Your turn.
Comments closed.
Make a new account
I don't think that falls under the heading of "unity".
Seriously, with friends like these, Obama has no need of swiftboaters. Parent
In case anyone's wondering . . . POPT does work with people too, lol!~ Parent
link Parent
BTD, you really live up to your screen name. (And the loveable part, I agree with that too!)
Thanks for everything you do here.
There is a comment in another post about an Obama supporter saying "I heard him speak" as his reason to support BO.
If that's all it takes...hasn't all of America already "heard him speak"?
And didn't half of Dems want someone else?
And if he really is/was so inspirational, why didn't he blow HRC out of the water with voters after Super Tuesday in February?
And why did he only win via Super Delegates?
And why - seriously - isn't he ahead of McCain by 25 points in the polls right now? I mean, these are his glory days...but the "old man"/Bush II is right there with him?
I have my answers to these questions? What about some answers by a BO supporter or two?
Don't these facts actually make you (even) slightly nervous?
Crickets.
Hard kwestins, I guess. Troubling that we're not getting answers. Parent
I guess they wanted to believe hope/change was enough.
I outgrew those hopes in 2000 when a lying rich guy who couldn't make sense 'won' over an honorable progressive who was really smart.
Do people not pay attention? Parent
The same guy who's brilliant campaign is based on not leaving a paper trail and avoiding anything "controversial" by voting Present -- cause yes or no might (:: eek eek ::) sully the suit later?
He's brave in his imagination, a downright champion in his hypothetical scenarios and a veritable lion of the civil rights movement in his rhetoric.
But he's a chickensh!t coward in standing up against injustice when it matters most: when it's happening right under his nose.
CLUE: denounce the bigotry when it's happening, Senator Obama, don't look the other way or USE it to score personal points when a worthy colleague and campaign rival is besieged with a historically unprecedented onslaught of bigotry. (My, isn't the b!tch divisive!) Parent
Clinton is not able to deliver 100% of her supporters to Obama any more than Obama is able to tell his supporters what to say (or not say) about Clinton. Parent
But after what I've seen the past six months, oh yea, I believe without a doubt there's some people there on the dole. Can't name names - won't name names - but yea, I believe it.
But I also think there are Republican operatives there, and it disgusts me even more that dKossians fell right into their trap(s).
Not too bright. And very destructive. Parent
Go ahead. I really want an answer. Parent
Glad to say that I'm a good old fashioned liberal and these positions don't appeal to me at all. Parent
I don't actually think all of America has heard him speak, no. I think a sizable percentage frankly hasn't been paying that much attention to this race, yet. It sometimes seems unthinkable to me because I've been following this race for almost 18 months, but we still have six months to go.
Why didn't he blow out Clinton seems obvious to me. She was an incredibly popular, formidible, talented and inspirational figure. She is, by all measures, an excellent candidate for President. The fact that he managed to edge her out at all was an amazing feat. But to turn it around. In six months, he managed to go from tied for a distant second with John Edwards to beating one of the most formidable candidates imaginable.
Yes, half of democrats wanted someone else. But had Clinton won, her detractors would be able to say the same thing. Its a problem we would have had to face either way.
These by the way are not the Glory Days. He's just come out of the toughest bitterest and most divisive primary we've seen in a generation. Whereas John McCain has literally coasted for three months.if anyone has in their glory days its him. And yet, the best he can do right now is tie Obama? If Obama can manage to unify the party (and I grant, that's a big if) he'll crush McCain. Parent
But thanks for answering. Parent
McCain's been within 3 point of Obama (when he hasn't been ahead) for a while now. Last night Fox was bloviating over the most recent Rasmussen poll, which shows Obama 4 points ahead. If that's the bump - 1 pont -- there's trouble ahead.
I think Obama maxed out his appeal in February and March, and I just don't see anything he could do, aside from putting Clinton on the ticket, that would produce a big swing either way.
And, if she's not on the ticket, I'm starting to wonder about the convention bump too. I almost think a floor fight would have been better for the Party, it would attract more eyeballs than a Unity Snoozefest.
(disclaimer: while I agree with BTD that Clinton on the ticket is Obama's only hope, I don't think she should accept, what a waste of her talents). Parent
But only a few would be willing to make their true feelings known to pollsters and the public.
We'll only know what chance Obama has of becoming President when every ballot is counted after Nov. 4. (if he's at the top of ticket -- yes, I'm still holding out hope for the best) Parent
One of Obama's assets is his speaking ability. Another strength is what he has to say. He won many supporters in his speech about Reverend Wright.
Why did he not blow Clinton away? Why is McCain as close as he is? For one thing, both seem to be great candidates (and Clinton doesn't just seem).
But Obama has negatives:
(I don't want to address these - although they may be problems in the GE: Reverend Wright. A penchant for saying true but impolitic things -- bittergate. His skin color. His gender (a factor with some Clinton supporters). His name.)
But take a look at the issues at the top of your list. And why, therefore are you a BO supporter?
(This question comes from someone who truly believes that we need someone great as our next POTUS to make up for 8 years under one of the stupiest human beings in my lifetime). Parent
The continual assertion that Obama's Bittergate statements were true.
They weren't.
And it wasn't simply impolitic, it was the worst form of elitism. It showed Obama was unable to project himself into the lives of the people he was describing. The group was simply a "they" to be derided.
Given his history, it's shocking Obama would be able to do this. And it shows both a lack of compassion and intellectual rigor. Parent
You're asking why didn't Obama blow out HRC? You should actually be asking why Obama was able to beat HRC at all. Haven't you read the post mortems? This is one of the biggest upsets in history.
Obama got superdelegate support after he proved his viability as a candidate and as a money raiser. Also, Hillary's attacks and tactics turned off a great many superdelegates. Some of her more radical supporters didn't help either. While Hillary did not encourage these people, I think the association was nevertheless made between Hillary's tone and the stridency of some of her supporters.
By the way, 90% of Hillary's supporters weren't interested in policy, imo. They liked her for intangible reasons, just like the person who embraced Obama after hearing him speak. You can wade through the comments here and other pro-Hillary sites; rarely will posters cite policy as the reason for supporting Hillary. Parent
90% of Hillary's supporters weren't interested in policy, imo
Your opinion would be wrong, like the rest of your little screed. Parent
This is a sincere question for Obama supporters: What is the difference between Bill Clinton's "triangulation" (bad) and Obama's "postpartisanship" (good)?
To me, they both sound like two sides of the same coin--with the difference that Clinton was operating in a political (massive GOP majorities in Congress) and ideological (no post-Bush implosion, no blogoshphere/media critique) environment far less hospitable to the enactment of a progressive agenda.
Truly, this is a serious question, because it really disturbs me that his own supporters (those who I've spoken to so far) cannot tell me exactly what their candidate is talking about on this score.
Indeed...both are triangulation in that they are strategies used by a "candidate [who is] presenting his or her ideology as being 'above' and 'between' the left and right sides of the political spectrum."
There's prolly a Greek term for it, but my Rhetoric dictionary is in box somewhere. Parent
Maybe...they don't have any answers or don't like the answers?
ANOTHER SERIOUS QUESTION: If Hillary manages to get true UHC through Congress will a "president" Obama sign it? Parent
Plus, if it's her bill, then the media will be all over it, saying that he's a hen-pecked husband if he caves in to her on it. It would be a capitulation to HER. He will not sign it.
But I think his allies in the Senate will recognize this and not want to cause trouble in his first year and won't let it pass. After the first year, who knows?
As always, this is just my opinion. Parent
Who's he beholding to? Parent
With regard to political context, triangulation was forced upon Clinton because he had to deal with a Republican controlled Congress for his last six years during a time when conservatism was ascendant.
Obama, on the other hand, seeks to establish an era of "postpartisanship" only after establishing a strong Democratic majority in Congress during an era of progressive ascendency. Due to his background as an organizer, Obama understands that winning an election isn't enough -- progressives must also build a long-lasting movement to govern successfully. This requires messaging that moves the political debate back to the center-left, away from the extreme right wing values that were mainstreamed by Bush II in the wake of 9/11.
When backed up by a strong grassroots movement, "postpartisanship" becomes a cudgel to threaten vulnerable Republicans in the Congress. They must move beyond right-wing partisanship and adopt mainstream progressive positions on issues like health care, global warming, etc or face annilation in the next election. And because this is about movement building and not just winning a presidential election, the electoral college isn't the only target. One key to building this movement is Dean's 50 state strategy and Obama's massive 50 state voter registration campaign to ensure that even red state legislators are not beyond the threat of a rising progressive tide in their states/districts.
In short, Clinton was forced to triangulate from a position of political weakness. Obama seeks an era of postpartisanship that is backed up with progressive political strength. It is a new day. Parent
To me this just seems like a code / rationalization for "we can compromise our principles, so long as we win"?
moves the political debate back to the center-left, away from the extreme right wing values
Sounds not that dissimilar to triangulation to me. After all, anything that happens in 2008 is surely bound to be post everything that happened in 2004.
If you believe that such ideological issues can be put on a Cartesian plane and these were like points A-B-C.. the issue is not how much you move from C to B (voters who have given Dems the majority in Congress already KNOW that's happened), but how much ground Obama is prepared to concede in going from A to B. No Obama supporter thus far has been able to clearly articulate this IMHO -- because I suspect they (and the MSM) have not asked their candidate concrete questions and gotten answers they are truly comfortable with.
Speaking of sustenance -- I'd rather not see the present laziness and ineffectiveness in Congress to deal with the war in Iraq, or real-issues that affect Americans, be sustained by a long-lasting movement.
And another point -- if post-partisanship comes to mean relaxing our system of checks and balances.. (which I see a high risk of given Obama's inexperience) I'm not sure I like that formulation either, given all the relaxation that has already gone on under Bush under the guise of fighting the war on terror.
JMO. Parent
When backed up by a strong grassroots movement, "postpartisanship" becomes a cudgel to threaten vulnerable Republicans in the Congress. They must move beyond right-wing partisanship and adopt mainstream progressive positions on issues like health care, global warming, etc or face annilation in the next election.
In other words, "post-partisanship" is an example of "just words". Its a stick to beat Republicans with. Rather like the "movement" and "unity" are sticks used to beat recalcitrant Dems.
This is feeling more and more like a Glorious Cultural Revolution. Parent
Talk of "postpartisanship" makes (1.) nervous while appealing to (2.) The more Obama has to explain postpartisanship to make you comfortable the less value it will have in securing the votes of Independents.
You obviously have to evaluate everything that Obama is both doing and saying to determine if he merits your support. But I'm confident that you are not so naive as to expect a candidate to fully explain his agenda in a manner that limits his appeal to a broader group of voters. Parent
And yes if Congress sends President Obama a UHC bill he'd sign it. President McCain wouldn't. And no, that's not me trying to scare people into voting for Obama that's just reality. Parent
Ahh, so great. The next generation now is responsible. I am off the hook.
The next generation now is responsible. I am off the hook.
snicker.
I'm jealous of your weather though.
The weather here will be ugly (hot). I've just realized that was why I felt so bad yesterday. I've got to get the AC set up before the Jewish holiday tonight... Parent
However, I draw the line at country music. It's a personal failing. I just can't reconcile cornpone and hip. (It was just as hard in the 60s when hip JFK chose cornpone LBJ as a running mate...) Parent
That is as far as I have ventured by myself. Sorta scared to go further. As a black man my cred with be severely hurt by having a Garth Brook CD :). Parent
Actually, I get into all kinds of music, I am not a very, "never like that". I can go from Tammy Wynette, to Digable Planets, to Mario Lanza, to Vivaldi, to Glass. Music is one thing I am not partisan on. Ok, I don't like a few things: 1. uber punk stuff that was just a cacophony . 2. What my kids call Emo. This new kind of rock where it's supposed to be "about deep feelings" and all it is , is way too many words to make a good song, but the brat singing has to show something for all the years in private schools and colleges. You know the lyrics: "that I am upper class privileged white kid from the suburbs and I am hurting". Parent
"I would die and slit my wrist before I'd vote for Obama," said a Silver Spring woman in the Clinton volunteers section who gave her name only as Edith. She wore a sign pinned to the back of her Hillary T-shirt proposing: "Remember in November: vote present."
Wonder how many other women feel that way. I have a niggling feeling it's a lot.
I am tickled by the notion that only women Clinton supporters would be unwilling to vote for BO. There are lots of men too, and lets not lose sight of the few million who voted for Edwards, Richardson et. al. A good number I'm sure -- women and men -- will not automatically fall in line behind Obama just because their first pick endorsed him. Parent
Of course, sometimes a few good men is all we get -- in politics, in the workplace, in life. But then, that's all that a good woman needs at her side.:-) Parent
Make sure you go sign the DSCC petition and tell them what you think, what you value, and who you will vote for!
Here is what I sent:
You want my congratulations?
I can't congratulate someone who did not earn the victory. This is how Bush "won" the presidency, twice, with no Democratic leader standing up for the truth. You rolled over then, but I will not roll over for you.
If you want my vote, you'll need to earn it.
Obama and the DNC have a lot to apologize for and a big hole to dig themselves out of. I need to hear explicit apologies for the misogyny, for the smears, for the lies, for the obscene gestures by Obama(It is on tape, don't deny it along with your references to sexist rappers.), for the bitter talk by Michelle Obama(the interview is on tape, don't deny it. I guess I'll just have to "think about it" like Michelle).
Smearing my candidate and myself by calling us racists doesn't make me want to vote for you. Won't get money for the DNC. Doesn't keep me in your party. And let me be clear about this. The Democrats left me, I didn't leave the party.
I was a lifelong Democrat, but I am re-registering as an independent. You have been clear in your messaging that women are not valued. Women are not accomplished, women do not count. Don't blame Hillary, this is all on you. Obama, the DNC, Howard Dean, Donna Brazile.
Obama's behavior has been immature and similar to the frat-boy currently occupying the oval office. It is conduct unbecoming to someone aspiring to the presidency. I don't like it in Bush, I don't like it in Obama. I won't accept it and most certainly I won't vote for it.
Howard Dean has ignored the sexism and misogyny in the media and from his candidate. By the sin of omission he has personally embraced and furthered the misogyny. I wrote and called him repeatedly, asking him to stand up against it and all I got was silence. Donna Brazile has been a huge disappointment to me as has Claire McCaskill. Women may choose to support a male candidate, I've got no problem with that, but they do us all a disservices when they propagate lies and smears about a woman candidate, especially when she is a fellow Dem.
Dean's and McCaskill's comments now are late and lacking. Empty because it is long past the time when they could have helped the situation. Along with Obama's race baiting (remember he admitted he was responsible for the memo on a publicly televised debate) you have created the division you now fear. Live by the sword, die by the sword.
Unity is a two-way street. You don't get to batter my worth day in and day out and then tell me I have to to give you my vote. That dog don't hunt. I have an education, a brain, and I have money. I am the creative class Obama thinks he owns. I support those that support me.
This is what crystallized my resolve.
"No self respecting woman should wish or work for the success of a party that ignores her self." - Susan B. Anthony, 1872
Words of wisdom. Words of a woman who knew the score long ago. Words that still ring true today. Words to live by.
You are not entitled to my vote any longer, or my money. I will consider voting for a candidate that demonstrates they have the experience and accomplishments to get things done. Someone who cares about the issues I care about and proves to me he or she will work tirelessly to deliver the results to me.
Voting present does not show me Obama vigorously supports women's issues, I have no confidence in his votes or voice. Don't tell me McCain is pro-life. At least I know where he stands; I have no clue what Obama "hopes" for or what he will "change". I have seen no evidence he can change anything except increase the lack of civility in the campaign and malign other Democratic candidates.
The only "Change" I see is a "Democrat" stealing votes that he didn't earn. You stole 600,000 votes from Michigan Democrats that did not want you. The DNC gamed the primaries by refusing to do the right thing by Florida and Michigan (BTW, good luck with them in the General Election). You can scream that Obama has more delegates until you are blue in the face, if you counted all the votes, Hillary would have more delegates in addition to already having more actual votes. Your actions disenfranchised 18 MILLION Democratic voters. 18 MILLION. More than anyone else in the history of presidential primaries.
Your "rules" won't matter in the General Election. Only the electoral college map counts there and you obviously haven't looked at it. You didn't follow your "rules" anyway. Some of us actually read the rulebook. We know where you lied and what you did. We know that others received waivers for the same actions that Florida and Michigan took. We know it was within your control to do the right thing and incredibly short-sighted to do what you did. We understand fair reflection and how you ignored the rule requiring both Fair Reflection and PUBLIC meetings and decisions rather than back room antics. Either follow the rules or don't. But if you don't, please to try and take the moral high ground. Obama made a political decision to take his name off the Michigan ballot because he wouldn't win there. He isn't entitle to any votes. He also violated YOUR rules by holding a press event in Florida AND running ads on TV in Florida, by your RULES he is not entitled to ANY votes in Florida. Those chickens will come home to roost in the general.
I'm not unreasonable, but I'm not stupid. Don't lie to me and think I won't call bulls**t on you.
So if you want me to consider you for my vote in any election (senate, house, presidential, school board, whatever):
Tell what is in it for me. After all, you are applying to work for me. I have a right to know what you will do in the job, why you think you can accomplish your stated goals, and how I know you will follow through on your promises.
Tell me how you are going to get me TRULY UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE. Not the watered down proposal Obama has. Talk about selling out to the healthcare lobbyists! How will you cover every one and achieve cost savings by spreading the risk across all. I don't need more "wins" that feed the pharmaceutical industry with nonnegotiation clauses.
Tell me how I can trust that you will support issues that are important to women, I need facts and accomplishments not pretty words.
Tell me how you will turn the economy around, specifically. Tell what actions you will take to get new jobs.
Tell me how you will fix the educational system. Both K-12 and getting more people into college without horrendous loans. What about a plan for retraining laid off workers. Let's not just talk about college for HS students, lets talk about getting older people and current workers back to college or into college for the first time. How do we fund that? They will be in the work force for a long time, they need skills.
Tell me how you will insure my retirement. I've paid into Social Security and Medicare all my life. I want my benefits fully funded. Don't tell me you will cut them. If you do, give me my money back so I can retire when the time comes. Get me Health care so I don't have to worry about what happens to me then, or choose between eating catfood and buying medicine.
Tell me how you will nominate for the Supreme Court. How many women will you nominate or confirm? We are more than half the population! Will they be pro choice and pro constitution? How can I be sure you will follow through on your promises?
How will you restore the constitution? How will you hold the telcos responsible for their wiretapping? They knew it was illegal, voting for their immunity will not earn my vote, quite the opposite.
Tell me how you will support our veterans, past and present. How will you protect my parent's benefits EARNED in the Vietnam war? How will you provide for returning soldier's needs without taking away from my parents? The VA is already broken, as is the military, how exactly will you fix this?
Tell me about the role of women in your administration and in your appointments - will they approximate the percentage of women in the country? Or how about going with the percentage of women that USED to make up the Democratic party? That would help, but you really need to apologize without equivocating. You were wrong and you need to own up to it, then start working hard to make it right.
I don't know what I will do in the GE at this point. Hillary has been extremely gracious to Obama, but still they bash her and say she hasn't done enough. Of course she has tried not to damage him throughout the campaign, regardless of what he and his supporters have said. (BTW, deal with your whiney obnoxious supporters. They have lost you almost as many votes as you have driven away yourself).
I value Hillary's experience, persistence, courage, and tireless campaigning. I haven't seen those qualities in Obama. I have been working in Biotech and High Tech since I graduated from college. I look at this as a hiring decision. When I hire someone for a job, I look at what they have accomplished, not what they say they can do. I look at what they have actually done and the skills those accomplishments demonstrate. I don't see much from Obama. He may complain that Hillary doesn't respect his accomplishments, but he should be more worried about the fact that no one knows what they are. His supporters can't articulate them, he doesn't talk about them, and his resume is very thin.
Obama can point to his speech on Iraq all he wants, but it is just words. At this point I don't even know whose words they are, Deval Patrick's? Axelrod's? Some anonymous speechwriter? I didn't see any actions to back it up. He never stuck his neck out when it counted or when there was any risk. Seems like his goal is just winning and cashing in, not working for me. Prove to me I'm wrong. And apologize for your wrongs.
To the Senate Democratic Caucus. I'll be looking at how you have acted and voted also. Those who dissed Hillary and made sexist remarks or stood by and said nothing don't demonstrate what I need to see in a candidate.
My money and votes will go to those with a clear strong voice on the values that used to be central to the Democratic Party I joined long ago. My money and votes will go to those who strongly and openly support women: their issues, their advancement, and their opportunities.
Visible strong actions are what I'm looking for, pretty words won't get the job done and won't get you hired. I've been in the real world long enough to know what to look for. Pretty words, immature actions, and lack of accomplishments aren't a recipe for success. Prove I'm wrong about you and you could get my vote.
Take me and my 18 million friends for granted and you will lose miserably.
And you also better stop slamming Hillary. No one else has ever been hounded to drop out of the primary, certainly no one who had more popular votes than the other candidate. Kennedy, Edwards, Bradley... look at history.
Hillary has been more than fair. The 18 Million Hillary supporters will not go to Obama if he doesn't earn them. Stop saying this is Hillary's job. Obama needs to step up and take responsibility for his actions and EARN something. He won't game us like he did the system. He won't bully us like he did in the Caucuses. (and BTW, get rid of the caucuses. Not democratic. not fair. not just).
If Obama loses, he will only have himself to blame. His nomination is illegitimate now. He took what didn't belong to him because he was desperate to win at all costs. He wanted it badly and he got it badly. Stop digging the hole and take responsibility for it. Stop blaming Hillary and her supporters. Be an adult for a change. Maturity in a president would be a nice change.
I'm not bitter and I don't cling to guns and religion. I am intelligent and a do cling to my vote. It is my right. I don't owe you anything, you work for me. Support me and I will support you,
So get busy if you want my vote. You don't get it automatically. You don't get it for nothing. Tell me what is in it for me. Show me what you have done for me in the past and tell me how you will do what you say you will do for me. Prove to me I should believe you.
To summarize, let me give you the take home message again. Get a tattoo if you need to, but remember it if you want 18 Million votes.
This Tuesday, the 89th anniversary of the first states' ratifications (first Wisconsin, then Illinois, although it typically screwed up so had to do a do-over, and then -- yes -- Michigan, the state where Dems even disenfranchise men now) of the 19th Amendment. Parent
I'm gonna pack some purple/yellow ensemble, myself...(not a delegate, just going for the fireworks) Parent
Btw, I have a wonderful purple, yellow, and white sash and lots of repro suffrage buttons that I wear when speaking on Women's Equality Day. I'm not taking any speaking commitments for it this year, not yet, while I wait and see. . . . But somehow, I doubt we'll see what we need to see from the Dem power structure running the party and the convention party. I know too much history.:-) Parent
Just got this message from the administrators at MyDD:
Tone down the accusations of racism and playing the race card. " if Obama and his supporters try to spread smears against McCain as they have done against Clinton -- accusing him falsely of racism, for example -- I will be all over those smears, doing everything in my power to expose them for what they are."
" if Obama and his supporters try to spread smears against McCain as they have done against Clinton -- accusing him falsely of racism, for example -- I will be all over those smears, doing everything in my power to expose them for what they are."
The quoted passage is from a post I made at MyDD.
Censorship is in full swing at MyDD.
Delusional, I think so :-) Parent
They just seem to love the echo chamber effect. Parent
My God, how I have been deceived.
Instead, we are, apparently, supposed to keep our mouths firmly shut when we see a fellow Democrat trump up an accusation of racism we know perfectly well is false and unjust.
I'm sorry, that's not me. And if that's what it takes to be a Democrat these days, count me out of the party. Parent
Apparently, my evenhandedness in attacking smears on both sides was just too much for these people running MyDD. Parent
Pretty sad--there was an "OOPS" quality to this.
Too many people are making too much money for things to change, imo. Parent
here's one at WSJ
and there was one by Marie Cocco... Parent
Added to this (as Krugman has pointed out) that, in Beltway/punditspeak, post/trans/bipartisanship is generally a code word for, "Democrats should bend over and give the Republicans whatever they want, with a smile." How will Obama's way of governing differ from this in practice? I think your definitions are just a way of putting a sleazy spin on a concept when it is applied to CLinton, and a noble one when applied to Obama. It still sounds in practice like six of one, half a dozen of the other.
And it radicalizes these good guys, at long last -- and there's no going back for women or men once radicalized that way. The scales drop from the eyes, and there's sticking 'em back there again.
Btw. same thing can happen for some fathers who see their daughters so dissed -- maybe dads who are called "pimps" and thus their daughters as well as their wives are "hos" to the "bros"? The "daddy factor," I call it, and it has been significant in women's progress throughout our history; see marital property rights law, see woman suffrage when dads wanted their daughters to vote even when they didn't care if their wives voted. It's historic distrust of sons-in-law. :-)
Anyway, yes, we have done the stretch of the Great River Road between lovely La Crosse and Prairie du Chien for the historic French culture before, and it left me hankering for more. Plus, this way, my spouse does not get to take the fast route home from the Twin Cities past the Big Orange Moose statue. It haunts my dreams, turning them into nightmares. . . . I do hope to see Big Ole in your state someday, though; I bookmarked a site to weird Minnesota outdoor art and statuary, too. Love my weird Midwest.:-) Parent
I guess it's like Rev. Wright, then, huh? He just didn't hear that part. That's why he was so crushingly silent.
Others have documented the sexism better than I. When he flipped the bird at Hillary, he flipped the bird at me. Sorry, no free passes from me.
Make a veiled attack, and then deny you made it. Parse out the words ("losing his bearings"), go to the Oxford English Dictionary, and claim others are gravitating to the most hysterical meaning. Claim that you really didn't flip the bird when you flipped the bird and the audience roared. Let your followers propagate sexism, then say it wasn't you, really...
All that bullcrap will have to go.
That's why I love the people out there in Bitterland. They see through this stuff so much faster than the creative class.
I feel I'm free of this election. I leave for two months in Tokyo on Tuesday. I'm over this stuff. It's a bitter memory, but it is indeed a memory.
Bon voyage! And thanks for all the fish! Parent
Many Obama supporters are inspirational and wise, why not focus on them instead of the trash? Parent
That is what pols do during a fight. From my perspective it was relatively clean. Obamamaniacs took Hillary's attacks personally as well.
Is it that some supporters (and candidates) have sullied the honor of the other. Is this a tribal sort of thing that bears similarity to honor killings or stoning. I just do not get it.
Both Hillary and Obama are Politicians, they are not gods or family or cult leaders. Parent
You have my sympathies. Not sure what you are gaining by this unless St Sebastian is your ideal. Parent
Turf and troll as they might, Club Obama's lame attempt to retrofit this spin onto reality won't win over the hardcore Dems they alienated, win over new ones, nor attract those Repugs and Independents the 25-cent Unity Pony Ride is supposed to do.
I'm doubtful it will even hold over the Movement Voters -- exaggerated in both number and loyalty IMO -- to serve both as activists and people who turn out to vote. Parent
It is about hiring someone from the pool that will come closest to representing your political positions. It is not about selecting a lover or even a roomate. Parent
If the DK, MyDD, TPM etc crowd, and the NBC, MSNBC, and CNN crowds were truly a fringe minority of Obama's supporters, I would not hold what they do or say against him. But they've become, in large part, the public face of his support.
There are perfectly reasonable Obama supporters out there; I know some of them; BTD is not the only one.
To say that Obama, who has used his money and influence to control the 'message' in new ways this year -- shutting down the Dem 527s, strong-arming DNC members -- must be viewed wholly separately from this very large number of crass, juvenile and offensive people, is a disingenuous argument. And maybe it's not even Obama, maybe it's the 'New Coalition', so intent on burning their own base. But that is equally worrisome.
If Obama had disavowed any of the rampant CDS and misogyny, or even once indicated disapproval, that would be something. Not much, but something.
I'm an old-fashioned girl. I truly believe in things such as honor and integrity. I believe that those who have great power have great responsibility, responsibility to speak up for those who can't speak for themselves and speak out against injustice and hatred. To not leverage it for themselves.
A hero, a leader -- they make people better than they are. They motivate people to strive for greatness themselves. They don't mine the bottom of the barrel and then cry 'those were not the supporters I knew.' Parent
Dont expect mere mortals to live up to the always-beyond-reproach standards of Our Lady and her humble servants in the Lords work. Parent
I've said for a while, he needs to Sistah Souljah those sexists and character-assassins who support him. If he TRULY practiced what he preached about "a new politics," he would have.
Instead, he does things like grin when his audience booed Hillary during John Edwards' endorsement.
Gah! I'll vote for him, but I feel like I'm voting for a childish man, like George W. Bush only "liberal," whatever that means these days. Parent
I follow Hillary's lead here. She obviously is a pro and expected all the crap that a fight entails, and dished out her own. Lower life forms posing as supporters said all sorts of things on both sides and that is to be expected as well.
But this is the cycle of Democratic nominations. Now those who believe that the Democratic platform is a better one than the GOP will come together to defeat McCain. Parent
I hope that Modo, Rich, and the gang at MSNBO will finally shut the frak up.
It's almost a hundred degrees here in Raleigh. I don't think He11 has frozen over yet. Parent
Now, I'm not "BluestBlue," so I can't speak for her, but her response was to a Democratic organization that seems to think it is entitled to her support and her cash - and her response to that request was to explain her disappointment and disgust over how the Party took it upon itself to manipulate and maneuver and cheat its way to forcing Barack Obama on us as a nominee.
But, that's okay - you just keep missing the point; as an Obama supporter, I'm sure you can't figure out why the rest of us think there is a problem in the party and we're not just content to go along with it. You just keep telling yourself there's nothing rotten in Denmark - by the time you figure out that there is, it will be too late to keep the stink from attaching to all Democrats for decades to come.
Where do you buy your blinders?
If you're going to tap that, you best tap the kind of wouldda couldda shouldda hypothetical that Obama's been eating lunch off since the start of his self-congratulating position on congress's voting to cede powers of war to the whims of the Executive Branch.
Saying that Bad Monster Lady voted for it, based on Bush admin lies and corruption, before Obama said he WOULD have voted against it doesn't pass the laugh test.
And to show my sincerity in that regard, I'd give you a million dollars if my lottery ticket from 6 yrs ago paid off big so I'm the bestest friend you'll ever have.
Here's where I find myself put off by many of the comments here. There seems to be such deep hostility and contempt for Sen. Obama, his background, his program, and his campaign, that I feel you are taking me and the more than 17 million voters who back it for fools.
Are you at all open to understanding why we are attracted to his candidacy. Or do you simply write us off as dupes, drones, and naive idiots?
And I'm:
And I believe the Obama campaign encouraged every single minute of it.
Mm, sorry! Not interested, Parent
Oh, goody.
"These guys" generalites are stupid and sexist, but I suppose you think you've earned the right to be as idiotic and superficial as your American male counterparts.
Yeah, loving and empathetic..and intelligent, creative, determined.
Either we get so many liberals into Congress that we just have the majority and can vote things into law? What's new about that?
Or we "rebrand" the same old things, using a new word for whatever those same old things might have been. A shallow marketing tool, in other words.
None of this sounds good. Clinton had real, concrete policies with real, concrete results. Not just either gaining the majority or changing the words.
Obama will have his chance to gain my support. At the end of that time, or let's say, by the time of the Dem convention, I'll be able to make my decision about who will ultimately get my vote.
BTW, I went to the Obama site today to see his welcome to all us Clinton supporters, or whatever, and the home page was a big contribution page - my address, my credit card number, the amount of the contrition, etc. Very unimpressive...almost seemed greedy to me. Clinton has a contribution button but also her info.
It reminded me of when I visited his site earlier and had to sign up as a supporter to even get into the site for information about his policies.
This doesn't seem like a new communications sort of thing....more like a forced manipulation.
Empathy for an ambitious, powerful, white woman worth $ 30 mil, and, roughly 0 for the women of the M.E who posturing cowards threaten to "obliterate" and "turn to glass".
We wont even get into what happens to poor and working class women in the U.S under the trickle down/piss-on-em agenda.
I dont know whether to laugh or cry.
Funny, I wasn't aware that all Hillary supporters wanted her for Veep, or generally thought in such groupthink ways.
Just asking! Parent
Is that an insult now? Parent
As far as Hillary goes, I don't think she really wants it anyway. Who would frankly? Parent
This process is just beginning, and Dems are weighing in on both sides of the Dream Ticket issue. It's premature, but it does make for lively discussion. And keeps some of us off the streets and out of trouble ... Parent
Intelligence is an important attribute, even a necessary one for a leader to possess. But being smart certainly does NOT make one a leader. Parent
"My (Unpleasant) Encounter with an Honest-to-God Radical 60's Professor Whom I Finally Got to SHUT UP..."
http://tinyurl.com/4lz39d
You know the type...the ones who want to "destroy America" like Rev. Wright...The guys who really understood the 60's better than anyone (at least according to this guy..."
A story of triumph!!!
Most upsetting was Mark Penn, who is "credited" with most of the bad advice she took. I didn't think she was well served with "ready on day one" or the 3am commercial. There are stories of backstabbing in the Clinton organization and this seems to fit that. He takes credit for his contributions and blames the fundraisers.
Chuck Todd with yet another screed on "why Hillary lost"
I'd actually agree with a couple of points in the Todd article, namely that Hillary shouldn't have let the Deaniacs control the DNC. (But seriously, is it true Penn didn't know CA wasn't winner-take-all?)
Not sure I'm buying the whole thing, though. Todd's thesis is that the Dems won Congress in 2006 "without help from the Clintons". Yeah, right. I'm sure nothing about the healthy economy and international credibility the U.S. held during Bill Clinton's two terms had nothing to do with boosting the Democratic brand.
The WashPost article is just more palaver about states that could or could not be in play. Apparently the list of states Obama plans to target first is Iowa, Virginia, North Carolina, New Mexico, Nevada, Colorado and Ohio.
Good luck with that. Seriously. North Carolina? Parent
When listening to Obama, I think what he is talking about is refraiming the argument so that (as an example) paying for day care insn't a liberal or conservative idea, it is an American idea. He takes his views and instead of discussing them in relationship to one group, he makes them universal- thus hard to attack. I personally believe his eliquence is such an amazing political gift that will allow him to be succesfull.
he makes them universal- thus hard to attack
How will that prevent the Republicans from saying anything they want to about a policy when the mount an attack against it if they choose to disagree with him. Parent
Do tell how this new found affection for the cuddly, self effacing McCain and his thug agenda relates.
Please.
I already care a little less after reading your post. Parent
I'm heartbroken that your "support" has lessened. Parent
Feminism...on the other hand...
Ultimately, "Feminism is the radical notion that women are people."
While some feminists engage in a form of invitational (Rogerianesque) rhetoric, not all feminists agree that a "touchy feely" form of empathy is the way to go. Parent
That doesn't make them ineffective politicians. I hope Hillary works on health care in the senate. And I hope Obama starts bringing the troops home. But I don't want to hear about Obama's family anymore (I'm still waiting for the Jewish uncle and the gay step-sister to pop up). And I don't want to hear about what Hillary thinks she represents to women. It's incredibly sad that Hillary couldn't be an astronaut, because those fifty smart, ambitious women decided that being an astronaut sounded like a much more enjoyable experience than running for president.