home

Excerpts From Obama's Speech Tonight

Just received these excerpts of President Obama's speech tonight on health care from the White House. The speech is at 8pm ET. If you are not by a TV, the White House is streaming it live here.

I am not the first President to take up this cause, but I am determined to be the last. It has now been nearly a century since Theodore Roosevelt first called for health care reform. And ever since, nearly every President and Congress, whether Democrat or Republican, has attempted to meet this challenge in some way. A bill for comprehensive health reform was first introduced by John Dingell Sr. in 1943. Sixty-five years later, his son continues to introduce that same bill at the beginning of each session.

[More...]

Our collective failure to meet this challenge – year after year, decade after decade – has led us to a breaking point. Everyone understands the extraordinary hardships that are placed on the uninsured, who live every day just one accident or illness away from bankruptcy. These are not primarily people on welfare. These are middle-class Americans. Some can’t get insurance on the job. Others are self-employed, and can’t afford it, since buying insurance on your own costs you three times as much as the coverage you get from your employer. Many other Americans who are willing and able to pay are still denied insurance due to previous illnesses or conditions that insurance companies decide are too risky or expensive to cover.

....During that time, we have seen Washington at its best and its worst.

....We have seen many in this chamber work tirelessly for the better part of this year to offer thoughtful ideas about how to achieve reform. Of the five committees asked to develop bills, four have completed their work, and the Senate Finance Committee announced today that it will move forward next week. That has never happened before. Our overall efforts have been supported by an unprecedented coalition of doctors and nurses; hospitals, seniors’ groups and even drug companies – many of whom opposed reform in the past. And there is agreement in this chamber on about eighty percent of what needs to be done, putting us closer to the goal of reform than we have ever been.

....But what we have also seen in these last months is the same partisan spectacle that only hardens the disdain many Americans have toward their own government. Instead of honest debate, we have seen scare tactics. Some have dug into unyielding ideological camps that offer no hope of compromise. Too many have used this as an opportunity to score short-term political points, even if it robs the country of our opportunity to solve a long-term challenge. And out of this blizzard of charges and counter-charges, confusion has reigned.

Well the time for bickering is over. The time for games has passed. Now is the season for action. Now is when we must bring the best ideas of both parties together, and show the American people that we can still do what we were sent here to do. Now is the time to deliver on health care.

The plan I’m announcing tonight would meet three basic goals:

It will provide more security and stability to those who have health insurance. It will provide insurance to those who don’t. And it will slow the growth of health care costs for our families, our businesses, and our government. It’s a plan that asks everyone to take responsibility for meeting this challenge – not just government and insurance companies, but employers and individuals. And it’s a plan that incorporates ideas from Senators and Congressmen; from Democrats and Republicans – and yes, from some of my opponents in both the primary and general election.

***

Here are the details that every American needs to know about this plan:

First, if you are among the hundreds of millions of Americans who already have health insurance through your job, Medicare, Medicaid, or the VA, nothing in this plan will require you or your employer to change the coverage or the doctor you have. Let me repeat this: nothing in our plan requires you to change what you have.

What this plan will do is to make the insurance you have work better for you. Under this plan, it will be against the law for insurance companies to deny you coverage because of a pre-existing condition. As soon as I sign this bill, it will be against the law for insurance companies to drop your coverage when you get sick or water it down when you need it most. They will no longer be able to place some arbitrary cap on the amount of coverage you can receive in a given year or a lifetime. We will place a limit on how much you can be charged for out-of-pocket expenses, because in the United States of America, no one should go broke because they get sick. And insurance companies will be required to cover, with no extra charge, routine checkups and preventive care, like mammograms and colonoscopies – because there’s no reason we shouldn’t be catching diseases like breast cancer and colon cancer before they get worse. That makes sense, it saves money, and it saves lives.

That’s what Americans who have health insurance can expect from this plan – more security and stability.

Now, if you’re one of the tens of millions of Americans who don’t currently have health insurance, the second part of this plan will finally offer you quality, affordable choices. If you lose your job or change your job, you will be able to get coverage. If you strike out on your own and start a small business, you will be able to get coverage. We will do this by creating a new insurance exchange – a marketplace where individuals and small businesses will be able to shop for health insurance at competitive prices. Insurance companies will have an incentive to participate in this exchange because it lets them compete for millions of new customers. As one big group, these customers will have greater leverage to bargain with the insurance companies for better prices and quality coverage. This is how large companies and government employees get affordable insurance. It’s how everyone in this Congress gets affordable insurance. And it’s time to give every American the same opportunity that we’ve given ourselves.

***

This is the plan I’m proposing. It’s a plan that incorporates ideas from many of the people in this room tonight – Democrats and Republicans. And I will continue to seek common ground in the weeks ahead. If you come to me with a serious set of proposals, I will be there to listen. My door is always open.

But know this: I will not waste time with those who have made the calculation that it’s better politics to kill this plan than improve it. I will not stand by while the special interests use the same old tactics to keep things exactly the way they are. If you misrepresent what’s in the plan, we will call you out. And I will not accept the status quo as a solution. Not this time. Not now.

Everyone in this room knows what will happen if we do nothing. Our deficit will grow. More families will go bankrupt. More businesses will close. More Americans will lose their coverage when they are sick and need it most. And more will die as a result. We know these things to be true.

That is why we cannot fail. Because there are too many Americans counting on us to succeed – the ones who suffer silently, and the ones who shared their stories with us at town hall meetings, in emails, and in letters.

< Here Comes The Prof | President Obama HCR Speech Live Blog >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    I like the big quote marks (5.00 / 2) (#1)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 05:26:24 PM EST


    Uh huh (5.00 / 1) (#14)
    by Steve M on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 05:41:50 PM EST
    You and this guy!

    Parent
    Would you say they are more of a (none / 0) (#19)
    by FoxholeAtheist on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 05:52:24 PM EST
    maroon or more of an oxblood color? Either way, it adds pizzaz to the big quote marks doesn't it.

    Parent
    Oxblood (none / 0) (#21)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 05:54:26 PM EST
    Always loved that color.

    Parent
    Link (none / 0) (#24)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 05:56:30 PM EST
    I believe you are correct. (none / 0) (#33)
    by shoephone on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 06:01:30 PM EST
    And here I thought it looked exactly like a Benjamin Moore color called "New London Burgandy" (HC-61).

    Parent
    Link for HC-61 (none / 0) (#37)
    by shoephone on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 06:05:55 PM EST
    Used to be (none / 0) (#49)
    by cal1942 on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 06:16:24 PM EST
    a fairly popular shoe color

    Parent
    Oxblood shoes go with any suit color (5.00 / 1) (#81)
    by FoxholeAtheist on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 06:45:20 PM EST
    Take note you legal eagles.

    Parent
    Now it will receive fame as a (none / 0) (#54)
    by MO Blue on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 06:20:33 PM EST
    very popular quote mark color. I can see it now. This trend will spread throughout the the land. And we will have President Obama to thank for it.

    Parent
    Pantone 1815 :) (none / 0) (#38)
    by nycstray on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 06:06:29 PM EST
    Sounds like a (5.00 / 1) (#3)
    by dk on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 05:31:20 PM EST
    love letter to President Snowe.  Or am I missing something?

    The big quote marks (none / 0) (#4)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 05:33:19 PM EST
    I really like them.

    Parent
    True. (none / 0) (#5)
    by dk on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 05:35:18 PM EST
    They're pretty.

    Parent
    Yes I'm impressed with the (none / 0) (#6)
    by MO Blue on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 05:35:50 PM EST
    big quote marks myself.

    Parent
    I don't know.... (none / 0) (#11)
    by desertswine on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 05:39:42 PM EST
    I would call them GIANT quote marks. But I also like them.

    Parent
    You know the more I think about it (5.00 / 1) (#26)
    by MO Blue on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 05:58:31 PM EST
    I am really impressed with the big or giant quote marks. They look very presidential. It is very important that the president has the biggest quote marks in town.

    Parent
    Heh (none / 0) (#32)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 06:00:57 PM EST
    Zactly!

    Parent
    Is That All There Is ??? (5.00 / 1) (#7)
    by cwolf on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 05:35:50 PM EST


    No, Peggy Lee (5.00 / 1) (#9)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 05:38:12 PM EST
    This si an excerpt.

    Parent
    Ohhhh,,, good (5.00 / 1) (#13)
    by cwolf on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 05:40:37 PM EST
    ...I missed that ,

    heart attack getting better already.

    Parent

    just relax and admire the big quotation marks (none / 0) (#88)
    by kempis on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 06:52:43 PM EST
    :)

    Parent
    Then let's keep dancing.... (5.00 / 2) (#10)
    by shoephone on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 05:39:22 PM EST
    let's break out the booze (5.00 / 1) (#87)
    by The Last Whimzy on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 06:50:49 PM EST
    i can't resist this....

    I remember when I was a very little girl, our health care system broke.
    I'll never forget the look on my president's face as he gathered us up
    in his arms and compromised with republicans.
    I stood there shivering in my pajamas and watched the whole bill go up in flames.
    And when it was all over I said to myself, "Is that all there is to the obama administration?"


    Parent

    Thumbs up (none / 0) (#99)
    by shoephone on Thu Sep 10, 2009 at 02:25:09 AM EST
    for creativity.

    Parent
    Let's break out the booze and have a ball (5.00 / 1) (#34)
    by FoxholeAtheist on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 06:02:37 PM EST
    if that's all there is. Port wine might be apropos - matches the color of the...well you know.

    Parent
    Ha! (5.00 / 2) (#39)
    by shoephone on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 06:09:50 PM EST
    I remember the time my father took me to the circus...

    Honestly, this song gave me the creeps when I was growing up!

    Parent

    Morbid children loved it - at least I did. (none / 0) (#83)
    by FoxholeAtheist on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 06:48:02 PM EST
    Where's the passion? n/t (5.00 / 1) (#12)
    by Coral on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 05:40:26 PM EST


    Not on the written page (5.00 / 6) (#15)
    by Steve M on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 05:42:23 PM EST
    It makes the ink run.

    Parent
    The passion is in the Progressive Caucus (5.00 / 3) (#16)
    by shoephone on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 05:43:37 PM EST
    Fingers crossed (5.00 / 5) (#17)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 05:45:03 PM EST
    If you do that too long you'll get a sprain... (none / 0) (#89)
    by FoxholeAtheist on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 06:52:45 PM EST
    leading to reduced blood flow, necrosis and, worst case scenario - amputation of your forefinger and middle finger. Still if you must cross your fingers, DON'T use BOTH hands. None of us can afford the consequences of that.

    Parent
    in my living room (none / 0) (#91)
    by kempis on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 06:55:32 PM EST
    and it's foul-mouthed and cynical and far removed from hope and change.

    All I want to hear him say is "I will veto any bill that does not include a strong public option."

    Not gonna hear that.

    And now that I've seen Max Baucus's mug, smiling and shaking hands through the crowd, I may just give this whole damned thing a pass and wait for the highlights.

    I just don't know if I can stomach this.

    Parent

    Clarity - details...??? (5.00 / 1) (#18)
    by lentinel on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 05:45:35 PM EST
    Obama said that his speech would contain clarity, but not details.
    I get neither from the speech. The only thing I feel from it is that the insurance companies will continue to be the major players.
    The "insurance exchange" idea - whatever it is - doesn't resonate.
    We already have competition between insurance companies. What has that gotten us?

    Obama also said, "And it's a plan that incorporates ideas from Senators and Congressmen; from Democrats and Republicans - and yes, from some of my opponents in both the primary and general election."

    If he is referring to Hillary Clinton, he should have named her and given her credit.

    As far as "ideas" from some of his opponents in the general election - what "idea" does he claim to have gotten from McCain or Palin? I'd like to know.

    Obama just keeps weaving b.s. into the fabric of his presentation. It's always the same.

    Thank God for the US Open.

    Clarity without details is that a (5.00 / 3) (#22)
    by FoxholeAtheist on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 05:55:00 PM EST
    new teaching model. Did Obama promote it in his education speech?

    Parent
    If the insurance exchange did nothing except (none / 0) (#20)
    by steviez314 on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 05:54:06 PM EST
    allow individuals to form groups and purchase insurance at group rates, that would cut their costs by 20-50%.

    Parent
    Details are necessary to know (5.00 / 3) (#23)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 05:55:06 PM EST
    that's (none / 0) (#48)
    by Ga6thDem on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 06:14:40 PM EST
    a big IF. It's unlikely to happen though.

    Parent
    The requirements for insurance plans in the (none / 0) (#58)
    by steviez314 on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 06:22:21 PM EST
    exchanges as set by the House and Senate HELP bills  don't allow for  price discrimination based on any criteria (except somewhat for age), so they provide community rated pricing for individuals.

    Parent
    Well (5.00 / 4) (#64)
    by Ga6thDem on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 06:25:25 PM EST
    that's basically no different than it is now. Right now you can shop around but everyone is charged by their age.

    For a coop to work you are going to have go get a ton of people to want the exact same insurance plan. And who's going to decide what gets offered in these coops? Who's to say only junk insurance won't be offered?

    There are so many simple ways to solve this problme but Baucus and Obama have totally screwed it up in their desire to please the insurance companies.

    Parent

    Unless the groups (none / 0) (#50)
    by BackFromOhio on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 06:17:20 PM EST
    have any members over 60 -- see comments earlier today on Baucus plan

    Parent
    Financing (none / 0) (#31)
    by Ramo on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 06:00:55 PM EST
    I'm guessing that it will be financing.  McCain wanted to tax health care, and a lot of conservadems want to tax a subset of health care (expensive plans).  This is one issue where the Blue Dogs  are right, since the health care exemption is a regressive subsidy that helps lead to uncontrolled cost growth.

    As for primary opponents, remember that Hillary got her plan from another primary opponent.

    Parent

    Expensive plans (none / 0) (#43)
    by waldenpond on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 06:12:09 PM EST
    The base level for an 'expensive' plan currently proposed is $8000.  That doesn't seem a very expensive plan for a family and it will be taxed at 35%.

    Parent
    Huh? (none / 0) (#52)
    by Ramo on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 06:19:23 PM EST
    Why wouldn't the cutoff for the plan be normalized by family size?  Your suggestion makes no sense.

    Parent
    Insurance doesn't normalize (none / 0) (#90)
    by waldenpond on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 06:53:49 PM EST
    for family size.  A single parent with 1 child pays the same as a married couple with 6 children (family plan) and the family deductible is the same.

    It will be easy for the govt to get it's info on employer based plans.  The employer can simply deduct the tax from a paycheck and submit it to the govt along with payroll taxes.

    BTW.... it was not my suggestion, it is an actual proposal on how to pay for the subsidies.

    Parent

    No. (none / 0) (#94)
    by Ramo on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 07:00:32 PM EST
    Your idea for how the rules work is ridiculous.  They would have to normalize by family size.

    Parent
    You are kidding me? (none / 0) (#66)
    by Ga6thDem on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 06:27:35 PM EST
    I'm going to have to pay an additional 35% tax on my plan that has a $5000.00 deductible that costs me $10,000 already????? The news gets worse and worse about this plan.

    Parent
    Sounds like a yawner. (5.00 / 4) (#27)
    by TheRealFrank on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 05:58:36 PM EST
    "I'm repeating the same non-committal stuff I've been saying all along. But, I'm begging you, please believe me this is good stuff, because I'll slap a big Mission Accomplished banner on anything."


    I wonder (5.00 / 6) (#28)
    by Steve M on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 05:58:50 PM EST
    if any Congressmen's parents will be keeping them home tonight, so that they're not exposed to the President's speech.

    I was wondering if Joshua's school (none / 0) (#84)
    by Militarytracy on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 06:48:27 PM EST
    was going to allow it.  I had my doubts but Josh was still recovery from H1N1 and wasn't even able to go back to school until today.  I didn't ask the kids though if they got to watch it.  I didn't want to be disappointed.  I would say it was a 50/50 shot from a school that still celebrates Robert E Lee day.

    Parent
    Cap on out of pocket expenses (5.00 / 1) (#40)
    by Militarytracy on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 06:10:03 PM EST
    and no more cherry picking, no more pre-existing conditions the day he signs the bill, no more catastrophic caps.....he has my attention.  Everybody gets insurance even if they leave the job that had coverge or not (don't know how he's going to do that)?  I don't know if he has anything else but he has my attention.

    I'm a little skeptical about those (5.00 / 1) (#76)
    by MO Blue on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 06:37:26 PM EST
    provision going into effect the day after he signs the bill.

    Per Rep. Weiner:

    As Rep. Weiner points out, the law would not go into effect until 2013 and then there's five year grace period, so there's already a ten year trigger in the existing bill.
    link


    Parent
    Now this was a solid statement (none / 0) (#86)
    by Militarytracy on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 06:50:21 PM EST
    I did have, but it wasn't Obama saying it.  He's saying different.  He's promising.  He is the President who will sign this thing....or not....and he is promising.

    Parent
    Yes Obama is signing it (5.00 / 1) (#92)
    by MO Blue on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 06:58:01 PM EST
    His signature does not change what is actually written in the legislation. If the legislation does not state that the regulations begin the day after signed into law, his words will not change the law.

    Politicians promise a lot of things.

    Parent

    After all this crap (none / 0) (#95)
    by Militarytracy on Wed Sep 09, 2009 at 07:02:12 PM EST
    and public pain and suffering and loss of polling points and loss of public support...you really think that Obama is going to get up there after announcing that this is THE BIG ONE and lie to us?  I'm jaded, but that is double down jaded :)

    Parent
    <