home

Friday Morning Open Thread

Attention! It's Friday Morning. That is all.

This is an Open Thread.

< Boulder Planning Board: Tread Lightly on Medical Marijuana | Unemployment Rises To 10.2%, Highest In 26 Years >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Truckful of swine flu vaccine (5.00 / 2) (#9)
    by Cream City on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 10:29:38 AM EST
    stolen in my town.  Found later, but having been out of the hands of the health officials, 1,000 units of vaccine were destroyed.  More shortages, more clinic cancellations -- and media continue to report oddities of federal distribution of vaccine that short our state almost 100,000 units allegedly to have been here by now.  And in a state and region where the flu is just raging; 20 deaths now.

    And also raging are letter-writers and blog commenters about Wall Street employees getting the vaccine, Obama daughters getting the vaccine, etc., while highest-priority people here, such as infants and young children with high-risk conditions, cannot get the vaccine.

    It's horrible (5.00 / 1) (#16)
    by CST on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 10:40:03 AM EST
    that it has even become a tit-for-tat.

    Steve M wrote yesterday that Wall Street firms only had the vaccine available for their "at risk" employees.  And the Obama girls are clearly in the at risk pool as well, being fairly young. I certainly don't begrudge any of those people the vaccine if they could get it.  Kdog was also mentioning that there seems to be an abundance of it in NY schools as well.  I just wonder why there is such a regional disparity.

    Parent

    Grading our national (none / 0) (#22)
    by Fabian on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 10:48:56 AM EST
    health infrastructure: a solid D.

    They rushed the vaccine as much as they safely could, but the production is scanty and distribution slow.

    If this had a been a pandemic as lethal as the 1918 Influenza, we'd be in deep doo-doo.

    Parent

    It seems perfectly obvious (none / 0) (#11)
    by andgarden on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 10:32:35 AM EST
    that the President and people who regularly come in contact with him should have priority for pandemic vaccine.

    Parent
    Yes, I see that, but the parents (5.00 / 2) (#15)
    by Cream City on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 10:36:57 AM EST
    of the kids have their biases.  And as this White House won on perception, it can lose on perception.

    Parent
    Seople are stupid (none / 0) (#23)
    by andgarden on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 10:50:17 AM EST
    If the proposed solution is to not give the vaccine to the President's kids, well. . .we'll just deal with the stupid people.

    Parent
    No, the bad pr is stupid (5.00 / 1) (#26)
    by Cream City on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 11:37:40 AM EST
    as it easily could have been handled better by fixing the context -- say, having the Obama girls get the vaccine among other kids or something.

    The indecisions and bad decisions by a young White House are not that astonishing to me, as I expected the same when the stupid people opted for inexperience as some sort of plus at the polls.    

    But after generally good handling of pr in the campaign, it is astonishing to me how poorly it is being handled in the presidency.

    Parent

    Ship those kids to Gitmo. (snk.) (none / 0) (#27)
    by oculus on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 11:40:19 AM EST
    State of California is about 3 mil. does short (none / 0) (#12)
    by oculus on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 10:32:35 AM EST
    of what it ordered from CDC.  Supposedly more arriving in 5 days.  

    Parent
    One of my daughter's friends (none / 0) (#48)
    by Militarytracy on Sat Nov 07, 2009 at 07:03:15 AM EST
    is 35 weeks pregnant in Texas right now.  When they finally got the vaccine there and called her to come in she was "stuffy".  When she got to her doctor she was vaccinated but sent to the lab to rule out that she hadn't contracted H1N1.  No such luck though.  So she was immediately admitted to the hospital until her physician saw the response to Tamiflu from her that was wanted.  She has a two year old, her husband is deployed, and she fretted horrible because she was not confident about the childcare she had to immediately use.  They have only been there for about six weeks.  What a mess!  I'm grateful that my daughter got vaccinated so early....I remember we were speculating that the "study" wasn't even over yet.  Alabama got so H1N1 hot so early on though.  Now there isn't vaccine for everybody else and it is shameful discovering some of the folks that there seemed to be vaccine for.

    Parent
    Here's a good one.... (none / 0) (#1)
    by kdog on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 09:36:37 AM EST
    on the clusterf*ck healthcare front...murdered college students parents get a whopping emergency room bill with a note from the hospital saying their dead deadbeat son ain't welcome back at the hospital.  When automated systems go horribly wrong....

    That's just heartless. (none / 0) (#4)
    by desertswine on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 09:48:33 AM EST
    Indeed... (none / 0) (#32)
    by kdog on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 11:54:19 AM EST
    automated systems don't have hearts, brains, or courage.

    Parent
    Yesterday's "event" in DC (none / 0) (#2)
    by kenosharick on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 09:44:29 AM EST
    demonstrated better than anything that the repubs are completely controlled by the tea bagger/birther/wingnuts now.  It is really time for the Dems to take bold action and pass a STRONG public option and real reform. Do it by reconciliation if they need to. They are so afraid they'll pay some political price for this- do they really think anyone outside the beltway cares about the details of the process? Americans just want some real action.  Harry Reid needs to act like a leader, maybe channel a little LBJ.

    Dana Milbank (5.00 / 3) (#6)
    by jbindc on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 10:08:21 AM EST
    Made some interesting observations about yesterday's event.

    But, as with a similar rally by Democrats a week before, unpredictable things tend to happen in the wide-open spaces of the Capitol's West Front. Minutes into the rally, a breeze toppled the American flag from the stage.

    More ominously, a man standing just beyond the TV cameras apparently suffered a heart attack 20 minutes after event began. Medical personnel from the Capitol physician's office -- an entity that could, quite accurately, be labeled government-run health care -- rushed over, attaching electrodes to his chest and giving him oxygen and an IV drip.

    This turned into an unwanted visual for the speakers, as a D.C. ambulance and firetruck, lights flashing, pulled in just behind the lawmakers. A path was made through the media section, and the patient, attended to by about 10 government medical personnel, was being wheeled away on a stretcher just as House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) stepped to the microphone. "Join us in defeating Pelosi care!" he exhorted. A few members stole a glance at the stretcher. Boehner may have been distracted as well. He told the crowd he would read from the Constitution, then read the "we hold these truths" bit from the Declaration of Independence.

    SNIP

    By the time it was over, medics had administered government-run health care to at least five people in the crowd who were stricken as they denounced government-run health care. But Bachmann overlooked this irony as she said farewell to her recruits.


    Parent
    I think you've got that backwards... (none / 0) (#3)
    by kdog on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 09:47:35 AM EST
    rick...the corporate sly as a fox republican party leadership controls the teabag/birther/wingnut contingent and plays them like pawns in a chess game.

    Parent
    Two more bodies identified. (none / 0) (#5)
    by Fabian on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 09:49:39 AM EST
    in the Anthony Sowell case.  link

    Only one woman was reported missing originally, one was reported missing when the bodies were first discovered, and one women was not reported missing at all.  Drug use, abuse and addiction made them particularly vulnerable and also made their friends and family accustomed to periodic disappearances.

    Blame is flying around in the usual fashion.  Is it the police, the neighbors, the courts, the prisons?  I'm surprised no one has blamed the economy yet.

    I'm not interested in Sowell.  He's a footnote now.  He'll be tried, convicted, and sent away again.  Even the best defense money can buy won't make much difference.  I just want the bodies identified and the families notified.

    For comparison (none / 0) (#18)
    by Fabian on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 10:45:19 AM EST
    an overseas site calls this "America's Nithari".  

    The killings in Nithari, the cover up, the investigation and the judicial process are a far, far cry from ours.  It's very hard to compare the two stories at all.  

    Parent

    Sarbanes-Oxley Act, was signed by (none / 0) (#7)
    by KeysDan on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 10:15:10 AM EST
    President Bush (passed by a Republican House and Democratic Congress) in 2002) in the wake of the WorldCom accounting scandal of 2002.  The law requires public companies to assure that internal controls guard against fraud.  Now the Democratic Congress, with the apparent approval of the administration, is in the process of gutting the law with the proposed repeal so as to allow most companies to avoid compliance and mandating a study to determine if even more companies should be exempt. Accordingly to the reporting in the NYT (cf. Floyd Norris, High and Low Finance), some veterans of past reform were "left sputtering" with rage. The former chair of the SEC under President Clinton stated that anyone who votes for this will bear the investor's mark of Cain.  However, those in favor of the repeal claim they are simply out to help small businesses which would be burdened by  pesky reporting assurances of anti-fraud controls and auditor checks.  

    There is a lot of useless crap (none / 0) (#8)
    by Steve M on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 10:28:39 AM EST
    in Sarbanes-Oxley.

    Parent
    Well, it looks like (none / 0) (#10)
    by KeysDan on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 10:31:52 AM EST
    all that will soon be gone and we can return to the good old days.

    Parent
    I dunno (none / 0) (#40)
    by Steve M on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 01:04:50 PM EST
    I have no personal knowledge of whether we're getting rid of the good stuff or the bad stuff.

    Parent
    For some reason, (none / 0) (#14)
    by Spamlet on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 10:34:02 AM EST
    I thought of David Friehling, the upstate storefront CPA who handled all those "pesky reporting assurances" for Bernie Madoff. Was Madoff's hedge fund a small business? Was Friehling's accounting firm, once Friehling hooked up with Madoff?

    those in favor of the repeal claim they are simply out to help small businesses which would be burdened by pesky reporting assurances of anti-fraud controls and auditor checks



    Parent
    But Arthur Anderson and Enron are so 200l. (5.00 / 1) (#19)
    by KeysDan on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 10:45:52 AM EST
    ...wait, I think I hear the music, let's all sing now, "happy days are here again."

    Parent
    Jonathan Chait: (none / 0) (#13)
    by andgarden on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 10:33:42 AM EST
    The Obama White House is like Czechoslovakia in 1938, so don't criticize Obama.

    Is that better than comparing Obama to (none / 0) (#20)
    by oculus on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 10:47:12 AM EST
    Hitler?

    Mr. Chait, I'm sorry to say, was editor of the Michigan Daily, graduated from U of M and avidly defends U of M football.  

    Parent

    I hate to link to a Fox Broadcasting link, but: (none / 0) (#17)
    by steviez314 on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 10:44:33 AM EST
    Puhlease. (none / 0) (#21)
    by oculus on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 10:48:43 AM EST
    Oh my. (none / 0) (#24)
    by Fabian on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 11:25:23 AM EST
    Of course I expected a certain amount of negative commenting concerning the shooting at Fort Hood, but it's coming from commenters over at The Orange that don't have a long history of emotional, reactionary rhetoric.  I missed the worst of it last night, too.

    I'm sad that the Sowell's victims don't get the same attention as Hasan's.  I know that an attack on the military gets the nationalistic fervor up, but still...is it because they were women? black? struggled with drug problems?

    I read their bios every time a new one is identified and bear witness, in my own small way.

    Probably more than anything... (5.00 / 1) (#25)
    by kdog on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 11:36:45 AM EST
    Sowell killed one at a time...Khan killed many at once in a bloodbath, on a military base no less.  That is the most likely reason for the coverage disaprity, imo....but the background of the victims could be part of it....drug addict victims on the fringes of society never get the media play more conventional victims get.  Natalie Holloway is a classic case.

    Parent
    Made me google, darn you. (none / 0) (#28)
    by oculus on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 11:40:55 AM EST
    Here's a bio to read, too (5.00 / 1) (#30)
    by Cream City on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 11:47:34 AM EST
    about one of the victims at Fort Hood.  I'm with you on reading about all of Sowell's victims, too.  But perhaps it is in part that the military are in service to us?  And that they were on their own base here, which ought to be safe compared to combat zones?

    Btw, in my mind, I'm classifying the Fort Hood victims as war fatalities from "friendly fire," too, from what we are learning about the shooter; it reminds me of reading about the fragging of our own by our own in Vietnam who went over the edge.

    I read about each and every one of our war fatalities bio'd in my media and mourn them all -- and here is another one who is a loss to our future.

    And the story of the wounded soldier, at the end of the link, who cared for others before herself also tells us of how great was the Fort Hood loss for our future, if she does not live.  Other reports have her pretty badly hit in the back and stomach.  So the death toll may rise.

    Parent

    And I come home to news (none / 0) (#45)
    by Cream City on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 04:06:47 PM EST
    of yet another -- and this is a student and the spouse of one of our students, devastated.

    The loss. . . .

    Parent

    Ohio was spared. (none / 0) (#46)
    by Fabian on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 04:15:12 PM EST
    No troops in Fort Hood at the time.

    We did have that awful group of losses in Iraq a couple years ago, all from the same unit.  The news every morning was "Funeral/Memorial services were held for ..... in .......".  

    I tell you, the war memorials that get me aren't the big ones or the ones erected on the battlefields, but the little ones like in my hometown - where their families lived.  They aren't grand or glorious or anything.  Just simple granite monuments with plaques with names engraved on them, one for each war.

    Parent

    I know. Those small-town monuments (5.00 / 1) (#47)
    by Cream City on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 08:05:44 PM EST
    stop me every time, reading names of no one with whom I ever would have a connection . . . but I do.

    My family cracks up at my need to read them -- recently, they even had to wait while I was reading those monuments to war dead in small-town Australia!

    Parent

    Polanski. This one's for steve m. (none / 0) (#29)
    by oculus on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 11:42:55 AM EST
    Hey now (5.00 / 1) (#41)
    by Steve M on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 01:06:48 PM EST
    are you horning on on that other poster's exclusive contract to post the WSWS stuff?

    Parent
    More re Polanski. This time from (none / 0) (#36)
    by oculus on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 12:41:07 PM EST
    The Village

    Who knew Polanski played Lucky in "Waiting for Godot"?

    Parent

    I don't know what is becoming... (none / 0) (#31)
    by kdog on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 11:49:04 AM EST
    of this once great nation...ya can't even get your freak on in a parked car anymore...whats more American than that?

    Never a good idea to flee though...the cop probably just wanted a cheap peek.

    Another mass shooting (none / 0) (#33)
    by jbindc on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 11:57:53 AM EST
    in Orlando

    No wonder they don't get it (none / 0) (#34)
    by jbindc on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 12:23:38 PM EST
    237 members of Congress are millionaires

    Talk about bad timing.

    As Washington reels from the news of 10.2 percent unemployment, the Center for Responsive Politics is out with a new report describing the wealth of members of Congress.

    Among the highlights: Two-hundred-and-thirty-seven members of Congress are millionaires. That's 44 percent of the body - compared to about 1 percent of Americans overall.

    CRP says California Republican Rep. Darrell Issa is the richest lawmaker on Capitol Hill, with a net worth estimated at about $251 million. Next in line: Rep. Jane Harman (D-Calif.), worth about $244.7 million; Sen. Herb Kohl (D-Wis.), worth about $214.5 million; Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), worth about $209.7 million; and Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.), worth about $208.8 million.

    All told, at least seven lawmakers have net worths greater than $100 million, according to the Center's 2008 figures.



    Speaking of Jane Harmon (none / 0) (#42)
    by MO Blue on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 01:08:09 PM EST
       Though Congressman Waxman (D-Santa Monica/West LA) had introduced an amendment for a 5-year fast-track of generic biologics, Harman joined with Rep. Eshoo (D-San Mateo) in committee to kill the Waxman amendment and protect the profits of big pharmaceuticals by enacting a 12-year exclusivity on the use of Big Pharma's clinical trial data. Under this amendment's ambiguous "ever-greening" clause drug companies could continue their monopoly indefinitely by changing a dosage instruction -- thus thwarting the sale and marketing of biosimilars or less expensive generics.

        I denounce Harman's committee vote to kill the Waxman amendment. There is no excuse for putting drug company profits before patient needs. Lowering regulatory obstacles to allow for more generics not only saves patients' lives, but also billions of dollars in taxpayer money spent on prescription drug medicines. Why should Big Pharma have a monopoly on medical research often subsidized by the taxpayers? We need representatives who will represent the people, not the big corporations.

        A May 15, 2009 financial disclosure statement Harman filed with the House of Representatives reveals Harman's 2008 investment portfolio included stock in at least three biologic manufacturers: Pfizer, Abbot Labs, and Johnson & Johnson. FDL



    Parent
    The WH and FOX (none / 0) (#35)
    by jbindc on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 12:30:08 PM EST
    It's off-limits for spokespeople

    At least one Democratic political strategist has gotten a blunt warning from the White House to never appear on Fox News Channel, an outlet that presidential aides have depicted as not so much a news-gathering operation as a political opponent bent on damaging the Obama administration.

    Political consultants are a staple of cable television talk shows, analyzing current events based on their own experiences working on campaigns or in government.

    One Democratic strategist said that shortly after an appearance on Fox he got a phone call from a White House official telling him not to be a guest on the show again. The call had an intimidating tone, he said.

    The message was, "We better not see you on again,'' said the strategist, who spoke on condition of anonymity so as not to run afoul of the White House. An implicit suggestion, he said, was that "clients might stop using you if you continue.''



    I hope the next batch... (5.00 / 2) (#37)
    by kdog on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 12:49:41 PM EST
    of crooks we elect at least have a little more respect for free speech and expression...who the f*ck are they to tell Dems where they can appear?

    Not to mention, its just bad strategy... does the admin. want Fox viewers to get no counterpoint at all?  I don't get it.

    Parent

    Query: who decides what "one half" (none / 0) (#38)
    by oculus on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 12:50:17 PM EST
    means re restriction on FL football player in tomorrow's game?  First half.  Second half.  Total of 30 minutes but need not be consecutive?  Inquiring minds, etc.

    Pelosi (none / 0) (#39)
    by jbindc on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 12:54:02 PM EST
    There will be no House vote on single payer plan (the Weiner Amendment)

    and the House health bill now may be delayed at least until Sunday.

    Kucinich (none / 0) (#43)
    by Steve M on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 01:08:11 PM EST
    posted a diary @ GOS saying they didn't want a vote on single-payer right now, for some strategic reason.

    Parent
    Yeah... (5.00 / 2) (#44)
    by kdog on Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 01:21:47 PM EST
    it might just pass by some miracle and the insurance co's will all want their money back:)

    Parent