First, what the decision held:
Under Indiana's law, voters must present a government-issued photo ID with an expiration date that has not elapsed. The law does not accept Veterans' IDs, Congressional IDs, student IDs, or work IDs.
Why it's problematic:
Many citizens—disproportionately low-income, minorities, students and seniors—do not have the identification required by Indiana's law.
"In the three years since this case was brought, reliable studies have shown that 10-12% of eligible voting-age Americans do not have voter government-issued photo identification, particularly low-income, minority, senior, and student voters. Unfortunately, some will ignore these facts, and seek to use this ruling to manipulate the rules of the game and block these eligible voters from the ballot box," stated Justin Levitt, counsel at the Brennan Center.
The fight isn't over. The Center calls upon lawmakers to consider the " disenfranchising impacts of ID laws acknowledged in today's decision."
"Today's decision is not the end of the story on voter ID. Although the Court upheld Indiana's voter ID law, it did not say that states must or even should pass restrictive ID laws. Now it's up to legislators and courts in states like Texas, Missouri, and Florida to decide if they are going to follow Indiana's lead and disenfranchise American citizens, or if they're going to protect the right to vote for all Americans as we head into a critical national election," stated Wendy Weiser, Deputy Director of the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center for Justice. "In doing so, they should keep in mind that the Court left open the possibility of future lawsuits against restrictive ID laws that prevent people from voting.
As for what's next:
First, we do expect that there will be a major push in state legislatures and Congress to pass very restrictive voter ID laws, this year or next. Whatever the merits or demerits of voter ID in theory, these proposals invariably are crafted to impact the poor, minorities, the elderly and others who simply lack the required photo ID. We are working with advocates to make sure they have our research on the impact of ID proposals.
Second, we are moving to strike down other barriers to voting and fair elections. Coincidentally, on behalf of the League of Women Voters of Florida, today we filed a federal lawsuit to strike down that state's restrictions on voter registration groups. The restrictions are so severe the League - hardly a radical fringe group! - has been forced to shut down its registration activities.
....Ultimately, it would be a huge missed opportunity to simply focus on stopping bad laws. ...This should be the time to craft new voter registration laws to make sure that every citizen who wants to vote, can vote. In the coming weeks we will be putting forward a draft proposal for universal voter registration, including Election Day Registration, for Congress and others to consider.
As TChris wrote in 2006, Voter ID is just another bad idea from the GOP.
Big Tent Democrat excerpted highlights from today's opinion here. The full opinion is here (pdf.)