Under Section 3.01 of the the Criminal Justice Act Manual, a privately retained lawyer can apply to the court to have the government pay for expert services and other expenses incurred with representation, if their client can't afford them.
Investigative, expert or other services necessary to adequate representation, as authorized by subsection (e) of the Act, shall be available to persons who are eligible under the Act, including persons who have retained counsel but who are found by the court to be financially unable to obtain the necessary services. In this connection, a person with retained counsel is financially unable to obtain the necessary services if his resources are in excess of the
amount needed to provide him and his dependents with the necessities of life, provide defendant's release on bond, and pay a reasonable fee to his retained counsel, but are insufficient to pay for the necessary services. In responding to requests for subsection (e) services by a defendant represented by retained counsel, the court should inquire into the fee arrangement between the retained attorney and the defendant.
If the court finds the fee arrangement unreasonable in relation to fees customarily paid
to qualified practitioners in the community for services in criminal matters of similar duration and complexity, or that it was made with a gross
disregard of the defendant's trial expenses, the court may order the attorney to pay out of such fees all or such part of the costs and expenses as the court may direct. The procedure outlined in paragraph 2.05 shall apply to such
persons who are financially able to pay some, but unable to pay all, the costs of necessary services.
Requests for CJA funds are ex parte, and not available to the public, at least until the case is over.
Ex parte applications for services other than counsel under subsection (e) shall be heard in camera, and shall not be revealed without the consent of the defendant. The application shall be placed under seal until the final disposition of the case in the trial court, subject to further order of the court.
Maintaining the secrecy of the application prevents the possibility that an open hearing may cause a defendant to reveal his or her defense.
Can the legal team also apply for their fees to be paid? Can more than one lawyer be appointed? From the New York CJA Plan:
4. In an extremely difficult case, where the Court finds it in the interest of justice and so states, a district judge may appoint two attorneys to represent one defendant, and each attorney shall be paid for his or her services, not to exceed as to each, the limits provided in ¶ IX herein.
D. APPOINTMENTS IN SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES
Whenever a judge makes a written finding, in a proceeding in which counsel must be assigned pursuant to this Plan, that there is good cause shown which renders it in the interests of justice that counsel who is not employed by the FDNY or a member of the CJA Panel be assigned,
the district judge or magistrate judge may appoint that counsel with the consent of the person to be so represented and the approval of the Chief Judge of the District. Such appointment shall constitute a temporary appointment to the CJA Panel for the purpose of that proceeding only. If the magistrate judge makes such an appointment and the case is transferred to a district judge, the district judge will review the matter and either confirm the appointment or assign a new attorney from the CJA Panel.
E. SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL A district judge or magistrate judge may, in the interest of justice, substitute one appointed counsel for another. Such a substitution should not be made when it would unreasonably impinge upon a person's interest in continuity of representation.
Would the court consider the added expense of having lawyers from Colorado travel back and forth to New York to attend court and meet with their client and insist that New York counsel be appointed? Or would that unduly interfere with Zazi's interest in continuity of counsel?