home

Saturday Afternoon Open Thread

Your turn.

This is an Open Thread.

< Clinton Goes To China | Burris "Revises" Testimony Regarding Blago >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Help, cooking is like (5.00 / 1) (#3)
    by Militarytracy on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 01:30:27 PM EST
    30th on the list things I can well enough to not die.  Recipe for dinner tonight?  Will go to grocery store.

    What genre? What protein? (5.00 / 1) (#15)
    by lobary on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 02:00:00 PM EST
    Genre? Not too complicated (none / 0) (#24)
    by Militarytracy on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 02:52:55 PM EST
    protein?  Chicken or beef

    Parent
    Here go: (5.00 / 3) (#17)
    by TeresaInSnow2 on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 02:11:47 PM EST
    From one of my dutch oven cook books.  This is a recipe for 2 people.  Double, triple, quadruple as you like.  Serve on rice.

    Santa Fe Chicken
    1 15 oz can black beans, drained and rinsed
    1 sliced green onion (I used 2)
    2 pieces of chicken (uncooked, and can even be frozen, although I defrosted mine a bit)
    1 8 oz can green chiles or 4-6 tbsp prepared salsa
    1/2 bell pepper, cut into 1" pieces (I used a whole one).
    1 15oz can corn kernels (I used frozen)
    1 14 oz can tomatoes, diced, drained (I didn't drain)
    1 6 oz can olives, black, sliced (I omitted).

    Preheat oven to 450F (I used 425). Layer ingredients in the order listed in a 2-quart dutch oven (scale up accordingly).  Bake for an hour if you used frozen chicken or ~45 minutes if you used fresh chicken.  She recommends a 2 qt enamel coated cast iron dutch oven.  My 6 qt worked just fine, although the ingredients looked lonely in there.  Good recipe, can make ahead and quite easy.

    Parent

    Leave out the chicken: mix all of Teresa's other ingredients together - call it your "mix"

    *Get medium-sized bag of corn tortilla chips
    *Grate 8oz of cheddar cheese

    Put a layer of mix in baking dish; add a layer of chips; add a layer of cheese. Repeat 2-4 times.

    Bake, covered, at 350 degrees for 30 minutes.


    Parent

    I'll do this one in a couple of days (none / 0) (#27)
    by Militarytracy on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 02:58:33 PM EST
    but get the ingredients today.  We love anything with a Mexi flair and I love black olives.  They'll think I'm turning into a chef or something around here.

    Parent
    Diary up at DK now: What's for dinner? (none / 0) (#60)
    by oculus on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 06:49:28 PM EST
    Darn, done eating :) (5.00 / 1) (#67)
    by Militarytracy on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 10:05:52 PM EST
    BTW (none / 0) (#58)
    by TeresaInSnow2 on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 06:48:05 PM EST
    Giving proper credit, this recipe is from "Glorious One-Pot Meals" by Liz Yarnell

    Amazon link

    Parent

    The mime wrote a cookbook? (none / 0) (#65)
    by ruffian on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 07:55:48 PM EST
    Was my first thought...but that was Lorene, not Liz.

    Anyone who does not get that did not watch nearly enough "Sonny and Cher" in the 70's.

    Parent

    Steak Chimichurri? (5.00 / 2) (#22)
    by lobary on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 02:47:18 PM EST
    This is one of my favorite easy 'n cheap dinners.

    For the chimichurri:

    1 bunch parsley, chopped
    1/2 cup extra virgin olive oil
    1/4 cup fresh lemon juice
    2 tbsp finely chopped garlic
    2 tsp crushed red pepper flakes
    salt and pepper

    Put the parsley in a small mixing bowl. Whisk in olive oil, lemon juice, garlic, red pepper, and salt to taste. Let it rest for about an hour to marry the flavors together.

    When you're ready to eat, heat a cast iron skillet on high for a couple of minutes and sear the steak to your liking. Allow the steaks to rest after cooking. Leave the steaks whole or slice them if you prefer, then top off with a generous helping of the chimichurri.

    You can use any cut, but there's no need to go too high end because the chimichurri does most of the work. I usually opt for flank steak, seasoning it liberally with SnP and searing it to med-rare.

    Serve with a side of sauteed spinach and/or herbed roasted potatoes.

    Parent

    Isn't cast iron a wonderful thing? (5.00 / 1) (#59)
    by TeresaInSnow2 on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 06:49:15 PM EST
    I just rediscovered it....cheap, beautiful, and extraordinarily well-performing.

    Parent
    Oh yes. (none / 0) (#64)
    by lobary on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 07:35:58 PM EST
    A hunk of tender, well-seasoned meat seared in cast iron can't be beat.

    Parent
    You know what else I rediscovered? (none / 0) (#68)
    by Militarytracy on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 10:12:13 PM EST
    A pressure cooker.  Was given a recipe to do a picnic pork roast in one and told it would make terrific pulled pork so went and purchased the first one I have ever owned myself.  I only remember these things from childhood used for canning green beans.  Never dreamed I would "cook" with one.  Wow was my husband impressed for about 6 weeks because he loves pulled pork and tender ribs.  He spent a lot of time mixing his BBQ sauces.  But the specialness has worn off now :(  I remember when he first got home from Iraq and said my dinner was terrific cuz it didn't have dirt in it :)

    Parent
    Mmmmm pulled pork (none / 0) (#77)
    by lobary on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 10:52:41 PM EST
    I'm starving. I could go for a pulled pork sandwich right now.

    I don't own a pressure cooker or even a crock pot so I've never cooked with either. My gear is basically limited to my Le Creuset dutch oven, a cast iron skillet, and a large nonstick sautee pan. And a large Calphalon roasting pan/rack combination.

    When we get our next warm snap I think I'll fire up the Weber charcoal grill and smoke some porkbutt.

    Parent

    I think I'll try this tonight (none / 0) (#25)
    by Militarytracy on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 02:55:36 PM EST
    we just had TexMex two nights ago and ate the leftovers at lunch.  Haven't had potatoes or spinach in awhile and both sound good.

    Parent
    Julia's breasts in cream (5.00 / 2) (#26)
    by gyrfalcon on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 02:58:09 PM EST
    (Julia Child of course!)

    Freely adapted-- I keep boned chicken breasts in the freezer for quick but delicious meals.

    Easiest is to slice them into bite-sized pieces, but you can also slice them horizontally if you know how, pound them thin, sprinkled 'em with S&P and a thin coating of flour, then saute quickly in a pan that isn't non-stick for no more than 2 or 3 minutes a side.  Do not overcook!  The chicken will continue to cook from its own heat after you take it out of the pan.

    Remove, keep warm on a plate, deglaze the pan with a bit of wine (any kind), or orange juice, cranberry juice, apple cider, whatever you have on hand plus some low-salt chicken broth.  Cook down rapidly until it gets thicker and almost syrupy.

    Serve with rice or noodles or with a potato side dish, drizzling the small amount of intense pan sauce over the chicken.

    If you want to go the cream route for a rich but divine sauce that's particularly fabulous with rice, add some heavy cream to the reduced pan sauce and bring to a boil to thicken.

    Another variation is to use zuccini or asparagus.  Quarter the zuccini lengthwise, then slice into 1/2-inch chunks, or slice the asparagus into 1 or 2-inch pieces.  After you've cooked the chicken and removed it, put a bit more butter in the pan and saute the vegetable lightly.  Take out the veg, deglaze the pan with wine and chicken broth as above, add cream, then throw the chicken and veg back in the pan and reheat.  WHen you're cooking the veg, add whatever dried or fresh herb you like.  I like tarragon with the asparagus and basil with the zucchini.

    The cream variations are particularly marvelous over brown rice, which also helps make you feel a bit less guilty about all that cream!

    Parent

    Hey there, MT, (5.00 / 2) (#47)
    by ChiTownDenny on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 06:03:30 PM EST
    I, like you, am not a "cook".  But, I have found the crock pot to be the salvation of "non-cooks".

     http://allrecipes.com/Search/Recipes.aspx?WithTerm=crock%20pot&SortBy=Rating&Direction=Desce nding

    Hope this helps....

    Parent

    Don't look my direction! (none / 0) (#5)
    by oculus on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 01:32:01 PM EST
    I did purchase two quite large bags of spice mixes in India.  Probably last several lifetimes.

    Parent
    Oh Man! (5.00 / 1) (#7)
    by Militarytracy on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 01:36:59 PM EST
    I bet that was the trip of a lifetime.  When I used to housesit for a gent who took clothing and essentials to the poor into the heart of Mexico on his way to Mexico City to visit his family, he used to repay me with these mole starters.  They were like a mole reduction that you added some moisture to and voila, instant sauce.  I could hide so much lack of skill under them.

    Parent
    CHICAGO (Reuters) (5.00 / 2) (#13)
    by SOS on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 01:57:53 PM EST
     - Gene sleuths who have come up with a rough draft of the Neanderthal DNA code said on Thursday the ancient relatives of modern humans shared with us one gene for speech, but little else.

    Sound like they discovered the original Republican gene pool.

    Krugman (5.00 / 3) (#30)
    by andgarden on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 04:19:49 PM EST
    has the numbers. By his figuring, all of the big banks probably need to be nationalized.

    Rush Limbaugh's head (5.00 / 1) (#53)
    by weltec2 on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 06:35:48 PM EST
    just exploded...

    "Hence the perplexity of policy. Our best hope right now is that the "stress test" will make (b) inevitable -- that Treasury will declare itself shocked, shocked to find that the banks are in such bad financial shape, leaving government receivership unavoidable."


    Parent
    Interesting (5.00 / 1) (#71)
    by cal1942 on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 10:25:36 PM EST
    that just before that paragraph Krugman pointed out that the Obama administration is hesitant to nationalize because, according to the administration, it "isn't in our culture."

    What was that again about Change?

    Parent

    Maybe the best approach would be ... (none / 0) (#55)
    by santarita on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 06:44:51 PM EST
    for Pres. Obama and the Dems to start a campaign declaring the banks perfectly healthy and advocating that every one buy stock.  The contrarian Republicans would then take the opposite approach and advocate receivership.

    Parent
    What do you think nationalization... (none / 0) (#40)
    by santarita on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 05:34:06 PM EST
    of some of these financial behemoths would entail?  

    Parent
    It would look like an FDIC seizure (none / 0) (#42)
    by andgarden on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 05:38:43 PM EST
    Depositors are protected, shareholders take a 100% haircut.

    Parent
    Can You Imagine the Litigation and General... (none / 0) (#49)
    by santarita on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 06:11:53 PM EST
    outcry if Geithner had gone to the microphones last Tuesday and announced that the FDIC had just sent examiners in to, let's say, CIti's NYC headquarters and had shut down the bank?  Or maybe just announced that Citi had been taken over, the board and senior management replaced and all equity had been reduced to O?  I'm not sure what Geither and Obama have in mind but if they did want to nationalize they would have to lay some political and legal groundwork not only within the country but internationally.  I haven't seen anything inconsistent with that laying of the groundwork.  Krugman, Roubini and others are certainly doing their part to introduce the subject of insolvency and nationalization into the public discourse.  If the banks are hopelessly insolvent in both the liquidation and going concern valuations, then the drastic steps of conservatorship and liquidation make sense.  If the banks are solvent in the sense of being able to make cash flows but insolvent in the sense of liabilities exceeding assets and/or are undercapitalized, the perhaps regulatory forbearance coupled with stringent government oversight (to the extent of having a federal official as a voting member of the board) could work.

    Parent
    I think it's a question of cost and time (5.00 / 3) (#50)
    by andgarden on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 06:14:39 PM EST
    But there's no question that if this were to be done through the FDIC, the regulatory framework is already there. The FDIC might need a cash injection, but I can't fathom Congress saying no to that.

    Parent
    Talk About the Mouse ... (none / 0) (#62)
    by santarita on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 07:31:19 PM EST
    swallowing the elephant...

    Yes there is a framework but the step is not to be taken lightly.  I'd hope that they are mapping out contingency plans.  I'm not suggesting that conservatorship may not be the appropriate step but it is a huge step that will rival the AIG conservatorship.  One possibility is that Geithner and friends will start applying pressure for a consensual orderly conservatorship and/or liquidation.  All of the bankers at the recent hearings said that they are solvent - so they may need convincing to the contrary.  A contested conservatorship wouldn't help anyone.  

    Parent

    They think if they wait long enough (5.00 / 1) (#63)
    by andgarden on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 07:34:58 PM EST
    that the junk mortgage securities will eventually regain some value.  Whether that's true is an interesting question, but the waiting is helping to bring down the rest of the economy.

    Parent
    Thanks for the link (none / 0) (#43)
    by cal1942 on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 05:43:01 PM EST
    If not nationalized then at least broken into many little pieces and insure by legislation that mega, mega banks can't happen again.

    Parent
    I don't have a problem with megabanks (none / 0) (#44)
    by andgarden on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 05:44:46 PM EST
    I do have a problem with likely insolvent megabanks that aren't loaning.

    Parent
    Except that the problem with mega-banks (5.00 / 2) (#56)
    by gyrfalcon on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 06:45:52 PM EST
    isn't just size itself, it's that they end up with their financial tentacles entwined around the intestines of vast swathes of not just the financial system but the world economy.  If they're allowed to fail, there's a rolling cascade of effects that's just horrifying.

    That's why the Fed and Treasury decided they had to try to save Bear Stearns, and why subsequently letting Lehman fail was so disastrous.  Citi can't possibly be allowed to just go bankrupt for the same reason.  If it can't survive, it'll have to be nationalized.

    If they all weren't so heavily, heavily leveraged, it wouldn't be quite as bad, but still pretty bad.  There's no reason why banks have to be gigantic, unlike our remaining 3 auto companies.

    Parent

    There are good reasons for (none / 0) (#61)
    by andgarden on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 06:51:19 PM EST
    megacorps. Economies of scale really do matter for the company
    and
    the consumer. I believe that 20 years ago if you moved from one area to another, you'd often have to open a new checking account. No more.

    The problem has been that the regulators don't regulate, and that the big banks have been able to get away with murder.

    Parent

    And that's really (5.00 / 1) (#69)
    by cal1942 on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 10:12:38 PM EST
    the reason that there should be limits on the size and reach of banks.

    Regulators don't ALWAYS regulate.  The proof of this is recent experience. When Republicans control the executive the regulatory apparatus is deliberately put to sleep.

    Since there is no way to insure that the executive will maintain the integrity of regulatory agencies then legislation to break up the big banks is a desireable option.  There's also no really good way of preventing large banks from gross mismanagement. Too large to fail is also too large to exist.

    So far as economy of scale is concerned; many smaller banks means many more jobs.

    The convenience of a national level checking account is meaningless given the risk of a failed financial system.

    Parent

    Honestly I just don't agree with this (none / 0) (#70)
    by andgarden on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 10:23:57 PM EST
    People have plenty of choices in banking: it's not like Citi or Wachovia were monopolies. They were just big, and people found them convenient.

    I'm all for anti-trust action when companies have too much control over a particular market sector, but that just isn't the case here. Keeping them small just to keep local jobs. . .I understand the sentiment, but I just don't agree. I don't want to start a fight, but I like the conveniences and technologies of my modern world.

    I think Atrios or someone made an incisive comment a few months ago about how Democrats and Republicans idealize the 50s for different reasons. Republicans are obsessed with going back to the conservative social order and "traditional values" (mostly imagined) of the day, and Democrats want to go back to the small (and frankly limited) local businesses of the era.

    Don't get me wrong, I LOVE my local independent pharmacy. And so do many other people, which is why it stays in business. But some businesses just don't lend themselves to being small and local (at least, not for everyone).

    Obviously it's not an either/or proposition, but I don't think there's any reason to ideologically object to Citibank.

    Parent

    Oh, geez, Andgarden (5.00 / 2) (#72)
    by gyrfalcon on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 10:31:48 PM EST
    this has zippo to do with the individual consumer.  If banks like Citi only did what banks traditionally do, we wouldn't have a problem.  The "economies of scale" are truly utterly trivial when it comes to banking.  They're just not a factor.  The issue is around the investing and cross-investing and CDOs and CDSs and all that other crap these "banks" have been indulging in with each other.

    You could reduce the problem hugely by strictly hemming in what kinds of activities they're allowed to engage in, as well as making rules about the degree of leverage, and I hope that's on the horizon.  But they'll only invent other, even more incomprehensible ways of making a profit.  But they do not need to be so big and so entwined into the system as a whole.o

    Parent

    I guess the question (none / 0) (#74)
    by andgarden on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 10:35:45 PM EST
    is whether we can continue to allow exotic investment instruments. It doesn't have anything per se to do with the size of banks.  

    Parent
    Sorry, but it does (none / 0) (#87)
    by gyrfalcon on Sun Feb 15, 2009 at 08:13:38 PM EST
    "Exotic investment instruments" are a big part of what caused the current problem, but even if we get that all cleaned up, it'll be something else we can't imagine somewhere down the road.

    The institutions all invest in each other, loan each other money (or did until recently) and are financially entangled quite legitimately in myriad ways.

    That's less true the smaller down the scale you go, but even if it weren't, a smaller bank failure doesn't impact the bottom line of other institutions  large and small to anywhere near the extent a big one does.

    We've had quite a lot of smaller regional banks go under recently, which isn't healthy, but no one of them failing brings the rest of it to its knees, as it would with any of the big banks like Citi or B of A, etc.


    Parent

    I believe (none / 0) (#75)
    by cal1942 on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 10:41:52 PM EST
    that there are practical reasons to object to Citi, JP Morgan, etc. and the technological conveniences certainly won't go away.

    But we should probably leave it at that. I don't see any reason for a fight. We'll all have to stay tuned to see what shakes out.

    Parent

    Reading recommendation (5.00 / 2) (#39)
    by Dadler on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 05:26:55 PM EST
    The March issue of Harper's features a Notebook column by Lewis Lapham titles "Achievetrons", which is, in a word I rarely use, brilliant.  He takes on the Obama yap yap about change and waxes skepticynical about it in a manner so urbane and witty and acutely on point that it comes as no surprise he wrote it prior to Obama's taking office and having this first largely failed test.  He gets it.  Entirely.

    A short excerpt, from his list of the beltway non-changers Obama has brought on board: "...Geithner as the president of the New York Federal Reserve Bank in the winter of 2007 neglected to address the impending trouble in the credit markets because to have done so would have upset the Wall Street achievetrons folding and refolding sets of imaginary numbers into paper hats and airplanes."

    Priceless (none / 0) (#78)
    by cal1942 on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 11:16:48 PM EST
    I always got a kick out of Lapham's stuff. He can get appropriately caustic at times.

    Unfortunately I allowed my Harpers subscription to lapse last year so I'll have to pick March up on the newsstand.

    In the appointment of Geithner and others we see a sharp contrast with the past.  When FDR appointed Joe Kennedy to head the new SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission not the SouthEast Conference) many people wailed that he'd put a fox in charge of the hen house.  But Joe knew every trick in the book and did his duty to country not the good ol' boys and got the new SEC off to a great start.

    Today, not so much. Too much sympatico.

    Parent

    Recipe for oysters magilli (5.00 / 1) (#52)
    by lentinel on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 06:23:46 PM EST
    Take six oysters, or seven if planning for dinter, and place on a floured rolling cart. Mix with brandy or lightly roasted squash oil.
    Set aside.
    Wash the celery and rottlebaggers and drain thoroughly. Wave a small white towel in front of the vegetables and throw them about while chanting.
    Be sure to reserve any liquid for future draining.
    Take the oysters which should be sticking to the cart, yet slightly oily to the touch.
    Mix the oysters with a mixture of mustard seed, rangamin, lighenthig and buttlehender.
    Set aside.
    Add celery and rottlebagger to a cheesecloth or breaded lentil. Slowly pour the mixture into a large trough.
    It is important now to add as quickly as possible the oysters, rottlehamsters and all of the other ingredients to a medium sized bucket or sterilized can. Shake.
    Add four or five sprigs of magilli and toast in a pitted, yet robust pottery crock at degrees to taste, stirring occasionally.

    Kos has FP entitled (5.00 / 1) (#80)
    by oculus on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 11:46:05 PM EST
    "Lesson Learned."  I gather he is fed up w/PPUS.  

    Nah. (5.00 / 2) (#82)
    by Dr Molly on Sun Feb 15, 2009 at 07:40:15 AM EST
    He's just extolling Obama and quoting Rahm to say that they will now behave differently. I don't think kos himself has learned any lessons.

    OMG, the comments on that post! I was laughing so hard, it made me cry. Here's one sample:

    "Thus the bipartisanship.

    I'm sorry to inform you, nothing Obama does is a mistake.

    And everything Obama does goes according to plan."

    Parent

    Ha. So Obama planned (none / 0) (#86)
    by Cream City on Sun Feb 15, 2009 at 06:23:09 PM EST
    to say he screwed up.

    What a double-back blind 21st dimension chess master the man is.  A genius!

    Parent

    Shucks (5.00 / 1) (#85)
    by TeresaInSnow2 on Sun Feb 15, 2009 at 10:24:00 AM EST
    I thought it was KOS who'd learned his lesson.  Oh well.

    Didn't read the comments.  Don't read them anymore.

    Parent

    I love listening to Karita Mattila (none / 0) (#1)
    by oculus on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 01:18:33 PM EST
    (Finnish soprano), Julie Landsman (principal horn), and Thomas Hampson, plus the entirely fabulous Metropolitan Opera Orchestra.  Eugene Onegin.  

    got linkage? (none / 0) (#2)
    by Militarytracy on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 01:29:08 PM EST
    I am listening to KUSC FM streaming (none / 0) (#4)
    by oculus on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 01:30:48 PM EST
    live.  Metropolitan Opera web site has a link to all stations streaming live.  Lots.

    Parent
    I want some sort of speakers (none / 0) (#6)
    by Militarytracy on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 01:32:40 PM EST
    or sound system as well that I can use for the stations on computer.  Does anyone out there have such a system set up for use throughout the house and how did they do it, what products did they use?

    Parent
    I have ceiling speakers in the (none / 0) (#8)
    by oculus on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 01:39:39 PM EST
    room where my computer is.  But I prefer listening over the computer, to which I have added Altec Lansing auxiliary speakers and sub-woofer.  Pretty good sound quality--but only when close to the computer.  Hence my blogging addiction, especially during the Met broadcast.

    Parent
    I have mine attached with wire (5.00 / 1) (#34)
    by scribe on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 04:54:23 PM EST
    so, in theory, I could put them anywhere.  Those Altecs rock.

    Tracy:  If you want good music (not just on Saturday afternoons), here's a number of good - really good - stations:

    MDR Figaro, (Leipzig-Dresden, Germany) A cultural/classical/jazz station which streams their feed free.  Realplayer or WMP.  No commercials.
    BR4 (Bavarian Radio 4), Munich.   Classical, streaming feed.  Free proprietary player. No commercials.
    Deutschlandfunk/ Deutschlandradio Kultur  Classical and jazz; Deutschlandfunk is more their NPR talk and news, Kultur is like their NPR music stations.
    Radio Classique, Paris.  Classical, very French.  Free Proprietary player.  Commercial.
    BBC5, London.  Classical  and modern classical.  Free.  No Commercials.

    And, it's a lot of fun hearing the Met broadcasts (which some of them carry) introduced in a furrin' language.

    I listen mostly to MDR, in part because they have a lot of spoken word programming which helps me get better with my German.  Their programs have stuff like reading serialized novels (they recently read some Edgar Allen Poe, last year they read Dorian Gray) and in-depth (hour or two-hour) shows on particularized items of local historical interest.  Like, how the Stasi co-opted their medical profession to spy on patients.  (A big reason I do not like OBama's "hey, let's computerize everyone's medical records to save money" idea.)

    But, all these stations have great music.

    Parent

    I'm selfish (none / 0) (#10)
    by Militarytracy on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 01:44:50 PM EST
    I want something that would allow the music to sound wonderful in the whole greatroom area.

    Parent
    amen to that system (none / 0) (#20)
    by DFLer on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 02:42:30 PM EST
    gotta have the sub woofer. That AL sys is only around 70 to 80 bucks, but I'm not sure they're still around.

    Pump it up!

    Parent

    FOr Mac (none / 0) (#9)
    by squeaky on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 01:41:59 PM EST
    And maybe pc as well. Harmon Kardon Sound Sticks are great. USB connection. Super cheap and they deliver really good sound.

    Parent
    I'll check out :) (none / 0) (#11)
    by Militarytracy on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 01:45:13 PM EST
    Good (none / 0) (#16)
    by squeaky on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 02:02:52 PM EST
    Don't be dissuaded by the low price. When they first came out they were almost $300. Great for movies and music. They put out a lot of sound as well. Many of my friends have gotten them on my rec and they are quite happy.


    Parent
    Hey, it looks like you can do this (none / 0) (#14)
    by Militarytracy on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 01:58:15 PM EST
    with the Bose wave.  I've always wanted one!

    Parent
    A friend gave me (none / 0) (#31)
    by scribe on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 04:31:12 PM EST
    a set of his old Altec Lansing computer speakers.

    The subwoofer is about 12 x 12 x 8 high and, coupled with the pair of smaller tweeter types, will rock the walls.  Even when attached to the computer.

    He was going to toss them out b/c they were old (in computer years).

    Parent

    I bought aux. speakers and (none / 0) (#48)
    by oculus on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 06:09:32 PM EST
    sub-woofer for my work computer first.  Seems those nifty Harmon Karden's could not--absolutelly could not--be re-assigned to me.  So I went to Circuit City and the kid clerk turned on one sound system, then the next, etc.  All were playing the most gosh aweful music.  I settled on Monsoon.  Larger speakers.  Good quality.  Inexpensive, but perhaps not longer available.

    Parent
    Station finder link: (none / 0) (#18)
    by oculus on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 02:11:52 PM EST
    I Saw Karita Mattila in "Salome" - (none / 0) (#23)
    by santarita on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 02:49:25 PM EST
    another of those operas that I would be hesitant to shell out $120 to see but I loved it (not enough to buy the CD) and she was awesome.  One of the things that I like about the Met Peformances in theaters is they have great interviews.  Karita is a hoot.  She does yoga during intermissions.  She did a cheerleader split in the last interview.  Oh and she sings well.

    I love Thomas Hampson's voice and presence.

    Parent

    I enjoyed the Salome Met HD. (none / 0) (#41)
    by oculus on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 05:35:29 PM EST
    Not a big fan of this opera previously.

    Heard Mattila sing Janufa w/L A Opera.  Then heard her do a concert performance of her big scene with orchestra from Finland.  Even better. She had on a black, floor length halter dress with an opening in the front all the way to the waist.  She kicked off her shoes and was quite convincing as the peasant girl.  

    Parent

    The Met Has Done A Good Thing for ... (none / 0) (#54)
    by santarita on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 06:41:25 PM EST
    opera with those HD performances.  What a brilliant idea.  Who knows? I may even come to love Wagner.

    Parent
    Ha. After my brother sat through (none / 0) (#57)
    by oculus on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 06:47:44 PM EST
    three of the Ring cycle operas he sd, quoting Mark Twain, I am waiting to be impressed by Wagner.  Don't think my bro will become a Ring Cycle groupie anytime soon. He plays the French horn, so I thought that might sway him.

    Parent
    Bernie Made Off (none / 0) (#12)
    by SOS on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 01:48:19 PM EST
    LONDON (Reuters) - A former British soldier killed himself after losing his life savings in an alleged $50 billion fraud run by Wall Street financier Bernard Madoff, the dead man's son said.

    I don't know (none / 0) (#21)
    by SOS on Sat Feb 14, 2009 at 02:45:25 PM EST