home

Friday Morning Open Thread

I am traveling this evening and will be wrapped up in a PI hearing all next week. There won't be much of me to kick around until 2 Saturdays from today.

Before I go my Final Four picks - Butler (-1) over Michigan State and Duke (-3) over West Virginia. I like Duke in the final.

This is an Open Thread.

< 162K Jobs Added In March | "Jihad Jane" Indicted in Philadelphia >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    teabonics (5.00 / 1) (#2)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 09:02:54 AM EST
    excellent flicker stream featuring some of the more hilarious misspellings from the regular illiterates we have come to know & love

    Thanks (none / 0) (#50)
    by BarnBabe on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 01:38:19 PM EST
    They were quite funny and worth a look.

    Parent
    I couldnt believe (none / 0) (#52)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 01:40:08 PM EST
    how MANY there was

    Parent
    how many there WERE (none / 0) (#69)
    by Dadler on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 02:19:53 PM EST
    i'll assume, lol, you err'd intentionally.

    Parent
    heh (none / 0) (#88)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 03:10:51 PM EST
    actually I didnt but it was not the first or last err

    Parent
    Apparently (5.00 / 2) (#3)
    by CST on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 09:13:39 AM EST
    Obama was in town last night.  He came to visit the flooding, hang out with Deval and go to the Opera or something.  This storm was bad though, really bad.  One sign - they closed down I-95 in RI at one point.  That's craaaaazy.

    But a friend of mine got to drive the press bus and met Obama - super jealous.

    In other local news, the state health insurance board rejected premium changes for "235 of 274 increases proposed by insurers for plans covering individuals and small businesses."  This would be the first time the state has ever done this.  Encouraging.

    Election year? That seems to one of the things (5.00 / 1) (#84)
    by jawbone on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 03:08:19 PM EST
    which motivates state insurance commissioners to stand up to the Big Health Insurance Parasites.

    Parent
    I'll take it (5.00 / 2) (#89)
    by CST on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 03:16:33 PM EST
    However I can get it.  Although I will note this is not the first time there has ever been an election year - but it is the first time they've rejected rate increases.  And it's also not the first time health care has been an election issue here - although it's probably a bigger deal now because of the economy than it was when the MA bill had just passed.

    Parent
    I have been hearing (none / 0) (#33)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 12:44:55 PM EST
    from friends in the area.  the flooding sound pretty epic.  one person lost power for about a week.

    Parent
    I've certainly (5.00 / 2) (#42)
    by CST on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 01:15:59 PM EST
    never seen anything like it.  Then again this is our worst month in history since October 1955, and it's unprecedented for March.  Usually the heavy rains come during Hurricaine season.

    Today is sunny though, it's been strangely nice in between the terrible.

    But the flooding has been very epic.  Closing down I-95 completely at any point between NY and Boston just doesn't happen.  Also the sewage smell on the walk home has been pretty horrific for the last few days.  It seems like most of the rivers have crested by now at least.  So hopefully the worst is over, as long as it doesn't rain again any time soon.

    I'm somewhat worried about April showers that bring May flowers.  We really can't afford any more rain in the next few weeks.

    Parent

    hang (5.00 / 1) (#48)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 01:29:42 PM EST
    in there

    Parent
    See the current AP headline? (5.00 / 4) (#5)
    by me only on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 09:23:08 AM EST
    Obama talks jobs to NC audience; Payrolls improve

    This begs the question why didn't he talk jobs in NC before to improve payrolls.

    Well at least Obama doesn't totally suck (5.00 / 1) (#8)
    by magster on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 10:11:40 AM EST
    on the environment with the CAFE standards and the new EPA ruling that essentially outlaws mountaintop removal.

    Whoops, spoke to soon (5.00 / 1) (#34)
    by magster on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 12:45:22 PM EST
    defending Bush policy on mine dumping.

    Parent
    Pendulum (5.00 / 1) (#79)
    by ruffian on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 02:49:43 PM EST
    Offshore drilling----> stronger CAFE standards--->
    back to mine dumping

    We'll get another bone tossed our way tomorrow

    Parent

    Obama's CAFE standards preclude states (read CA) (4.00 / 3) (#87)
    by jawbone on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 03:09:57 PM EST
    from implementing their desired standards (43mpg, iirc).

    So, yes, national standards, but lower than many states wanted.

    That's our Compromiser in Chief.

    Parent

    Ret roh. Looks like calling the president (none / 0) (#154)
    by FoxholeAtheist on Sat Apr 03, 2010 at 03:49:17 PM EST
    the Compromiser in Chief will get you a rating of "2" on the ever-vigilant, hyper-sensitive, Obamapologist Shermometer.

    Parent
    Seeing as how one of the first things (5.00 / 4) (#14)
    by scribe on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 10:41:27 AM EST
    Rahm and Barack did was get rid of Howard Dean from the DNC (after shutting down the fifty-state strategy), and replace him with their ex-Republican friend Tim Kaine, whaddya expect?

    Good point (none / 0) (#24)
    by lilburro on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 11:15:31 AM EST
    and it's not like reverence was shown for Dean on the healthcare debate, although from the Obama Admin standpoint I can understand that (Dean scream and whatnot).  However.  Let's not act like the strategy has been to activate the progressive base.  More like go for indies.

    Parent
    What was so bad about the "Dean scream"? (5.00 / 1) (#78)
    by FoxholeAtheist on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 02:47:19 PM EST
    Hasn't Media Matters (for all of its faults) exposed the corporate media's role in hyping the meme of Dean's 'mania'.

    Parent
    Obama's Website says he's Against Drilling (5.00 / 3) (#16)
    by Dan the Man on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 10:56:43 AM EST
    Link


    As a senator, Barack Obama has been a strong leader on clean water issues. He fought against offshore drilling in the U.S. Senate, and he supports maintaining current moratoriums on new offshore oil and natural gas drilling.


    heh (none / 0) (#17)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 10:58:18 AM EST
    I predict updates today.

    Parent
    I found something on the site (none / 0) (#106)
    by Inspector Gadget on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 04:46:07 PM EST
    A "Use it or Lose It" Approach to Existing Oil and Gas Leases.

    Obama and Biden will require oil companies to develop the 68 million acres of land (over 40 million of which are offshore) which they have already leased and are not drilling on.

    That kind of says what he is doing is what he said he would do.

    Parent

    It's actually (none / 0) (#151)
    by cawaltz on Sat Apr 03, 2010 at 07:59:26 AM EST
    what Sarah Palin did. But hey, I'm sure that doesn't make it e-vil now that Barack is the one proposing it. You just gotta laugh between taxing excises and his energy policy......

    Parent
    Palin.. (none / 0) (#155)
    by jondee on Sat Apr 03, 2010 at 11:01:58 PM EST
    Be sure and give us the heads up when Obama starts quoting Joe The Plumber on the evils of socialism and giving speeches to Stars 'n Bars waving secessionist groups in Alaska..

    Parent
    What would Ezra Klein and the like do? (5.00 / 4) (#19)
    by KeysDan on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 11:02:33 AM EST
    We know what Scott McClellan did, three-years to wake up, and then write a book.  Also, I wonder what Robert Gibbs would do.  From the NYT obituary, April 2: J.F. terHorst, ex-WH press secretary died at age 87.  A veteran newsman,  respected member of the WH press corps, and long time friend of President Gerald Ford, when named to his post, was given early credit for openness and honesty after the Nixon administration, resigned after only four weeks when Ford granted Nixon an unconditional pardon in connection with the Watergate scandal. In his resignation letter, Mr. terHorst wrote: "I cannot in good conscience support your decision to pardon.., as your spokesman, I do not know how  I could credibly defend that action in the absence of a like decision to grant absolute pardon to the young men who evaded Vietnam military service as a matter of conscience and the absence of pardons for former aides.." "If justice is to be even-handed..to the rich and poor, weak and powerful alike, then mercy..when administered by a president who sets the tone, also should be an act of similar kind."

    And see Greenwald's column today (5.00 / 3) (#32)
    by oculus on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 12:38:05 PM EST
    on this subject.  Did Obama's initial WH counsel resign for reasons of conscience?

    Parent
    Jerry Ford really squandered (5.00 / 2) (#36)
    by brodie on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 12:57:51 PM EST
    so much good will he got from the public -- i.e., particularly from the anti-Tricky Dem base -- when he delivered on what was almost certainly a pre-arranged deal with the Nixon camp.  Not only was the process of investigation short-circuited, but the public was deprived of probably finding out exactly what motivated Nixon in that scandal, as well as knowledge of the extent of other crimes committed by the prez.

    The public at the time of the pardon had the correct instincts -- it was a lousy backroom deal that ill served the country.  What we've heard about it since the 70s has been Nixonian spin aided greatly by an increasingly compliant MSM plus some MOR "consensus" popular historians like Beschloss and the like.

    Good for terHorst.  Similar principled types in recent history deserve applause, like SoS Cy Vance (resignation over the disastrous decision by JC to try to very high-risk military rescue of the hostages), and AG Elliott Richardson during Watergate.

    Too bad a few others didn't resign or do so sooner:  McNamara and Mac Bundy over VN (and the lies about it), for instance.  But no, at least the former put president over principle, loyalty to person over loyalty to country and history.  

    Parent

    Disagree w/this: (none / 0) (#38)
    by oculus on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 01:01:09 PM EST
    Not only was the process of investigation short-circuited, but the public was deprived of probably finding out exactly what motivated Nixon in that scandal, as well as knowledge of the extent of other crimes committed by the prez.

    Parent
    Well, how is (none / 0) (#41)
    by brodie on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 01:11:34 PM EST
    that not true?   Make your case.

    Parent
    Intensive investigation by Congress. (none / 0) (#43)
    by oculus on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 01:16:04 PM EST
    Oval office tapes, revealed by Butterworh, and now available for public listening.  

    Parent
    Sure looks like Obama had (5.00 / 1) (#45)
    by observed on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 01:18:53 PM EST
    a Ford-like understanding with the Republicans about Bush.

    Parent
    I dont believe that at all (5.00 / 1) (#46)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 01:26:27 PM EST
    look how divided the country is already.  I think he, possibly rightly, thought that any attempt to do what you suggest would only further split the country and make governing it even more impossible than it already is and probably result in nothing substantial happening to any guilty party.

    I think it was his decision entirely.  right or wrong.


    Parent

    That was almost word for word (5.00 / 5) (#51)
    by observed on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 01:39:55 PM EST
    the defense of what Ford did.
    It was wrong then and it's wrong now.
    What tears the country apart is not confronting the fact that one party  routinely runs criminal enterprises to stay in power, with no concern for that their tricks (read: October Surprise, Kissinger's Paris lies, etc.) may have a huge cost in lives, in some cases.


    Parent
    on one level (5.00 / 1) (#53)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 01:42:47 PM EST
    I agree with you.  on another I completely understand why he would not want to use the best chance democrats have had in decades of getting some of their agenda passed on some quixotic quest top make Bush pay.

    and come on, you and I both know, nothing would have happened to him.

    history will judge him.  and Obama for what they do.

    Parent

    a couple of points (5.00 / 4) (#54)
    by observed on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 01:46:29 PM EST
    First of all, he's getting the Republican agenda passed, so I'm not cutting him any slack there.
    Second, it's not about making Bush or Nixon pay: it's about getting the truth out so that people can make informed judgments about the parties.
    These guys ---Nixon and Bush---are mass murderers on the scale of some of the worst African monsters, yet their reputations are nearly intact.


    Parent
    Also, I think history makes it quite (5.00 / 4) (#55)
    by observed on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 01:47:55 PM EST
    clear now that Ford's choice came at a terrible price which was not obvious then.
    No matter how uncomfortable it would be for Obama to lead the nation in confronting the truth, it must be done for the sake of future generations.

    Parent
    I think nothing you have said (5.00 / 1) (#118)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 05:37:25 PM EST
    indicates in any way that Obama had any kind of "deal" with republicans.  which is what you said that I disagreed with.

    Parent
    So you're saying that he made (5.00 / 1) (#120)
    by observed on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 05:50:40 PM EST
    a decisively wrong decision on his own.
    That's comforting.

    Parent
    yes (5.00 / 1) (#121)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 05:51:22 PM EST
    as a matter of fact I believe I said exactly that

    Parent
    No, you defended Obama's choice. (2.00 / 1) (#122)
    by observed on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 05:53:04 PM EST
    You said nothing would come of investigations or trials, so it wasn't worth it.
    Why the revisionism? A large majority of the population probably agrees with your opinion--no need to disown it.

    Parent
    oh fer gods sake (none / 0) (#124)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 05:53:55 PM EST
    look how divided the country is already.  I think he, possibly rightly, thought that any attempt to do what you suggest would only further split the country and make governing it even more impossible than it already is and probably result in nothing substantial happening to any guilty party.

    I think it was his decision entirely.  right or wrong.



    Parent
    why are you arguing? (none / 0) (#134)
    by observed on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 06:12:51 PM EST
    I accept what you say, and that you defend Obama's choice on  its merits.
    that's your prerogrative.

    It's also perfectly plausible that there was an agreement of some sort made not to prosecute Bush or Cheney.


    Parent

    What observed (5.00 / 6) (#56)
    by brodie on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 01:48:25 PM EST
    observes.

    Rbt Parry has written about this a lot.   Republican crimes followed by Republicans being let off the hook completely by Dems, or  being excused in large part as with Ford pardoning Nixon.  

    Meanwhile the public is deprived of learning about its own history while the powerful and those who reach the highest offices mostly go unpunished.

    Interestingly, Parry says this lamentable and wimpy Dem syndrome of enabling Repub crimes started with LBJ allowing Nixon to get away with secretly stymieing the 68 Paris Peace Talks.  In Johnson's own words prior to that year's election, if he went public with his information, it might damage Nixon's ability to govern as president should he be elected.  

    Parent

    the poor dem saps (5.00 / 1) (#60)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 01:56:31 PM EST
    their eternal Achilles heel:  actually wanting to try to govern to do some good when they are given the opportunity.
    actually I am sure the republicans would have loved it if Obama had taken your advice.  nothing would have happened but a show trial with no consequences.
     

    Parent
    Silly comment. (5.00 / 4) (#67)
    by observed on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 02:16:19 PM EST
    Playing defense with Republicans gets you NOWHERE.
    That's the lesson of the last 40 years.
    Furthermore, your comment goes against history.
    Why did Ford pardon Nixon, and why did Bush pere pardon Weinberger, if  investigations were not to be feared.
    Jack Abrahamoff would disagree with you about the efficacy of investigating Republican crooks.

    Parent
    I should add that the Dems don't (5.00 / 2) (#68)
    by observed on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 02:17:32 PM EST
    even need direct evidence of criminal activity. The massive coverup and destruction of evidence which is already known warrants a very noisy outcry.

    Parent
    If the show trial (5.00 / 3) (#86)
    by ruffian on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 03:08:55 PM EST
    had prevented Liz Cheney and a few others from having a voice in the discourse, and possible elected office in the future, it would be worth it. It also would have made it impossible for the Obama administration to keep up some of the same practices of the Bush administration.  

    Parent
    Iran-Contra has been erased also (5.00 / 7) (#80)
    by ruffian on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 02:54:23 PM EST
    and a lot of miscreants came back to plot the Iraq war. Not to mention that if Dems had held George H. W. Bush's feet to the fire more on Iran-Contra, perhaps we would not have gotten GWB.

    It never pays to let them get away with it. Never.

    Parent

    How right you are. (none / 0) (#83)
    by FoxholeAtheist on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 02:59:24 PM EST
    Time will tell if GWB's free ride also greases the path for a President Jeb Bush.

    Parent
    GWB / Rove: Jr. GOP Dirty Tricksters in 1972 (none / 0) (#108)
    by Ellie on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 04:57:26 PM EST
    As Young Republicans they cut their viper eye-teeth as CREEPS, whether planting racist doctored "evidence" -- à la Van Jones/ACORN takedown -- (GWB during his AWOL year) or generic criminality (Rove, well, forever).

    Parent
    Thanks for that history. I wasn't aware (none / 0) (#57)
    by observed on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 01:49:52 PM EST
    of that info about Johnson.

    Parent
    Yes the tapes were (5.00 / 1) (#47)
    by brodie on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 01:29:32 PM EST
    discovered but have they yet revealed the actual motive for breaking into the Dems' offices at Watergate?  And have we ever gotten the full story of some of the other WH "horrors" that might have been revealed had Nixon not been able to just take the pardon and go into (temporary) exile?

    Parent
    Exactly. The 1972 election results (5.00 / 2) (#49)
    by Cream City on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 01:38:09 PM EST
    are, to my mind, forever in doubt.  We only heard about some of not only the criminal acts -- break-ins to Ellsberg's psychiatrist's office, so often forgotten, as well as to the DNC hq in the Watergate building -- but also only some of the so-called "pranks" during the election campaign.

    I worked in that campaign, and all sorts of oddities occurred that still make me wonder.

    And that's only the start of all that I still want to know -- and thanks to Ford, good guy that he was in other ways, now I never will.

    Parent

    Elliott Richardson (none / 0) (#150)
    by gyrfalcon on Sat Apr 03, 2010 at 12:21:05 AM EST
    had only one moment of principle in his entire life, and that was the one.  Good for him.  But take it from somebody who was deeply involved in Mass. politics when Richardson was an active pol, the guy was a deeply unprincipled scumbag for most of his career.

    Parent
    Yeah,but that was back when (none / 0) (#29)
    by scribe on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 12:24:47 PM EST
    people in public life actually let their moral compass and conscience be their guide.

    How quaint.

    Parent

    Public officials with a conscience (none / 0) (#59)
    by KeysDan on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 01:56:23 PM EST
    have shown up from time to time, but, you  are right, it is quaint. And, from a WH staff, a real novelty.   I always appreciated the low-level State Department staff members Stephen Walker of the Croatian desk and Jon Wester, an Eastern European analyst, for their resignations in 1993 owing to American lack of resolve in the Bosnian crisis, particularly the rape and genocide. Their public acts, even though they were  not high in the pecking order, did bring needed attention from the Clinton administration.  

    Parent
    Unfortunately, because (5.00 / 1) (#66)
    by brodie on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 02:15:12 PM EST
    they are lower-level people, their principled resignations all too often only garner lower-level media coverage.

    I've lately wondered what might have happened if a real higher-up had resigned over a principled disagreement on major policy, like VP Hubert Humphrey resigning over Johnson' entirely unnecessary and bullheaded decision to rush massively into a war in VN, given that Humphrey had privately warned LBJ in a detailed memo in early 65 about the dangers of escalation over there.  He could have drawn attention to a matter which was only being partly disclosed, deliberately, by the admin, and won considerable praise from many in his party as time went on and people began to wake up to the quagmire that was unfolding.  

    Possibly he could have come back in 68, certainly in 72, and not only claimed the nom but been a much more powerful political force to contend with, as opposed to the insincere water-carrier for war political hack that he was in 66-68 because of Johnson's insisting on a tight leash and complete loyalty.

    Parent

    maybe a tiny bit bitter? (5.00 / 1) (#37)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 12:59:30 PM EST
    pouting always works so well dontcha know:

    Doctor tells Obama supporters: Go elsewhere for health care

    The sign reads: "If you voted for Obama ... seek urologic care elsewhere. Changes to your healthcare begin right now, not in four years."

    Cassell, whose lawyer wife, Leslie Campione, has declared herself a Republican candidate for Lake County commissioner, said three patients have complained, but most have been "overwhelmingly supportive" of his position.



    It worked, eh? Publicity for wife's (5.00 / 3) (#39)
    by oculus on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 01:02:08 PM EST
    candidacy.

    Parent
    TIME finds way to insult Bill Clinton again -- old (5.00 / 1) (#90)
    by jawbone on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 03:23:09 PM EST
    debunked story about the LA airport being tied up when bill got a haircut there.

    The MCM (Mainstream Corporate Media) hates to give up a good narrative, even when it's proved false. Or someone at TIME has a brain worm she can't get rid of.

    TIME made a list of the Top Ten Expensive Haircuts.  Bill's haircut in LA  was placed second after Rubio's (FL Repub US Senate primary candidate).  Of course, TIME printed the debunked initial story, a pile of lies.

      Media Matters caught them on this journmalism. The original article's wording is at the MM link. (Via Atrios)

    Today, TIME wrote a correction, but it's so snarky it's almost not a correction:  

    Hairgate by Kathy Steinmetz  

    Correction Appended: April 2, 2010  

    For about an hour in May 1993, two of LAX's four runways were shut down. Then President Bill Clinton never heard the end of it. The reason for the closure was the presence of Air Force One, inside of which, the President was in the throes of a $200 trim from a glamorati stylist named, fabulously, Christophe.  

    The media widely reported that scheduled flights had been forced to circle, that runways were jammed and that people were made hours late, though a Newsday report later that year showed that there were no significant delays. By then, however, "Hairgate" had already become a public-relations nightmare and solidified an opinion in some quarters of Clinton's out-of-touch excesses. What made it doubly awkward was that it occurred while the President was struggling to get Congress to pass a deficit-reduction bill.  

    An earlier version of this item incorrectly stated that flights and passengers had been delayed several hours by the President's haircut.

    This is your MCM on brain worm. Or stupidity. Or misuse of the English language and publishing.

    What the hell is all this snark about? Sheesh.

    BTW, Edwards' $400 haircut made...fourth place. Even though his cost twice as much as Clinton's....


    The guys have left on a fishing trip. (5.00 / 2) (#112)
    by Dr Molly on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 05:12:28 PM EST
    Ah the peace and quiet that stretches before me this weekend...

    Outed (5.00 / 1) (#141)
    by squeaky on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 06:58:32 PM EST
    Sadistic harassment and outright bigotry? Good to know that the issue of being gay in the military has nothing to do with gay troops undercutting the Military's anything.  :
    Reporting from Washington - Lt. Robin R. Chaurasiya wasn't exactly asked, but she told anyway: She is a lesbian, and in a civil union with another woman.

    Her commander at Scott Air Force Base in Illinois, Lt. Gen. Robert R. Allardice, could have discharged her under the Pentagon's "don't ask, don't tell" policy. Instead, he determined in February that she should remain in the Air Force because she acknowledged her sexual orientation for the purpose of "avoiding and terminating military service."

    Chaurasiya says that is not true. But the general's reasoning has the flavor of a Catch-22: If you admit to being homosexual you can be discharged from the military, but if you admit it for the purposes of being discharged you won't be.

    Link


    I was going to take Boonen (none / 0) (#1)
    by me only on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 08:56:12 AM EST
    but I figured if he won, the universe could not stand us agreeing and being right.

    So I am going with the sentimental pick of Devolder, even though the course change works against him and I don't think he is as ready as Boonen.

    genius marketing (none / 0) (#6)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 09:30:12 AM EST
    Monolith Action Figure

    Deep in the heart of Aisle 7 (the action figure aisle), all throughout the 70's, 80's, and 90's, something waited. No one knew it was there, until toy stores began their turn of the century renovations. Then the Monolith Action Figure was discovered (the first given the name "TRU-1"). What was it for? Where did it come from? Why wouldn't its barcode scan? No one knew. And no one knows to this day.


    It's the new pet rock. (none / 0) (#15)
    by scribe on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 10:43:25 AM EST
    zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz (none / 0) (#7)
    by ruffian on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 09:54:31 AM EST


    Netflix and ABC Launch iPad Apps (none / 0) (#9)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 10:24:57 AM EST
    Hulu App on the Way

    In about 24 hours, Apple stores across the east coast will open and the eager public will finally get a chance to purchase the company's latest computing creation: the iPad. My feelings for the table device have changed dramatically over the past few months, from "It's too expensive, it doesn't do anything I need it to do, it doesn't have flash, and it's kind of lame," to "WANT NOW!"

    In the past couple of days, a spate of iPad-related news has whet my appetite even further. Specifically, the iTunes store already has Netflix and ABC apps for the iPad, and a Hulu app is on the way.

    The Netflix app duplicates the experience of browsing Netflix on the web, but perhaps most importantly, it streams video through its "Watch Instantly" service to your iPad! In a move that is probably too awesome to be a coincidence, Netflix's Watch Instantly service recently added a ton of television shows to its roster, including Rescue Me, Lie to Me, and the entire series of 24 (you can check them out here if you have a Netflix login).




    Oh happy day (5.00 / 2) (#10)
    by ruffian on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 10:29:25 AM EST
    Kind of sacrilegious to be this excited on Good Friday. Luckily I'm a heathen.

    Parent
    WANT (none / 0) (#11)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 10:33:59 AM EST
    NOW!!

    Parent
    "No red nor white (none / 0) (#40)
    by jondee on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 01:10:20 PM EST
    was ever seen so
    amorous as this
    lovely green"

    Parent
    I just ditched DirecTV for antennae reception (none / 0) (#12)
    by magster on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 10:35:14 AM EST
    and free online content connecting laptop to HDTV. Technology is changing things quickly.

    Parent
    the ipad (none / 0) (#13)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 10:37:57 AM EST
    is also going to include a slingbox like app that would transmit your dish or whatever directly to the device with all the controls you have at home.

    I will be keeping my dish.

    Parent

    Good move (none / 0) (#23)
    by BDB on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 11:10:19 AM EST
    We went to an antenna about a year ago and have never regretted it.  Between netflix, which also streams many things live over our tivo, and online, there's not anything to miss.  Except of course sending $75 bucks a month to some corporation so that Bill O can be paid millions by Fox.

    Also, many people don't know this, but over the air HD TV has a better picture (not that my eyes are good enough to notice).  It doesn't have to be compressed to go through a "pipe".

    Parent

    I tried it with an HD antenna once (none / 0) (#27)
    by ruffian on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 12:13:59 PM EST
    and it was not that good in my area. Maybe the antenna quality differs. Your mileage may vary I guess.

    Parent
    Our first antenna HD night was lastnight (none / 0) (#30)
    by magster on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 12:30:00 PM EST
    watching survivor.  The coral reef shots coming out of commercial were stunning, and you could see Parvati's acne.

    Our decision was made when our old school big screen tv from 1995 finally bit the dust and we had to drop a small fortune on an HD tv.  Researching the capabilities of online transmissions and the quality of the old rooftop antenna in our attic made the decision a no-brainer.

    Parent

    OT, but what do you think (none / 0) (#82)
    by ruffian on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 02:57:35 PM EST
    of Survivor this season? I guess every season is a combination of idiocy and jerkiness, but this one is entertaining.

    Parent
    Oh, it's fun (none / 0) (#91)
    by magster on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 03:36:15 PM EST
    James seemed like much more of a jerk than I remember before, and laughed when Rob called Coach a "little man".  Parvati will win again is my guess -- high IQ and strategic flirtiness continues to work for her.

    Parent
    People on some of the blogs (none / 0) (#146)
    by ruffian on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 08:10:00 PM EST
    were saying James was coming off of steroids and thats why he was kind of a jerk this time. FWIW.

    Parvati coud easily win. I think the only thing standing in her way is the fact that she already won once and maybe they won't vote her the money again. I like Russell better this time around. Maybe he won't antagonize the whole jury this time. Oh, who am I kidding.

    Coach - it was funny to see Rob tell him off, but I'm afraid we will be in for another crying jag now, with neither Rob or Tyson to comfort him!

    Parent

    Do you suppose there is an inpatient (none / 0) (#18)
    by oculus on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 11:02:20 AM EST
    treatment program designed for addicts of a blog?  In Arizona maybe?  And will two weeks be enough?

    we are (5.00 / 2) (#20)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 11:06:28 AM EST
    here to support you and have faith you will come through this.

    Parent
    I predict Squeaky will be all over this. (5.00 / 1) (#21)
    by oculus on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 11:07:21 AM EST
    its (5.00 / 1) (#22)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 11:07:54 AM EST
    early

    Parent
    depends (none / 0) (#139)
    by CoralGables on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 06:34:43 PM EST
    on who you want to meet, Eldrick or Jesse.

    Parent
    Who is Eldrick? (I only recently (none / 0) (#140)
    by oculus on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 06:46:11 PM EST
    figured out who the modern day Jesse James is.)

    Parent
    Eldrick is Tiger (none / 0) (#142)
    by caseyOR on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 06:59:28 PM EST
    Woods' first name. Tiger is a nickname.

    Parent
    Digby on why the HCR bill included (none / 0) (#25)
    by oculus on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 11:31:52 AM EST
    &250,000 for abstinence education in light of the fact there were no GOP votes for the bill: link

    Plus, newsflash, Digby abandons her post at the computer to hear Paul McCartney at Hollywood Bowl.

    unbelievable (none / 0) (#26)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 11:35:50 AM EST
    but then Hatch did so much to get the damn thing passed.

    -P

    Parent

    The story about Tiger Woods' (none / 0) (#28)
    by observed on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 12:18:40 PM EST
    6th grader teacher calling him a liar and hiring Gloria Allred was an April Fool's joke, right?!

    Tiger Tracks (5.00 / 1) (#35)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 12:52:02 PM EST
    new iPhone app.

    Ever sent a text, then immediately wished you could delete it?

    Apparently, you aren't alone.

    A new iPhone app called TigerText is getting attention for its ability to delete text messages from the sender's and receiver's phones after they've been sent out.



    Parent
    Yup. (none / 0) (#31)
    by gyrfalcon on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 12:35:49 PM EST
    It's actually his kindergarten teacher.

    Parent
    How's the Pope doing with that (none / 0) (#44)
    by observed on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 01:17:18 PM EST
    "petty gossip"?
    Any more bombshells recently?

    In the city that is ground central (5.00 / 1) (#62)
    by Cream City on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 02:03:25 PM EST
    right now in terms of the U.S. case -- Fr. Murphy and 200 deaf boys -- that is causing outcry, I can suggest that you see today's story at jsonline.com, as well as several earlier stories in recent days.

    Btw, especially see the earlier stories this week re the role of the longtime Catholic DA here then.  He's the same guy whose Catholicity made the city a major target the anti-abortion crazies almost two decades ago now, in a case that finally went to the Supreme Court again and again with appeals (not sure if it is fully resolved yet) in sheer frustration from having to deal with a DA who would do nothing while we were subjected to thousands on thousands of crazies from across the country, descending on our clinics.  End result: More than a dozen clinics in this state alone closed since then, so Roe v. Wade hardly exists here.

    And earlier stories decades ago; this is not new to us in this archdiocese.  The NY Times just jumped on it now, if not attributing much of this to the JS reporters on this then, when media elsewhere just were not interested.  So I find it interesting to wonder why now?  What else is up?  Is this part of a larger campaign to dump this pope?

    Parent

    I thought about that, but if they (none / 0) (#70)
    by observed on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 02:21:11 PM EST
    wanted Ratzi out, the reason would have to be huge.
    The damage to the church's "authority" if he resigned over this scandal would be enormous.


    Parent
    And... (none / 0) (#100)
    by lentinel on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 04:31:40 PM EST
    what about the Church's authority if Ratinger stays?

    The Church is behaving like Toyota.

    Parent

    Right. I dont' think there's any planning (5.00 / 1) (#105)
    by observed on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 04:41:03 PM EST
    ---just reaction.
    He may need to spend some more time with the Vatican Choir, to unwind.

    Parent
    Vatican is on the "offensive" (none / 0) (#58)
    by Merle on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 01:55:04 PM EST
    And it's extremely offensive (5.00 / 3) (#63)
    by Cream City on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 02:05:01 PM EST
    as I have met some of the Americans who went there last week to protest and were detained and hassled by the Italian cops.

    As one of the protesters said, they spent more time in custody, if only hours, than did the priests who abused them.

    Parent

    so so offensive (5.00 / 4) (#72)
    by CST on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 02:25:01 PM EST
    especially considering the Pope was once a part of the Nazi youth.  You'd think they would be more wary of playing that card.  Completely tone deaf.

    The Catholic Church is a real piece of work sometimes.

    Parent

    translation (none / 0) (#61)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 01:58:09 PM EST
    offensive = spinning like dervishes

    Parent
    Ooh, tasteful (none / 0) (#65)
    by observed on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 02:13:09 PM EST
    Well, at least they're not blaming the Jews (yet).


    Parent
    They Are (5.00 / 1) (#74)
    by squeaky on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 02:25:19 PM EST
    ROME -- A senior Vatican priest speaking at a Good Friday service compared the uproar over sexual abuse scandals in the Catholic Church -- which have included reports about Pope Benedict XVI's oversight role in two cases -- to the persecution of the Jews, sharply raising the volume in the Vatican's counterattack....

    .... Wearing the brown cassock of a Franciscan, Father Cantalamessa took note that Easter and Passover were falling during the same week this year, saying he was led to think of the Jews. "They know from experience what it means to be victims of collective violence and also because of this they are quick to recognize the recurring symptoms," he said.

    So the Vatican now claims that pedophile priests are just like the jews....  Of course just a bit of incitement, nothing official, during the high season when many of the faithful seek vengeance on Jews for supposedly killing Chirst..

    The Vatican spokesman, the Rev. Federico Lombardi stressed that Father Cantalamessa's sermon represented his own private thoughts and was not "an official statement" from the Vatican.

    NYT

    Parent

    better (5.00 / 1) (#85)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 03:08:26 PM EST
    Satan behind media attacks on the Pope, asserts Italian exorcist

    which might be funny if it was not from the catholic news agency

    Parent

    Yeah (none / 0) (#93)
    by squeaky on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 03:43:32 PM EST
    We should not be surprised, but then again the Vatican should not be surprised that those "tempted" to break the law are vilified by the press and held culpable by the law.

    Calling the press and I assume the law, work of the Devil, is quite a stretch...

    Parent

    The wily evil one (none / 0) (#147)
    by jondee on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 08:27:50 PM EST
    has been known to take the form of a 3 ft tall chocolate rabbit this time of year..

    Parent
    More Catholic disavowal of pedophilia... (none / 0) (#71)
    by FoxholeAtheist on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 02:22:02 PM EST
    From Gawker today: Stuff Catholics Have So Far Blamed for the Church's Pedophilia Scandal: The Devil; The Gays; The Sexual Revolution; The media; The persecution.

    Parent
    Unfair laws.. (none / 0) (#75)
    by jondee on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 02:26:56 PM EST
    This may sound strange, but (none / 0) (#109)
    by Inspector Gadget on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 04:59:28 PM EST
    I doubt many of the priests are actually "pedophiles". There is no doubt they molest the young boys, but their other choice is women who would be more likely to expose them for not abstaining. If the church were to allow priests to have relationships, I'm guessing the rate of molestation would plummet.

    Parent
    Then again, how many is "many'? (5.00 / 1) (#148)
    by FoxholeAtheist on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 10:11:36 PM EST
    More Like (none / 0) (#115)
    by squeaky on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 05:30:43 PM EST
    Historically the priesthood has been a magnet for the types of personalities who like to prey on young boys, as well as a safe haven for closeted gays.

    As regards homosexuality, there is an inverse proportion between the normalization of homosexuality in society and the number of applicants for the priesthood, imo.

    Parent

    bingo (none / 0) (#117)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 05:35:34 PM EST
    the real scandal is the churchs continued feeding of a culture that encourages repression and causes latent homosexuals to join the priesthood as a place to hide by their positions on things like celibacy and women in the priesthood and then acts surprised when those confused tormented pathetic people act out.


    Parent
    Yes, But (none / 0) (#131)
    by squeaky on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 06:07:32 PM EST
    From the stories I have heard, there is little confusion or torment by the priests. It was more like this went on for ever, blatantly and arrogantly, because they were protected by the "brown line" identical to the "blue line" we are so familiar with by the police.

    Here is a little writing by Kevin Killian, a friend of a friend, about the "abuse" he experienced by priests in Catholic high school.

    Parent

    oh, no doubt (none / 0) (#132)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 06:10:58 PM EST
    I guess I was referring to the whole damn misguided bunch as tormented and pathetic.

    including and possibly particularly the people moving them around.

    its worth mention at this point that anyone who has not seen "Doubt" and is interested in this issue really should.  it is one of the best films of last year.
     

    Parent

    a personal story (none / 0) (#135)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 06:15:19 PM EST
    one of my best friends wanted to be a priest early in his life.  this would be very early 70s.  he started seminary school right out of high school and when he himself was a confused and tormented homosexual.  and not at all out yet.
    he said soon after starting he went to a party with all the priests and people from the school and was absolutely horrified by what he saw.  which was priests sitting on each others lap and all sorts of other things I will not relate.  he left the next day.

    I have not told that story many times over the years but for some reason it just came back to me.

    Parent

    after thinking about this last night I (5.00 / 1) (#152)
    by Capt Howdy on Sat Apr 03, 2010 at 09:05:18 AM EST
    emailed my friend Tom to laugh about it.  
    he said he still has his tshirt that says "the clergy was too gay for me".
    and if you know my friend Tom . . .

    Parent
    lol (none / 0) (#153)
    by squeaky on Sat Apr 03, 2010 at 11:10:20 AM EST
    Funny how language works, far too straight does not connote the opposite...

    Parent
    Yeah (none / 0) (#136)
    by squeaky on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 06:19:51 PM EST
    Well Kevin Killian was totally out of the closet when he was in HS. An entirely different take than what we are used to hearing..  Worth a read, not to mention that he is a really good writer as well...

    The writing is NSFW though.. be warned..

    Parent

    My Friend (none / 0) (#137)
    by squeaky on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 06:24:11 PM EST
    Who went to school with Killian said that any infraction, real or perceived, would have you over the lap, for a spanking, by one of the priests. That took place in front of the whole class. If the spankee was in any way "excited" by the throbbing lap of the priest, he would be required to have a mandatory after school remedial session in the priests office, for further exploration of the infraction...

    Parent
    They could've said "witch hunt" (none / 0) (#73)
    by jondee on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 02:25:14 PM EST
    but they hunted so many themselves, that that was pretty much out..

    I can here it now.."It's as if haters of the Church had taken holy fathers out to the center of Vatican Square, branded their tongues and immolated them.."

    Parent

    Thanks, lol on both accounts. (none / 0) (#81)
    by FoxholeAtheist on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 02:55:23 PM EST
    A hearing (none / 0) (#64)
    by Maryb2004 on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 02:09:37 PM EST
    sounds like a weak excuse not to write the promised law post.  

    Ah well, it goes in the pile with the Justice Thomas opinion post.   Whatever that was about.

    Hey, he eventually wrote his (5.00 / 1) (#77)
    by observed on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 02:41:45 PM EST
    AfPak post. Give him a month or so.

    Parent
    Did he? I misssed it. (5.00 / 1) (#138)
    by oculus on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 06:25:36 PM EST
    RIght after Obama's best evah (none / 0) (#143)
    by observed on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 07:19:25 PM EST
    speech on AfPak, IIRC

    Parent
    Searched "stories" including (none / 0) (#149)
    by oculus on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 11:09:00 PM EST
    "Afghanistan."  Haven't found it.

    Parent
    I don't envy (none / 0) (#92)
    by lilburro on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 03:43:28 PM EST
    the person that has to write the definitive history of the 2009-10 healthcare debate and its becoming harder than ever to remember the tit for tat.  My argument with Booman if anyone cares.

    dont worry (5.00 / 1) (#94)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 03:47:36 PM EST
    it will be completely rewritten.
    and in fact is already being rewritten.

    Parent
    Insider access (none / 0) (#95)
    by lilburro on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 04:01:23 PM EST
    which I of course don't have is necessary.  So no one will really give a damn about my interpretation of media reports and statements to the media.  It's all manipulative anyway.

    Still I think it's useful for progressives who act on the day to day media reports to figure out how the real history matches up with the tit for tat we read.


    Parent

    I think (none / 0) (#116)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 05:31:16 PM EST
    you are right.

    Parent
    Is there a worse actor than Dolph (none / 0) (#96)
    by observed on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 04:17:30 PM EST
    Lundgren?
    Just curious.
    He's definitely in the "so bad it's fun" category, though.


    That David Caruso (none / 0) (#97)
    by jondee on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 04:27:43 PM EST
    is exactly Sir John Gielgud, either.

    Talk about the GWB of actors..

    Parent

    You (none / 0) (#99)
    by lentinel on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 04:29:53 PM EST
    got there two minutes ahead of me!

    Parent
    i got it... (none / 0) (#103)
    by lentinel on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 04:37:21 PM EST
    The winnah!

    Tom Arnold!

    Parent

    Hmmm (none / 0) (#98)
    by lentinel on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 04:29:04 PM EST
    Sylvester Stallone comes to mind...

    Then, let's see... Nicolas Cage... I know --- David Caruso!

    Parent

    Ha, good one (none / 0) (#102)
    by observed on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 04:37:19 PM EST
    I watched a few minutes of Rocky on TV ages ago before I turned it off. I've never seen any Stallone movie since. I figured if I hated his "masterpiece", I wouldn't be able to watch anything else. Then again, I didn't care much for Raging Bull.

    Parent
    I think Cage is pretty good (none / 0) (#107)
    by jondee on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 04:53:53 PM EST
    in those loopy Raising Arizona-ish films..

    Also, I thought he was pretty good in Matchstick Men, if you saw that one..


    Parent

    Loved Matchstick Men (none / 0) (#111)
    by shoephone on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 05:02:55 PM EST
    I always assume (wrongly) that no one but me saw it.

    And his performance as the twin brothers in Adaptation was worthy of two Oscars, IMO.

    I dig Nic Cage. I just can't stand some of his dumber movies (which will go unmentioned here.)

    Back to dumb actors: I wholeheartedly go with nominating Sly Stallone as one of them.

    Parent

    I think some of (5.00 / 1) (#114)
    by jondee on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 05:22:20 PM EST
    his slightly hyperkinetic mannerisms just get on some people's nerves.

    Adaptation: Chris Cooper, (one of the underrated ones), kicked some serious A in that film, also.

    Now: "Let's go get Nathan Junior!"

    Parent

    I love Chris Cooper (5.00 / 1) (#119)
    by MKS on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 05:45:46 PM EST
    Lonestar was a good movie of his.

    Parent
    Thats the one with Kristofferson? (5.00 / 1) (#123)
    by jondee on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 05:53:36 PM EST
    I havnt seen that yet. Cooper was also great in Syriana and Seabiscuit. The boy has some chops.

    Parent
    Yup (none / 0) (#133)
    by MKS on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 06:11:17 PM EST
    Surprise ending....

    Great cameo by Frances McDormand....You'll remember the character she plays....

    It is The Last Picture Show meets American Beauty.

    Parent

    Sounds good (none / 0) (#145)
    by jondee on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 07:54:22 PM EST
    I may watch it tonight, if I can track it down,

    Parent
    Oh yes... (none / 0) (#101)
    by lentinel on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 04:35:53 PM EST
    How about Harrison Ford?
    How about Steven Seagal?

    Ahhrnold is in the running.

    Parent

    Harrison Ford's career is the worst (none / 0) (#104)
    by observed on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 04:38:29 PM EST
    thing to come out of the Star Wars movies.
    He makes Charlton Heston look like Olivier by comparison.

    Parent
    Hey! Harrison Ford, (5.00 / 1) (#127)
    by brodie on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 06:04:06 PM EST
    one of my favorites over the past 35 yrs.

    Understated often, and usually you can't see the acting gears grinding.  Versatile, too, and can pull off high brow and middle brow characters a little better than most or at least as well as say a James Garner or (the overhyped) Tom Hanks.  His Dr Richard Kimball, for instance, should have garnered Academy® recognition.  As good as David Janssen.

    Fine roles early in American Graffitti, then later as Indy Jones and in Polanski's Frantic.  

     

    Parent

    I am looking forward (none / 0) (#129)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 06:07:02 PM EST
    to Ford in Indiana Jones and the Golden Catheter

    Parent
    I only saw the furrowed brow (none / 0) (#130)
    by observed on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 06:07:11 PM EST
    performances.

    Parent
    Have to agree about Tom Hanks (none / 0) (#156)
    by observed on Sun Apr 04, 2010 at 11:13:55 AM EST
    being overhyped.
    Really boring actor.

    Parent
    Boxer is against legalizing (none / 0) (#110)
    by MKS on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 05:02:51 PM EST
    marijuana.....It will be a ballot initiative in California this Fall....

    Boxer is behind Campbell, albeit by one point.....

    Governors Receive Threats From Extremist Group (none / 0) (#113)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 05:13:14 PM EST
    WASHINGTON -- Governors across the country said Friday that they had received letters from an extremist group warning that that they might be forcibly removed from office if they did not step down within three days.

    Officials from the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Department of Homeland Security confirmed that they had sent out an intelligence note with information about potential threats made to governors by a group calling itself Guardians of the Free Republics.

    The note was sent to state law enforcement officials in the last few days.

    A homeland security official said the federal agencies were not aware of "an immediate or credible threat."

    "No specific information indicates that violence is intended," the official said. "These threat assessments are issued regularly out of an abundance of caution."

    State officials said they were taking the threat seriously because it came at a time of increased attention to antigovernment groups.

    Nine members of a militant Christian militia group were arrested in Michigan last weekend and accused of plotting an uprising against the government.

    On its Web site, the Guardians of the Free Republics sets forth a plan to "restore America." It describes the plan as "a bold achievable strategy for behind-the-scenes peaceful reconstruction of the de jure institutions of government without controversy, violence or civil war."

    Jews Respond to Vatican (none / 0) (#125)
    by squeaky on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 05:54:03 PM EST
    American Jewish leaders on Friday denounced a Vatican official's likening of anti-Catholicism during the church's escalating abuse crisis to "collective violence" against Jews, but predicted it would not deal a severe blow to the two faiths' often-strained relationship.
    "What a sad irony this would be on Good Friday, where so much of the anti-Semitism was brought about by the church against Jews," said Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League. "Anti-Semitism was pogroms, inquisitions, expulsions that led to death ... What a grotesque comparison."

    link
    But things are getting better between the Vatican and the jews, because at least this time there was no mention of blood libel, a myth perpetuated for centuries by the church.  They could have said 'we identify with the jews as they have had to suffer due to misunderstanding stemming from their ritual practice of blood libel', yet they showed great restraint this time around.

       

    "A most barbarous secret for a long time suspected in the Jewish nation...at last came to light in the city of Damascus, that of serving themselves of Christian blood in their unleavened bread...a secret which these 1,840 years must have made many unfortunate victims."  Jasper Chasseaud, US vice-consul, Beirut, Lebanon, 1840 CE.

    link

    we are gonna (none / 0) (#126)
    by Capt Howdy on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 05:59:41 PM EST
    need more popcorn

    Parent
    And this at Passover time (none / 0) (#128)
    by Cream City on Fri Apr 02, 2010 at 06:05:05 PM EST
    makes me so glad to be a former Catholic.

    Oh, and Catholic Church?  Stop calling me "fallen away."  You pushed me and millions away, for decades now.

    Parent