home

Wednesday Night Open Thread

Who's going home on American Idol? Bigger question: Is anyone watching? Dancing With the Stars had bigger ratings last night. Since I'm still watching, I'll say I really don't care who goes tonight, since I doubt it will be my favorites Crystal or Casey -- or Lee or Katie Stevens. Most likely: Aaron Kelly or Andrew Garcia. Who should go? Tim Urban. (No spoilers please.)

A new Top Chef Masters is on Bravo. I've never seen it, is it like Next Iron Chef or something unique?

This is an open thread, all topics welcome.

< Louisiana Considers Adding "Drug Offender" to Driver's Licenses | DC Flight to Denver: Doubtful That Diplomat Tried to Set Shoes on Fire >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Pay to pee. (5.00 / 1) (#1)
    by MileHi Hawkeye on Wed Apr 07, 2010 at 09:03:52 PM EST
    Just when you may have though air travel couldn't get any worse...

    European discount giant Ryanair is pushing ahead with plans to charge passengers to use the lavatories, news that comes just a day after U.S. low-cost carrier Spirit said it would charge for overhead bin space.


    Atlanta Braves (none / 0) (#2)
    by jeffinalabama on Wed Apr 07, 2010 at 09:24:22 PM EST
    are 2-0 on the season. I know, a loooooong way to go.

    the girls (a 14 y.o. and a 15 y.o.) in my Spanish conversation class think I'm a great teacher, but I'm 'old.' It was funny, one of them just blurted out, "Gee, you're OLD!" I cracked up at the way it was said. Reminded me of my 7 year old.

    Parent

    The Padres are 1 and 1 and ahead 3 to 1 in the (none / 0) (#3)
    by oculus on Wed Apr 07, 2010 at 09:27:06 PM EST
    bottom of the 3rd against the Diamondbacks.  Do the Braves have the pitching?  (Sports radio jibber jabber yesterday.)

    Parent
    Yankees 3, RedSox 1 F/10 (none / 0) (#6)
    by scribe on Wed Apr 07, 2010 at 09:32:47 PM EST
    Mo gets his second save in two nights and Papelbon the loss after coughing up a dinger to Granderson.

    Parent
    looking good so far (none / 0) (#14)
    by jeffinalabama on Wed Apr 07, 2010 at 09:46:19 PM EST
    barring injury, the Braves ought to be in the hunt. Unbelievable offensive potential and decent pitching, although not too deep. However, thus far, no earned runs for the bullpen.

    Parent
    So that must mean the Cubs (none / 0) (#21)
    by ruffian on Wed Apr 07, 2010 at 10:14:55 PM EST
    Are 0-2. Greeeaaat.....

    Parent
    That will go until someone decides (none / 0) (#9)
    by scribe on Wed Apr 07, 2010 at 09:36:56 PM EST
    they have to whiz on the floor, likely b/c they don't have change.

    Parent
    But won't it be credit cards only? (none / 0) (#10)
    by oculus on Wed Apr 07, 2010 at 09:37:55 PM EST
    No. (none / 0) (#13)
    by MileHi Hawkeye on Wed Apr 07, 2010 at 09:45:14 PM EST
    Per the linked article--"developing coin operated toilets".

    Parent
    Better start saving Euro coins. (none / 0) (#15)
    by oculus on Wed Apr 07, 2010 at 09:50:07 PM EST
    Or learn how to... (5.00 / 1) (#17)
    by MileHi Hawkeye on Wed Apr 07, 2010 at 09:57:29 PM EST
    ...put a Foley catheter in pre-flight.  I'll bet the TSA folks would love having to pat down the leg bag.

    Parent
    There might be a lot of that... (none / 0) (#12)
    by MileHi Hawkeye on Wed Apr 07, 2010 at 09:41:35 PM EST
    ...since they're talking about taking out all but one bathroom on the planes.  

    All so they can make a few more Euro's each flight.

    Parent

    cant resist (none / 0) (#44)
    by Capt Howdy on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 10:16:02 AM EST
    Bizarre Facts About ... Pee!

    In her book That's Disgusting! An Adult Guide to What's Gross, Tasteless, Rude, Crude, and Lewd, Greta Garbage explains all sorts of bizarre trivia about urine.

    Warning: not for the squeamish. True to the title of her book, Greta Garbage's book is like a No Holds Barred trivia book about really gross things. You've been warned (or if this sort of things interest you, then "urine" for a treat!)



    Parent
    Jeralyn -Obama is nominating Bush holdover for DEA (5.00 / 1) (#19)
    by jawbone on Wed Apr 07, 2010 at 10:01:21 PM EST
    head.  Michelle Leonhart, who, according to this petition site:

    ...oversaw the Bush administration's tactic of raiding the homes of desperately ill individual medical marijuana patients in California.

    Ms. Leonhart also has a record of adamantly fighting against allowing scientific research of the potential medicinal value of marijuana. Ignoring the ruling of a federal judge, Ms. Leonhart single-handedly blocked applications from respected university researchers studying medical marijuana.

    Via ubethcaiam's post at FDL.

    Obama nominated her back in (none / 0) (#34)
    by Jeralyn on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 01:10:25 AM EST
    January. More here. I complained about her in December when she applauded the killing of a drug cartel member (as opposed to arresting him.) Here's some testimony she gave to a House committee.

    She really wants to go global.

    Unfortunately, she'll get confirmed, Holder and Obama like her.

    Parent

    Top Chef Masters is like (5.00 / 1) (#20)
    by Anne on Wed Apr 07, 2010 at 10:02:34 PM EST
    Top Chef, except with already-established chefs at the top of their game.  Chefs who own restaurants and have cookbooks, have won James Beard awards, been featured in Food & Wine and Bon Appetit and Gourmet, etc.

    What's kind of fun about it is that it subjects these master chefs to the kind of hands-on cooking many of them may not do as much of anymore.  And competing against each other...

    Each episode of Top Chef Masters holds two challenges for the chefs. The first is a Quickfire Challenge which tests their basic abilities.  Each quickfire challenge will be judged by a blind taste test and a five-star system, similar to fine dining reviews.  

    The second challenge is a more involved Elimination Challenge designed to test the versatility and invention of the chefs as they take on unique culinary trials such as working with unusual and exotic foods or catering for demanding clients. The food will be tasted and evaluated by the judges and a wide range of tasters for whom the challenge is aimed, whether it is patrons at a five-star restaurant or a room full of hungry kids - the food has to appeal to the diner as well as the critics if the chef is to survive.

    Link

    Eventually, it comes down to 6 chefs competing in the finale; the winner gets $100,000 to donate to the charity specified at the beginning of the competition.

    Last season's winner was Rick Bayless.

    It's a fun show - if you like to cook, it may be something you also would enjoy!

    Yup, it's a fun show to watch (5.00 / 1) (#32)
    by andgarden on Wed Apr 07, 2010 at 11:53:56 PM EST
    I actually enjoyed the last Masters season more than the original Iron Chef.

    Strange that it's on at 11PM ET this year. TGFDVR!

    Parent

    Next week, it goes to its regular time (none / 0) (#38)
    by Anne on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 06:53:34 AM EST
    of 10PM, which is much more doable, and of course, with Bravo, you can always catch the prior week's show in the hour before the current week's new episode.

    I recorded it, but did manage to stay awake for the whole thing in real time; regretting that a little this morning, lol, but what the heck...it's only sleep, right?

    Not sure I liked the pairing through both challenges, although I think both chefs on the winning team pulled their culinary weight.

    [as a totally snarky and gratuituous aside, how often do you think someone tells/gestures to Govind Armstrong that he has a little something hanging out of his nose?  That mole, or whatever it is, really bothers me.]

    Parent

    Not really interested in (none / 0) (#26)
    by gyrfalcon on Wed Apr 07, 2010 at 11:02:19 PM EST
    watching, but I'd sure like to be one of the judges.  Where do I sign up for that?

    Parent
    AP re Tuesday filing in DCA on behalf (5.00 / 1) (#24)
    by oculus on Wed Apr 07, 2010 at 10:37:53 PM EST
    of Roman Polanski:  AP

    Somewhat ironic, no?

    Defense lawyers Chad Hummel and Bart Dalton said that the misconduct allegations should not be buried just because the trial judge is dead and some participants are no longer in the district attorney's office.

    "The lapse of time...does not make the misconduct or its consequences go away or mean that they are not deserving of full exploration," they said, suggesting an investigation by a special counsel could deter similar misconduct in the future.



    A hint of what is in store for the exchanges (5.00 / 2) (#25)
    by MO Blue on Wed Apr 07, 2010 at 10:48:39 PM EST
    in the Health Insurance legislation?

    Private health insurers in Massachusetts are threatening to withhold offers for new plans in the state's Health insurance "Connector." That follows a decision by the Massachusetts insurance regulator to deny most of the requests by insurers to raise their insurance premiums. We've seen this before, and unless the Massachusetts Governor and regulators are smarter than California's Governor and Public Utility Commission, this is not going to turn out well. link


    Doesn't matter. HRC won't be enforced. (none / 0) (#28)
    by Cream City on Wed Apr 07, 2010 at 11:08:49 PM EST
    Did you see the story yesterday quoting the IRS Commissioner saying so?  We are to report on our IRS forms whether we have health insurance or not, but the IRS won't do anything about it, either way.

    It's an ex-mandate.  A non-mandate.  A demised mandate!

    Parent

    The mandate may not be inforced (none / 0) (#70)
    by MO Blue on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 03:19:39 PM EST
    but other elements of the Health Insurance legislation will be. IOW, Medicare's budget will be cut, the excise tax on good coverage will be implemented, the amount of medical expenses that a person may deduct will be reduced, all increases to group and individual rates will be blamed on HIR and IIRC insurance will be able to be sold across state lines.

    Parent
    Well (none / 0) (#33)
    by TeresaInSnow2 on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 12:43:28 AM EST
    I always use Washington state as an example, wherein our insurance commissioner attempted to regulate medical (medical as opposed to HEALTH) insurance premiums.  The insurers moved out of state.  Needless to say they only came back when they got what they wanted.

    AYup and the same can happen in any state that tries to regulate premium rates....because the states can't walk away.

    We have no recourse except a true public option, wherein if the medical insurance co's say they'll walk, we can tell them not to let the door hit them where... well, you know.

    Parent

    There was an AMA Report issued (5.00 / 2) (#45)
    by Anne on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 10:32:20 AM EST
    near the end of February - before the health reform bill was finalized and passed - that updated their annual review of competition in the health insurance market.

    Some "highlights:"  

    Competition in the health insurance industry is disappearing with more markets across the country dominated by one or two insurers, according to the American Medical Association's newly released edition of Competition in Health Insurance:  A Comprehensive Study of U.S. Markets.

    In 24 of the 43 states reported in the new AMA report, the two largest insurers had a combined market share of 70 percent or more.  Last year, just 18 of 42 states had two insurers with a combined market share of 70 percent or more.

    "The near total collapse of competitive and dynamic health insurance markets has not helped patients," said AMA President J. James Rohack, M.D. "As demonstrated by proposed rate hikes in California and other states, health insurers have not shown greater efficiency and lower health care costs. Instead, patient premiums, deductibles and co-payments have soared without an increase in benefits in these increasingly consolidated markets."


    [snip]

    By reviewing enrollments in private health maintenance organizations (HMOs) and preferred provider organizations (PPOs), the new AMA study found:

    Ninety-nine percent of metropolitan markets are "highly concentrated" according to federal merger guidelines (up from 94 percent metropolitan markets the year before).

    In 54 percent of metropolitan markets, at least one insurer had a market share of 50 percent or greater (up from 40 percent of metropolitan markets the year before).

    In 92 percent of the metropolitan markets, at least one insurers had a market share of 30 percent or greater (up from 89 percent of metropolitan markets the year before).


    "An absence of competition in health insurance markets is clearly not in the best economic interest of patients," said Dr. Rohack. "The AMA has urged the Department of Justice (DOJ) and state agencies to more aggressively enforce antitrust laws that prohibit harmful mergers."

    Does anyone remember any kind of extensive discussion about the lack of competition in the markets - aside from "this legislation will make the market more competitive?"  I sure don't.

    But then, extensive discussion might have taken us down a path the powers determined to protect the status quo most assuredly did not want to go.

    Can anyone explain how the new legislation is going to increase the level of competition, when (1) exchanges will not go into effect for another four years, (2) they will be state-based, not regional or national, and (3) not that many people will qualify to participate?

    Now, the AMA is calling on the DOJ to:

    Perform a retrospective study of health insurance mergers similar to that performed by the Federal Trade Commission on hospital mergers;

    Commission new research to identify causes and consequences of health insurer market power; and

    Create a system for predicting the effects health insurer mergers will have on consumer and provider markets.

    Guess we couldn't have gotten this done before we got pretend reform, could we?  Raise your hand if you think any of this will actually happen.  

    Anyone?


    Parent

    it will be interesting to see how this plays out (none / 0) (#41)
    by CST on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 09:25:33 AM EST
    The insurers are required by law to offer plans on the exchange by the end of the week.  The insurers are going to court to argue for rate increases and could be in front of a judge as early as today.  Once that case gets resolved, they will have to offer plans, or face fines.

    Link

    We should probably know a lot more by the end of the week.  But it's not as cut and dry as allowing the insurers to simply walk.

    It does show, for the umpteenth time, that exchanges alone do not control costs.  If that were the case, the state would not have had to reject the rate increases.

    Parent

    McDonnell is a fool (5.00 / 1) (#27)
    by gyrfalcon on Wed Apr 07, 2010 at 11:05:50 PM EST
    for stepping into this at all.  There's no way he can come out of this ahead.  If he backtracks, he enrages the yahoos, but his behind got badly singed nationally for his initial blindness and idiocy.

    What, he just forgot about slavery?  I mean, really!  Saw a black state legislator on TV this evening on CNN, and he wasn't in even a slightly forgiving mood.

    hardly a fool (none / 0) (#40)
    by Capt Howdy on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 09:10:26 AM EST
    he knows exactly what he is doing.  and confederate week is the tip of the iceberg.

    Bob McDonnell, Culture Warrior
    At 34, the GOP candidate for governor disapproved of fornicators, homosexuals and working women.

    Parent

    Some good news... (5.00 / 1) (#43)
    by MileHi Hawkeye on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 10:12:58 AM EST
    ...to counterbalance yesterday's report of two more glaciers disappearing from Glacier National Park:  

    After nearly 10 years of work and more than $11 million, one of the largest single conservation efforts in Washington has permanently protected some 7,000 acres of land along the Hoh River.

    Taken together, the lands purchased, plus those already protected within Olympic National Park, conserve nearly the entire length of the Hoh.

    Link

    The Hoh River is one of the most scenic in North America--flowing from high alpine to the rocky Washington coast.  

    Maybe the ice went here (1.00 / 1) (#47)
    by jimakaPPJ on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 10:46:07 AM EST
    Or maybe... (5.00 / 3) (#48)
    by MileHi Hawkeye on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 10:50:13 AM EST
    ...it's wedged inside that thick skull of yours.  Certainly would explain a lot of things.

    Parent
    would help if he read (5.00 / 1) (#49)
    by Capt Howdy on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 10:58:11 AM EST
    more than the headline

    He added: 'What this doesn't show is any indication that global warming is over. If you look at the Arctic as a whole we might get to average amounts of sea ice for the time of year. But the ice is thin and quite vulnerable and it can melt very quickly.'

    The best measure of the health of the Arctic was not only the amount of cover, but also the thickness of ice, he said.




    Parent
    Ah yes, the old "it's snowing harder (1.00 / 1) (#54)
    by jimakaPPJ on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 01:33:57 PM EST
    because it's warmer."

    The GW Hoaxers have you guys hook line and sinker.

    lol

    BTW, don't you just love qualifers?

     

    we might get to


    Parent
    Thank God (none / 0) (#56)
    by jondee on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 01:40:14 PM EST
    the rigorously scientifically minded like you and the intelligent design people are staying on top of and exposing the hoax of the century.

    Parent
    Thank God for the emails (none / 0) (#92)
    by jimakaPPJ on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 10:58:05 PM EST
    that were discovered that show the hoaxers off.

    Parent
    They're in league (none / 0) (#96)
    by jondee on Fri Apr 09, 2010 at 03:13:44 PM EST
    with those ACORN people, Michael Shiavo and whoever set up Sen Craig.

    None Dare Call it Conspiracy.

    Parent

    Do all facts bother you? (none / 0) (#55)
    by jimakaPPJ on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 01:34:25 PM EST
    The only "facts" that bother (none / 0) (#68)
    by FoxholeAtheist on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 03:04:12 PM EST
    us Jim, are the ones you and your junk scientists make up.

    Parent
    I assume you are an East Anglia fan,,, (none / 0) (#93)
    by jimakaPPJ on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 10:59:04 PM EST
    Of course it's (none / 0) (#52)
    by jondee on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 12:25:26 PM EST
    all in little chunks, four inches thick, but that's beside the point..

    As Rush says, nature is relentlessly in league with the Left in wanting to punish success.

    Friggin commie "laws of nature"..

    Parent

    Did The Big Guy say that? (none / 0) (#94)
    by jimakaPPJ on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 11:00:58 PM EST
    Wow. Maybe I should listen to him sometime.

    Nah. No need to. Jondee will keep us informed.

    Parent

    fascinating lunch time lecture (5.00 / 1) (#57)
    by Capt Howdy on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 01:50:04 PM EST
    with a guy named Paul Debevec here is his site.
    among other things he just won, along with three other people, a technical oscar for his "light stage" research.

    the most interesting part for me, since I loath Cameron, was the part where he totally debunked the whole this is totally new and fabulous stuff that has never been done before crap about Avatar.

    he and his team were responsible for the most cutting edge stuff in Avatar and from his presentation it was totally clear that nothing about it was new.  it had a couple of minor advances that had not yet been used in a feature film which is always the case but pretty much all of the same techniques were used on Benjamin Button and other films.

    fascinating.  usually those things are as boring as a baptist funeral.

    I should say (none / 0) (#58)
    by Capt Howdy on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 01:51:25 PM EST
    the thrust of his research is to create a totally believable digital actor.
    the Digital Emily project, that you can read about on the site is the newest project and in some ways the most interesting.

    Parent
    Malcolm McLaren (5.00 / 2) (#60)
    by lilburro on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 01:53:06 PM EST
    has passed away.  !!!

    I LOVE his music...here for example is a video that pays better tribute to vogueing than Madonna and came out a year before hers, two years before "Paris is Burning."  AND it features famed vogue pioneer Willi Ninja.

    He combined Opera and House music which inspired me to steal his CD from the College radio station.  And one of his songs, "Miles and Miles of Miles Davis" gets stuck in my head just because of its excellent name.

    He is simply a musical pioneer.  Oh yeah, and the Sex Pistols.  :P

    RIP.  

    ahh (5.00 / 1) (#61)
    by Capt Howdy on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 01:57:24 PM EST
    Madam Butterfly is still on my play list.


    Parent
    Dedicating this to all the DJs in the whole world (none / 0) (#90)
    by Ellie on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 06:25:02 PM EST
    ... from the World Famous Supreme Team

    Hey, DJ just play that song, keep me dancing all night long ... and all the ladies, sing along Huh?

    Here's the Sex Pistols' Pretty Vacant. (LOL, Johnny Rotten's sneer is still classic. You just can't teach that kind of @ssholery.)

    Bye, Malcolm. RIP.

    Parent

    I love (5.00 / 1) (#95)
    by lilburro on Fri Apr 09, 2010 at 10:24:11 AM EST
    the World Famous Supreme Team.  "We've got a caller from Oyster Bay..."

    Here is an excellent interview of Mr. McLaren by another talented songwriter and artist, Momus.

    Parent

    Someone tried lighting their shoes (none / 0) (#4)
    by scribe on Wed Apr 07, 2010 at 09:27:46 PM EST
    on a DC to Denver flight.  The plane has landed in Denver.

    A Qatar diplomat. How far does his (none / 0) (#5)
    by oculus on Wed Apr 07, 2010 at 09:32:30 PM EST
    immunity extend?  link

    Parent
    Mmmm. This could get interesting. (none / 0) (#7)
    by scribe on Wed Apr 07, 2010 at 09:34:47 PM EST
    One onders whether AQ has managed to get diplo jobs, or whether the guy's just cracked.

    I suspect diplomatic immunity will cover this guy - he'll get sent home and the Qataris will deal with him.

    Parent

    I suppose the Pres. could issue a capture (none / 0) (#8)
    by oculus on Wed Apr 07, 2010 at 09:36:11 PM EST
    or shoot to kill Executive Order.

    Parent
    Doing that to a diplomat (none / 0) (#11)
    by scribe on Wed Apr 07, 2010 at 09:40:50 PM EST
    is a casus belli, pure and simple.

    Since the Qataris have a pretty big sovereign wealth fund, they might not be able to do much militarily, but they could wreak a lot of havoc in the financial markets.

    Parent

    THE EARLY DAZE, part 10 (none / 0) (#16)
    by Dadler on Wed Apr 07, 2010 at 09:55:50 PM EST
    Ty Dadler. Tell me, did you post the (none / 0) (#18)
    by jeffinalabama on Wed Apr 07, 2010 at 09:57:35 PM EST
    first line and links to Chandler's "Red Wind" some months ago?

    Parent
    'Twas not I (none / 0) (#22)
    by Dadler on Wed Apr 07, 2010 at 10:21:57 PM EST
    Your mystery lingers.

    Parent
    I so enjoyed the debate on this (none / 0) (#29)
    by Cream City on Wed Apr 07, 2010 at 11:14:35 PM EST
    on CNN tonight, Anderson Cooper's hour, with the representative of the Sons of the Confederacy or something, the group that pushed the governor to do this.  What a fool.  So many amazing things came out of his 19th-century mouth, but best was when he said that the Confederates were fighting the good cause against a tyrannical government just as people (read: tea-partiers) are doing today.

    So Anderson Cooper had to ask:  "Sir, are you comparing the Republicans to the Confederates?"

    The mind reels.

    Oh, and btw, the Southrun guy was spouting so many historical inaccuracies that it was breathtaking.  Would have been good to have a historian on against him, instead of Roland Martin, who simply -- understandably -- could not contain himself when faced with a spokesman for the 19th-century South.  So Martin blew a gasket, which the guy deserved -- but it would have been wonderful to see the guy taken apart coolly, as Anderson Cooper did, but on all of the untruths.

    However, I suspect that what we witnessed was that these are "truths" taught in Ol Virginny to this day.

    Just another, slightly more perverse (5.00 / 1) (#46)
    by jondee on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 10:44:45 AM EST
    manifestation of "Southern Strategy" thinking, is what all this "our culture and heritage" revisionism smells like..

    And, if this lightening rod dosnt take, maybe the next step is a big budget remake of Birth of a Nation.

    Parent

    American Idol is boring this year (none / 0) (#30)
    by BrassTacks on Wed Apr 07, 2010 at 11:17:34 PM EST
    It's so boring that I switched to Dancing with the Stars which I have never watched before.  I am loving it!  The woman we love to hate, Kate Gosselin is just as awful as you might expect.  

    DWTS ratings up for reasons..... (none / 0) (#31)
    by BarnBabe on Wed Apr 07, 2010 at 11:20:32 PM EST
    1. The talent on Idol is just not as exciting this season. 2. Everyone is watching Kate walk around the stage. Like, when is she going to get booted off? Jon made a move to gain temp custody of the kids as she is dancing, cough cough. She says she is a single working Mom who #1 priority is her kids and providing for them. That is why she is dancing, heh heh. Then you read Jon pays $22,000 a month child support. I think there are a lot of working Moms who wish they had the supplemental earnings and would be happy with 2 weeks of that. Amazing. So I think Jon is trying to get that amount reduced. I guess he is thinking of asking for spousal support. Will there be an end to this? Apparently ABC won't let her get kicked off (And I have no doubt they make the final decision and not the audience). There are 3 really good couples and they are in the top. Kate's performance has gone from so so to so not. On other Tuesday night Bigger Loser news, Melissa got voted off. Yeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa! I hate when they play this as a game to win the money vs a wonderful opportunity to take control of their lives.

    I read people are voting for her just (5.00 / 2) (#35)
    by Jeralyn on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 01:12:04 AM EST
    to be able to continue to watch her making a fool of herself.

    Parent
    Well, since they aren't actually in (5.00 / 1) (#39)
    by Anne on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 07:08:35 AM EST
    your living room - or mine - we don't have to watch, and that's the best part for me!  Thank goodness we aren't forced to participate in what can only be described as the network's way of making money using people who've already spent too much time in the pages of the tabloids (although that doesn't explain Evan Lysacek or Buzz Aldrin - guess they're in there for the crowd that doesn't want to admit they can't shake their voyeuristic need to see more - more - more! of some of the least interesting people on the planet).  I wonder what might be next?  Dancing with Mistresses?  Tiger could do a whole season all by himself!  How about Dancing with an Insurance Company CEO?  Free coverage and 10% of his or her bonus for life for the winner - it would be like hitting the lottery!

    Have you seen any of the ridiculous stunts people are trying to do on "Minute To Win It" just for the chance to win money?  Strangely fascinating, but if you see one show, you've seen all you need to.  No one's going to win the million bucks.

    Television...do we love it, or what?

    Parent

    I do (none / 0) (#65)
    by Capt Howdy on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 03:00:03 PM EST
    but my definition of "television" includes a lot more than the broadcast networks.

    actually it doesnt even include the broadcast networks.  

    Parent

    Whitney Houston (none / 0) (#42)
    by Capt Howdy on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 09:48:33 AM EST
    "Brokeback Tweety." See Digby. No, (none / 0) (#50)
    by oculus on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 11:02:31 AM EST
    I didn't watch it.

    Also, NYT has an article by Charles Savage on Lawrence Tribe and his new position in Obama administration.  WH will not permit Tribe to be interviewed.  Bet he doesn't stay there long.  

    Absolutely hysterical but smart move by Obama to (5.00 / 1) (#53)
    by Dan the Man on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 12:41:38 PM EST
    place Tribe in the administration.  By placing Tribe in the administration, it makes it impossible for Tribe to say anything bad about Obama.  But by placing him in a useless position, Tribe can't do anything that would actually harm Obama.  And if Tribe quits because he doesn't like his job and later criticizes Obama, the OFB can say Tribe was just saying that because he wanted revenge on Obama for removing him from his job due to his incompetent legal skills.

    11th dimensional chess at its very best.  Heh.

    Parent

    Yeah Right (5.00 / 1) (#67)
    by squeaky on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 03:01:14 PM EST
    You have the skinny on Obama but stupid Mr. Tribe is being duped. That is what is absolutely hysterical.

    Cultism derangement, no doubt.

    Parent

    Eh? Never said I had the skinny on Obama (none / 0) (#83)
    by Dan the Man on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 04:28:39 PM EST
    What I said was this was a BRILLIANT political move by Obama and therefore I COMPLIMENTED him for it.  Of course, this BRILLIANT political move by Obama might not have been intentional on his part.  After all, good pols often work by instinct rather than thinking everything out.  And Obama is an AWESOME POL.  Wouldn't you agree?

    Parent
    At some point in all this (5.00 / 1) (#89)
    by jondee on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 06:23:51 PM EST
    did some persons-unknown hold a gun to Tribe's head and force him to take this position?

    Parent
    well (none / 0) (#84)
    by Capt Howdy on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 04:33:11 PM EST
    I see your point.  but Tribe is a pretty smart guy.
    sometimes pawns turn out to have their own plans.

    Parent
    Oh I Get It (none / 0) (#86)
    by squeaky on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 04:57:02 PM EST
    You are emulating your fantasy...  not working, imo

    Parent
    Eh? I see you know little about political strategy (none / 0) (#87)
    by Dan the Man on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 05:31:17 PM EST
    Let me remind you of a well-known saying: "Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer".  

    If you've never heard of it, you can Google it.  If you don't know what Google is, you can click on this link here.  I was suggesting Obama, being the master political strategist that he is, might use that tactic now and then.  Of course you might never have heard of that saying, but I have no doubt that Barack Obama, being the well-read person he is, has heard of it.

    Parent

    And (5.00 / 1) (#88)
    by squeaky on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 06:19:36 PM EST
    You apparently know little about Tribe.

    Parent
    Yes, brilliant, (none / 0) (#59)
    by KeysDan on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 01:53:05 PM EST
    looks like President Obama "Bork'd"  Tribe-- Bork has been avenged, by Democrats.

    Parent
    Yes, the NYT article was sad reading. (none / 0) (#51)
    by KeysDan on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 11:50:22 AM EST
    Professor Tribe, the great constitutional scholar, looking around for things to do in, apparently, an achromatic environment.

    Parent
    Sad? (5.00 / 1) (#64)
    by squeaky on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 02:59:16 PM EST
    We must have read a different article.
    The Justice Department said Mr. Tribe could assume a more public role in the future, noting that his initiative was still new and that he was still figuring it out. And Thomas C. Goldstein, a prominent Supreme Court lawyer who has worked with Mr. Tribe for more than a decade, said Mr. Tribe had described himself as happy and busy with the job, which he assumed in March.....

    ......Mr. Tribe's friends said that if he felt he could not do something meaningful in Washington, he would quit.

    "If Larry Tribe is in any way viewed as -- or is in fact -- only window dressing," Mr. Ogletree said, "then I have no doubt that he would resign from that position and return to Cambridge in a New York minute."



    Parent
    Seems like we did. (none / 0) (#91)
    by KeysDan on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 06:35:24 PM EST
    After a brain tumor and a divorce, going to Washington to get away, no major role, tucked away and muzzled.  I did not gather that the article was intended to be celebratory.  Moreover, he seems to be paying a price for his contribution to the defeat of Robert Bork's nomination to the Supreme Court, and in that, I find no joy.  

    Parent
    meet Reverend Barbie (none / 0) (#62)
    by Capt Howdy on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 02:38:19 PM EST
    Anglican Barbie? (none / 0) (#63)
    by jeffinalabama on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 02:45:15 PM EST
    I prefer Dawn French as my vicar, but thanks anyway.

    What say you: if BTD weren't such (none / 0) (#66)
    by oculus on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 03:00:04 PM EST
    a tough bargainer, wouldn't he back here by now?

    Awwww (none / 0) (#69)
    by squeaky on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 03:08:03 PM EST
    The Man I Love

    That's funny... but sorta sweet..

    Parent

    Can you tell I am getting bored with the (none / 0) (#71)
    by oculus on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 03:23:34 PM EST
    diplomat from Qatar?

    Parent
    how bout this (none / 0) (#72)
    by Capt Howdy on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 03:30:42 PM EST
    cant stop talking about this lunch time meeting. but one of the things that came up was a question about bringing dead actors back to life with this process.
    he then made them turn off the camera and told us a story about the planned new Bruce Lee movie he and his team worked on. they were going to do it. they had permission from his wife and daughter. they did the whole process and when the first test scenes were ready to view they watched them and said, "you know, this is just to weird. we cant let you do this".

    Parent
    Weird. Thought you might enjoy (none / 0) (#74)
    by oculus on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 03:45:28 PM EST
    this theatre review.  A new take on "Truly, Madly, Deeply."  NYT

    Parent
    that actually sound pretty awsum (none / 0) (#78)
    by Capt Howdy on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 03:54:27 PM EST
    wish I was local

    Parent
    Me too. Always. Maybe if I can't (none / 0) (#80)
    by oculus on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 03:55:48 PM EST
    actually get in to see all three Horton Foote plays I can squeeze this one in in late April.

    Parent
    Why not finish... (none / 0) (#76)
    by MileHi Hawkeye on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 03:50:13 PM EST
    ..."Game of Death"?  Rumor has it there was already 100+ hours of film in the can for that.

    Parent
    actually I think (none / 0) (#77)
    by Capt Howdy on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 03:53:47 PM EST
    that may have been the plan.

    Parent
    well (none / 0) (#79)
    by Capt Howdy on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 03:55:24 PM EST
    he talked about using some existing footage.  I cant say if they were doing that particular script.

    Parent
    100+ "minutes" (none / 0) (#82)
    by MileHi Hawkeye on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 04:12:10 PM EST
    Duh.

    Parent
    You can always (none / 0) (#73)
    by lilburro on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 03:43:26 PM EST
    read more great reactions about "Confederate History Month":

    There's a whole list of less controversial replacements for the Confederate-flag-as-symbol-of-The-South (choose one):

    SoCo
    A mint julep
    Paula Dean's face
    A magnolia blossom
    Paula Dean's restaurant
    Um...yeah.

    Unfortunately, I found Paula's restaurant in Savannah to be mediocre.  Which makes me really sad.  I'll probably go again to see if it was just a fluke - 3 stories of service though, it's just not an enjoyable environment really.

    Parent

    oh this is funny: (5.00 / 1) (#75)
    by lilburro on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 03:48:59 PM EST
    from Jezebel:

    How many Virginians does it take to screw in a light bulb?

    3: one to do it, and two to talk about how grand the old bulb was. Reply



    Parent
    reffing the above (5.00 / 1) (#81)
    by Capt Howdy on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 03:56:27 PM EST
    someone pointed out that now they really can bring Reagan back.

    Parent
    How can we miss Reagan (5.00 / 1) (#85)
    by kmblue on Thu Apr 08, 2010 at 04:36:29 PM EST
    if he never evah goes away?

    Parent