home

Tweety Matthews Mulling Run For PA Senate

So says Poblano:

According to multiple sources, who confirmed the Tip O'Neill staffer-cum-MSNBC host has negotiated with veteran Obama staffers to enlist in his campaign, Chris Matthews is likely to run for United States Senate in Pennsylvania in 2010. Matthews, 62, would run as a Democrat.

I would strongly oppose a Tweety candidacy for ANY office, including, but not limited to, dog catcher. The man is an embarrassment.

Speaking for me only

< Wrongfully Imprisoned Man Set Free in Time For Thanksgiving | MoDo Speculates: Am I Going To Be Outsourced? >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Apparently Matthews shot it down (5.00 / 1) (#2)
    by andgarden on Sun Nov 30, 2008 at 09:45:24 AM EST
    I don't think he'll run, but if he does, he'll lose the primary.

    If Specter retires, there's a very good chance that our next Senator will be a Democrat from the Southeast; either Joe Sestak or Allyson Schwartz.

    What about Rendel? (none / 0) (#26)
    by BackFromOhio on Sun Nov 30, 2008 at 12:11:14 PM EST
    No way (5.00 / 1) (#27)
    by andgarden on Sun Nov 30, 2008 at 12:15:11 PM EST
    First, Specter is an old friend of his, and second, he would hate being a Senator.

    Parent
    That is a thought. (none / 0) (#28)
    by BarnBabe on Sun Nov 30, 2008 at 12:22:34 PM EST
    He will be finishing up his 2nd 4 year term and thus not be able to run for Governor again. It would work. A LOT better than Tweety. And he should have little trouble winning a Senate Seat. All up to Arlen. I would have trouble voting for Matthews. Arlen gets a lot of Democratic votes in the state.

    Parent
    I hope if he does run (5.00 / 5) (#6)
    by Jjc2008 on Sun Nov 30, 2008 at 09:53:11 AM EST
    I will have been able to make my move back to PA.
    I grew up not far from where that misogynistic blowhard grew up.  We are the same age and "came of age" at the same time.

    I KNOW Matthews....or rather I know his ilk.  He likes to claim Philly roots.  He's a suburban elite...he went to private prep schools and was reared in a part of the burbs that looked their noses down on those of us from the steel towns.  
    He was of the "Grace Kelly" ilk (not that Ms Kelly was a bad person but many of the Irish catholics of that area and era elevated her as the icon of their goals.....rich, beautiful, and living in areas where the rest of us had parents and grandparents who worked as the gardeners, the housekeepers).

    Matthews, Buchannan, and all that MSNBC crew of the Catholic boys club have this built in misogyny and they totally looked down on other ethnic groups.  

    I remember going to mixers at the catholic prep schools (our parishes arranged for us to "mix" with those nice catholic boys).  Their arrogance was palatable especially toward those of us who happen to be Italian or Polish (the old prejudices of our parents had not yet left some of those my age).  Every time Matthews drooled over the "Guiliani" stereotype he had in his head, I got it. He was using his mental stereotypes of Italian mobster that he both admired and loathed.

     Don't get me wrong.  I despise Guiliani but it was Matthews stupid "tough street guy" meme that was laughable.  Guiliani, Scalia, Aliton are the worse icons I can think of when it came to people like my immigrant parents who left their homeland to get away from fascist mentality.

    Matthews admires the macho man still. He is the classic male of that era of the Catholic church, permanently STUCK in the arena of paternalistic, religious dominance of all unlike him.

    I swear if I am back there then, I would support ANYONE running against that twit....and if push came to shove I would run myself and use every YouTube incidence of his drooling of W, and trashing women.

    If you run (5.00 / 3) (#7)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Sun Nov 30, 2008 at 09:58:26 AM EST
    and Tweety has no other challengers, you have my support.

    Parent
    He went to (5.00 / 1) (#9)
    by andgarden on Sun Nov 30, 2008 at 10:03:26 AM EST
    La Salle.

    What's funny is that, even if he holds the snobberies you suggest, he still wouldn't have been at the top of the food chain. The WASPs would have looked down their martini glasses at him.

    Parent

    You're right (5.00 / 2) (#13)
    by Jjc2008 on Sun Nov 30, 2008 at 10:28:04 AM EST
    The WASPS he so adores and drools over (like W and Thompson) would not have let him be anything more than a "gopher".

    Oh yea, La Salle.  Couldn't remember which one it was....went to a lot of mixers there. I am sure at some point we crossed paths.  Being very dark and ethnic looking, I am sure he and his friends would not have glanced my way.  Back in those times, the look was "blonde, wasp, and no curves" (think Twiggy).  I was more in the "exotic" curvy category of young women with really dark hair, dark skin.....oh how I wanted to be blonde and fit in.

    Parent

    Matthews deserves a dose of his own medicine (none / 0) (#31)
    by S on Sun Nov 30, 2008 at 02:35:18 PM EST
    If Matthews does run, I hope all or us that have seen his 'true colors' are starting their oppo research...collecting quotes of all the most sexist...AND hypocritical things he has said...

    quotes like how Matthews gushed over Bush and Mission Accomplished and opined on how Bush was such a regular guy to have a beer with and how he looked like Tom Cruise in his get up on the ship...

    ...and all the republicans butts he kissed against Al Gore and even Kerry...his friendships with his self proclaimed "buddies' like G Liddy and Tom Delay...etc, etc, etc...clips of him setting up Dems to make them look like fools...and cavorting softball with Repubs all during the bush admin...

    this man has been such a traitor to the Democrats and beyond sexist and manipulative to women...his irrational hate for Hillary and Bill knows no bounds...

    if he runs...there will be a democratic 'army' prepared to run against him...

    Parent

    Matthews (5.00 / 3) (#12)
    by sas on Sun Nov 30, 2008 at 10:26:14 AM EST
    is a political junkie, not a policy wonk.  Will he work for the people of Pennsylvania?

    Can you think of anyone running for office temperamentally less qualified?

    We know that he is a sexist, and possibly a misogynist.  We know he interrupts people as they speakW we know he has comprimised any journalistic integrity he might have had by admitting on Morning Joe that it is his job to help the Obama presidency succeed.  We know over the years he has berated his guests, and has practiced selective listening.

    I cannot imagine that I would vote for him.  Certainly there are many others more qualified, who truly wish to serve.

    Tweety (none / 0) (#1)
    by Joe the carpenter on Sun Nov 30, 2008 at 09:43:50 AM EST
    vewy vewy scawy....lol

    Well, to quote myself (none / 0) (#3)
    by oldpro on Sun Nov 30, 2008 at 09:45:53 AM EST
    and hijack my comment from the previous thread on this topic:

    "Matthews will have to be careful if he really does want to run for the senate as a Democrat.
    I'm hoping against hope that he does and gets a well-deserved dose of the medicine he's been dispensing.  He'd probably be taken out in the primary but in fact it might be more useful to bury him in the senate where showboats are sometimes shunned.

    Don't know how he'd survive without the limelight of a weekly television show or two."

    Suppose his media friends would promote him?  Oh, yeah.  Could be a circus and a bigtime distraction.

    Tweety (none / 0) (#4)
    by 21787432 on Sun Nov 30, 2008 at 09:51:55 AM EST
    He knows first hand about the support he will receive from the liberal media. However, I am all for him running. I want him to explain the "tingle" he gets everytime Obama speaks.

    How about the codpiece tingle? (5.00 / 2) (#11)
    by Stellaaa on Sun Nov 30, 2008 at 10:16:47 AM EST
    That is when the tingling started.

    Parent
    he'd be a harbinger of defeat. (none / 0) (#5)
    by Salo on Sun Nov 30, 2008 at 09:52:00 AM EST
    he'd be one of the characters like franken who wins in a
    Nailbiter or lose in nailbiter.

    Noooo (none / 0) (#8)
    by WS on Sun Nov 30, 2008 at 10:01:09 AM EST
    I don't want controversial celebrity candidates to run as Democrats anymore like what happened with Franken (I really like Franken but a more generic Democrat would have had an easier time with Coleman).  

    I'm okay with celebrity candidates. But I don't want those with heavy baggage like what Matthews has.  

    Franken has displayed more (5.00 / 5) (#10)
    by Fabian on Sun Nov 30, 2008 at 10:13:59 AM EST
    interest in actual governance.  Matthews just likes politics and seems not to care about what government does or is supposed to do.

    Parent
    Exactly. There is no comparison between (5.00 / 2) (#17)
    by ruffian on Sun Nov 30, 2008 at 10:54:11 AM EST
    the two, though I'm sure that is how it would be talked about. Matthews has never bothered himself to learn the facts of any policy topic in all the years he has had his show.  

    Parent
    Agreed (none / 0) (#14)
    by Lora on Sun Nov 30, 2008 at 10:32:06 AM EST
    I dislike him intensly.  As a Pennsylvanian, I can only hope he is not on the ticket.

    There are no words to describe (none / 0) (#15)
    by ruffian on Sun Nov 30, 2008 at 10:49:56 AM EST
    how strongly I would oppose this vanity run. Who's next, Rush? Despite all evidence to the contrary I like to think of the Senate as a place for serious people. Tweety cares for nothing but his own ego.

    Aye (none / 0) (#16)
    by pluege on Sun Nov 30, 2008 at 10:50:22 AM EST
    Second to the hell no, never motion on Senator wannabe Tweety. Mathews is just another egomaniac looking for self-aggrandizement at the expense of the American people.


    I would love to dump Arlen Specter (none / 0) (#18)
    by lucky leftie on Sun Nov 30, 2008 at 10:58:49 AM EST
    but I could never support Matthews.  I'm hoping my rep Joe Sestak will run against Specter. He's great.  

    My pick would be Allyson Schwartz (none / 0) (#19)
    by andgarden on Sun Nov 30, 2008 at 11:00:26 AM EST
    Either would win an open seat, but both would struggle to defeat Specter. The question is whether Specter either a) retires; or b) gets defeated in the Republican primary.

    Parent
    Allyson Schwartz would be great, too. (none / 0) (#22)
    by lucky leftie on Sun Nov 30, 2008 at 11:17:03 AM EST
    I'm hoping Specter retires.  He's old and his health isn't good.  But you're right, he could be defeated in the primary.  It was close last time, as I recall.  

    Parent
    Problem for Specter: (5.00 / 1) (#24)
    by andgarden on Sun Nov 30, 2008 at 11:25:11 AM EST
    many of the moderate Republicans in SE PA who saved his rear end last cycle have since registered as Democrats. Another advantage of the long Democratic Primary. . .

    Parent
    That's Sean Quinn... (none / 0) (#20)
    by Tony on Sun Nov 30, 2008 at 11:15:22 AM EST
    not Poblano.  Not a big deal, just a FWIW.

    Poblano updates (none / 0) (#21)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Sun Nov 30, 2008 at 11:16:16 AM EST
    FWIW.

    Parent
    Yes. (none / 0) (#23)
    by Tony on Sun Nov 30, 2008 at 11:19:31 AM EST
    Right you are.

    Parent
    Tweety Elected to Senate (none / 0) (#25)
    by kaleidescope on Sun Nov 30, 2008 at 11:36:19 AM EST
    Being There morphs into Being Here.

    Not true (none / 0) (#29)
    by sj on Sun Nov 30, 2008 at 12:30:04 PM EST
    Speaking for me only

    You're definitely speaking for me as well.

    Embarassment? (none / 0) (#33)
    by BobTinKY on Mon Dec 01, 2008 at 07:26:50 AM EST
    Since when does that disqualify someone from Congress?  As embarassing as he is, and I quite agree, he would be less embarassing than Joe Leiberman and probaby a more reliable member of the caucus.

    The guy's a jerk but if he can win and his presence bolsters Ted Kennedy, Jack Reed, Pat Leahy etc., I can stomache it.

    Having "Hardball" off the air is almost worth it by itself.

    Tweety? (none / 0) (#34)
    by joel dan walls on Mon Dec 01, 2008 at 12:28:49 PM EST
    What's with the silly pejorative for Chris Matthews? He's neither angel nor devil. He can sometimes be obnoxious, but other times be a quite canny interviewer.