Everything he has done is not quite enough. Now he is demagogue in chief as he fires up the rhetoric without giving a single detail or a single truth.  His positions are and will be Democrat Lite.  He has capitulated and joined the most regressive group in the party.

here is little difference between Drmocrat Lite and Republicanism.

Obama and Rham's disdain of liberals has been loud and clear. Rham wants nothing to do with them
and the rest of the opportunists from Daly's Chicago Political mob want a new imprint for the party.

This is not how Obama was sold, and it's not what he says. He doesn't do as he says. Basically his vagueness and aloofness are a matter of style with no substance, but he is being led by Oprah Group Think with a dash of Axelrod and Jarrett, all former Daly followers who worked in  Chicago politics, as did Michelle  who worked in City Planning.

So screw the liberals, the progressives. Where else can they go and they have no real money or power.

Kennedy is an entirely unreliable as he is NOT a liberal. There is no way that this will for sure go the court now, and if so it will take years if it is heard at all. If Republicans win the WH or Congress you better believe there will as little sympathy shown woman as did Obama.

We have just removed serious health and life issues from millions of women,and this was done by democrats spinelessly.

By the time this ever might get to the Supreme Court in whatever administration, and by what group....millions of women will suffer and many will die of illegal abortions, self inflicted abortions, or no abortion when a woman's mental health and physical healtha re at stake.

This will cause immediate damage to women's health, and produce profound mental,physical, and economic damage to millions. The poorest among us will suffer the most.

Yes, I used the problem of access to point out how high the costs can go.  But even in an area with better access, and even with a "free" or low-cost abortion at a clinic with a sliding scale, there can be additional costs, of course.

Again, though, real Progressives and Dems would not be arguing costs or even access.  They would be fighting for women's rights -- as they claim to do in the Dem platform.

Margaret Higgins Sanger started doing so almost a century ago, went to jail for it, had to flee the country for it, returned to keep fighting for it -- and for better birth control within women's control -- for decades and decades and decades. . . .

So give to her organization, while you ponder how well that effort for almost a century has worked for us.  Bless her, but women doing the heavy lifting on such efforts on our own has let the parties off the hook, while we kept voting for the guys in those parties who put promises to us in party platforms but don't even deliver on those.

a woman's employer, male partner or parents can all potentially prevent her getting insurance coverage for it, whereas now, it usually doesn't come up because most private plans just cover it.

so what do I do?  I guess this is the middle-class problem.  

Possible problems include non-exchange private plans dropping abortion, or the exchanges expanding without changing abortion-related regulations.

You may be right about Medicaid and affording an abortion.

I'm also violently allergic to wild overstatements and distortions, whether they come from or side or the bad guys.