His answer proved to me that he's never had a legitimate job interview.  In job interviews, you're always asked that question.  But if you read good books on interviewing skills (What Color is your Parachute, etc), you should NEVER actually answer with a weakness.   You should always list a strength and pretend it's a weakness (e.g. I'm a workaholic, I'm too dedicated to my work and sometimes forget my family responsibilities, etc.).

Imagine saying, "my weakness is I always lose my paperwork".  You wouldn't get the job.

When Obama crosses 1,000,000 small donors, will that merit serious discussion about the implications?

There are TalkLeft rules too. Some things don't get addressed but should, some things used to get addressed here but have fallen by the wayside.

58% in Wisconsin. Winning by almost 200,000 votes in a state with favorable demographics to Clinton.

Splitting the vote of women in Wisconsin, winning the vote of voters who make less than $50,000, winning registered Democrats 53 to 46%. Senator Feingold's vote.

I mean this in all sincerity, these are real topics of substance that folks in our party are looking at and thinking about.

Winning the vote of Democrats and popular vote totals were topics that were HOT TOPICS here just two weeks ago.

At some point one or the other primary candidate has to win and we have to come together.

Either candidate will face challenges in the general. I think we can all understand that.

At some point Senator Clinton will either succeed or fail in the firewall strategy. We all know that. It could be sooner rather than later.

Are her current tactics helping any of us? I don't happen to think so. And I think that you can lose Wisconsin the way she just did and then take such a divisive tone...190,000 votes in WI is a very big deal.  

Would you mind fixing your italics tag in this post?  You've got an open tag without a corresponding closed tag.  It's turning the whole page into italics.

The missing tag appears to be the closing bracket on the "/i" following your "By Big Tent Democrat" signature line..

I have a migraine today, so the italics really hurt.  Of course, I could go lay down, but I'm a hopeless addict.

Whatever

Really?  

Check this out: Michelle channels (or is that Chanels?) Jackie

First HE cribs Deval Patrick's campaign down to the last jot and tittle.  Now, SHE adopts a persona not her own.  How long will it be before we see the kids riding a pony named Macaroni?

anyone care to bet real money on it?

It's really sad because for several years the Blogosphere has been justifiably critical of the hackery of the traditional media.

The highlight portions above pale in comparison to other dabbles on the Huff Post. It is tragic how divided we are now. I fail to see how it can be mended. The feelings are too raw. I do applaud your efforts to heal. But I am going with Nader. This experience has led me to believe that indeed the system is broken. Perhaps four more years of GOP misrule will cure us what does ail us. That shocks me to say that because I have never subscribed to the theory that things have to get worse before they get better nor have I ever believed that ends justify the means.

While behaving like the lunatic fringe of a cult, in their adoration of Obama, they go into rabid attacks on anyone who won't join in the horrible attacks on anybody that doesn't subscribe to the Obamamania  there.

It's frightening to know that people can become so vicious in the name of being an upstanding American interested in the political health of this country while attacking their fellow citizen.