Your turn.
This is an Open Thread.
Make a new account
Kirk was registered as a lobbyist a decade ago. He was paid $35,000 to represent the pharmaceutical company Hoechst Marion Roussel on legislation before the US Senate in 1999, according to federal disclosure records. He is currently on the board of directors of the Hartford Insurance Group.
[snip]
Some Kennedy insiders who support Kirk's appointment, though, have argued that Dukakis is too outspoken on health care issues, espousing liberal positions that could complicate Democrats' attempts in Washington to moderate their approach on the legislation
Gotta love that second paragraph particularly. It's as galling as it is unsurprising. Parent
Because God forbid there might be a liberal voice in the Senate who would ruin the Democrats' attempts to pass the mediocre legislative gruel that is currently on the Congressional stove. Parent
They are playing up the Kennedy angle to the story because they are hoping it may make it more palatable to the people of MA (most of whom, by the way, have no idea who Kirk is), than the angle that Obama asked Patrick to pick Kirk over Dukakis because Dukakis might be "too liberal." Parent
I await further study. Parent
But, important to note that the reduction in infection rates wasn't to zero, it was from 74% to 51%. So, still a lot of work to do. Parent
I don't know if we have a single vaccine for ANY retrovirus, let alone HIV. Retrovirii excel at stealth and what the immune system can't detect, it can't react to. I wonder what they are doing to trigger the immune system. Parent
And then there were steroid hearings in Congress, and indictments in the BALCO case and all the other stuff.
Well, it turns out, as discussed in a specialty magazine for insurance underwriters, that the real story is quite a bit different.
McGwire had bad ankles. He wanted to insure them, kind of like a pianist will insure his hands or a dancer their legs. Makes sense - you can't play baseball (and can't make money) if you're ankles are a mess.
The normal insurance policy would not cover them - i.e., excluded them - because they were such a mess. So, he had to get a special policy to insure what had been excluded.
Think of it this way. Your car insurance will not cover you if, say, you want to drive your car for business. That's an exclusion. You want to drive your car for business. You have to buy an additional policy to cover the exclusion, i.e., driving the car for business.
You get the idea.
Well, McGwire and his folks got Certain Underwriters at Lloyds to come in to write a specialized policy. This article sets it out in a lot of detail. From the article:
In these cases, Mr. Thomas said, finding a carrier can be difficult. There are a fair number of underwriters who write sports disability insurance, he said, but far fewer "who have the expertise and appetite for tougher exclusions to body parts. Not a lot are comfortable covering that." To write these kinds of policies, the exclusion language must essentially be inverted, Mr. Thomas said. Underwriters will typically apply "very broad exclusions" to the body part in question. When writing back the exclusion, Mr. Thomas said it is possible to continue to exclude some conditions considered impossible to insure while still giving back a lot of coverage. These types of policies are not cheap, Mr. Thomas said. While noting that in many cases the initial exclusion is often "more broad than it needs to be," he said there is still a reason the exclusion was put in place, so it is costly to write coverage back. In one interesting story about this type of policy, Mr. Thomas talked about insuring Mark McGwire's problematic ankle during the baseball player's epic 70-home-run season with the St. Louis Cardinals in 1998. Mr. Thomas said a lot of medical details had to be vetted before Lloyd's underwriters would consider writing a policy. Details included exactly how the ankle is strapped, types of orthotics used and any anti-inflammatory medications taken. One substance used by McGwire at the time--androstenedione--was part of the regiment that Lloyd's said should be maintained to help Mr. McGwire recover. At the time, the substance was not on Major League Baseball's banned substance list for performance-enhancing drugs, but it has since been added and is considered a "steroid precursor." And so, as Mr. Thomas noted, "something that was the start of all the steroid [discussions in baseball] was part of the underwriting interest for this policy."
To write these kinds of policies, the exclusion language must essentially be inverted, Mr. Thomas said. Underwriters will typically apply "very broad exclusions" to the body part in question. When writing back the exclusion, Mr. Thomas said it is possible to continue to exclude some conditions considered impossible to insure while still giving back a lot of coverage.
These types of policies are not cheap, Mr. Thomas said. While noting that in many cases the initial exclusion is often "more broad than it needs to be," he said there is still a reason the exclusion was put in place, so it is costly to write coverage back.
In one interesting story about this type of policy, Mr. Thomas talked about insuring Mark McGwire's problematic ankle during the baseball player's epic 70-home-run season with the St. Louis Cardinals in 1998.
Mr. Thomas said a lot of medical details had to be vetted before Lloyd's underwriters would consider writing a policy. Details included exactly how the ankle is strapped, types of orthotics used and any anti-inflammatory medications taken.
One substance used by McGwire at the time--androstenedione--was part of the regiment that Lloyd's said should be maintained to help Mr. McGwire recover.
At the time, the substance was not on Major League Baseball's banned substance list for performance-enhancing drugs, but it has since been added and is considered a "steroid precursor." And so, as Mr. Thomas noted, "something that was the start of all the steroid [discussions in baseball] was part of the underwriting interest for this policy."
In other words, Mark McGwire was required, by the terms of the policy of disability insurance covering his ankles, to use the andro which has made him a poster child for steroid use in baseball. If he had not used the steroids, he would not have been insurable.
Kinda changes things, don't you think?
On the other hand, if he is physically unable to play without performance enhancers, even if the performance enhancer is just a by-product of the 'medicinal purposes' substance....couldn't that be true of plenty of people? Parent
The "outrage" was and always will be comedic, imo. Parent
The stuff was legal at the time either way. Athletes do all kinds of stuff to improve performance - there's no clear ethical line on the issue. The rules allowed it. Parent
wordsmith Parent
In other words, accountability.
Something our government could use a lot more of. Parent
Ever true to its subject, it's so badass it's the only known statue in existence without even a trace of pigeon sh!t. Parent
I hope The Sun didn't blow up their spot.
even if the frog was fake.
Does the suit against the filmmaker have merit?
Seems Acorn has more to loose during the trial then some kid with a video camera.
I don't know if ACORN should be going after the phonies, it was a low-blow sandbag job, but I don't see anybody gaining from the suit except the lawyers. Parent
Yet suddenly they're the Illuminati and Elders of Zion rolled into one. Parent
If you read between the lines, the point was that ACORN was not part of the beltway/big money crowd and their willing pawns so any evidence of wrong doing should be used to not just punish, but hopefully destroy the organization. Mere corrective action was not enough. Parent
The congressional legislation intended to defund ACORN, passed with broad bipartisan support, is written so broadly that it applies to "any organization" that has been charged with breaking federal or state election laws, lobbying disclosure laws, campaign finance laws or filing fraudulent paperwork with any federal or state agency. It also applies to any of the employees, contractors or other folks affiliated with a group charged with any of those things. In other words, the bill could plausibly defund the entire military-industrial complex. Whoops. .... Lockheed Martin and Northrop Gumman both popped up quickly, with 20 fraud cases between them, and the longer list is a Who's Who of weapons manufacturers and defense contractors. HufPo
In other words, the bill could plausibly defund the entire military-industrial complex. Whoops. .... Lockheed Martin and Northrop Gumman both popped up quickly, with 20 fraud cases between them, and the longer list is a Who's Who of weapons manufacturers and defense contractors. HufPo
Parent
Where's the Union protection for the aspiring H.S or College lineman who dosnt wanna use human-bovine-primate growth hormone, or whatever it is they're using these days? Parent
No sense crying over spilled milk, I'm sure the customs official's replacement is being corrupted as we speak.
A PAIR of rabid rabbits has been caught killing a series of snakes near Cairns.
For three weeks Armando Del Manso believed his dog was responsible for the dead snakes showing up with teeth marks all over them on his East Barron property's lawn each morning.
But it turns out it was a pair of rampaging rabbits killing the snakes.
video of rabbit attacking snake
Ick. Parent
LONDON - An amateur treasure hunter prowling English farmland with a metal detector stumbled upon the largest Anglo-Saxon treasure ever found, a massive seventh-century hoard of gold and silver sword decorations, crosses and other items, British archaeologists said Thursday. One expert said the treasure found by 55-year-old Terry Herbert would revolutionize understanding of the Anglo-Saxons, a Germanic people who ruled England from the fifth century until the Norman conquest in 1066. Another said the find would rank among Britain's best-known historic treasures. link
One expert said the treasure found by 55-year-old Terry Herbert would revolutionize understanding of the Anglo-Saxons, a Germanic people who ruled England from the fifth century until the Norman conquest in 1066. Another said the find would rank among Britain's best-known historic treasures. link
Get yours today!
Link
Saw the ad for the first time on TV. I thought it was a joke....
I guess I'm insensitive because I saw the Chia Obama along the lines of the "commemorative plates"....figuring the koolaid drinkers would like the Chia as much as the other commemoratives. I saw it as cashing in on Obama, not as any of the other less politically correct interpretations, whatever those happen to be. Parent
Yep, she suffers from depression. She claims she was "cured," I think she was having an episode this week. I don't know about you, but I could see it in her dancing. She wasn't "up to it".
So sorry to see her go. She wasn't that good and maybe it was because of the depression. She didn't need to go first.