The Beltway's "Bipartisan" BSers Idea Of "Stimulus"
Proving how unserious and silly she and every Beltway "bipartisan" BSer is, Claire McCaskill twitted:
Proud we cut over 100 billion out of recov bill. Many Ds don’t like it, but needed to be done. The silly stuff Rs keep talking about is OUT.
What McCaskill is celebrating:
The House puts greater emphasis on helping states and localities avoid wide-scale cuts in services and layoffs of public employees. The Senate cut $40 billion of that aid from its bill . . . The Senate plan, reached in an agreement late Friday between Democrats and three moderate Republicans, focuses somewhat more heavily on tax cuts, provides far less generous health care subsidies for the unemployed and lowers a proposed increase in food stamps.
(Emphasis supplied.) There is not a serious economist in America that will tell you that the Senate plan provides a better stimulus or is truly cheaper than the House plan. Here is one simple change that will improve the stimulative effect in the Senate plan AND lower the overall cost of the Senate bill:
< Late Night: A New Constitution | McCaskill Tries To Falsely Rewrite Her Role On The Stimulus > |