Wiretaps on Two Democratic Governors: No Problem!
Why?
How?
Nobody cares!
The most corrupt and anti-Constitutional Justice Department since Richard Nixon installed electronic eavesdropping equipment directly in the Governor's office in Illinois.
So what?
David Broder says
"Unaware that Fitzgerald had obtained court orders allowing him to tap Blagojevich's phone and bug his office, Blagojevich indulged himself in obscenity-laden talk about how he would use the Senate appointment to enrich himself and his wife."
No big deal! Right, Dave? Bug the Governor's office! Why not?
"Fitzgerald began to close in on Blagojevich. A number of the governor's pals, including developer Tony Rezko, were indicted and convicted."
Blago knows Rezko! And that's all it takes to bug the Governor of Illinois, according to the Dean of the Washington Press Corps, and "high priest of political journalism" David Broder!
Remember Watergate?
Maybe somebody in that famous office knew somebody who was convicted of something, just like Blago knew Rezko.
Maybe somebody in those Watergate offices fooled around with a high-priced call-girl, once upon a time, just like Eliot Spitzer.
Bug them all! Tap their phones! Install cameras in their underwear drawers! It's all okay, according to the Dean of the Washington Press Corp, and the networks, and even the so-called "liberal" blogosphere.
But for some strange reason, Richard Nixon didn't get a free pass for Watergate.
Reporters in Washington investigated. Senators were enraged! And one fine day, Richard Nixon waved goodbye from a helicopter on the White House lawn.
But that was then, and this is now: All it takes is a little blather about "national security" and you can bug anybody!
Separately, the NSA was also able to access, for the first time, massive volumes of personal financial records--such as credit-card transactions, wire transfers and bank withdrawals--that were being reported to the Treasury Department by financial institutions. These included millions of "suspicious-activity reports," or SARS, according to two former Treasury officials who declined to be identified talking about sensitive programs. (It was one such report that tipped FBI agents to former New York governor Eliot Spitzer's use of prostitutes.) These records were fed into NSA supercomputers for the purpose of "data mining"--looking for links or patterns that might (or might not) suggest terrorist activity.
Now you can put a "national security" wiretap on the Governor of New York, for calling a call-girl.
Does that sound like "national security" to you?
Maybe David Broder, "Dean of the Washington Press Corps" and "high priest of political journalism" could devote one of his syndicated columns to this peculiar question:
What was Eliot Spitzer's weenie doing in an NSA supercomputer?
< Net Neutrality vs. Torture Policy | Envisioning Intelligence Post-Bush > |