home

Holder Has His Prosecutors' Backs. Why?

Given the unprincipled performance of prosecutors from the Justice Department's Public Integrity Unit during the Ted Stevens trial, it's time for Eric Holder to demand prosecutorial integrity from his Public Integrity lawyers. The Attorney General showed some integrity of his own when he dumped the tainted Stevens prosecution, but he may have signaled a tolerance for the unit's unethical behavior when, a week later, he assured the unit's prosecutors "personally that I’ve got your back" and called them "among the finest lawyers in the entire government."

[A] decision by the Bush administration eight years ago to shake up the section has had some troubling consequences, like frequent leadership changes and the loss of experienced prosecutors, according to interviews with more than a dozen current and former officials. Against that backdrop, court records show that the Stevens case has not been the only one in which the unit may have failed to disclose evidence favorable to the defense, as required by law.

[more ...]

Perhaps Holder's instinct was to boost morale among prosecutors who might have been demoralized by his public admission that Justice Department attorneys behaved unethically during the Stevens prosecution. Perhaps when he ranked the Public Integrity Unit lawyers "among the finest lawyers in the entire government," he was speaking of better days -- like the period from 1976 to 1988 when Holder worked in the unit. Surely he wasn't referring to the lawyers who worked on torture memos or who based their decisions to prosecute public officials on the political needs of the White House.

The linked article offers evidence that the Bush administration began meddling with the Public Integrity Unit in 2001, when it removed the unit's longtime chief -- a career prosecutor who had resisted Republican pressure to recommend the appointment of an independent counsel to investigate allegations of illegal campaign fund-raising by Al Gore. The unit went downhill from there, as experienced prosecutors quit or transferred out of the unit. Three quarters of the lawyers in the unit at the start of the Bush administration had departed by its end. That left newbies recruited by the Bush administration running the show.

If Public Integrity Unit prosecutors were "among the finest lawyers in the entire government" when Holder was there, the Bush administration put an end to that. Law Professor David Sklansky calls the unit's deterioration "a kind of organizational failure."

Mr. Sklansky said the pressure to bring cases coupled with the erosion of “the institutional memory of the unit and the availability of prosecutors with seasoned, detached judgment” had created an ideal environment for mistakes like the disclosure violations.

If Holder does his job well, "I've got your back" means "I'll support your future ethical decisions to bring meritorious charges that are politically unpopular," not "I'll cover your mistakes." His actions so far reflect a commitment to restore the Justice Department's integrity.

Last month, he ordered all prosecutors to undergo retraining and established a working group to review where they needed additional resources to fulfill their obligations to provide material to the defense. He has also made several other moves, including changing the leadership of the department’s internal ethics unit, the Office of Professional Responsibility, which the judge in the Stevens case criticized for moving slowly.

That's a good start. The real challenge lies in weeding out the prosecutors who have internalized the Bush administration's elevation of politics over justice, of results over rules. For some, retraining just won't be enough. Those are the Justice Department lawyers who need to be reassigned to prosecute traffic tickets issued in national parks or to handle student loan collections.

< Waiting For Rove | Friday Afternoon Open Thread >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    i'll withhold judgment, until (5.00 / 1) (#3)
    by cpinva on Fri May 08, 2009 at 05:20:18 PM EST
    the cliff's notes version is published.

    Those are the Justice Department lawyers who need to be reassigned to prosecute traffic tickets issued in national parks or to handle student loan collections.

    no, those are the ones that need to be shown the door, and quickly. there are even rules in traffic court and collections.

    John Dean wrote about the loss (none / 0) (#4)
    by hairspray on Sat May 09, 2009 at 03:45:32 PM EST
    of good prosecutors being many of his friends from both political parties.  He thought a thorough housecleaning was in order in "Broken Government."

    Parent
    It sounds to me like Holder (none / 0) (#1)
    by oculus on Fri May 08, 2009 at 01:48:19 PM EST
    taking seriously the job of making sure this division of his office does its job well and ethically.  

    Well, they'll have the Grace acquittals (none / 0) (#2)
    by scribe on Fri May 08, 2009 at 02:43:47 PM EST
    to ponder - another case in which DoJ just couldn't get it's Brady/Giglio compliance straight wound up in a complete acquittal.

    On those Brady issues:  once is a mistake, twice is a problem, but when it happens in this many cases, it's a policy.