Your turn.
Make a new account
The problem with putting a big Surgeon General's warning label on this satire reading NO!! NOT REALLY!!! BUT JOHN MCCAIN THINKS SO!!!! is that doing so would make it not a satire; or, if it were a satire, a satire of humorless liberals. (And would presumably fail for the same reason that this satire allegedly fails - many liberals appear to sincerely believe this is a good and necessary correction.) I further suggest that "A Modest Proposal" would not actually be improved by putting the whole thing in the blood-drenched mouth of a Tory industrialist named "Dasterdly McBabyeater von Evil" and/or renaming it "An Absurdly Broad Caricature of Aspects of Contemporary Society which The Author, In Truth, Deplores". True, the idiots being satirized won't "get" the joke - that's the joke's value to those who do. I may be a horrible elitist, but I don't think jokes are improved by pitching them to people with no sense of humor.
censoring it and denouncing it only makes people want to find out what its all about.
I thought we were all really ticked off that Kerry never responded to any negative information, or at least not quickly enough. The Obama campaign seems to be watching for these issues. Parent
But the allegations (which are really being made) that Obama is a secret Muslim infiltrator are no more or less ridiculous than the allegations against Kerry, they are equally baseless, and they are clearly intended to ruin his name and destroy his electoral chances. Kerry should have acted faster and Obama better learn from his example. Since the allegations against Obama are not being propagated openly (there's no "Crypto Muslims for Truth" group) if anything the New Yorker may have done him a favor by giving him the opportunity to attack this openly.
I hope to heaven Obama won't repeat Kerry's mistakes (he's got enough of his own to worry about) and it seems he's determined not to. Parent
I very much doubt it was orchestrated, but certainly the Obama camp is making use of it. He's caught a number of lucky unlucky breaks recently -- like Jesse Jackson. Parent
Not. Parent
Is this good satire? Is it even HONEST to call it good satire? That's a judgement each of us can make as individuals. Parent
Made me imagine George Carlin chuckling from above -- in the company of Lenny Bruce, Will Rogers, et al. Parent
As I noted above the question of how Obama's camp reacts to the cover and the question of whether or not the cover is good satire are two different questions. Again, Pohdertz is attacking the former largely he because he assumes the latter is resolved.
The fact that Pohdertz responds in this way just gives more weight to Digby's analysis imo. Parent
Suffice it to say, I am with The Editors on this one.
Context is everything.
Since this is an open thread and we love polls around here:
Obama beats Bush hands-down, but Al Gore and Hillary Clinton do better against McCain than Obama, sez Rasmussen.
The last paragraph is interesting:
These numbers help explain why Election 2008 is competitive even though events so heavily favor the Democrats -- because the Republicans are on course to nominate their strongest possible general election candidate but the Democrats are not. Perhaps even more importantly, the data suggests that voters don't see a potential McCain Administration as the third term of President Bush.
I don't think much of the "McSame" meme myself. Parent
McCain has flip-flopped on immigration big time.... Parent
He is pandering to all sides on the immigration issue simultaneously--that is simply dishonest. Parent
That was Bush's plan too. He was much more of a moderate on immigration than other areas.
So in essence McCain is with Bush on this issue, they just both happen to be right. Parent
I know it ain't happening, but wouldn't it be so nice if the SD's would wake up before the end of August and do the right thing? I can't help still wishing for it. Parent
But that, of course, is not funny at all. Parent
To explain my reaction to the cover, I have to explain a little of my reaction to the fist bump photo that is most seen in the media, and that is used as the model in the cartoon. I love photography, and since the fist-bump I have stared a lot at that photo. I love it because it seems to me to capture their relationship so well. They are sharing an important moment together, and looking right into eachother's eyes. Michelle looks so focused and fierce, and playful at the same time, clearly expressing encouragement and belief in her husband. I think it's beautiful. It has even made me regret not having such a strong relationship of my own, and I do not do that often.
I think it will go down as the iconic photo of this campaign, and I'm sorry the stupid Fox 'terrorist fist bump' crap tarnished it.
What struck me most about the cover was the perfect capture of Michelle's expression in that photo. Now, you would think that loving the actual photograph so much, I would be dismayed at it being used in satire, but my reaction is the opposite, because the artist seems to have shared my notice of the impact of that, and used it to great affect. That is art.
I refuse to insist that everything is dumbed down to the level of entertainment weekly. If the New Yorker , for gods sake, can't run cartoons that take some thought, what's next? Does Colbert have to stop calling Obama a secret Muslim, which he does in a way that makes fun of himself, and not Obama? Just shoot me. Parent
unreal...
I'm sure George, Dick, Condi and Rummy are shaking in their jackboots. Parent
Not trying to pile-on or anything, but I know there are some on this blog for which this story would put a smile on their face:
"Crowd erupts during Obama speech -- but it's over mention of Clinton"
They are in for a huge shock in November. Parent
McCain voted against prohibiting the CIA from torturing people it holds....
Cutting off noses..... Parent
Guys, if you really fear four more Republican presidential years that badly, you should be telling your superdelegates you changed your mind and they should nominate Hillary. It's not too late. Parent
Dream on..... Parent
Put your money where your mouth is. Parent
And the vote would be cathartic and you would support Obama as the nominee if Hillary lost the roll call vote? Parent
Obama no doubt still would win the convention. But if he wants to win the election, he could use the votes of us former Dems who are appalled by the corruption of the committee and thus of the party -- so far. I, for one, will be watching for what happens in that step of reviewing committee recommendations, repeat, recommendations.
And it would be useful, too, for the convention to instruct the committees and leaders to come up with something to fix the corruption of caucuses. Parent
With the dust settled on the primary season, one thing is clear: Obama is the presumed nominee thanks only to superdelegates. He never did win enough pledged delegates to reach the winning number, falling about 350 votes short. His expected victory stems from beating Clinton among superdelegates 463-257, according to a tally on Real Clear Politics. All the more reason for Obama to make sure that there is no roll call including Clinton's name on the ballot at the national convention -- which a few die hard fans of the former First Lady are still clamoring for. Why highlight just how close the Democratic contest really was? And there is certainly no gain for Obama in dwelling on how he had to depend on superdelegates to win the nomination.
All the more reason for Obama to make sure that there is no roll call including Clinton's name on the ballot at the national convention -- which a few die hard fans of the former First Lady are still clamoring for.
Why highlight just how close the Democratic contest really was? And there is certainly no gain for Obama in dwelling on how he had to depend on superdelegates to win the nomination.
;0) Parent
Well maybe that gives Obama too much credit but that's my unity moment.
But really what's so sad is how Obama and his people feel they must fight against living in the shadow of the Clinton brand.
People. Obama supporters. Does Steve young worry about how much applause joe Montana gets??? Parent
In the coming days, I understand you will travel to Afghanistan for the first time and visit with a few of our European partners. Like my travels to these regions, I trust this trip will afford you a unique opportunity to see the facts on the ground firsthand and witness the work of our brave men and women who sacrifice so much to secure our freedom. In February, I had the privilege of visiting and talking with our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. These brave Americans serve their country with incredible passion, pride and courage. As you know, NATO's International Security and Assistance Force (ISAF) plays an integral part in the current operations and reconstruction of Afghanistan. There are concerns about the imbalance between some European nations, their level of commitment to the fight in Afghanistan,... However, despite these successes, I am concerned our Subcommittee has not held any hearings on these issues over the last two years. With oversight of NATO relations and its role in Afghanistan, I believe it is time for us to focus closely on these issues. As Ranking Member of your Subcommittee on European Affairs, I would welcome a chance to hold a hearing on NATO's mission in Afghanistan upon your return. The success of Afghanistan is critical to the future of NATO and vital to our efforts to defeat Al Qaeda and the Taliban. As the situation in Afghanistan grows more tense, it is time for us to hold a hearing on the mission there. I look forward to working with you to schedule this hearing.
In February, I had the privilege of visiting and talking with our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. These brave Americans serve their country with incredible passion, pride and courage. As you know, NATO's International Security and Assistance Force (ISAF) plays an integral part in the current operations and reconstruction of Afghanistan.
There are concerns about the imbalance between some European nations, their level of commitment to the fight in Afghanistan,... However, despite these successes, I am concerned our Subcommittee has not held any hearings on these issues over the last two years. With oversight of NATO relations and its role in Afghanistan, I believe it is time for us to focus closely on these issues. As Ranking Member of your Subcommittee on European Affairs, I would welcome a chance to hold a hearing on NATO's mission in Afghanistan upon your return.
The success of Afghanistan is critical to the future of NATO and vital to our efforts to defeat Al Qaeda and the Taliban. As the situation in Afghanistan grows more tense, it is time for us to hold a hearing on the mission there. I look forward to working with you to schedule this hearing.
I wonder what McCain has ever done to push for hearings on Afghanistan, not to take away from the point he's trying to score at Obama's expense. If McCain is the Ranking Member of the subcommittee now, that means he was probably (not necessarily) chair of the subcommittee before the Democratic takeover in 2006... Parent
In the previous Congress, this subcommittee was apparently chaired by George Allen. So I'm sure they were really on the ball... Parent
The House subcommittee, chaired by Robert Wexler, has held nine hearings in this Congress, I seem to remember. Parent
Or, maybe McCain is confused again...;-) Parent
But all this Afghanistan bluster is highly disingenuous on everyone because they all know but the MSM and very scant alt media will talk about the long-sought pipeline from Turkmenistan thru Afghanistan, Pakistan and on to India. Englehardt mentioned it the other day in the Nation but didn't do justice to the situation. Lots of behind the scenes stuff going on over that pipeline, not to mention the pipeline from Iran thru Pakistan to India that the Bush admin wants to stop and why they offered India nuke support instead.
Canada has sure taken note of their NATO troops being put in harms way for a gas/oil pipeline. Parent
See
Obama not holding any committee hearings on NATO.
Try to wait until someone actually says something inaccurate, wouldja? Parent
Also, I forgot my favorite section from the article:
"...What ignited that outburst was the mere mention by Obama of the name Hillary Clinton, his vanquished party opponent.
She wasn't there, of course. But in absentia the Democratic Party's loser got a noticeably warmer response than the winner, perhaps a reflection of that lingering party unity thing that was taken care of up in Unity."
Consider it done...
Just in case you needed your faith in the human race restored...sun god knows I do.
I'd call the DH the invention of a capitalist pig...owners wanting to sell tickets with more home runs, the rules be damned. Me?...I'll take a 1-0 pitchers duel anyday...you're holding your breath with every pitch. Parent
I do not think football would be a better game if we forced the punter to line up at defensive end. Parent
And rules change all the time. Parent
Gave my all-American heart a little twitter to think about it. Parent
It's not Home-Run Derby...it's a baseball game. Nobody should only play half of every inning...that's exhibition bullsh*t.
Why stop at the DH, why not hit 9 guys and field 9 different guys. Parent
So much more strategy at work when the game is played correctly. Parent
Just imagine the damage W can do if he's the next MLB Commissioner! Parent
Plus, by "better" I don't mean "better to watch", I mean they win more - so they are better teams. And you do see those things in the AL - especially late in the season.
But again, I am not a purist, and I am biased. Parent
Regarding a guy like Ortiz, that's where even more managerial strategy comes in...is the big stick/no field guy better for the club than a more rounded player? Do you put in a defensive replacement? I love those kind of intricacies only a NL manager has to worry about.
My dog could manage an AL team:) Parent
In each case, it's very slight. Parent
NL baseball: Single, sacrifice bunt, two-run homer. Parent
No doubt the Rockies would have won the WS last year had they had the home field advantage... Parent
Helluva run they had to get there though! Parent
I actually have come to appreciate the extra subtleties that come with having pitchers bat, though. It must be a lot more fun to be a bench player on an NL team than an AL team Parent
Then there is only one true professional league in all the world in my book...everybody else may as well be playing beer-league softball...when is the AL planning on implementing courtesy runners, starting with a 1-1 count, and the EH?...:) Parent
Ready, set, Spin!
LOL! Parent
Should work out a lot like "step 1: invade, step 2: _____, step 3: be greeted as liberators" did. Parent
Thanks, Bush, for giving us this wonderful quagmire... Parent
But based on what they are proposing right now, there's a vast gulf between Obama and McCain on Iraq. Obama's talking about immediately beginning a withdrawal upon taking office, that would wrap up in the summer of 2010, with no permanent bases, and McCain's talking about staying the course and theoretically coming home in four years. Except for those bases, of course, because Iraq is like South Korea to him. Parent
Then we will win in Afghanistan the exact same way we won in Iraq, and all the money we save will be used to balance the budget and give every new baby a chocolate eclair. Parent
Obama would never give a baby a chocolate eclair. Not healthy! Parent
"What the boycott of McDonald's IS NOT about This boycott is not about hiring homosexuals. It is not about homosexuals eating at McDonald's. It is not about how homosexual employees are treated.
What the boycott of McDonald's IS about It is about McDonald's, as a corporation, refusing to remain neutral in the culture wars. McDonald's has chosen not to remain neutral but to give the full weight of their corporation to promoting the homosexual agenda, including homosexual marriage."
The comments are tres amusing, in a sad, sad sort of way. http://www.boycottmcdonalds.com/
I wonder if they will make it easier to get a divorce from out of state too. I know that has been a big problem for many couples. Parent
I lived in Mass. most of my life before moving to the only place in the U.S. more liberal in its politics. Parent
And they always had the best fries.
But I still prefer BK or Wendys...and the greatest fast-food burger of all time, White Castles. Parent
There's a local place called Smashburger that is very, very tasty, albeit a tad expensive. Parent
But make a stop at Mickey Lu's, a '50s diner that is not retro like the ones in the big trendy cities. Nope, Mickey Lu's is still as it started and never stopped -- and still serving the truly great burgers a la the White Castle era. So you need a bagful.
But skip the burger, say I, and go for the malted! A real malted, still made in an original Horlick's machine with the real Horlick's malt powder -- and with Wisconsin custard, which isn't pudding but our sinfully rich ice cream.
If you stop there even once, you will go to Peshtigo again. The northland where nothing changes is calling to me now. . . . Parent
This makes me sick! McDonals's has chosen to accommodate a small group of people who live by what is right in THEIR eyes, and they expect all of society to accept their definition of morality and tolerance. "Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools."
Mote, eye, beam. Parent
That being said, I really don't think this matters that much and is just a chance for tech types to whine about how he doesn't "get" them. Pretty good article today on Stumper about how insignificant this stuff is, presidents aren't even allowed to use e-mail for security reasons. Parent
In the end, Tony Snow couldn't be saved by his politics.
Elizabeth knows that all too well. Parent
Democrats have posted even greater gains statewide, up 106,508 voters from January through May, compared with 16,686 for the Republicans.
Yes you read that right. Dems outgained Republicans in Florida 106,508 new voters to 16,686.
I agree with you CoralGables. Obama can win in Florida. Here are two big issues in Florida that I think favor Obama: McCain wants to privatize Social Security and favors offshore oil drilling. Parent
I'm distressed beyond words over his patent disrespect and disparagement of his most loyal voting constituency, who have asked little more of him than to be as proud of them as they are of him. It makes me sick the way he takes the votes of my family and friends for granted and gives them nothing but the back of his hand in return for their steadfast support. They deserve much better, and he's not nearly good enough.
I wonder why no one has brought up the obvious (to me) parallel: If HRC were to address audiences of women by scolding them and telling them they need to be more personally responsible and better parents, I doubt she'd be getting a pass, much less being praised for it. In contrast, when she speaks to women (and women's issues) she does not use negative stereotypes about women. She praises women, celebrates their achievements, and respects her audience.
(There is much more good commentary at Make it Plain)
It's white voters, imho. If it were actually black men and parents, it would have been couched in terms more like your hypthetical Hillary discussion. Praise, then urge even more efforts, etc. Some mention of the societal problems affecting even the most dedicated parents, some programs to make it easier to do good parenting.
But that's just me. Parent
If you don't think there was any oil spill then watch this video. (Per talkingpointsmemo and thinkprogress)
Is Rush pushing this story? Parent
He testified today before congress. Mostly very very gloomy inflation with no growth. Remember stagflation? Remember Jimmy Carter got the blame? Is there a connection?
It's interesting, because a lot of Virginians applied for those jobs according to my dad. Parent
As ye sow, so shall ye reap, you jerks. Parent
If you cut your jeans into shorts, does that count as "made in the USA"? Parent
I know it's true because I read it on Daily Kos. Parent
This site is better: American site that lists US companies. I didn't see mens shorts, but they listed pumpkin creek for women. Parent
(We have migrant workers in Vermont, but they're paid and treated well and regarded as seasonal members of the community.) Parent
There's a happy ending--to this story. But do read, as it is a bit scary. Of course, revealing they'd even received the subpoena was verboten bcz it might interfere with an ongoing investigation.
BTW, Ben Smith does not take a strong stand against giving out the info. Might want to learn to use one of those anonymizing programs....
It appears it's important to know what the IP provider's code of privacy is--some require the blogger to inform a commenter of anyone wishing to learn their identity, thus permitting the blog owner to tell the individual commenter.
Bloggers concerned about possible litigation may want to check the privacy policies of their Internet service providers, to see whether they include a pledge to notify any customer whose site is the subject of a subpoena, Mr. (Jonathan) Zittrain (a law professor at Harvard) said. I added the parenthetical info.