Monday Morning Open Thread

By Big Tent Democrat, Section Blog Related
Posted on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 09:56:00 AM EST
Tags: (all tags)

Share This: Digg!

UPDATE: Tebow misses Mon. practice, still not cleared to play. I guarantee you this is the biggest story in Florida this week.

Could Max Baucus look any more like a bumbling fool? Apparently, yes:

The Senate Finance Committee was supposed to convene for a vote on its controversial health care bill tomorrow. Now, that's looking doubtful.

A cynic might think Baucus' overlords, the insurance industry, do not like the way this is going. I am more a believer in the "Baucus is an idiot" theory. YMMV.

This is an Open Thread.

< McChrystal's Disrepect For The Chain Of Command | Supreme Court Rejects Cert for Joe Nacchio >

The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

Menu

Home | About | RSS
E-Mail | Comment Policy |
Search
Login

Make a new account

Existing Users

Username:
Password:
Creator and Principal Author
- Jeralyn E. Merritt
TL Alumni

Contribute To TalkLeft

Sections
Site Credits
- TalkLeft Graphics by C.L., Our Man in Hollywood (2006 - 2008)
- TalkLeft Header Graphic by Monk
- Powered by Scoop
Legal
- All Content Copyright ©2002-2024. Reprints only by permission from TalkLeft.com
- Nothing on this site should be construed as legal advice. TalkLeft does not give legal advice.
- TalkLeft is not responsible for and often disagrees with material posted in the comments section. Read at your own risk.
"The pump don't work 'cause the vandals took the handles"
© 1965 Bob Dylan

Monday Morning Open Thread | 92 comments (92 topical)

Readers Must Login or Create an Account to Comment

This was probably answered some time ago, but: (5.00 / 1) (#1)
by steviez314 on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 12:11:20 PM EST

Must the SFC pass SOMETHING, even a blank piece of paper, just to proceed to the next step, the merging of a HELP and SFC bill?

Or, if the SFC fails to pass a bill, can they just use the HELP bill as the sole starting point of something the whole Senate can vote on?

Schumer reveals nature of Public Option (5.00 / 1) (#2)
by BackFromOhio on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 12:13:06 PM EST

On Morning Joe earlier today, Sen. Schumer indicated that the "compromise" public option he thinks will be included in the Senate bill will be an option initially funded by the federal government, but only for a period of time, and then the provider of public option insurance will have to compete.

Will this form of public option work to provide reasonably priced, effective health insurance over the long term?

With MEdicare +5 rates? (none / 0) (#4)
by Big Tent Democrat on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 12:16:28 PM EST

Sure.

Parent

No mention (none / 0) (#7)
by BackFromOhio on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 12:27:19 PM EST

of Medicare +5 that I heard.

Also, Schumer stated that the media is behind on covering the latest discussions among Senators, and he went thru names of various Senators -- such as Lincoln, and indicated where they were on this compromise PO Schumer described.

Parent

No mention of them NOT being there either (none / 0) (#9)
by Big Tent Democrat on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 12:33:30 PM EST

Parent

: True (none / 0) (#19)
by BackFromOhio on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 01:01:33 PM EST

do you know something....?

Parent

BTW, LA Times Carrying story (none / 0) (#66)
by BackFromOhio on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 03:14:43 PM EST

Parent

The link won't (none / 0) (#67)
by BackFromOhio on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 03:15:10 PM EST

take; it is:

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-healthcare-obama5-2009oct05,0,4785377.story

Parent

Better link: (none / 0) (#77)
by oculus on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 03:48:49 PM EST

LAT

Parent

: Thanks! (none / 0) (#91)
by BackFromOhio on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 04:16:03 PM EST

Article leaves many details murky at best

Parent

Would love to see one or two (5.00 / 1) (#3)
by MO Blue on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 12:13:39 PM EST

Dems vote against the Baucus Insurance Industry Profit Protection and Enhancement Act."

Most insiders expect the bill to pass on a heavily partisan basis. Depending on how Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME) chooses to vote, Finance chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) will be able to lose one or two Democrats, but no more. Several Democrats, but most notably Sens. Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Jay Rockefeller (D-WV)--frustrated by the right-leaning nature of the bill, and upset about being shut out of the months-long negotiations process--have suggested they may not be prepared to support the legislation as is.

Probably won't happen but it would be nice if it did.

: So brainwashed. I read that is (none / 0) (#10)
by oculus on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 12:33:49 PM EST

President Olympia Snowe.

Parent

Or, a realist might conclude that (5.00 / 2) (#5)
by Anne on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 12:21:47 PM EST

it could be both: the industry might not like the way things are going AND Baucus is a bumbling fool.

I'm more inclined to think that the industry sees an opportunity to get more than they already have - Obama really, REALLY wants to pass something; an announcement of more (fake) industry concessions in exchange for what - less regulation? - is probably coming.

That Baucus is a fool is a given; since I have to believe Obama is backing him, well, you can connect those dots...

And as they say (5.00 / 1) (#6)
by TeresaInSnow2 on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 12:24:23 PM EST

The buck stops with Baucus.

Baucus is no idiot (5.00 / 1) (#27)
by NYShooter on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 01:28:20 PM EST

You don't get to hold the fate of 300,000,000 people in your hand while reducing the President of the United States to a foot-licking wimp, and also be an idiot.

An immoral quisling, yes; a disgusting wretch of protoplasm, yes; a backstabbing, traitor to his constituents, yes; a hypocrite of classical proportion, yes; but an idiot? Hardly!

happy birthday Monty (5.00 / 1) (#75)
by Capt Howdy on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 03:46:14 PM EST

Monty Python's Flying Circus debuted 40 years ago today.

: Interesting. I just finished listening to (none / 0) (#83)
by oculus on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 03:57:46 PM EST

the CDs of Palin's diaries from those years. Tough group to keep on the same page. Lots of whining.

Parent

Is kdog in the house? (none / 0) (#8)
by sarcastic unnamed one on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 12:31:40 PM EST

Springsteen concert?

Check his Sat. comments. He gave (none / 0) (#12)
by oculus on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 12:35:12 PM EST

a quick overview on his way to play football.

Parent

Thanks, I found it . (none / 0) (#15)
by sarcastic unnamed one on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 12:55:36 PM EST

Here's the set list from Friday:

Wrecking Ball
Out In The Street
Outlaw Pete
Hungry Heart
Working On A Dream
Born In The USA
Cover Me
Darlington County
Working On The Highway
Downbound Train
I'm On Fire
No Surrender
Bobby Jean
I'm Goin' Down
Glory Days
Dancing In The Dark
My Hometown
The Promised Land
Last to Die
Long Walk Home
The Rising
Born To Run
Jersey Girl
Kitty's Back
Detroit Medley
American Land
Waiting On A Sunny Day
Thunder Road

Parent

Oops, sorry that was Sat's show. (none / 0) (#16)
by sarcastic unnamed one on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 12:58:08 PM EST

Friday's was only about 1000% better:

Wrecking Ball
Tenth Avenue Freeze-Out
No Surrender
Outlaw Pete
Hungry Heart
Working On A Dream
Badlands
Adam Raised A Cain
Something In The Night
Candy's Room
Racing In The Street
The Promised Land
Factory
Streets Of Fire
Prove It All Night
Darkness On The Edge Of Town
Waiting On A Sunny Day
I'm Going Down
Be True
Jailhouse Rock
Thunder Road
Long Walk Home
The Rising
Born To Run
Cadillac Ranch
Bobby Jean
American Land
Dancin' In The Dark
Rosalita

Parent

I have added going to a Springsteen (none / 0) (#20)
by oculus on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 01:03:05 PM EST

concert to my lengthy list of things to do.

Parent

Oh man, you got some good ones (none / 0) (#74)
by ruffian on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 03:45:08 PM EST

I didn't get.

Of course we could all say that about every show. No two the same.

Didn't Clarence look great? I was so glad to see that.

Parent

: He did... (none / 0) (#82)
by kdog on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 03:56:58 PM EST

so glad the big man looks and sounds fully recovered.
I was a slightly bummed we didn't get "Johnny 99" like you ruffian, but I think they've got ordinances against playing any longer a set than they do:)

Parent

I could never... (none / 0) (#17)
by kdog on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 12:58:42 PM EST

do it justice my man...simply sick.

I was surprised at how much lead guitar Bruce himself played on "Darkness..."...he was really shredding.

Put it this way...I might be back across the river this week to see it again...I really shouldn't but I might not be able to help myself:)

Parent

Go man! (none / 0) (#21)
by sarcastic unnamed one on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 01:09:04 PM EST

Candy's Room, Friday, 10/2/9.

Parent

That's right about... (none / 0) (#22)
by kdog on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 01:11:21 PM EST

when I lost my mind...in a good way:)

Parent

Will Springsteen take any action against (none / 0) (#23)
by oculus on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 01:18:06 PM EST

this guy, who posts his e mail address on his theft?

Parent

Dunno, I think probably not. (none / 0) (#31)
by sarcastic unnamed one on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 01:40:24 PM EST

clark3135 will probably only make enough money to get himself to the next show...

Parent

I don't see why... (none / 0) (#32)
by kdog on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 01:41:05 PM EST

its like free advertising for the tour.

Parent

Official version of Wrecking Ball (none / 0) (#36)
by sarcastic unnamed one on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 01:47:34 PM EST

here. It's growing on me.

kdog, did they project the lyrics for all the songs? See pics here.

Parent

: I liked it... (none / 0) (#43)
by kdog on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 01:58:36 PM EST

but they didn't kill the lights until "10th Ave...", I guess people were still piling in but it took away from the track a little.
I didn't notice lyrics at all on the screens on 10/2...but I tend to try not to look at the screens, too much like watching tv...coulda been there but I didn't even notice.

Parent
: OMG: Springsteen's organization is (none / 0) (#78)
by oculus on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 03:50:37 PM EST

picking up my suggestions in comments at Talk Left. Impressive.

Parent

Feeling sick as a dog today (none / 0) (#11)
by lilburro on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 12:34:49 PM EST

but it's just a cold, not the flu so I'm thankful.

Trying to figure out what all this fuss is about regarding Wyden's amendment though:

Baucus did not allow Wyden to bring up his "free choice" amendment until 1:30 in the morning on the very last day of mark up. When Wyden did bring up his amendment, Kent Conrad was informed via text message that "somehow" the CBO did not fully score Wyden's amendment. Wyden had been told by the CBO that they did score his amendment. This is no small mistake. Wyden's free choice amendment could have brought in over $100 billion in new revenue (even more if the bill also contained a strong public option). Wyden had to withdraw his amendment. Since this "mistake" was not "discovered" until the very last day of mark up, Wyden did not have a chance to get his amendment properly scored.

So 1. how the hell did this happen? 2. Does this mean exchanges would work?

Can we (none / 0) (#13)
by coast on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 12:51:38 PM EST

throw a red flag into the committee room and request a review?

Parent

: I'd think so (none / 0) (#89)
by lilburro on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 04:04:20 PM EST

the circumstances are really bizarre.

Parent

Sorry you are sick. Feel better soon. (none / 0) (#79)
by oculus on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 03:51:03 PM EST

Parent

: Thanks. (none / 0) (#88)
by lilburro on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 04:03:48 PM EST

Thankfully I love soup, and don't think it's swine flu.

Parent

Big game here (none / 0) (#14)
by eric on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 12:55:00 PM EST

in Minneapolis tonight. Vikes v. Packers with Favre fighting for the good guys this time. My money is on some drunken fights in the Dome.

The old good guys... (none / 0) (#18)
by kdog on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 01:00:39 PM EST

I always had a soft spot for the Vikes E...till this year...Go Pack!

Parent

I'm still disappointed... (none / 0) (#24)
by MileHi Hawkeye on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 01:18:46 PM EST

...that the Gophers let the Cheeseheads come away with a victory on Saturday.

Parent

: Yes (none / 0) (#44)
by eric on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 02:03:00 PM EST

it was a really close game. No axe for us.

Parent

That game (none / 0) (#45)
by eric on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 02:05:00 PM EST

should have been played today, but because of Monday Night Football in the dome, the playoff is tomorrow at 4:07 CDT.

Parent

Update (none / 0) (#49)
by eric on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 02:31:58 PM EST

just talked to my wife who is downtown and she reports that the natives have hit the bars early. Green and Purple mixed with lots of booze. It will be a busy night at the local county jail.

Parent

Hopefully... (none / 0) (#51)
by kdog on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 02:36:10 PM EST

the cops keep cool and don't go on an arrest spree...some drunken revelry must be tolerated in a free country. Step in when fists start flying, but otherwise let them party.

Parent

Totally agree (none / 0) (#57)
by eric on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 02:49:13 PM EST

I am just wondering about the dynamic when you have two gentlemen discussing the game, both of whom are wearing the number 4 but with different colors. It is an odd situation.

Parent

What self-respecting... (none / 0) (#58)
by kdog on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 02:53:36 PM EST

Packer fan would wear a #4 anymore? They shoulda burned that thing in August:)

Trying to think of a similar situation in the past...all-time legend for one franchise coming out of retirement (again) to play for arch-rival...coming up blank...anyone?

Parent

close (none / 0) (#65)
by CST on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 03:13:59 PM EST

Roger Clemens comes to mind although he didn't really retire. It feels the same.

Parent

Thats a good one... (none / 0) (#68)
by kdog on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 03:16:45 PM EST

had the stop-over in Toronto too, just like Favre in NY...good call. But I think Favre meant more to the Pack than Clemens to the Sox...but you're a Sox fan so you'd know better than me.

Parent

Probably not (none / 0) (#70)
by CST on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 03:24:08 PM EST

just because football and baseball are so different. A star pitcher is great, but still only plays once every few games. A QB is the star every game.

Parent

Very true... (none / 0) (#73)
by kdog on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 03:34:29 PM EST

now if Derek Jeter hung up the spikes, and came back a year later with the Sox...that would be a very similar scenario.

Parent

Babe Ruth? (none / 0) (#80)
by oculus on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 03:55:23 PM EST

Parent

Nah... (none / 0) (#84)
by kdog on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 03:58:28 PM EST

he wasn't the "Babe Ruth" we know when the Sox sold him...just a damn good pitcher then.

Parent

Then how did he manage to curse the Sox (none / 0) (#85)
by oculus on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 03:59:28 PM EST

for so many years?

Parent

he sold his soul (none / 0) (#86)
by CST on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 04:01:15 PM EST

to the devil.

aka the yankees.

Parent

He was sold by the Sox. No free agency. (none / 0) (#87)
by oculus on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 04:02:28 PM EST

Parent

: his body (none / 0) (#90)
by CST on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 04:06:06 PM EST

but not his soul. That happened when he became an all-star for them.

Parent

NYPD set to expand... (none / 0) (#25)
by kdog on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 01:19:01 PM EST

the "ring of steel"...sounds so welcoming doesn't it?

Nagging unanswered question: (none / 0) (#26)
by oculus on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 01:27:28 PM EST

should Tebow have still been in the game in which he was injured?

You don't win the Heisman... (none / 0) (#28)
by MileHi Hawkeye on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 01:31:10 PM EST

...if you're not out there padding your stats against over-matched foes.

Parent

Ugh (none / 0) (#29)
by Big Tent Democrat on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 01:34:15 PM EST

Since the Hawkeyes never actually have a comfortable lead in a game, I know it is hard for you to understand that a 24 point lead in the 3rd quarter is not insurmountable.

Parent

That's soo cute. (none / 0) (#30)
by MileHi Hawkeye on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 01:38:12 PM EST

If they can't hold on to a 24 point, 3rd quarter lead against Kentucky, perhaps they shouldn't be ranked #1.

Parent

Call me when the Hawkeyes (none / 0) (#33)
by Big Tent Democrat on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 01:42:25 PM EST

actually get a 24 point lead against someone, anyone.

Parent

Sure... (5.00 / 1) (#39)
by MileHi Hawkeye on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 01:51:38 PM EST

...like that 35 to 3 win over Iowa State? Let's see 3 from 35 is 32.

Consider yourself called.

Parent

Since I predicted that blowout (none / 0) (#42)
by Big Tent Democrat on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 01:56:34 PM EST

I doubt I can consider myself called.

Iowa 24, Arkansas STATE 21.

In Iowa City. Impressive. When could you sit Stanzi?

Oh BTW, did Stanzi sit in the Iowa State game? When?

Parent

Wellllll... (none / 0) (#53)
by MileHi Hawkeye on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 02:42:21 PM EST

...I'd hardly call

Iowa (-6) to beat AND cover over Iowa State

"predicting a blow-out".

Aside from the ASU tilt being a classic trap game, there is value in it not being a blow-out. I'd rather have them knowing that they have to work on some things for the Michigan game than going into Saturday thinking they were all that.

Not to mention that ASU, unlike most of Iowa's opponents plays the spread--as does UM--so it was good practice against an offense they don't see that much. ASU schemes well, executes well and has a couple of very good athletes to boot.

Yes, Stanzi sat in the 4th quarter of the Iowa State game. Of course, he's not Gawd's own QB and has some work to do on his game.

Parent

Two Things (none / 0) (#76)
by Socraticsilence on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 03:47:50 PM EST

Tebow went out midway through the third
I'm willing to bet Florida pulled its starters earlier in its game against a FCS team than Iowa did in its game against UNI.

Parent

Has Iowa State ever beat Iowa in (none / 0) (#81)
by oculus on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 03:55:58 PM EST

football?

Parent

So, in your opinion, It was a good (none / 0) (#34)
by oculus on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 01:43:00 PM EST

decision to leave him in until just before he was injured?

Parent

You can be hurt on any play (5.00 / 1) (#41)
by Big Tent Democrat on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 01:55:13 PM EST

It's silly to focus on when it happened.

Parent

: I am Monday morning quarterbacking (none / 0) (#52)
by oculus on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 02:40:43 PM EST

I guess. Given Tebow's dedication to charity work, I'd just as soon he get that NFL signing bonus.

Parent

soda tax (none / 0) (#35)
by Capt Howdy on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 01:43:51 PM EST

seen this?

it always strikes me as funny for some reason.

an honest commercial would have featured her

Not necessarily.... (none / 0) (#37)
by kdog on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 01:50:58 PM EST

I love me some Coca-Cola, 3 cans minimum daily...I'm a buck-fifty soaking wet.

And against any new taxes on what the man deems "unhealthy"...I knew this kinda crap was coming once healthcare reform took center stage. It will lose support for healthcare reform, imo, when people gotta wonder how the man is gonna soak 'em on the stuff we like that might not be the best thing for us. Smokers know all about it, soon so will just about everybody but the rice-cake eaters.

Parent

The commercial said (none / 0) (#46)
by nycstray on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 02:12:15 PM EST

juice along with soda. Would be interesting to see the good juice cost less than the crap juice . . .

Parent

Hey.... (none / 0) (#47)
by kdog on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 02:21:55 PM EST

its "purple stuff", not "crap juice", if you please:)

Parent

I think its (none / 0) (#50)
by Capt Howdy on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 02:33:41 PM EST

"juice drinks" which is like calling american cheese "cheese food"

I dunno. if you have to tax something I think you might as well tax soda.

ps
you should not drink 3 cans of soda a day.
just MO. you may be 150 soaking wet now but just wait until that metabolism starts changin!
you will quickly look like the walmart vixen.

Parent

Doubt it... (none / 0) (#55)
by kdog on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 02:44:44 PM EST

there isn't an overweight man in my family, all like rails and eat/drink whatever we want...thank you gene pool lottery!

There is no one size fits all here...some can't handle the high fructose and some can. Those who can shouldn't be punished...sh*t even those who can't shouldn't be punished anymore than they punish themselves.

If the feds need more money for something, and I'm not sold they do, but assume they do...raise the income tax across the board and spread the burden somewhat more evenly.

Or at least stop pickin' on my vices...it feels personal...feds hate dope, hate gambling, hate tobacco, now soda? Whats a degenerate to do in this country anymore?...:)

If it passes, I can only hope the native american tribes start selling it tax-free...or the Gambinos...somebody.

Parent

"thank you gene pool lottery" (none / 0) (#61)
by Capt Howdy on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 03:06:03 PM EST

I hate you.

just sayin

Parent

: Take it up with the boss... (none / 0) (#64)
by kdog on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 03:13:54 PM EST

Mother Nature:)

Parent

Interesting case... (none / 0) (#48)
by kdog on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 02:31:24 PM EST

regarding land ownership/squatter's rights in PA...link.

Use it or lose it...I can dig that, but the couple should get all those taxes they paid on the property refunded, I love me some squatters but nobody else should have to pay their taxes for them...thats just wrong.

Attorney's advice in the link is good. (none / 0) (#56)
by oculus on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 02:46:43 PM EST

Parent

Or couldn't you (none / 0) (#59)
by eric on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 02:56:49 PM EST

send the trespasser a letter saying they have your permission, revocable at any time, to use the land? There is no adverse possession when they have your permission.

Parent

: Have it served by a process server. (none / 0) (#60)
by oculus on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 03:02:06 PM EST

Parent
: Or... (none / 0) (#62)
by kdog on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 03:08:19 PM EST

just don't buy land you don't plan on using, only flipping as an investment....unless you're willing to gamble you won't lose it to somebody who will use it.
Always had a hard time wrapping my head around the concept of land ownership myself...I see how the concept can reduce violence, but on the other hand it encourages it. I don't know.

Parent

Ever wondered how the State of FL can (none / 0) (#54)
by oculus on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 02:42:35 PM EST

support so many top tier football teams? No income tax. How do they do it?

pay the hospitality tax on rooms (none / 0) (#92)
by jeffinalabama on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 04:23:59 PM EST

when visiting... that's one BIG source of income for Florida

Parent

: Ah. That's the part San Diego voters (none / 0) (#94)
by oculus on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 04:49:10 PM EST

keep beating down. Unbelievable.

Parent

wow. just wow. (none / 0) (#63)
by Capt Howdy on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 03:11:32 PM EST

Does Obama use God's name in vain?

By GARY BAUER | 10/5/09 4:49 AM EDT

: This barely left of center (none / 0) (#93)
by jondee on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 04:45:42 PM EST

gameshow host has them more unhinged than Clinton did. Though God only knows why. Must be the slippery slope idea: as in, if we let this one in, there's no telling what nasty secular-humanist, progressive direction the country might slowly start moving in. Nothing like that good ole fundamentalist-hysterical, "paranoid style" of the Right.
Listened to that racist pos Limbaugh for about ten minutes the other day with his -- reiterated every ten minutes -- "Barak Hussein Obama MMM-MMM-MMM" (think "yazza boss" and "sho' nuff"); I dont care how "conservative" you are, what kind of idiot in an idiocracy is comfortable having someone like that as the "voice" of your movement?
Keep it up Oxycotin Boy, so there's no mistake in anyone's mind what you and yours are about.

Parent

Cold Medicine lands Grandma in jail (none / 0) (#69)
by Inspector Gadget on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 03:17:50 PM EST

This is too much.

What a ridiculous law.

a new site (none / 0) (#71)
by Capt Howdy on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 03:27:59 PM EST

to check daily.

lovelylisting.com

: be sure to check (none / 0) (#72)
by Capt Howdy on Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 03:31:30 PM EST

the older listings. like this one:
Starter Home For Serial Killers?

Parent

Monday Morning Open Thread | 92 comments (92 topical)

Readers Must Login or Create an Account to Comment