Why There Is No Progressive Movement For Obama
E.J. Dionne asks why there is such a heated Tea Party movement against Obama. In the process, he indvertently explains why there is no progressive movement fighting for Obama:
Most of the left simply doesn't see him as especially liberal [. . .] Obama, after all, is the man who saved the banks and the capital markets. Now the bankers are secure and most of them are still rich.
His health-care proposals stopped far short of the single-payer system that so many liberals have long sought [. . .] Obama put absolutely no political muscle behind the progressives' backup idea: a public option that could have served as a beachhead for a single-payer system.
The president is also decidedly moderate on budget questions. His stimulus plan was, if anything, too small. And Obama [. . .] endorsed a bipartisan commission to reach a deal on deficit reduction. The idea originated with centrist Democrats and moderately conservative Republicans -- and most liberals opposed it.
Sort of explains the progressive reaction to Obama don't you think?
Speaking for me only
< Anthem Blue Cross And The Selling Of The Health Bill Regulations | Will The Village Dems Be "Radicalized"? > |