home

Pakistan: The Ignored Threat

2 years ago, we learned a good deal more about how untrustworthy the U.S. "ally" Pakistan can be, and how the Bush Administration has chosen to turn a blind eye about what Pakistan is up to. Today, the NYTimes drops another shoe:

Four years after Abdul Qadeer Khan, the leader of the world’s largest black market in nuclear technology, was put under house arrest and his operation declared shattered, international inspectors and Western officials are confronting a new mystery, this time over who may have received blueprints for a sophisticated and compact nuclear weapon found on his network’s computers. Working in secret for two years, investigators have tracked the digitized blueprints to Khan computers in Switzerland, Dubai, Malaysia and Thailand. The blueprints are rapidly reproducible for creating a weapon that is relatively small and easy to hide, making it potentially attractive to terrorists.

It sure would be nice to be able to interrogate A.Q. Khan about this:

[E]ven as inspectors and intelligence officials press their investigation of Dr. Khan, officials in Pakistan have declared the scandal over and have discussed the possibility of setting him free. In recent weeks, American officials have privately warned the new government in Pakistan about the dangers of doing so. “We’ve been very direct with them that releasing Khan could cause a world of trouble,” a senior administration official who has been involved in the effort said last week. “The problem with Pakistan these days is that you never know who is making the decision — the army, the intelligence agencies, the president or the new government.”

(Emphasis supplied.) That inspires confidence no? Well, at least we DO know that the Bush Administration accepted Pakistan's decision to NOT allow the U.S. to interrogate Khan about his activities. To this day, no American has been permitted to present a question to Khan.

Pakistan's ties to Al Qaida and the Taliban are well documented. It is no wonder that Afghani President Hamid Karzai has declared:

President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan threatened on Sunday to send soldiers into Pakistan to fight militant groups operating in the border areas to attack Afghanistan. His comments, made at a news conference in Kabul, Afghanistan, are likely to worsen tensions between the countries, just days after American forces in Afghanistan killed 11 Pakistani soldiers on the border while pursuing militants.

“If these people in Pakistan give themselves the right to come and fight in Afghanistan, as was continuing for the last 30 years, so Afghanistan has the right to cross the border and destroy terrorist nests, spying, extremism and killing, in order to defend itself, its schools, its peoples and its life,” Mr. Karzai said. “When they cross the territory from Pakistan to come and kill Afghans and kill coalition troops, it exactly gives us the right to go back and do the same,” he said. “Today’s Afghanistan is not yesterday’s silent Afghanistan,” he warned. “We have a voice, tools and bravery as well.”

You think someone might want to ask the Presidential candidates about this? Me neither. More fun to chase the trivia. Tim Russert, may he rest in peace, has led the Media down this primrosse path of pathetic punditry.

Speaking for me only

< Elections in the Internet Age | Hillary The Icon >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    There's so much that has been lost (5.00 / 1) (#1)
    by Militarytracy on Mon Jun 16, 2008 at 09:48:11 AM EST
    during the Bush administration.  I don't really want to interrogate A.Q. Khan.  I know why he is considered a national hero.  It is because he delivered the bomb to Pakistan and saved them from the evils of India.  He can do no wrong and now in fact can save other middle east nations from their own perceived evil.  The ruling administration of my own country has focused on war as a means to solve the world's problems and contributed to this way of thinking.  I don't for one minute believe that America can solve all the world's problems, we contribute to the conversation though and when we focus on creating a better life for each of us in every day small yet most personally impacting ways others join us in that focus, and the landscape of war on earth has an opportunity to become different and even much less desireable.

    Remember when Dubya.... (5.00 / 1) (#8)
    by Dadler on Mon Jun 16, 2008 at 11:38:48 AM EST
    ...put nuclear bomb plans on the internet, too?

    Worst.  Administration.  Ever.

    And why would anyone be surprised that Pakistan, or any other nation, gives us the finger like this.  Imagine if we actually worried about America and the problems of Americans and trying to mitigate those?  Imagine if we focused on turning our nation into something that the rest of the world WANTS to emulate for moral reasons instead of financial.

    Imagine, imagine, imagine.

    But, we've chose to bankrupt ourselves in every possible way.


    The Bush administration has (none / 0) (#2)
    by oculus on Mon Jun 16, 2008 at 09:48:46 AM EST
    revived its interest in capturing Bin Laden before Jan. 20/09.  I suppose dealing w/Khan will have to wait.  

    One thing I just don't get (none / 0) (#3)
    by Militarytracy on Mon Jun 16, 2008 at 10:13:13 AM EST
    When it comes to Iran we don't always know who is making the decisions either.  It makes it tough in holding Iran accountable for certain things like when an IED has items it is made out of from Iran.  Who with power got the stuff to Iraq because everyone with power in Iran is not complicit or condoning of such things.  Pakistan is the same flippin sort of problem but Pakistan is nothing to worry about while Iran is everything to freak out about.

    Parent
    We don't need Iran's o.k., at present, (none / 0) (#4)
    by oculus on Mon Jun 16, 2008 at 10:17:10 AM EST
    for our military occupation of Iraq and/or our military presence in Afghanistan.  We need Musharraf and have to ignore his failings, such as replacing the judges, and, until quite recently, retaining his military position whilst also being the President.  

    Parent
    I don't think or feel that we need (none / 0) (#5)
    by Militarytracy on Mon Jun 16, 2008 at 10:28:14 AM EST
    Musharraf as much as we have been led to think we need Musharraf.  The Pakistan military is so loyal and military that I'm told they may even be able to put our own to shame in those departments.  They will follow their leader, whoever that is.  I think and feel that our current administration identifies with Musharraf and has conversations with him that make sense to the NeoCons in charge right now and that is why he is such a perceived need and asset.  His failings are the failings they wish they could get away with.

    Parent