home

Besides Iraq, Tax Cuts For The Rich And Corporate Pork, Howd'a You Like The Liberal Bush Presidency?

Taking his brownnosing Beltway Dems to new heights, Ezra Klein writes:

To make a bit of a heretical point, most of those cases prove that Bush's domestic agenda was a capitulation to liberalism, not that Democrats were spineless wimps. NCLB and the Medicare prescription drug bill were both longtime Democratic ideas. The problem with NCLB was implementation, and while the problem with Medicare Part D was that its design was a giveaway to drug companies, it was also hundreds and hundreds of billions funneled towards the largest expansions of Medicare since the program's creation. [. . .] The war stuff is, well, the war stuff. [. . .] The tax cuts were free money, and the bankruptcy bill was indefensible. But on the whole, Bush's domestic record is more a tale of co-opting liberal ideas and adding money for corporations than it is a tale of achieving longtime conservative ends.

Wow! Just wow! Klein call his take heretical. I call it an embarrassment.

Speaking for me only

< The Argument For Saving Citibank Managment | Media Darling >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Time for a break (5.00 / 1) (#2)
    by mmc9431 on Tue Nov 24, 2009 at 04:07:55 PM EST
    Ezra really needs a vacation. He gotten delusional. His take on Bush is as bad as Obama's take on Reagan.

    "The war stuff is, well, (5.00 / 1) (#4)
    by lilburro on Tue Nov 24, 2009 at 04:16:18 PM EST
    the war stuff."

    If Ezra's point is that Bush spent a sh*tload of money, then I agree.

    Among the Many Dangerous (and Stupid) Things Here (5.00 / 1) (#5)
    by The Maven on Tue Nov 24, 2009 at 04:18:23 PM EST
    is the takeaway for the "average voter" that a so-called progressive analyst/observer deems the Bush domestic record as one of "co-opting liberal ideas".  Not only does this end up smearing pretty much any and all genuinely liberal ideas, it also has the effect of shifting the perceived center even further to the right, thus implicitly defining any of those actual liberal ideas as way outside the mainstream.

    You really have to wonder if some of these folks don't even stop to think about the way they phrase things.  And if they have given it any thought, they clearly have abandoned any pretense of progressive advocacy.

    may be ... (none / 0) (#9)
    by nyrias on Wed Nov 25, 2009 at 02:37:28 PM EST
    "And if they have given it any thought, they clearly have abandoned any pretense of progressive advocacy."

    That is exactly what they are trying to do.

    Parent

    Bush's domestic agenda.... (5.00 / 1) (#6)
    by kdog on Tue Nov 24, 2009 at 05:04:27 PM EST
    was all about big government...but that alone doesn't make it liberalism...closer to fascism as the government he expanded was for the benefit of corporations, not people.  He's right in that Bush was no conservative in the classical conservative sense...his conservatism was strictly the social religous-right variety....not the small limited government fiscally responsible variety...but we all knew that already.

    It's kinda the Clinton Presidency. (none / 0) (#1)
    by ChiTownDenny on Tue Nov 24, 2009 at 04:06:58 PM EST
    Compromises and all that.  Except everyone was better off during the Clinton tenure.

    Do I need to write SNARK womewhere? (none / 0) (#3)
    by ChiTownDenny on Tue Nov 24, 2009 at 04:13:04 PM EST
    The war stuff (none / 0) (#7)
    by Steve M on Tue Nov 24, 2009 at 05:53:45 PM EST
    was in part a co-opting of the rhetoric of liberal interventionism.  But that doesn't make it any less a neocon endeavor.

    Galileo was a heretic (none / 0) (#8)
    by FreakyBeaky on Tue Nov 24, 2009 at 11:42:24 PM EST
    Klein is just an idiot.

    I mean this is so bad, I thought it was JOE Klein.