Make a new account
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Tests performed before the deadly blowout of BP's oil well in the Gulf of Mexico should have raised doubts about the cement used to seal the well, but the company and its cementing contractor used it anyway, investigators with the president's oil spill commission said Thursday. ... BP and Halliburton decided to use a foam slurry created by injecting nitrogen into cement to secure the bottom of the well, a decision outside experts have criticized. The panel said that of four tests done in February and April by Halliburton, only one -- the last -- showed the mix would hold. But the results of that single successful test were not shared with BP, and may not have reached Halliburton, before the cement was pumped, according to a letter sent to commissioners Thursday by chief investigative counsel Fred H. Bartlit Jr. BP had in hand at the time of the blowout the results of only one of the tests -- a February analysis sent to BP by Halliburton in a March 8 e-mail that indicated the cement could fail. The slurry tested in that case was a slightly different blend, and assumed a slightly different well design, but there is no indication that Halliburton flagged the problem for BP, or that BP had concerns, the letter said.
The panel said that of four tests done in February and April by Halliburton, only one -- the last -- showed the mix would hold. But the results of that single successful test were not shared with BP, and may not have reached Halliburton, before the cement was pumped, according to a letter sent to commissioners Thursday by chief investigative counsel Fred H. Bartlit Jr.
BP had in hand at the time of the blowout the results of only one of the tests -- a February analysis sent to BP by Halliburton in a March 8 e-mail that indicated the cement could fail. The slurry tested in that case was a slightly different blend, and assumed a slightly different well design, but there is no indication that Halliburton flagged the problem for BP, or that BP had concerns, the letter said.
"quiet, behind-the-scenes effort to help draft and pass Arizona Senate Bill 1070 by an industry that stands to benefit from it: the private prison industry."
SAO PAULO (AP) -- A Brazilian court ruled this week that McDonald's must pay a former franchise manager $17,500 because he gained 65 pounds (30 kilograms) while working there for a dozen years. The 32-year-old man said he felt forced to sample the food each day to ensure quality standards remained high, because McDonald's hired "mystery clients" to randomly visit restaurants and report on the food, service and cleanliness.
The 32-year-old man said he felt forced to sample the food each day to ensure quality standards remained high, because McDonald's hired "mystery clients" to randomly visit restaurants and report on the food, service and cleanliness.
Besides the lunches were free to employees.
There goes the free lunch policy...much needed too with what McDonalds typically pays. Parent
Seriously, imagine a career as kitchen help at McDonalds, no retirement, no real bennies... there have been some changes under Lula, but not that many.
Oh, Kdog, I been dumped-- before even getting there, lol! Latinas, my kryptonite! This one took oh, a natty lite to get over, though. just one. So... next time you head to Guadalajara, let me know, I might try to join you there! Parent
I was gonna splurge on orchestra seats too...now I'm hitting the balcony cuz my arse is broke as a joke...had way too much fun this spring/summer.
Unless this is the year the Breeders Cup Pick-6 comes in...we're putting a big syndicate ticket together, me and some degenerate gambler buddies of mine...if that puppy hits pack your bags cuz we're leaving the next day:) Parent
Call ahead for low room rates. Parent
Catfish for breakfast... definitely Mississippi! Middle Alabama, too, and this time of the year quail, sometimes... Mmmmmmm! Parent
Keep your eyes open for PPJ down in Tunica, he's there filleting catfish on the regular! Parent
;-) Parent
The day McDonald's is forced to put up signs saying "Food NOT served here" is the day I'll feel sympathy for them. Parent
But it's still a total bullsh*t lawsuit...blaming McDonalds for getting fat is like blaming your neighborhood cocaine dealer for getting strung out. Parent
There has to be an acceptable level of hazard on certain jobs...sampling a Big Mac in the fast food industry is an acceptable hazard to me...we're not talking radioactive waste here. Parent
Smart move because after about 10 days I could hardly look at the stuff much less eat it. Parent
Oh yeah, he was a stand up guy who would never dream of suing somebody over his own over-indulgence. Parent
We used to call it personal responsibility. Parent
The principal of a Cincinnati Catholic school has apologized to parents after Rep. Jean Schmidt (R-Ohio) discussed abortion during a speech to kids as young as 6. HuffPo
Would it not be better to have the elections during the same year of the presidential election? Although I know not senators fall in a four year grouping but could there be a better job of not having elections that would derail a presidents agenda. I know it works both ways like it could be a blessing vs a crippler.
In other words was the design made on purpose to derail any president and his administration just two years into the presidency. If it was done with this specific design as we see it today then what were they afraid of? Or did they just not see the fact that a midterm election would be detrimental to a president and his administration? Parent
One thing I doubt they had in mind was the gerrymandering of districts such that Represemtatives are so hard to unseat. They should run more of a risk of losing their jobs in repayment for possiblynsubverting the will of the people as putnforth bybthe president. Parent
the president is up every 4
you have to have midterms to do that math.
Congress gets re-elected during presidential years and midterms. Parent
I'm sure it was explained that it would add continuity... if one gets kicked out, the recycled staffers can get them on to the party line and tell them how to vote. Parent
The 2010 election will be the most expensive non-presidential contest, and spending might reach $4 billion by Election Day, a Washington research group said. The Center for Responsive Politics reported today that federal candidates, parties and outside groups have spent more than $2.8 billion, matching the figure from the 2006 midterm elections with a week to go in the campaign. If the center's projection of a $4 billion election holds, it would be the third most expensive ever, trailing only the 2004 and 2008 presidential contests. Bloomberg
The Center for Responsive Politics reported today that federal candidates, parties and outside groups have spent more than $2.8 billion, matching the figure from the 2006 midterm elections with a week to go in the campaign.
If the center's projection of a $4 billion election holds, it would be the third most expensive ever, trailing only the 2004 and 2008 presidential contests. Bloomberg
The money the U.S. spends on elections is ridiculous IMO. No wonder ordinary people have little or no voice in their government.
Get rid of Corporate Taxes. That'll take the money out.
ha!ha! ha!
oh yeah, that'll end the greed!
Some of these bloggers are getting really funny now that they have to twist their politics so hard to fall in line with Obama. Parent
BTW, Keven has missed his calling. He is better suited to be a stand up comedian than a political blogger. Parent
For those who don't bother to actually read what he actually says, here's his point:
"The corporate tax code is by far the most popular way for politicians to reward favored interests without making those rewards too obvious. As long as it exists, even if the tax rate is low, it's a way to funnel money to one sector over another or one company over another."
He goes on to say,
"The big question, though, is what to replace it with. Higher capital gains and dividend taxes are an obvious possibility. Higher top marginal income tax rates. A carbon tax. A financial transaction tax. There are lots of alternatives."
And "On a more substantive level, it would seriously raise the incentives for income shifting scams, so we'd have to amp up tax audits to catch that."
It's an intriguing idea. Can anybody seriously argue that the way we handle corporate taxation now actually works? Parent
In any case, it's, as Drum points out, theoretical only since it will never happen.
You're entirely right that most of our current tax system doesn't work at all, which is why the idea of a flat tax or a VAT to replace it has some adherents. There really is something to be said for replacing the collossal mess we have now with something much less manipulable.
But the abuses of the income tax absolutely pale in comparison to what corporations get away with, and the spectacularly pernicious effect they have on governance, which was the point of the post. Parent
But the abuses of the income tax absolutely pale in comparison to what corporations get away with, and the spectacularly pernicious effect they have on governance, which was the point of the post.
Not a fan of a lot of Drum's writing and do not think it advances leftward progress. But then YMMV. Parent
And no, his objective is most definitely not to "advance leftward progress." He's a center-left guy, and certainly has big blind spots.
The reason I like his blog so much is precisely, exactly because he's NOT trying to advance progress in any particular ideological direction, he's just pondering information and possibilities of all kinds.
That's why I object so strongly when people try to put him in a pigeonhole and claim he's advancing some agenda or other.
In our hyper-partisan/ideological world, I find that an enormous relief and refuge. I have my prejudices, but I vastly prefer honest exploration to agitprop. I disagree with him pretty violently on some issues, but I always find him interesting and much of his stuff thought-provoking. Parent
And it returns as we just have from Hawaii. The Big Island was grand. Peace.
October 27, 2010 - Washington Ledge
The upshot of the 130-page report is that a Seattle-based political consultant allegedly shuffled campaign donations through several Political Action Committees (PACs) in an effort to conceal the backers - labor unions and trial lawyers - of a stealth "attack from the right" on Senator Jean Berkey during last August's primary election.
Dem backers posing as a conservative outfit sponsored a Get Out The Republican Vote mailer and robo-calls program in an effort to deny one particular (D) candidate enough primary votes for a place in a top-two election. Since the democrat in question came up about 122 votes short of the republican candidate, the ruse appears to have been successful. But now the previously concealed identities of the backers and the disclosure camoflage methods are being revealed.
What labels apply here, I wonder?
And kudos to the various agencies involved for working out a solution that worked for everyone. Nature is inherently dangerous and permanently "fixing" this sieve/cavern would set an unwarranted (an extremely costly) precedent.
so what's the deal with this? is Meeks still in? is this a ploy to give 2nd place Christ a final push over Rubio? Parent
Butif so, even more interesting. A Democrat wins in Alaska over Palin backed Tea Party Candidate? Parent
thanks for the polling info. i'm hoping the numbers i want to hear here are true. aka brown up by 10. not hearing consistent numbers on the boxer race :( Parent
Tuesday is going to be that kind of election, folks.
UGH.
(CNN) - Former President Bill Clinton says he talked to Rep. Kendrick Meek about ending his bid for Senate twice, but that he never discussed the issue with the White House. "He was trying to determine what was the best thing for him to do," Clinton said in an interview with CNN's Susan Candiotti Thursday. "I knew it was being discussed, people had discussed it on and off... it was no secret." Clinton said Meek did not have enough money to break through in the polls. "He was trying to think about what was the best thing for Florida," Clinton said.
"He was trying to determine what was the best thing for him to do," Clinton said in an interview with CNN's Susan Candiotti Thursday. "I knew it was being discussed, people had discussed it on and off... it was no secret."
Clinton said Meek did not have enough money to break through in the polls.
"He was trying to think about what was the best thing for Florida," Clinton said.
at least one democrat is not crassly 'playing the race card' and trying to keep Meek in the race to help the governors race. and its the one I would expect. heh
Japanese Fembot Has Incredibly Realistic Facial Expressions
does that make me a bad person. Parent
Media Post reports a horrible story about a mother who allegedly killed her baby for interrupting her playtime in the Facebook game, FarmVille. Alexandra V. Tobias entered a guilty plea in court this week for the January murder of her infant son Dylan Lee Edmondson. The 22-year-old Jacksonville, Florida mother lost her temper when her child began crying while she was playing FarmVille on Facebook, according to the report. Enraged, she shook the baby once, smoked a cigarette, and then shook the baby again.
Alexandra V. Tobias entered a guilty plea in court this week for the January murder of her infant son Dylan Lee Edmondson. The 22-year-old Jacksonville, Florida mother lost her temper when her child began crying while she was playing FarmVille on Facebook, according to the report. Enraged, she shook the baby once, smoked a cigarette, and then shook the baby again.
Personal political ideology could be shaped by a combination of factors, including the number of friends one has during adolescence and whether or not a person posses a specific dopamine receptor gene. A trio of University of California, San Diego researchers, in conjunction with a Harvard University participant, examined the subject in a research paper entitled Friendships Moderate an Association between a Dopamine Gene Variant and Political Ideology. You're likely to think that political leanings are influenced by parental units, but these researchers claim that evidence from recent studies indicate that "the mechanism by which parents pass their ideology to their children may in part be due to heredity, and that political attitudes themselves are genetically influenced." The researchers explain: ... we hypothesize that the combination of an innate desire for novel experience and many friends may contribute to the activation of a liberal ideology. People who have many friends may nonetheless remain uninterested in their friends' point of view. Alternatively, people who crave new experiences may not get them from their social context if they have only a few friends.
A trio of University of California, San Diego researchers, in conjunction with a Harvard University participant, examined the subject in a research paper entitled Friendships Moderate an Association between a Dopamine Gene Variant and Political Ideology.
You're likely to think that political leanings are influenced by parental units, but these researchers claim that evidence from recent studies indicate that "the mechanism by which parents pass their ideology to their children may in part be due to heredity, and that political attitudes themselves are genetically influenced."
The researchers explain:
... we hypothesize that the combination of an innate desire for novel experience and many friends may contribute to the activation of a liberal ideology. People who have many friends may nonetheless remain uninterested in their friends' point of view. Alternatively, people who crave new experiences may not get them from their social context if they have only a few friends.
It has affected his relationships with family. It's certainly affected my desire to be around him. ugh. Parent
Rebellion? let's hope.
Again, sorry for the feelings you must be having. It's been about a year since I've spoken with one of my sisters, similar reasons. We don't talk because it seems to always end in a fight. Parent