us go to war against those candidates.

    It is our expressed intention to make these few people political lepers.


    da

    dave neiwert

    Anyone else hear (none / 0) (#10)
    by BackFromOhio on Mon Nov 10, 2008 at 07:03:59 PM EST
    the smears are coming from Mitt?

    Parent
    So they (none / 0) (#24)
    by cal1942 on Tue Nov 11, 2008 at 12:56:01 AM EST
    feel they'll succeed by purging from their ranks those who spoke out against ignorance.

    Boffo plan.  Can we all watch.

    Parent

    and here's the knife (none / 0) (#11)
    by Salo on Mon Nov 10, 2008 at 07:07:26 PM EST
    serrated or knotched sir? Ceramic or cold steel m'dam? Let the black shirts finish off the browns as it were...

    Translation (none / 0) (#14)
    by WS on Mon Nov 10, 2008 at 07:59:08 PM EST
    Deroy Murdoch: The GOP lost because our coalition was too big!  Time for a purge!

    Should read (none / 0) (#17)
    by WS on Mon Nov 10, 2008 at 09:01:30 PM EST
    Deroy Murdoch: Our coalition is not small enough!  Time to purge!

    Parent
    I keep hearing stories about (none / 0) (#19)
    by kenosharick on Mon Nov 10, 2008 at 09:25:41 PM EST
    who will be the new gop "stars" and Rep. Eric Cantor keeps coming up. I have seen him several times and I think he makes sarah palin look like Einstein by comparison. I'd be more concerned about Bobby Jindal or Paul Ryan of Wis.

    This ought to be (none / 0) (#21)
    by cal1942 on Mon Nov 10, 2008 at 11:06:15 PM EST
    interesting.  If the rest of the gang is as clueless as Murdock they may wander into oblivion as fast as the old Whig party.

    BTD's part about giving them Lieberman still has me LOL.  With friends like that eh.

    i say, let 'm go for it. (none / 0) (#22)
    by cpinva on Mon Nov 10, 2008 at 11:40:38 PM EST
    the last one can stab himself. certainly no great loss to humanity, and the air will surely be the cleaner for it.

    certainly an apropriate analogy, for a party that has styled itself (perhaps unconsciously, perhaps not) after a group raised to power by a madman, and responsible for the death of millions, and trillions in destruction.

    i can see the skinheads flocking to them as we speak.

    This has been coming for a long time (none / 0) (#27)
    by SeeEmDee on Tue Nov 11, 2008 at 06:02:23 AM EST
    The split between the Goldwater and Rockefeller Wings of the Republican Party, formerly a matter of keeping family dirty laundry from being public, has now caused said dirty laundry to be run up the flagpole for all to see.

    Those who considered themselves 'traditional conservatives' of the Goldwater type have ground their teeth in frustration for decades at the 'Invasion of the Principle Snatchers' as illustrated by the NeoCons inserting themselves into the fold and then, like a virus, changing the environment to suit themselves. Like with most viruses, that usually means the host suffers and quite possibly dies. That's why the Libbers split off from the Reps back in 1971.

    As I once read long ago, "The Devil can quote Scripture for his own purposes". And while the remaining Reps still mouthed Randian philosophy, the former(?) Trotskyites comprising the NeoCons were busy 'quoting Scripture' while doing what they always wanted to, and that is to use the apparatus of government for their own social engineering (and mercantile) purposes. And this is what happens when the music stops during the political musical chair game.

    No 'long knives', no scalpels wielded deftly, no lasers, no antibiotics, nothing, can save the Reps from the internal cancer they've allowed to spread within their ranks; it's now metastasized. This has actually been a long time coming, and like a freight train, can't be stopped on a dime after running full throttle for so long. It's own inertia will add to the inevitable crash.

    An Inconvenient Truth (none / 0) (#28)
    by jsj20002 on Tue Nov 11, 2008 at 08:34:32 AM EST
    The temporary coalition of the religious right and the small government conservatives has destroyed the principles that underlay Goldwater conservatism. I don't believe Goldwater would have championed using the Federal government to punish gays, oppose freedom of choice, deny women equality, incarcerate the addicted, teach creationism, support prayer in school, etc. The Republicans can choose to be either a theocratic party attempting to impose a national Taliban-like moral code or they can choose to be a small government party that champions personal liberty, but they cannot be both.        

    There's been liberal use (none / 0) (#29)
    by OldCity on Tue Nov 11, 2008 at 09:04:41 AM EST
    or should I say, misuse of the terms, "socialist", "Marxist", and certainly "fascist" by (mostly) Republican operatives.

    I mean, aside of Seseseko, or Salazar in Portugal, who's really led a truly effective Fascist movement?  In what construct can anyone ever imagine such a movement taking hold in America?  We have no common ethnicity, our commonality is one of ideals.  We also, despite the efforts of the Bush administration, continue to have an abiding belief in individual rights.  And, let's not forget that religious diversity that exist in this country.

    As for Socialism and Marxism...c'mon.  The redistributive policies Obama advocates are more relevant to Progressivism than they are anything.  Marxism died with advent of Stalinism.  "Socialism" as practiced recently in France and Latin America has been a failure.  Any idea that such wholesale restructuring not just of the policies of the government but of the actual structure, is ludicrous.  

    The use of the "langen Messer" language is heinous in the extreme.  It shows a historical insensitvity as well as pure social ignorance.