home

Clay Learns From His Mistake: Voters Support Decrim of MJ

Only six representatives co-sponsored Barney Franks' sensible bill to end the federal prosecution of marijuana possession for personal use. One of them, Lacy Clay, mistakenly thought it was a medical marijuana bill. Is there now egg on Clay's face? Not at all.

Clay was worried about the reaction. Supporting the liberalization of marijuana laws is not often seen as a political winner, especially in Midwestern cities like St. Louis. But instead of stoner jokes, derision and righteous indignation, Clay was surprised to start getting praise from complete strangers. ...

So far, he said, his calls, mail and contacts are running 80-20 in favor of the bill. He was impressed enough that he decided to go ahead and step before the cameras last week with Frank and Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) at a news conference touting the bill.

The prison and law enforcement industries, both of which see marijuana busts as job security, support the war against pot smokers. Many others realize, as Clay has come to believe, that it's a waste of federal resources. [more ...]

The lone Republican co-sponsor is Ron Paul. One might think that other Republicans, who claim to value personal freedom and to oppose big government, would support the bill. But most politicians of either party still fear being labeled "soft on crime." Perhaps that will start to change if Clay continues to receive the support of his constituents in the country's heartland. Of course, it would be useful if more legislators, like Clay, accidentally supported good bills that they haven't read.

In any event, the bill isn't likely to go anywhere this year.

When asked about the prospects of passage last week, Frank didn’t miss a beat in showcasing his sense of humor: “I would say the chances are not high.”
< Suskind Book Charges Bush Used Forged Document to Embark on Iraq War | Today's Republican News, Complete With Paris Hilton >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    if it isn't illegal, (5.00 / 1) (#1)
    by cpinva on Tue Aug 05, 2008 at 07:38:18 PM EST
    you can't possibly be held to task for supporting it.

    But most politicians of either party still fear being labeled "soft on crime."

    so, you pass legislation legalizing the sale/use/possession of whatever. et voila', they are no longer illegal acts, so the issue of terms of incarceration becomes moot. hence, you no longer have to fear being labled as soft on crime, since there is no crime.

    see how easy that was? for a small fee, i'll be happy to provide ocham's razorish solutions to any major problem.

    oh, i do weddings and bar/batmitzvahs too! :)


    I, for one... (5.00 / 1) (#2)
    by MileHi Hawkeye on Tue Aug 05, 2008 at 07:47:55 PM EST
    ...welcome any and all additional voices that speak out against this stupid, misguided policy.

    With enough voices, a whisper becomes a scream.

    Oh well look... (none / 0) (#3)
    by weltec2 on Tue Aug 05, 2008 at 07:50:56 PM EST
    people -- myself included -- have been screaming about this for as long as I can remember and look where has all the screaming gotten us.

    Parent
    Up to six. (5.00 / 1) (#4)
    by Ben Masel on Tue Aug 05, 2008 at 08:06:10 PM EST
    Only 212 to go.

    Parent
    splendid... (none / 0) (#5)
    by weltec2 on Tue Aug 05, 2008 at 08:20:43 PM EST
    sorry, I forgot the (none / 0) (#6)
    by weltec2 on Tue Aug 05, 2008 at 08:24:09 PM EST
    -: part.

    Parent
    Well... (none / 0) (#7)
    by MileHi Hawkeye on Tue Aug 05, 2008 at 08:32:48 PM EST
    ...I guess I just have to be more optimistic about it.  

    If we're to the point where a Heartland Senator reads only the title of a bill and sees/thinks MM and comes out in support of it, then there's hope.  

    MM may just be the crack in the door.

    Parent

    Gotta disagree old pal.... (none / 0) (#8)
    by kdog on Wed Aug 06, 2008 at 09:41:11 AM EST
    I see the medical marijuana movement as a counter-productive waste of time.

    To argue that only the sick should be allowed to use marijuana basically admits that the state has a right to prohibit its use amongst the healthy...I can make no such concession as I do not believe the state has the right to prohibit its use at all.

    Parent