home

Robert Reich Does Not Know the President Is Impotent

Apparently, Robert Reich is not a part of Ezra Klein's JournOList:

What Obama Must Demand from Congress on Health Care

. . . In order to get anything meaningful through this session of Congress, then, the President will have to give congressional Democrats far more leadership and more cover. . . . [H]e'll need to be specific about what he wants -- especially about three things. I hope says the following next Wednesday, and makes clear to individual members that he means business.

1. I will not stand for a bill that leaves millions of Americans without health care. . . .

2. The only way to cover all Americans without causing deficits to rise is to require that the wealthiest Americans pay a bit extra. . . .

3. Finally, I want a true public insurance option -- not a "cooperative," and not something that's triggered if certain goals aren't met. . . .

Obviously, Robert Reich is delusional.

Speaking for me only

< Unemployment Hits 9.7% | Friday Morning Open Thread >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    GLad to see (5.00 / 2) (#1)
    by jeffinalabama on Fri Sep 04, 2009 at 08:35:14 AM EST
    some more delusion like this in the world. Heck, we get enough delusional people, we might just be able to change things!

    What Obama Must Demand from Congress (5.00 / 2) (#2)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Sep 04, 2009 at 08:41:25 AM EST
    funny, I just heard on Morning Joe from no less an authority than David (mini tim) Gregory that the more interesting "demands" are the ones he will be  making of the "far left".

    like grow up.
    why I watch that piece of crap show is beyond me

    I would rather he get concessions (5.00 / 5) (#3)
    by MO Blue on Fri Sep 04, 2009 at 08:48:43 AM EST
    from Senators on the "far right." People like Snowe, Collins, Lieberman, Nelson(s) and crew.

    I know - I know these people are currently labeled as "moderate." But if people just wanting real meaningful health care are the "far left", then surely those mentioned above are the "far right."

    Parent

    yep, it seems like an inside out bell curve (5.00 / 1) (#6)
    by jeffinalabama on Fri Sep 04, 2009 at 08:56:27 AM EST
    68.26 percent or more are either far left or far right, and only 5-10 percent are centrists.  Can you say lunacy?

    Parent
    well not really at least in this case IMO (5.00 / 2) (#8)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Sep 04, 2009 at 08:59:45 AM EST
    the last number I saw was 56%.  that is the number of people who want to see a "robust public option".

    I thought when I heard that, oh, you mean that "far left 56% of the country".  got it.


    Parent

    Oh. the far left 56 percent. (5.00 / 1) (#9)
    by jeffinalabama on Fri Sep 04, 2009 at 09:01:28 AM EST
    I see. I guess I need to re-tool my stats lectures. Whatwas I thinking?

    Parent
    So the "centrists" want (5.00 / 1) (#17)
    by Fabian on Fri Sep 04, 2009 at 09:50:18 AM EST
    a robust public option?  Real People, not pols that is.

    Parent
    only those "far left" (5.00 / 1) (#21)
    by jeffinalabama on Fri Sep 04, 2009 at 01:27:18 PM EST
    "centrists." Otherwise called the majority of the population.

    Parent
    Obama has given up on single payer! (5.00 / 2) (#22)
    by hairspray on Fri Sep 04, 2009 at 01:53:55 PM EST
    That should be all the concession he does now.  The rest of the bill should be what progressives will accept, like a bill with a public plan like the Federal Employees health plan that Hillary promised.

    Parent
    Ah, the far left (5.00 / 4) (#7)
    by Steve M on Fri Sep 04, 2009 at 08:59:27 AM EST
    Maybe Obama should announce that he won't be forming a Department of Peace.  Independents all over the country will swoon to see how boldly he disowns the "far left."  Clearly that is the key to political success.

    Parent
    Gregory (none / 0) (#4)
    by Ga6thDem on Fri Sep 04, 2009 at 08:53:34 AM EST
    is probably right here. It fits Obama's "they have nowhere else to go MO" and then begging the GOP to go along. It's just another day in the milquetoast presidency.

    Parent
    he basically said exactly that (none / 0) (#5)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Sep 04, 2009 at 08:56:21 AM EST
    is what he is hearing from "them" at the white house.

    I hope, I really really hope, that they are not taught that staying home is also a "place to go"

    Parent

    Even David Brooks Gets Things (Partly) Right (5.00 / 4) (#10)
    by The Maven on Fri Sep 04, 2009 at 09:09:39 AM EST
    In his column today, Brooks takes Obama to task for completely fumbling the actual reform issue here:
    Obama's promise [that people satified with what hey have now wouldn't be forced to change] sent the reform effort off the rails. It meant that efforts to expand coverage marched ahead, but efforts to fundamentally reform the system got watered down.

    Instead of true reform we got a series of bills that essentially cement the present system in place. The proposals do not fundamentally challenge the fee-for-service system. They don't make Americans more accountable for their own health care spending. They don't reduce costs. They just add more people into the mess we've got.


    While the solutions that Brooks seems to want are very different from what we would advocate, he does at least hit the nail on the head in that we appear to be lurching toward locking in the dysfunctional system we have now for another generation.
    But the president's in political hot water already. He got there trying to dodge the hard issues. He might as well be there because he's fighting for something real.

    There are many people telling him to go incremental. They're telling him to just enlarge the current system a bit and pay for it by pounding down a few Medicare fees. But did Barack Obama really get elected so he could pass the Status Quo Sanctification and Extension Act?

    This is not the time to get incremental. It's the time to get fundamental.


    If I find myself in general agreement with Brooks and in opposition to a Democratic president, that's got to be a sign that things are really messed up.


    It is standard practice (5.00 / 6) (#11)
    by Steve M on Fri Sep 04, 2009 at 09:16:34 AM EST
    for conservatives who are invariably opposed to radical change to look at a finished product that was designed mainly to please people like them, and say "hey, you didn't deliver radical change! how disappointing!"

    It is so annoying dealing with people who expect you to solve all the problems but then oppose all your solutions.

    Parent

    You don't deal with them (5.00 / 5) (#12)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Fri Sep 04, 2009 at 09:20:26 AM EST
    is the obvious solution.

    Especially when you do not have to.

    Parent

    I can't help it (5.00 / 3) (#13)
    by Steve M on Fri Sep 04, 2009 at 09:34:33 AM EST
    I work on Wall Street!  They're everywhere!

    People like our friend Jim who think Obama forged his birth certificate but are also just so, so disappointed that he won't propose single-payer.

    Or my personal favorite, conservatives who advocate that we replace our affirmative action system with "class-based" affirmative action.  Watch that one last 2 seconds once someone on the left actually proposes it.

    Parent

    Yep (5.00 / 1) (#14)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Fri Sep 04, 2009 at 09:35:36 AM EST
    I still don't get it... (5.00 / 2) (#15)
    by sallywally on Fri Sep 04, 2009 at 09:44:27 AM EST
    are their brains mud? Are they unable to see obvious logical inconsistencies in their views? Can they think a thing all the way through at all, ever????

    Has something happened in the move from analog to digital information/analyzing skills?

    Parent

    "logical inconsistencies" (5.00 / 2) (#16)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Sep 04, 2009 at 09:47:06 AM EST
    thats a joke right.  remember who we are talking about.  when has logic or inconsistencies for that matter had anyting at all to do with what they do or say.


    Parent
    No offense to you personally, sally, (none / 0) (#18)
    by Spamlet on Fri Sep 04, 2009 at 09:55:50 AM EST
    but your comment is a textbook example of how, according to George Lakoff, progressives fail to "frame" issues . . . and lose.

    Parent
    Well (5.00 / 1) (#19)
    by Ga6thDem on Fri Sep 04, 2009 at 10:11:27 AM EST
    Robert Reich is delusional in the fact that he doesnt realize that we're dealing with Milquetoast Goodspeech for a President.

    Wonder how long it will take him (5.00 / 1) (#20)
    by Radiowalla on Fri Sep 04, 2009 at 10:39:50 AM EST
    to turn against this President?