In the fall of 2007, I declared my view (and the basis of my support) that Barack Obama was the most electable Democratic Presidential candidate. I argued that he provided the basis for a new electoral map due in no small measure to his status as a Media Darling. I think that view was vindicated.
I also declared that Barack Obama could have secured victory by choosing Hillary Clinton as his running mate. Obviously, as I stated for the past 5 months Obama was a shoo in, but you try to leave as little to chance as possible. Obama's narrow margins in Florida and Ohio point to the correctness of my view about Clinton securing victory. Why? Because Florida and Ohio would not have been close with Hillary on the ticket.
Finally, one that looks wrong - Stevens in Alaska (I am not giving up on Franken. It is headed for a recount.) But who knew that Alaska wanted felons to represent them in Congress?
This is an Open Thread.
Speaking for me only