home

From The Duh File: McCain Has To Scorch The Earth

Robert Novak writes:

[T]he private Republican view is that the focus must be on Obama in the coming campaign for McCain to win. A positive campaign will lose, and the spotlight on Obama must be harsher for McCain to have a chance.

Thanks for the insight Bob.

< Poll: CA Voters Oppose Initiative to Ban Gay Marriage | Bush and Maliki Agree to Iraq "Time Horizon" for Troop Withdrawal >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Seriously, no $h*t (5.00 / 3) (#1)
    by andgarden on Fri Jul 18, 2008 at 06:21:13 PM EST


    Imagine getting paid so much to state the obvious (5.00 / 3) (#2)
    by davnee on Fri Jul 18, 2008 at 06:34:08 PM EST
    The R's can only win this election by riding the swiftboats to victory.  There has never been the slightest doubt about that.  The only thing that has made things even slightly interesting is that the Dems managed to nominate the candidate most susceptible to being swamped.  If Obama loses, in an electoral cycle like this, he and every Dem that ever supported him deserves to be run out of town on a rail.  

    It's a signal to begin the assault. (none / 0) (#4)
    by Salo on Fri Jul 18, 2008 at 06:51:20 PM EST
    In other words just like all their other campaigns (5.00 / 5) (#5)
    by ruffian on Fri Jul 18, 2008 at 07:01:04 PM EST
    No sense changing the game plan until it stops working.

    They are like the Roman army to our Celts. (none / 0) (#7)
    by Salo on Fri Jul 18, 2008 at 07:11:26 PM EST
    Ah look same old legions and Gladius's hacking through our lines and beseiging our cities in the same old way. frikking McLegions and McCaesar, why do they always beat us?

    Parent
    If I were Sen. Obama, I would sure (5.00 / 1) (#8)
    by oculus on Fri Jul 18, 2008 at 07:17:27 PM EST
    pick Bill Clinton and James Carville's brains.

    Parent
    They haven't won yet (none / 0) (#12)
    by ruffian on Fri Jul 18, 2008 at 07:56:15 PM EST
    I think a positive, inspiring campaign could do it this time, but this attacking McCain stuff does not get me excited, and does not seem to work very well.

    Parent
    It's just a bit of satire. (none / 0) (#14)
    by Salo on Fri Jul 18, 2008 at 08:00:08 PM EST
    I'm so very tired of seeing Dems lose.

    Parent
    I know, I enjoyed it. (none / 0) (#16)
    by ruffian on Fri Jul 18, 2008 at 08:02:19 PM EST
    Just trying to cheer you up, what with the Legions at the walls and all.

    Parent
    Yeah? Well, (none / 0) (#19)
    by oldpro on Fri Jul 18, 2008 at 08:37:59 PM EST
    "The Irish Saved Civilization"

    Parent
    Since when (5.00 / 0) (#9)
    by Nadai on Fri Jul 18, 2008 at 07:34:22 PM EST
    do Republicans have to be told that their only hope of winning is to savage the Democrat?  Isn't that always The Plan?

    I know it's considered long over by most (1.00 / 0) (#22)
    by MarkL on Fri Jul 18, 2008 at 09:20:22 PM EST
    people, but I think the coke use is Obama's fatal flaw, politically; furthermore, the fact the Republicans hardly mentioned it while Obama was wrapping up the nomination tells me they were holding back.

    I don't (2.00 / 1) (#30)
    by Ga6thDem on Sat Jul 19, 2008 at 06:48:03 AM EST
    think it alone will be a huge problem. The problem is that it will help create a narrative of a candidate who throughout his life has made poor choices--drug use, TUCC, Jeremiah Wright, Rezko etc.

    Parent
    I have repeatedly been admonished (none / 0) (#23)
    by oculus on Fri Jul 18, 2008 at 09:24:27 PM EST
    only older [read "ancicent"]Americans care a smidge about Obama's admitted use of cocaine.  

    Parent
    yeah, I don't believe that in the least. (none / 0) (#24)
    by MarkL on Fri Jul 18, 2008 at 09:24:54 PM EST
    Me neither. (none / 0) (#26)
    by oculus on Fri Jul 18, 2008 at 09:28:08 PM EST
    LOL --- stoooopid (1.00 / 1) (#28)
    by Edgar08 on Sat Jul 19, 2008 at 03:46:55 AM EST
    [T]he private Obama view is that the focus must be on McCain in the coming campaign for Obama to win. A positive campaign will lose, and the spotlight on McCain must be harsher for Obama to have a chance.

    What a waste of space.

    I mean really who's voting for Obama cause he's worth a damn??

    Aren't we all supposed to vote for Obama cause he's better than a ....

    pols are pols.  And didn't we end up supporting a certain candidate not because his issues were any different but because he was more electable based on media preference?

    And so Novak says media preference will determine the General Election too!

    Not much insight anywhere at all.

    Thanx for the Bat Signal actually (none / 0) (#3)
    by Salo on Fri Jul 18, 2008 at 06:50:36 PM EST
    He' always on the forwards edge of what teh GOP plan to do...

    Was Novak the source of McCain's (none / 0) (#6)
    by oculus on Fri Jul 18, 2008 at 07:01:50 PM EST
    speculation on Obama's itinary?

    Parent
    Too late (none / 0) (#10)
    by tek on Fri Jul 18, 2008 at 07:41:25 PM EST
    Barack Obama already scorched his own corner of the earth.

    This should give the Obama (none / 0) (#11)
    by Lahdee on Fri Jul 18, 2008 at 07:42:56 PM EST
    campaign more opportunities to brand McCain uncivil.


    Please, no more whining from the Obama campaign (5.00 / 3) (#13)
    by ruffian on Fri Jul 18, 2008 at 07:58:58 PM EST
    Everyone knows the Republicans are uncivil. They take pride in it, and just brand us right back as wimps for complaining about it.

    Parent
    I'm sure Rupert Murdoch (none / 0) (#15)
    by weltec2 on Fri Jul 18, 2008 at 08:02:03 PM EST
    and his evil minions are listening carefully to this toad of the NeoCon Council of Dark Lords and are taking notes.

    Novak opposed the war! (none / 0) (#17)
    by Salo on Fri Jul 18, 2008 at 08:12:41 PM EST
    odd really.

    He' conidered to be soft on terror in neocon circles.  He's a GOP hack.  he even said that one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.

    You'll never hear a Dem say that.

    Dark Lord Hacksideous.

    Parent

    He's Richard Perle's hacktacular twin (none / 0) (#18)
    by ruffian on Fri Jul 18, 2008 at 08:25:19 PM EST
    Separated at birth

    Parent
    Musr be a (none / 0) (#20)
    by oldpro on Fri Jul 18, 2008 at 08:42:01 PM EST
    slow news day...

    proving once again (none / 0) (#21)
    by cpinva on Fri Jul 18, 2008 at 09:04:29 PM EST
    that you have to get up pretty darn early in the morning, to get one over on robert novak! i mean, he just picked right up on that!

    this is as insightful as pointing that your army must be bigger and badder than the other guy's, to win. but then, we've all come to expect such gems of penetrating analysis from mr. novak.

    The media is nearly 100% behind Obama- (none / 0) (#25)
    by kenosharick on Fri Jul 18, 2008 at 09:25:29 PM EST
    so this is mccain's best strategy; of course they always play nasty.  BTW- example of media bias: Obama goes overseas and 200 reporters follow, all 3 network anchors pull up stakes to follow.  Mccain goes overseas and media yawns-most barely  report on it.

    well see. (none / 0) (#27)
    by cpinva on Fri Jul 18, 2008 at 11:46:21 PM EST
    The media is nearly 100% behind Obama

    the game hasn't started yet. i predict they'll turn on him in a heartbeat, once the conventions are done.

    "The media" (5.00 / 1) (#31)
    by jondee on Sat Jul 19, 2008 at 01:14:03 PM EST
    meaning the advertisers meaning the corporations.

    The only thing they're 100% behind is whatever increases their market share -- this week.

    Parent

    Well somebody has to ask Obama some (none / 0) (#29)
    by lizpolaris on Sat Jul 19, 2008 at 06:16:17 AM EST
    questions.  The MSM sure isn't going to do it.

    The Onion sums it up.  Which 'news' organization will win the prize for best puff-piece?

    http://www.theonion.com/content/news/time_publishes_definitive_obama