home

The Declaration Of Independence

232 years ago today, the Continental Congress, meeting in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, issued a Declaration of Independence:

IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.

< More Sexism At NBC | Morning Holiday Music: Jimi Hendrix, Star Spangled Banner >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Thoughts on the Fourth (5.00 / 3) (#9)
    by MsExPat on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 10:55:11 AM EST
    Woke up this morning, rolling around in bed, remembered today is the Fourth of July, and a couple of pre-morning coffee thoughts hit me:

    1. 200 odd years ago, we made a revolution--how cool is that!?

    2. The Constitution and Bill of Rights, 232 years down the road, are still revolutionary documents. Look around the world--China, Russia, fugettaboutit. Europe, even the U.K., still not up to our gold standard of human rights. At least on paper.

    3. And there's the rub. What the founding fathers did back then was so out of the box, that the powerful, greedy, and mighty are still trying to chip away at the Canon.

    So Happy 4th of July, and remember to keep your powder dry. Oh yeah, one more thing. Remember the French. They helped us back then, a lot. The ideological and intellectual foundations of our revolution came from theirs. As my Chinese friends say, you gotta always give thanks to the ancestors. So, today, I do.

    Pass the fireworks (but not in California!) And the champagne.

    I have to say... (none / 0) (#22)
    by pmj6 on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 12:13:20 PM EST
    ... US independence comfortably predated the French Revolution, but collectively they do form the foundation of our era. Not to mention they both sprang from the same intellectual tradition.

    Parent
    History Channel "The Revolution" (5.00 / 1) (#13)
    by Joan in VA on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 11:24:33 AM EST
    marathon today. Thanks for posting-never get tired of reading it! TJ is the man. "When wrongs are pressed because it is believed they will be borne, resistance becomes morality".

    Went to DC (5.00 / 3) (#20)
    by sj on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 11:51:50 AM EST
    ...yesterday.  I found myself moved to tears (well, shimmering eyes) at the Jefferson and Lincoln memorials.  

    Here's what I don't get:  

    Quotes from the Declaration of Independence and of the first amendment are carved into stone and are visible everywhere.  As a visitor, I was inspired and moved at those visible reminders.  To my own surprise, actually.

    How jaded to you have to be to be a legislator, who lives and moves amongst those monuments, entrusted with the work of the nation -- to casually ignore these visible reminders of the birth of this nation and all it stood for?

    "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

    I don't get it.

    oh and this (5.00 / 1) (#21)
    by sj on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 11:55:51 AM EST
    "...It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us -- that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion -- that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain -- that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom -- and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth."


    Parent
    Benj. Franklin, Constitution Day speech (5.00 / 1) (#24)
    by wurman on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 12:20:45 PM EST
    For me, Sept. 17, 1787, is the actual birthday of The United States of American.

    And Franklin's prose, delivered by James Wilson, as taken by James Madison:

    Here's a link:

    Here's my money quote:

    In these sentiments, Sir, I agree to this Constitution with all its faults, if they are such; because I think a general Government necessary for us, and there is no form of Government but what may be a blessing to the people if well administered, and believe farther that this is likely to be well administered for a course of years, and can only end in Despotism, as other forms have done before it, when the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic Government, being incapable of any other.

    It has been my opinion for 7 year & 9 months that the citizens of the United States have become so corrupted as to actually need George W. Bush & his despotic government.

    As Sen. Mike Mansfield (D-MT, 1953-77) once put it [paraphrased] <my biggest fear is that we actually have representative government>.

    D of I is so cool (5.00 / 1) (#25)
    by DandyTIger on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 12:47:29 PM EST
    It's amazing that it happened at all. Truly. It always brings a smile to my face. And going into DC (I do that every couple of months for work), I always like hanging out a the mall, and looking over the monuments. It never gets old.

    And then I look at today's government with FISA, with our dem candidate on the side of dismantling the constitution (in my opinion anyway) and I think about how far we've fallen. It's very sad. It's even more sad that the so called liberal party is doing much of this.

    "Mr. Secretary, New York abstains" (none / 0) (#1)
    by andgarden on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 10:20:58 AM EST


    Declaration of Sentiments (5.00 / 1) (#8)
    by ghost2 on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 10:49:08 AM EST
    Annabellep at Peacocks and Lilies wrote a great blog post yesterday.  I especially liked her linking to the Declaration of Sentiments written in 1848, an amazing feminist piece.    

    Today, Annabellep followed by putting another great post: Declaration of Objections. All the links are worthy of your visit.

    Yes, Annabellep is a PUMA.  

    Parent

    Have you seen the side (none / 0) (#2)
    by Stellaaa on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 10:24:11 AM EST
    by side comparison of the two Georges?  Heard it on the radio yesterday. The parallels are rather obvious.  

    Must research whether the Declaration (none / 0) (#3)
    by oculus on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 10:27:17 AM EST
    of Independence has ever been set to music.  I'm hearing Copeland's Lincoln Portrait in my head.

    I would prefer some (none / 0) (#4)
    by Stellaaa on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 10:31:21 AM EST
    modernist, like  John Adams.

    Parent
    Good one. (none / 0) (#6)
    by oculus on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 10:34:24 AM EST
    The Wiki references include the musical and movie 1776 and the movie National Treasure, but no mention of any musical setting.

    BTW:  my brother called from Denver airport.  Flight to SFO delayed an hour at the gate due to smoke.  

    Parent

    Today? (none / 0) (#7)
    by Stellaaa on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 10:40:53 AM EST
    Must be the Big Sur fire, that is really tragic.  Henry Miller's house, Bob Dylan, Keraouc's hut etc.  

    Parent
    Can we have a constitution (none / 0) (#5)
    by MichaelGale on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 10:32:27 AM EST
    amendment that changes 'All men' to All men and women please.

    Thanks to Annabellep (5.00 / 1) (#10)
    by ghost2 on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 10:55:25 AM EST
    She had a great piece yesterday (The Revolution WILL be downloaded).  She linked to this amazing document: Declaration of Sentiments, written in 1848:

    We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men and women are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights governments are instituted, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of those who suffer from it to refuse allegiance to it, and to insist upon the institution of a new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.
    ...
    The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.

    He has never permitted her to exercise her inalienable right to the elective franchise.

    He has compelled her to submit to law in the formation of which she had no voice.

    He has withheld from her rights which are given to the most ignorant and degraded men, both natives and foreigners.

    Having deprived her of this first right as a citizen, the elective franchise, thereby leaving her without representation in the halls of legislation, he has oppressed her on all sides.
    ...
     



    Parent
    No amending the D of I (5.00 / 1) (#18)
    by Cream City on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 11:43:03 AM EST
    as we can do with the Constitution.  And the Constitution was gender-free until 1868, the 14th and 15th Amendments with {black) "male."  We went backward as a country with that, and it took a woman to write what women called the 16th Amendment. But then it had to be called the Susan B. Anthony Amendment for its author, until -- and she did not live to see it -- it finally got a number as the 19th.  Of course, it really negates only the 15th, which is why another woman had to pen the ERA aka the Alice Paul Amendment, as it still doesn't have a number lo these 85 years later. . . .

    Thus, the Constitution still can be and is a work in progress.  That's the most admirable thing about the founding fathers -- well, they were a different group more than a dozen years after the D of I, but founding fathers still -- to me: their humilitas in admitting that they might not have anticipated everything, so they included the amending process in the Constitution.

    And that is why we still have the same Constitution, more than 200 years later, and have not had to have a coup: the humilitas that is the measure of truly great men -- and good women.  Would there had been more of it in American history.

    Parent

    If the founding fathers could come back today (none / 0) (#11)
    by Saul on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 11:07:48 AM EST
    what do you think they would think on how the bill of rights and the constitution  has changed through years of interpretation?.  Do you think they would agree with all the amendments, interpretations  and changes or do you think they would say,  "Hey that's not what we meant." Also if they could come back and review everything, and had a chance to rewrite the constitution and the bill of rights do you think they would be modified if they know now what has  occurred through out the years?

    Depends on who you have in mind (none / 0) (#23)
    by pmj6 on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 12:15:38 PM EST
    Hamilton was into strong executive power, Madison preferred strong federal government to states' rights, but others disagreed. The Constitution is as vague and short as it is due to it being a compromise among widely differing positions. A lot of issues were swept under the rug, as it were, to be hashed out by future generations. That would be us.

    Parent
    Declaration read aloud (none / 0) (#12)
    by ruffian on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 11:23:11 AM EST
     by NPR voices.

    It is very powerful heard aloud. Jefferson wrote it intentionally that way. Take a few minutes, listen, and raise a glass.

    Better link (none / 0) (#14)
    by ruffian on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 11:31:11 AM EST
    Use this one instead.

    Sorry I did not test the other one first.

    Parent

    That's some beautiful sh*t right there.... (none / 0) (#15)
    by kdog on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 11:32:47 AM EST
    whenever I get to thinking humanity ain't nothing but a cancer I read the Declaration and see all of our glorious potential realized.

    And about this bit...is it time, or long past time, to seriously alter or abolish?

    That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

    I say yes.

    I must admit (none / 0) (#16)
    by flyerhawk on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 11:39:57 AM EST
    While I find Jefferson to be one of the poorer founders politically, he sure did know how to write.  

    Happy Birthday USA (none / 0) (#17)
    by Abdul Abulbul Amir on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 11:41:51 AM EST

    Is this a great country, or what!

    Actually, more our moment of conception (none / 0) (#19)
    by Cream City on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 11:50:31 AM EST
    as the D of I was only that, a declaration and not a treaty.  Winning that required a seven years' war, as we remained British and did not become a country until 1783, our real birthday.

    The stories of what so many endured and sacrificed for the seven years after the D of I are not taught enough -- including the stories of the Tories who endured torture and were driven from this country that was theirs, too.  

    Morals of the story worth teaching to our children: It ain't easy being free.   Nothing worth winning is won in a day.  Sacrifice is required -- but consider the costs and whom you really sacrifice to win.  Etc.

    Parent

    if you should ever have time, (none / 0) (#26)
    by cpinva on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 06:21:38 PM EST
    take a few minutes to read the rough draft of the D of I. quite interesting. in it, jefferson blamed G III for the institution of slavery in the colonies, along with the multiple other transgressions he noted.

    it required ben franklin's artful guidance to suggest that, perhaps, young mr. jefferson had slightly overshot the mark, and strongly urged him to excise that part from the final, edited version presented to the continental congress, for their review and approval.

    jefferson, among many others, knew slavery would be the main fly in the ointment of the new country. so much easier to blame all that on George, rather than being a mensch, and taking responsibility for it themselves.