home

Another Protest, Another Clash With Police

Protesters clashed with police officers outside World Bank and International Monetary Fund meetings in Washington this morning. As usual, the police got the better of it.

Authorities used batons and pepper spray when activists tried to march onto a prohibited street, and several people were pushed to the ground by police. ... "This was very excessive," said the Rev. Don Thompson, 73, who was observing the protest on behalf of the National Lawyers Guild. "They didn't give us a warning to get off the street."

Police say they were "unexpectedly swarmed" by protesters. Perhaps the officers weren't paying attention to the direction the protesters were walking.

< Saturday Morning Open Thread | Broder: They Committed War Crimes, But They Didn't "Trash Our Town" >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Calls to mind a Ted Rall article... (5.00 / 1) (#5)
    by Romberry on Sat Apr 25, 2009 at 02:46:18 PM EST
    ...in Mother Jones from April of 2000: Smashing Windows for a Better World:
    (V)iolence and publicity for protest movement(s) are directly related. . . Back in November 1999, the American left found itself involuntarily reinvigorated. Anti-free-trade protestors turned downtown Seattle into a riot zone during a meeting of the World Trade Organization.

    ...

    Five months later, in April 2000, traditional opposition groups . . . converged on Washington DC to protest a meeting of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund. . . Protesters were corralled in the streets where between 600 and 1,000 people -- including members of the press -- were shoved around and eventually arrested. Protest leaders even reportedly coordinated "peaceful arrests" in conjunction with police.

    The D.C. protests proved both peaceful and useless.


    Much more at the link...

    It seems to me that, in general, the use of (5.00 / 1) (#8)
    by DeborahNC on Sun Apr 26, 2009 at 02:13:24 AM EST
    harsher techniques and more restrictive measures by law enforcement against protesters has escalated in recent years.

    People who protested against war or governmental policies during the sixties and seventies had more freedom of movement than protesters do today.

    And the liberal use of pepper spray and Tasers on college campus protesters is frightening. There was a recent student protest at UNC-Chapel Hill when Tom Tancredo came to the campus to discuss his ideas on immigration, etc. Mr. Tancredo was sponsored by a group, Youth for Western Civilization, a Southern Poverty Law Center-desiganted Hate Group.

    The interaction led to police using pepper spray against the students, with several students sprayed directly into the eyes. Then, the police brought out a Taser, discharged it, sending out an arc of sparks that the police said, "was meant to disperse the crowd, not to subdue an individual protestor."

    Granted, the protest was poorly executed, but the use of the Taser was very menacing. Once they've been used in particular setting, law enforcement seem tp be less hesitant about using them again.

    The issue is police control. Law enforcement officers are increasingly using more nocuous instruments and potent methods to prevent or deter public protest.

    It seems the restriction of protests escalated during the Bush years--probably part of his police-state plan.
     

    Know what you mean. Under Bush, people were (none / 0) (#10)
    by Aramis on Sun Apr 26, 2009 at 05:56:01 AM EST
    walled off a certain distance away from where he was speaking. As it turned out, sometimes they were located so far away that he couldn't even see them!

    Parent
    What is a "prohibited street"? (none / 0) (#1)
    by oculus on Sat Apr 25, 2009 at 12:23:17 PM EST
    Also, one of the protestors peppersprayed an officer:

    A 22-year-old man accused of using pepper spray on an officer during the scuffle was arrested, D.C. police said. Before the demonstrations began, police arrested six people and accused them of vandalizing two banks, an incident that authorities think was linked to the protests.
     [Emphasis added.]


    I work in Baltimore, and we have an (5.00 / 1) (#4)
    by Anne on Sat Apr 25, 2009 at 02:34:22 PM EST
    office in DC; we got the following e-mail about all the street closings:

    To: All Office - Washington

    Subject: World Bank Protests

    Between Friday April 24th and Sunday April 26th the WB/IMF will hold their spring meetings in Washington.

    As of today the DC Police plan to close 18th, 19th, and 20th Sts between Pennsylvania Ave to G St NW. Pennsylvania Ave will remain open in both directions.

    The street closings will take effect after rush hour on Friday and remain in place until Sunday early evening.

    On Friday a march to the WB/IMF complex will occur through various yet undetermined sections of the city and will attempt to slow traffic. As the route is undetermined this march could come past the Bank. A run to the WB/IMF will begin at 12:00 noon from Malcolm X Park (16th St and Florida Ave NW).

    On Saturday, one group of protestors will meet at 8:00 am at the Law Enforcement Memorial at Judiciary Square in the 400 block of G St. NW. It is believed that they will disrupt traffic while marching to the WB/IMF complex. A separate group of protestors are making plans to block the delegates hotels and engage in unpermitted marches and traffic blockade. Later in the evening they will regroup and march into Georgetown.

    On Sunday there is a march scheduled to begin at 12:00 noon from Dupont Circle to the WB/IMF.

    Below is a list of the scheduled street closings and parking restrictions which will be enforced by the DC Police.

    **TRAFFIC ADVISORY**

    Street Closures and Parking Restrictions for

    IMF/World Bank Spring 2009 Conference

    (Washington, D.C.) The Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) has provided the following information regarding street closures and parking restrictions for the Spring Meetings of the IMF/World Bank Board of Governors this weekend.

    Street Closures

    Beginning at 7:30 p.m. on Friday, April 24, 2009 until 5 p.m. on Sunday, April 26, 2009, the following streets surrounding the IMF/World Bank will be closed to vehicular traffic:

    • 18th Street, NW from G Street to Pennsylvania Avenue

    • 19th Street, NW from G Street to Pennsylvania Avenue

    • 20th Street, NW from G Street to Pennsylvania Avenue

    • G Street, NW from 18th Street to 20th Street

    • H Street, NW (south side) from 18th Street to 20th Street

    Parking Restrictions

    No parking will be allowed on the following streets from 3 p.m. on Friday, April 24, 2009 until 6 a.m. on Monday, April 27, 2009:

    • 18th Street, NW from G Street to Pennsylvania Avenue

    • 19th Street, NW from G Street to Pennsylvania Avenue

    • 20th Street, NW from G Street to Pennsylvania Avenue

    • G Street, NW from 18th Street to 20th Street

    • H Street, NW (south side) from 18th Street to 20th Street

    • Pennsylvania Avenue, NW from 18th Street to 20th Street

    No parking will be allowed on the following streets from 7 p.m. on Friday, April 24, 2009 until 6 a.m. on Monday, April 27, 2009:

    • 600 block of 18th Street, NW

    • 600 block of 19th Street, NW

    • 600 block of 20th Street, NW

    • 2000 block of H Street, NW

    • 1700 block of G Street, NW

    • 2000 block of G Street, NW

    If that helps...I realize it speaks more to vehicular traffic, but I suspect at least some of these street were closed to vehicular and foot traffic.


    Parent

    Any street they can claim they (none / 0) (#2)
    by Militarytracy on Sat Apr 25, 2009 at 12:59:24 PM EST
    made some sort of indication that protest wouldn't be allowed on.  There are all sorts of such things that go along with protests these days. Probably wouldn't have worked well in the 60's.

    Parent
    that was my first question too... (none / 0) (#3)
    by of1000Kings on Sat Apr 25, 2009 at 01:20:00 PM EST
    prohibited street?  what a weird term...

    Parent
    Can't have any peasants (none / 0) (#6)
    by of1000Kings on Sat Apr 25, 2009 at 05:23:16 PM EST
    getting near the Gods of Industry, the Aristocrats of the World...

    Everyone should know by now that those in the financial industry are better human beings in every facet than the meager peasant citizens of this country...

    Do these people even know what they're protesting? (none / 0) (#7)
    by jbindc on Sat Apr 25, 2009 at 06:12:05 PM EST
    Oddly enough, these meetings always have violent protests break out - they plan it.  Don't these people realize that they hurt their own cause by egging on law enforcement and then crying "Ooh.  Police Brutality!"

    This makes me think they can't make rational arguments for their positions.

    I would lay money that the reaction here would (none / 0) (#9)
    by Wile ECoyote on Sun Apr 26, 2009 at 05:42:09 AM EST
    be opposite if it were a tea party.

    My reaction would be the same. (none / 0) (#12)
    by TChris on Sun Apr 26, 2009 at 07:28:50 PM EST
    Civil rights are civil rights, and excessive force is excessive force, regardless of the principle (or lack thereof) that motivates the protest.

    Parent
    Well (none / 0) (#13)
    by jbindc on Mon Apr 27, 2009 at 09:30:26 AM EST
    Sunday was a day of vandalism

    This is what happened on Saturday:

    About 8 a.m., a group of about 50 people marched in tank tops or spandex, doing fan kicks and arm curls while chanting "Kick out the capitalists!" and "Pump up the people power!"

    Later, they joined with a group that had marched down Connecticut Avenue led by self-described anarchists. Members of that group dressed in black, and many wore hooded sweat shirts and bandannas over the mouths.

    About 9:15 a.m., as they snaked down Pennsylvania Avenue past the IMF headquarters, chants turned darker. "No bailouts, no thanks! We'll burn down your [expletive] banks!"

    A 20-year-old area college student and member of an anarchist collective said the group was not responsible for the vandalism but supported it.

    "Banks should be abolished, and we believe in the destruction of capitalism and all organizations that support it," said the student, adding that he would not give his name because he feared government retaliation. "Housing is a right, and the banks are taking that away through foreclosure, so we do support any action against banks."

    About 9:45 a.m., the protesters marched through Foggy Bottom flanked by police and approached the financial institutions' headquarters for a second time. Police ordered the demonstrators, who did not have permits to march in the street, to move to the sidewalk.

    The protesters resisted, some pounding their hands on the hood of a police car. Dozens of federal and local officers arrived -- by bicycle, motorcycle and cars and on horseback -- to help quell the disturbance.

    Police formed a line and began pushing the group onto the sidewalk with batons. In the tussle, some people fell. One officer from a federal agency used pepper spray, and the group retreated into Edward R. Murrow Park, where many plunged their stinging faces into a fountain.

    The protesters had intended to block delegates from entering the meetings in the morning, but they arrived late.

    Forgive me if I have no sympathy for these people.  They come looking to stir up trouble, as opposed to peacefully protesting.