home

Friday Morning Open Thread

It's still morning on the West Coast. Anyway, Sports Left is up, and to give you a flavor of what that blog will be like, I link to one of my favs, Bill Simmons:

If we ever figure out the whole "gambling on the Internet" thing, how much fun would it be if there was a Web site that allowed us to bet on props and things-happening-in-the-moment wagers? For instance, we see that shot of [Cards kicker Neil] Rackers, and 20 seconds later the following prop goes up … "Neil Rackers attempts a field goal of under 40 yards on this drive: Makes it (-250), misses it (+200)." [-] and we could wager on it in real time.

This is a great idea and can be applied to Reality TV as well. Of course Reality TV would have to go live but with the gambling proposition, even I would watch it. So there is a flavor of what Sports Left will be discussing (not only . . .)

This is an Open Thread.

< Cost Control | Obama to Campaign For Coakley >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Trying to think what would persuade (5.00 / 1) (#1)
    by oculus on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 12:50:17 PM EST
    me to watch Reality TV.  

    Yeh, I don't get it. Entertainment (5.00 / 1) (#15)
    by Cream City on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:07:59 PM EST
    is supposed to be escapism from reality, so it is not entertaining to me to turn on more reality.  I have plenty of reality, thankyouverymuch. :-)

    Parent
    question (5.00 / 1) (#31)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:22:49 PM EST
    does the fact that Obama is going to MA mean they think she will lose or they think she will win?

    the cynic in me thinks the latter.


    My buddy is a (5.00 / 1) (#35)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:24:55 PM EST
    great ahtlete!

    Did you see the video? Funny watching Helmuth get made fun of.

    Agree that poker is not a sport... (5.00 / 2) (#41)
    by kdog on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:28:00 PM EST
    it is certainly a game...but not of luck alone...its a game of skill and luck.  California courts even ruled that it is not strictly a game of chance, hence legal poker rooms in Cali.

    Speaking of gambling... (5.00 / 1) (#67)
    by kdog on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 02:10:54 PM EST
    according to the Gov, young Paterson wasn't even gambling on the dice game that caused his detainment, it was just for fun, no money involved.

    I assume the Gov will be tackling the problem of harrassment without cause on the part of the NYPD any day now, considering the problem has hit so close to home.

    How He Got There (5.00 / 2) (#80)
    by ruffian on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 03:50:26 PM EST
    Bob Somerby of Daily Howler fame is writing a book online about the 2000 election, titled How He Got There

    I'll be reading the installments at home this weekend, since I hate to cry at work.

    Ben Nelson's woes continue (5.00 / 1) (#82)
    by Ellie on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 05:31:52 PM EST
    WASHINGTON - Sen. Ben Nelson of Nebraska is asking Senate leaders to eliminate a controversial Medicaid deal for his state in the health care bill.

    The moderate [sic] Democrat [...] has been criticized because Nebraska was exempted paying any cost of a proposed expansion of Medicaid.

    All other states would have to pick up a portion of the tab after the first few years.

    Nelson's been arguing ever since that he never wanted a special deal for Nebraska [...]

    That didn't quiet the controversy so Nelson took it one step further on Friday and asked for the deal to be withdrawn and replaced with a provision treating all states equally. (Nelson seeks deletion of Nebraska Medicaid Deal - AP Jan 15/2010)

    How was it not his idea? Did he get politically roofi'd or something?

    What if All 50 States Get Ben Nelson's Medicaid Deal? by Kate Pickett, TIME Magazine, Jan 15, 2010

    [...] The 49 other states, by contrast, would have full federal funding for a few years, but would eventually have to pick up part of the tab. As soon as word of the special treatment broke, the deal became known as the "Cornhusker Kickback" and Nelson was roundly mocked.  ...

    [Nelson] insists the deal wasn't his idea and, in a January 15 letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nelson asked that special treatment for Nebraska be excluded from final legislation. In the same letter, however, Nelson repeated something he has been saying since word of his special got around -- that newly eligible Medicaid enrollees in all states should be fully and permanently paid for by the federal government. At first, this seemed like a crude and overly expensive solution, but as negotiations continue between House and Senate leaders over final legislative language, the idea of lessening the Medicaid burden for states is gaining traction. "Senator Nelson's deal has been a blessing to those states like New York that were feeling left out. It brought the issue back into public recognition" says James Tallon, a former New York State Assemblyman and current president of the United Hospital Fund, a non-profit philanthropic group which studies health care in New York. [...]

    In addition to Schwarzenegger ... many other governors -- including New York's David Paterson, a Democrat -- have publicly protested the legislation on the basis of the Medicaid expansion, saying it amounts to an unfunded mandate. ...

    [A]t least 13 state attorneys general have said Nelson's special deal is unconstitutional. But extending the Cornhusker Kickback to all 50 states would be a lot more than a quick, short-term fix to a political problem. By further nationalizing Medicaid, a public insurance program that's now jointly funded by states and the federal government, Democratic reform could move the health insurance system even further under the umbrella of the federal government, which was the main criticism of the much maligned "public option."  [... more ...]



    Polanski: LA DA's office opposes (5.00 / 1) (#93)
    by oculus on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 07:32:11 PM EST
    sentencing in absentia.  If the statements in quotes are actual quotes, the pleading contains inaccuracies.  Polanski did not plead guilty to rape.  Also, Polanski does not need to surrender.  He has every right to await conclusion of the extradition proceedings.  LAT

    Polanski: French court orders (none / 0) (#2)
    by oculus on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 12:53:14 PM EST
    damages for photos taken in Switzerland.  Speedy justice.  Long arm statute?

    TL needs a Polanski Left site... (none / 0) (#18)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:10:55 PM EST
    And Palin Left. (5.00 / 1) (#27)
    by oculus on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:21:23 PM EST
    The Politics of Being Beautiful.

    Parent
    PolanskiLefttheCountry site? (5.00 / 2) (#32)
    by Cream City on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:23:00 PM EST
    When will registration be available on (none / 0) (#3)
    by jes on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 12:55:03 PM EST
    SportsLeft?

    By the time catchers and pitchers (5.00 / 1) (#4)
    by oculus on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 12:56:49 PM EST
    report for Spring Training?

    Parent
    It's available now (5.00 / 1) (#57)
    by Jeralyn on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:54:21 PM EST
    I just added it.

    Parent
    Soon I think (none / 0) (#8)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 12:59:34 PM EST
    Oh no - my office server blocks SportsLeft (none / 0) (#6)
    by ruffian on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 12:57:37 PM EST
    Oh well, I will have to stick to the politics of crime and the crime of politics during the day.

    Mine, too. (5.00 / 1) (#7)
    by Anne on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 12:59:28 PM EST
    Potentially Damaging Content.

    Parent
    That's funny (5.00 / 1) (#9)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 12:59:54 PM EST
    For some reason, though, I can (none / 0) (#34)
    by Anne on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:23:55 PM EST
    get to Ezra and Booman, and I consider that Actually Damaging Content...

    Parent
    Heh - probably true! (none / 0) (#10)
    by ruffian on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:00:13 PM EST
    No problems here... (none / 0) (#14)
    by kdog on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:06:12 PM EST
    Congrats on gettin' her up and running BTD.

    And any friend of a friend who puts a hurtin' on Helmuth's roll is a friend of mine:)

    Parent

    Can you get (none / 0) (#59)
    by Jeralyn on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:55:38 PM EST
    popleft.com?

    Do you know what program your office uses that is blocking it?

    Parent

    I get PopLeft with no problem. (none / 0) (#69)
    by Anne on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 02:15:38 PM EST
    I have no idea what the firm uses to block sites.

    Parent
    Nope (none / 0) (#77)
    by ruffian on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 03:44:42 PM EST
    Not in my undisclosed location. Big company, lots of controls on the net. The message is 'unknown content potentially posing a risk'. I get that more and more lately - I wonder what they are doing behind the scenes.

    I probably need to be using the internet a whole lot less here at work though, that much seems clear.

    Parent

    OK. I checked no swimsuit competition (5.00 / 1) (#13)
    by oculus on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:04:06 PM EST
    posted.  There is a "meta" category.

    Parent
    For SportsLeft's first pinup (5.00 / 1) (#17)
    by Cream City on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:10:24 PM EST
    I nominate Massachusetts' Brown in his Cosmo bare-all.  He was a college athlete then.

    But he wasn't even wearing a swimsuit, so BTD won't get sued by SI for infringing on its turf.

    Parent

    And commenters here wonder why (5.00 / 3) (#20)
    by oculus on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:16:42 PM EST
    Brown may beat Coakley.

    Parent
    Hah (5.00 / 1) (#43)
    by CST on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:28:20 PM EST
    I will say I think that either one of them would improve the "appearance" factor in the senate.

    Coakley's not a bad looking woman herself.  And Brown... well, the pictures speak for themselves.

    Parent

    Tim Tebow (none / 0) (#45)
    by oculus on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:30:30 PM EST
    If 'No Swimsuit' is the category Brown's way ahead (none / 0) (#39)
    by Ellie on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:27:29 PM EST
    And fergawdsake's don't be giving SI any ideas.

    Parent
    Repeal of gambling prohibitions... (none / 0) (#11)
    by kdog on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:01:58 PM EST
    might also help voter turnout if we were allowed to bet on elections...err, allowed to bet on elections "legally":)

    Is this a good idea? Would people (none / 0) (#22)
    by oculus on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:17:46 PM EST
    rather text message who they think will win, as opposed to actually voting?

    Parent
    If I got money on a candidate... (none / 0) (#33)
    by kdog on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:23:07 PM EST
    why wouldn't I vote for them and improve my odds of cashing a winner, even if only very slightly?

    I'm thinking it just might get people more involved in the process..gambling makes any activity more interesting...hence the saying "lets make it interesting."

    Parent

    But wouldn't you be gambling on (none / 0) (#36)
    by oculus on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:24:57 PM EST
    who you thought would win, not necessarily the candidate you support.  Look at BTD.  He sometimes does NOT pick the Gators.

    Parent
    That assumes... (none / 0) (#44)
    by kdog on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:30:21 PM EST
    good leadership is more important than cashing a winner:)

    Good point though, I might vote for Nader every time, but I'd never wager on him to win unless I was getting 5 million to 1 odds or better.

    Parent

    As to that instantaneous betting thing (none / 0) (#16)
    by scribe on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:08:22 PM EST
    you should have gone to look at the site for the German Bundesliga a cople years back, before they had the big match-fixing scandal.  Back then, there was betting in real time or close to it through the site.  

    Technologically possible, but almost certainly illegal in the States....

    Where's the NFL playoff weekend preview? (none / 0) (#19)
    by magster on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:16:23 PM EST
    Are the Chargers going to pull a Coakley and lose despite all the advantages in the world?

    Tomorrow (none / 0) (#37)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:25:54 PM EST
    I'll cross post it.

    Parent
    All the advantages? (none / 0) (#52)
    by kdog on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:47:43 PM EST
    How so?  They're a good solid team, don't get me wrong, but the J-E-T-S Jets Jets Jets have the better run game and the better defense...the great nuetralizers of a great passing offense.  And San Diego's homefield advantage isn't exactly akin to Seattle's homefield.

    And we've got the Fat Man Rex Ryan...the Bolts coach can't even play blackjack:)

    Parent

    Jets all the way baby. (none / 0) (#54)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:48:49 PM EST
    I'll be rooting Jets (none / 0) (#62)
    by magster on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:58:22 PM EST
    but SD has won 10 in a row dominating both sides of the ball, have the highest yard per completion average and home field advantage.... just like almost every other year in recent memory when they gag at home.  The only time they do well in the playoffs is when they enter the post-season at 8-8.

    Parent
    True.... (none / 0) (#63)
    by kdog on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 02:04:45 PM EST
    but like Kerry Rhodes said about the high flying Bolts passing attack..."they haven't played us yet."

    I have little doubt Revis Island will make Jackson disappear like all those before him...the key I think will be shutting down Gates and the other receivers with Rhodes, Sheppard, and my man Dwight Lowry.  And getting grass stains on Rivers' jersey early and often.

    Parent

    Tiger Woods is supposedly mulling over (none / 0) (#21)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:17:04 PM EST
    a $3Million donation to the Haitian relief effort.

    TL needs a Tiger Left site... (5.00 / 1) (#23)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:17:54 PM EST
    Don't forget Polanski (and Poland). (none / 0) (#26)
    by oculus on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:19:22 PM EST
    Healthcare Wanking Left? (5.00 / 1) (#46)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:34:17 PM EST
    I'd stop mulling and start writing (5.00 / 1) (#78)
    by ruffian on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 03:45:54 PM EST
    if I were him.

    Parent
    He should sign on with George Clooney (none / 0) (#24)
    by oculus on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:18:41 PM EST
    and MTV re telethon or go to Haiti and stand in front of cameras with blow-up of big, big check.

    Parent
    Breaking! In the Coakley thread (none / 0) (#25)
    by Cream City on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:18:45 PM EST
    noholib reports Obama is going to come to MA, after all.  I look forward to Gibbs' presser on that again.

    Coakley's internal numbers must (5.00 / 1) (#29)
    by Anne on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:22:23 PM EST
    be in bad shape for the president who wasn't scheduled to go there to now have time for it.

    Parent
    Coakley's internals are bad (5.00 / 1) (#42)
    by Cream City on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:28:16 PM EST
    in a report I read.  The internals came out two days ago, putting her behind Brown.  I suspect that's when the calls to the White House started to get through.

    Parent
    p.s. (none / 0) (#28)
    by Cream City on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:22:11 PM EST
    Got interrupted amid that comment.  Sorry -- if it's obscure, go look up the hilarious transcript of Gibbs' WH presser last week when he was asked why Obama was not coming to MA for Coakley.  It's not on the schedule, Gibbs said.  Yes, said the reporters, but the question is why is it not on the schedule.  Because it's just not on the schedule, Gibbs said.  I kid you not.  That's almost word-for-word.

    Parent
    Whyever did you think BTD wants (none / 0) (#38)
    by oculus on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:26:39 PM EST
    comments.  Think of it.  Say anything you like.  No flack.

    I like comments (none / 0) (#40)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:27:53 PM EST
    Will Sports Left be (none / 0) (#47)
    by oculus on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:36:46 PM EST
    with gloves on or off?

    Parent
    Gloves on probably (none / 0) (#48)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:44:27 PM EST
    It is a Talk Left Network site.

    Parent
    block SL? Can't imagine why she would...

    Parent
    yes I care (none / 0) (#61)
    by Jeralyn on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:58:01 PM EST
    And there is no reason it should be blocked. So if someone can tell me what program is blocking it, I will contact them.

    Parent
    Sorry J, I should have been more clear. (none / 0) (#64)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 02:06:09 PM EST
    I thought one of the main reasons there was no cursing, etc., allowed on TL was becuase the servers of law offices and colleges would block the site.

    Cursing and other such "gloves off" activities can often be part 'n parcel of sports "debates"...

    Parent

    well right now the (none / 0) (#70)
    by Jeralyn on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 02:15:55 PM EST
    site is being blocked from some places and I don't know why. I'm trying to check into it.

    Yes, I would like no cursing on SportsLeft since it's affiliated with me and I don't want it blocked. Use asterisks in place of letters please.

    The site is for BTD and I don't intend to interfere but I really don't want to be hosting a site that uses profanity. So please don't. Thanks!

    Parent

    I've learned to write "expressively" (5.00 / 1) (#71)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 02:22:53 PM EST
    without profanity.

    Parent
    Can't retrieve that and "usually calm" (none / 0) (#73)
    by oculus on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 02:40:14 PM EST
    quote.

    Parent
    "as usual, . . . analytical and calm" (none / 0) (#92)
    by oculus on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 07:25:23 PM EST
    Is it possible that the security (none / 0) (#72)
    by Anne on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 02:24:58 PM EST
    software thinks SL is a gambling site?

    That was my gut reaction when I read the excerpt BTD posted, but what do I know?

    Parent

    It's a sports blog. (none / 0) (#49)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:45:14 PM EST
    The only thing more acrimonious is a sports car blog.

    Parent
    I slay me.

    Parent
    I am hoping to be invited to write (none / 0) (#58)
    by oculus on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:54:56 PM EST
    headlines, one of my top goals in life.

    Parent
    Now that raises an interesting (none / 0) (#51)
    by oculus on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:46:40 PM EST
    question.  Will Sports Left cover NASCAR?

    Parent
    Jimmie Johnson (none / 0) (#55)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:51:35 PM EST
    Is that the Marlin's workhorse pitcher? (none / 0) (#56)
    by oculus on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:54:18 PM EST
    Josh Johnson (none / 0) (#65)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 02:08:35 PM EST
    Jimmie Johnson is the NASCAR driver who won the Sprint Cup for the 4th straight year.

    Parent
    I can already see where this is going. (none / 0) (#66)
    by oculus on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 02:10:17 PM EST
    or with a Y (none / 0) (#87)
    by CoralGables on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 06:27:54 PM EST
    an Elmers glue head ex-football coach.

    Parent
    registration is now open (none / 0) (#60)
    by Jeralyn on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 01:56:26 PM EST
    Venn Diagram Contest: 3 categories, one circle (none / 0) (#68)
    by Ellie on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 02:11:47 PM EST
    I wonder if this is as near as you can get to one perfect circle:

    1. Fans of a James Cameron blockbuster instantly and weirdly band cultishly around a frickin movie.

    2. Avatar viewers report depression after seeing movie. (CNN 01/11/2010)

    3. What the hell is behind Titanic Crying Parties:

    [...] Critics have commented that the Titanic hyteria is the result of the contagion phenomena, similar to the public outpouring of grief after the death of Diana last summer. [...]

    Die-hard fans of the Cameron film have been referred to as 'Titaniacs' and, like 'Deadheads', they kept on trucking back to the theatre to relive the experience. Some people have seen the movie almost every day since it was released, a remarkable feat given the length of the film and the difficulties in buying tickets through to the end of March.

    Fans have been reported in theatres yelling at other filmgoers who were not crying during the film's emotional scenes.

    Some have taken cold showers so they can appreciate how Jack and Rose must have felt after the Titanic sank. Young females have been reported visiting the Halifax gravesite of the aforementioned Titanic victim J. Dawson and leaving floral bouquets, movie ticket stubs and, in one case, a pair of panties on his headstone.

    Other fans have been holding crying parties, where the listen to the soundtrack CD and sob together while they listen.

    On the Internet, fans debate endlessly about tiny plot points that most filmgoers wouldn't even notice. These 'rivet counters' obsess over minute details in the sets, re-examine sub-plots, plead for information about a video release date, spread rumours about the actors' personal lives,
    hypothesize about the film's ambiguities and lend each other moral support since their friends and families think that they're crazy.

    IMO it's lame to deride any creative work just because some of its fans go bonkers (or in the above case(s), overly so because those who are bonking primarily happen to female).

    Just ... what are the odds that two blockbusters from one filmmaker would ripple this way? (Granted, the sound of Celin Dion makes me weep uncontrollably too, but not in a crying-party kind of way.)

    Young, pretty Vietnamese immigrant (5.00 / 1) (#74)
    by oculus on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 02:42:06 PM EST
    manicurist asked if I cryed at Titanic.  I sd. no and that I didn't think it was a very good movie.  (Didn't tell her I laughed.)

    Parent
    Thank-you, Oculus. (5.00 / 2) (#79)
    by vml68 on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 03:47:40 PM EST
    I thought I was the only person in the world that did not care for the movie. My friends absolutely hated me because I grumbled and muttered through most of it.

    Parent
    I've felt 'Meh' over some 'awesome' films (none / 0) (#84)
    by Ellie on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 05:49:01 PM EST
    ... and had mega-fans swearing they'd beat the snot out of me if I didn't retract my 'Meh'.

    Off the top of my head, The English Patient, American Beauty, Brokeback Mountain.

    I've also had my snot threatened over recommending, eg, the original Bad Lieutenant. (Hard to watch, sure, but that scene with Harvey Keitel kicking over a statue in church to Led Zeppelin's Kashmir alone was worth the price of admission.)

    I thought Titanic was a good bucket of popcorn but I haven't revisited it.

    Parent

    Like "The English Patient." (none / 0) (#88)
    by oculus on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 06:33:29 PM EST
    Never saw "Brokeback Mountain," but enjoyed Annie Proulx's novella; thought "American Beauty" was a good movie but reviews and trailer downplayed the child molestish aspects of it. Enjoyed Nicholas Cage's "The Bad Lieutenant."  Haven't seen original.

    Parent
    TheEP and BrMt were better books than movies (none / 0) (#90)
    by Ellie on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 06:57:37 PM EST
    ... to me. I'll probably skip the Bad Lieutenant remake out of a combination of (a) preserving, in my memory, Harvey Keitel's great performance in the title role and (b) finding Nicholas Cage hard to take even at his best. (I liked him up to and including Moonstruck.)

    Parent
    Did you like Cage in Leaving Las Vegas? (none / 0) (#91)
    by oculus on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 07:06:14 PM EST
    This has some of the same feel to it.

    Parent
    Saw it, and Cage seemed more of a plug-in (none / 0) (#94)
    by Ellie on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 07:35:25 PM EST
    ... than as an actor really making a role his own (as my fave actors do consistently, or just any actor does when pulling out a particularly splendid performance).

    The Bad Lieutenant (movie and role) really is about bringing the sleaze, though.

    Parent

    Bad Lieutenant rocked... (5.00 / 1) (#99)
    by kdog on Sat Jan 16, 2010 at 09:16:33 AM EST
    Still often quoted to this day in my circles...

    "You got something to say to me?"

    Parent

    The scale of 'Titanic' and the love story ... (none / 0) (#75)
    by Ellie on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 02:54:47 PM EST
    ... being so intimate was a huge achievement in itself. My recollection was feeling shaken but not stirred: I remember earliest audiences -- M or F -- being simply at a loss for words (in the way the filmmakers would like).

    After a day or two, I was hard pressed to remember many details beyond the feeling.

    Once it played for awhile fan-derision became kind of a sport.

    Parent

    Ground Control to Major Tom.... (none / 0) (#76)
    by kdog on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 03:09:31 PM EST
    Major Tom, is this your bag of blow?

    Hope the law ain't too hard on 'em if they find the culprit.

    Teaser re H Ford running in NY on the news (none / 0) (#81)
    by nycstray on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 05:18:14 PM EST
    They framed it as he was moving here, going to transform himself to possibly run against Giliibrand. Not quite the intro I think he wants here . . .

    lol!~ They just called him a "curious newcomer" and "going through an interesting transformation".

    Apparently Gillibrand's prob is she's Schumer's puppet . . .

    FYI (none / 0) (#95)
    by gyrfalcon on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 11:41:00 PM EST
    he moved to NY state a while ago already.  Says he considers himself now a "New Yorker."  Yeah, sure.

    Parent
    My sentiments exactly. (none / 0) (#83)
    by lentinel on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 05:42:30 PM EST
    Someone named William from California posted this in a discussion in the New York Times:

    The first thing Haitians should have seen on Wednesday at dawn was U.S. cargo planes dropping clean water, meals, concrete-breaking tools, and leaflets telling them more help was on the way. This would have given them hope - energy - and some tools to help them dig out at least some of their loved ones. None of that came. Even today there is chaos developing because no help has arrived - with no news that help is near. Although a huge relief response was organized, it was slow to arrive and even now it is bogged down. This was a terrible error on the part of our government planners. Haiti is just over an hour by air from Florida. Initial air drop flights didn't even need to land. What sort of thinking is in charge of our disaster planning, that it ignores immediate first aid - followed by massive relief?


    Single runway. Nurses available (5.00 / 1) (#89)
    by oculus on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 06:36:05 PM EST
    150 miles away on another island but no way to get to capitol of Haiti, per NPR.

    Parent
    William is a moron (5.00 / 1) (#96)
    by gyrfalcon on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 11:43:32 PM EST
    You can't "drop" containers of supplies, never mind tools, in a heavily populated urban area with all its open spaces now filled by people.

    Parent
    There are a lot of errors in that (none / 0) (#85)
    by Cream City on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 05:56:50 PM EST
    as anyone knows who is paying better attention to the reports of the complexities, including reports in the NYT.  Google could be William's friend.

    Parent
    One thing that could change right away (none / 0) (#86)
    by nycstray on Fri Jan 15, 2010 at 06:07:28 PM EST
    is that reporters that are going to "hospitals", could take medicines to them. They show them at the airport and then reporting at the "hospitals". Antibiotics are needed badly.

    Parent
    I know William. He's a horse's ass. (none / 0) (#97)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Sat Jan 16, 2010 at 12:23:38 AM EST